Eportfolio Peer Review of: Aember Hawley

By: Alejandra Hernandez

Criteria

Exemplary - 4

Proficient - 3

Limited - 2

Most of the
artifacts are
accompanied by
an Introduction
that clearly
explains what
the item is, why
it was created,
and why its
important.

Some of the
artifacts are
accompanied by
an Introduction
that clearly
explains what
the item is, why
it was created,
and why its
important.

Unsatisfactory Point
-1
s
3

Introduction of All artifacts are

Artifacts
accompanied by
an Introduction
that clearly
Artifacts are
accompanied by explains what
an introduction the item is, why
it was created,
that clearly
and why its
explains what
the item is, why important.
it was created,
and why its
important.

No artifacts are
accompanied by
an Introduction
that clearly
explains what
the item is, why
it was created,
and why its
important.

3
Selection of
Artifacts
Selects artifacts
that support the
purpose of the
eportfolio and
the
skills/abilities
demonstrated in
each section.

All artifacts and

work samples
are clearly and
directly related
to the purpose
of the
eportfolio. The
eportfolio
includes a wide
variety of
artifacts.

Most artifacts
and work
samples are
related to the
purpose of the
eportfolio. The
eportfolio
includes a
variety of
artifacts.

Some of the
artifacts and
work samples
are related to
the purpose of
the eportfolio.
The eportfolio
includes some
variety of
artifacts.

The artifacts
and work
samples do not
relate to the
purpose of the
eportfolio. The
eportfolio does
not include a
variety of
artifacts.

3
Reflection on
Learning
Reflections on
each
page/section
describe the
learning (i.e.
skills, abilities,
growth,
achievement,
accomplishment

All reflections
clearly describe
the learning (i.e.
skills, abilities,
growth,
achievement,
accomplishment
s) that occurred
from producing
the artifacts.

Most of the
reflections
describe the
learning (i.e.
skills, abilities,
growth,
achievement,
accomplishment
s) that occurred
from producing

A few of the
reflections
describe the
learning (i.e.
skills, abilities,
growth,
achievement,
accomplishment
s) that occurred
from producing

The reflections
do not describe
the learning (i.e.
skills, abilities,
growth,
achievement,
accomplishment
s) that occurred
from producing
the artifacts.

Eportfolio Peer Review of: Aember Hawley

By: Alejandra Hernandez
s) that occurred
from producing
the artifacts.

the artifacts.

the artifacts.

3
Connection to
Future
Learning
Reflections
illustrate the
ability to
effectively
critique the
work and
identify areas
for continued
learning.

All reflections
illustrate the
ability to
effectively
critique work,
and include
goals for
continued
learning (long
and short term).

Most of the
reflections
illustrate the
ability to
effectively
critique work,
and include
goals for
continued
learning (long
and short term).

A few
reflections
illustrate the
ability to
effectively
critique work,
and include
goals for
continued
learning (long
and short term).

The reflections
do not illustrate
the ability to
effectively
critique work or
include goals
for continued
learning (long
and short term).

2
Navigation and
Readability
The
organization of
the eportfolio
and how to
navigate to
various
sections/pages
is clearly
indicated.
Page layout
(including
headings, font
size and color,
whitespace, and
other text
formatting make
the eportfolio
and artifacts
easy to read.

The various
parts of the
portfolio are
labeled, clearly
organized and
allow the reader
to easily locate
an artifact and
move to related
pages or a
different
section.
Color,
background,
font styles
(italic, bold,
underline) and
type size for
headings, subheadings and
text are used

The navigation
links generally
function well,
but it is not
always clear
how to locate an
artifact or move
to related pages
or different
section.

The navigation
links are
somewhat
confusing, and
it is often
unclear how to
locate an
artifact or move
to related pages
or a different
section. Some
of the external
Color,
links do not
background,
font styles, and connect to the
appropriate
type size for
headings, sub- website or file.
headings and
text are
The eportfolio
generally used is often difficult
consistently
to read due to
throughout the inappropriate
eportfolio.
use of fonts and

The navigation
links are
confusing, and
it is difficult to
locate artifacts
and move to
related pages or
a different
section. Many
of the external
links do not
connect to the
appropriate
website or file.
The eportfolio
is difficult to
read due to
inappropriate
use of fonts,
type size for
headings, sub-

Eportfolio Peer Review of: Aember Hawley

By: Alejandra Hernandez
Writing is clear
and free of
grammatical,
spelling, and
punctuation
errors.

consistently and
enhance the
readability
throughout the
eportfolio.
Horizontal and
vertical white
space alignment
is used
appropriately to
organize
content.

Horizontal and
vertical white
space alignment
is generally
used
appropriately to
organize
content.

The writing is
largely free of
grammatical,
spelling or
The writing is punctuation
clear and free of errors.
grammatical,
spelling or
punctuation
errors.

type size for

headings, subheadings and
text or
inconsistent use
of font styles
(italic, bold,
underline).
Color of
background,
fonts, and links
decreases the
readability of
the text and
used
inconsistently in
some places
throughout the
eportfolio.
Horizontal and
vertical white
space alignment
is sometimes
used
inappropriately
to organize
content.

headings and
text and font
styles (italic,
bold, underline).
Color of
background,
fonts, and links
decreases the
readability of
the text, is
distracting and
used
inconsistently
throughout the
eportfolio.
Horizontal and
vertical white
space alignment
is used
inappropriately,
and the content
appears
disorganized
and cluttered.

Numerous
grammatical,
spelling or
The writing
punctuation
includes include errors hinder
some
effective
grammatical,
communication
spelling or
and distract the
punctuation
reader.
errors that
distract the
reader.