SCNo.

46/13
FIRNo.318/12
U/s302/506/201IPC
PSNajafgarh
StateVs.GovindRamMeena
15.5.2015.
Present:

Sh.V.K.Swami,ld.Addl.PPforState.
Accused is produced from JC, with ld. proxy
counsel Sh. Satish Kumar for main counsel Sh.
AnirudhYadav,foraccused.
Ld.PresidingOfficerisonhalfdayleavetodayfor

thefirsthalf.
PWsJaiDayalSharma,Const.BijenderandPW11
HCSunilDuttarepresent.
NaibCourthasinformedthattelephonicrequestfor
exemptionfortodayonlyhasbeenreceivedonbehalfofPWDr.
ArchanaDhawanBajaj.
IOInspectorAkashRawatispresentandisdirected
toappearinpersononNDOH.
As directed by ld. Presiding Officer, matter is
adjournedforRPEfor16.5.2015and18.5.2015.

(READER)
15.5.2015

SCNo.3/14
FIRNo.49/10
U/s4/5Exp.SubstanceAct&
U/s25/54/59ArmsAct
PSCrimeBranch
StateVs.ArunChopra
15.5.2015.
Present:

Sh.V.K.Swami,ld.Addl.PPforState.
AccusedArunChopraispresentonbail.
Ld.PresidingOfficerisonhalfdayleavetodayfor

thefirsthalf.
PWIOSIAnujNautiyalispresent.
As directed by ld. Presiding Officer, matter is
adjournedfor14.8.2015and17.8.2015forRPE.

(READER)
15.5.2015

CANo.13/15
ParveenGuptaVs.State&Another
15.5.2015.
Present:

Appellantconvictinperson.
Sh.V.K.Swami,ld.Addl.PPforState/respondent
no.1.
Sh.KamalBahl,ld.counselforrespondentno.2
complainant.
Ld.PresidingOfficerisonhalfdayleavetodayfor

thefirsthalf.
Attherequest ofld.counselfor respondent no.2
andasdirectedbyld.PresidingOfficer,matterisadjournedfor
argumentsonappeal,for16.5.2015.

(READER)
15.5.2015

CRNo.61/14
Satinder&OthersVs.State&Others
15.5.2015.
Present:

Sh.LalitOhlan,ld.counselforrevisionistsaccused
persons.
Sh.V.K.Swami,ld.Addl.PPforState/respondent
no.1.
Noneforrespondentno.2complainant.
Ld.PresidingOfficerisonhalfdayleavetodayfor

thefirsthalf.
As directed by ld. Presiding Officer, matter is
adjournedforargumentsfor21.7.2015.

(READER)
15.5.2015

CRNo.12/15
SunitaMehraVs.UshaSharma&Others
15.5.2015.
Present:

Revisionistcomplainantwithld.counselSh.Rajeev
Chhibber.
Noneforrespondentno.1.
Sh. Mayank Sharma, ld. counsel for respondents
no.2to4.
Ld.PresidingOfficerisonhalfdayleavetodayfor

thefirsthalf.
As directed by ld. Presiding Officer, matter is
adjournedforargumentsonrevisionpetitionfor15.7.2015.

(READER)
15.5.2015

SCNo.65/12
FIRNo.231/09
U/s452/323/427/304/302/34IPC
PSDabri
StateVs.Naresh&Others
15.5.2015.
Present:

Sh.V.K.Swami,ld.Addl.PPforState.
Three of the accused persons namely Naresh,
Yogesh and Hitesh against whom initially charge
sheet was filed and subsequently, charges u/s
452/323/302/427/34IPCwereframedvideorder
dated23.2.2011bytheld.Predecessor,arepresent
inperson.
OutofthefourotheraccusedpersonsnamelyTara
Dutt, D.K. Matwal @ D.K. Matpal, Monty and
Sandeep@Sanjeev@Pasa,whowereorderedtobe
summoned u/s 319 CrPC, vide order dated
21.4.2011oftheld.Predecessor,proceedingsagainst
accused Monty were ordered to be dropped vide
orderdated24.3.2014asthesaidaccusedcouldnot
be identified by the investigating agency despite
repeated opportunities and the remaining three
other accused persons namely Tara Dutt, D.K.
Matwal@D.K.MatpalandSandeep@Sanjeev@
Pasaweredischargedvideorderdated12.11.2014.
Ld.PresidingOfficerisonhalfdayleavetodayfor

thefirsthalf.
As directed by ld. Presiding Officer, matter is
adjournedforremainingfinalargumentsfor19.5.2015.

(READER)
15.5.2015

SCNo.10/15
FIRNo.292/07
U/s147/148/149/353/332/308/186/171FIPC
PSDabri(CB)
StateVs.Meena&Others
15.5.2015.
Present:

Sh.V.K.Swami,ld.Addl.PPforState.
Outoftotalnineaccusedpersons,eightaccused
persons namely Meena, R. Mallaya Swami, Prem
Sagar,Prabhay@Pintu,ArunKantJha,Mahabal
Mishra,VinayMishraandVimlaDeviarepresenton
bail.
One of the accused namely Santosh Kumar is
absent.
Ld.PresidingOfficerisonhalfdayleavetodayfor

thefirsthalf.
An application for exemption has been moved on
behalfofaccusedSantoshKumar.
IO Inspector Puran Pant has sent written request
forexemptiononthegroundthattodayhehastoappearbefore
Hon'bleDelhiHighCourtinconnectionwithcriminalrevision
petitionno.102/15and123/15.
As directed by ld. Presiding Officer, matter is
adjournedforargumentsonthepointofchargefor8.7.2015.

(READER)
15.5.2015

INTHECOURTOFSH.ASHUTOSHKUMAR:
LD.ASJ3:DWARKACOURTS:DELHI
SCNo.19/15
FIRNo.14/14
U/s323/325/308/452/34IPC
PSDwarkaSector26
StateVs.Rani&Others
15.5.2015.
Fresh sessions case has been received by way of
assignment, vide order dated 15.5.2015 of the ld. District &
SessionsJudge,SouthWestDistrict,DwarkaCourts,Delhi.It
becheckedandregistered.
Present:

Sh.V.K.Swami,ld.Addl.PPforState.
AllfiveaccusedpersonsnamelyRani,Bhim,Sonu,
Satish and Rakesh are present on bail, with ld.
counselSh.ArnavBhattacharya.
Heard.Perused.
List for arguments on the point of charge for

15.7.2015.
IssuenoticetoIOtoappearinpersononNDOH.

(ASHUTOSHKUMAR)
ASJ3:DWARKACOURTS:
DELHI:15.5.2015

SCNo.12/13
FIRNo.181/10
U/s302/34IPC
PSNaraina
StateVs.Sanjay@Annu&Others
15.5.2015.
Case file taken up today, as an application for
release of FDR furnished by surety Rajesh Kumar has been
moved.
Present:

Applicant/surety Rajesh Kumar of erstwhile

accusedDalip@Babban,withld.counselSh.M.K.
Kanhaiya.
Sh.V.K.Swami,ld.Addl.PPforState.
Heard.Perused.
The original case has already been disposed of.

Accordingly,consideringthefactsandcircumstancesmentioned
intheapplicationandoralreasonsstated,originalFDRofthe
suretyisorderedtobereleasedtohimafterproperidentification
and verification and against proper receipt. Photocopy of the
FDRbekeptonrecord.
Filebeconsignedtorecordroom.

(ASHUTOSHKUMAR)
ASJ3:DWARKACOURTS:
DELHI:15.5.2015

FIRNo.318/15
U/s376(D)/34IPCr/w/s6POCSOAct
PSNajafgarh
StateVs.Harish
15.5.2015.
Thisisanapplicationforgrantofbailu/s439CrPC
movedonbehalfoftheapplicant/accusedHarish.
Present:

Sh. Praveen Pachori, ld. counsel for applicant

Harish.
Sh.V.K.Swami,ld.Addl.PPforState.
IOWSISeemaofPSNajafgarhispresentandhas
filedreplytotheapplication.
Heard.Perused.
Ld.PresidingOfficerisonleavetoday.
At the request of ld. counsel for applicant, the

application is adjourned for arguments for 19.5.2015 for 2.00

pm.
IOtoappearinpersononNDOH.

(ASHUTOSHKUMAR)
LINKJUDGE:
ASJ3:DWARKACOURTS:
DELHI:15.5.2015

SCNo.24/12
FIRNo.99/11
U/s302/201IPC
PSDwarkaNorth
StateVs.LalBahadurDass
15.5.2015.
Casefiletakenuptoday,asanapplicationforgrant
ofbailu/s439CrPCmovedonbehalfoftheapplicant/accused
LalBahadurDass,ispending.
Present:

Sh.NareshC.Sharma,ld.counselforapplicant.
Sh.V.K.Swami,ld.Addl.PPforState.
Heard.Perused.

1.

Ld.counselforapplicanthasstatedthattheapplicant

isincustodysince12.5.2011andhasalreadyspentmorethen
fouryearsincustody.Hehasfurthersubmittedthatoutoftotal
39 prosecution witnesses, 16 prosecution witnesses including
all the material public prosecution witnesses have been
examinedandnomaterialpublicprosecutionwitnessisleftfor
examinationandhencethereisnoapprehensionofinfluencing
anyofthem.Hehasfurthersubmittedthatafterthedismissal
ofthepreviousbailapplicationoftheapplicantvideorderdated
4.12.2014,thereischangeofcircumstanceastheapplicanthas
spentfurtherperiodofmorethensixmonthsincustodyandno
moreprosecutionwitnesshasbeenexamined.Hehasfurther
Contd.........

::2::
submitted that mobile phone call records relied upon by the
prosecution,contradict the caseoftheprosecution itself. He
hasfurthersubmittedthatitwasacaseofhonourkillingand
not murder, as alleged by the prosecution. He has further
submitted that some of the material public prosecution
witnesses in their cross examination, have contradicted their
earlierpartoftestimonyintheexaminationinchief. Hehas
furthersubmittedthattherearelargenumberofdiscrepancies
in the testimony of material prosecution witnesses and the
applicantislikelytobeacquittedandhencenopurposewould
beservedbykeepingtheapplicantincustodyanylongerand
thathemaybereleasedonbail.

2.

Percontra,ld.Addl.PPforStatehasstronglyopposed

thebailapplicationoftheapplicantandhassubmittedthatall
thegroundsurgedbytheld.counselforapplicantonmerits,
havealreadybeenconsideredbythisCourtwhiledismissingthe
previous bail application of the applicant vide order dated
4.12.2014 and there is no change of circumstance. He has
furthersubmittedthattheargumentsofallegedcontradictionof
evidenceinmaterialpublicprosecutionwitnessesandtelephone
callrecords,relieduponbytheld.counselforapplicant,was
available with the applicant at the time of arguments on the
previousbailapplicationoftheapplicantandhencemerely
Contd.........

::3::
becausethesaidgroundswerenotformallyurged,itcannotbe
saidthatthisCourtdidnotconsiderthesame.Hehasfurther
submittedthatmeticulousexaminationofthetestimonyofthe
material public prosecution witnesses cannot be done in the
mannerattemptedbytheld.counselforapplicant,atthestage
ofdisposalofthisbailapplication.

3.

Thereisforceintheargumentsofld.Addl.PPforState

thatthereisnochangeincircumstanceasfarasincriminating
material available against the applicant on record till date, is
concerned.Furtherafterdismissalofpreviousbailapplication
of the applicant vide order dated 4.12.2014, PW15 Const.
Bahadur Singh Negi was further examined in chief, cross
examined and discharged on 18.2.2015. Also PW Const.
Praveencouldnotbeservedsinceheispostedondeputationin
IndianEmbassyinPakistan.ThisCourthasalreadyconsidered
the material submissions of the ld. counsel for applicant on
meritsandhadalsoperusedtherecord,whiledismissingthe
previous bail application of the applicant vide order dated
4.12.2014. Merelybecausetheapplicanthasspentsomemore
time in custody and also because only one witness was
examinedafterthedismissalofpreviousbailapplicationofthe
applicant,itcannotbesaidthattheapplicantisentitledforbail
onthesaidground.TheCourthastoconsiderthetotalityof
Contd.........

::4::
facts and circumstances, gravity of offences and the
incriminating material available against the applicant.
Consideringthesame,Iamoftheconsideredopinionthatthis
is not a fit case to grant bail to the applicant at this stage.
Accordinglythebailapplicationisdismissed.

4.

Acopyofthisorderbesenttotheapplicant/accused

Lal Bahadur Dass for information, through concerned Jail

Superintendent,whoisdirectedtoensurethatthecopyofthis
orderisdeliveredtothesaidapplicant.

Listforpurposealreadyfixedi.e.RPEforthedates
alreadyfixedi.e.7.9.2015,9.9.2015and11.9.2015.

(ASHUTOSHKUMAR)
ASJ3:DWARKACOURTS:
DELHI:15.5.2015

DENo.01/15
DepartmentvsHarenderKumar

15.5.2015
Department Witness no.1 : Sh. Achint Prakash, Jr. Judicial
Assistant,presentlypostedasAsstt.AhlmadinthecourtofMs.
ShreyaAroraMehta,Ld.MM05(South),SaketCourts,NewDelhi.
OnS.A.
I was posted as Ahlmad, in place of delinquent employee
HarenderKumar(whowasmadeAsstt.Ahlmadinthesamecourt)
inthecourtofSh.SandeepGarg,thethenLd.CivilJudge01,Tis
HazariCourts,DelhiinthesecondhalfofFebruary,2009.
At this stage, at the request of Presenting Officer, all the
records including Parcha Yardast, pertaining to Civil Suit no.
552/08titledas'MTNLvsGurbachanKaur',decidedon01.8.2014
bySh.VikrantVaidh,Ld.CivilJudge,TisHazariCourts,Delhiand
consigned to Record Room vide Goshwara No.357CD, be
summonedfromRecordRoom(Civil),TisHazariCourts,Delhi.

RO&AC

(AshutoshKumar)
ASJ03,DwarkaCourts,
15.5.2015

S.C.No22/13
FIRNo231/12
P.SBindapur
StateVs.Sanjeev&Ors.
15.5.2015
Filetakenuptodayasanapplicationforextensionof
interimbailismovedonbehalfofaccusedRajKumars/oLateSh.
TejpalSinghon11.5.2015,ispending.
Present:

Sh.NareshC.Sharma,ld.counselforapplicant.
ShV.K.SwamildAddl.P.PfortheState.
Ld.P.O.isonleavetoday.
Perused the report of SI Shakti Singh of P.S.

Bindapur,dulyforwardedbyInspr.,Investigation.
Heard.Perused.
Consideringthetotalityoffactsandcircumstances,in
view of the averments made in the reply on behalf of SHO
concernedandthegroundsurgedbyld.counselforapplicant,the
interimbailoftheapplicantisextendedtilldatealreadyfixed,i.e.
05.6.2015, on the same terms and conditions. The applicant is
directedtosurrenderafterexpiryofhisinterimbailperiod.
List for date already fixed i.e.05.6.2015 for purpose
fixed.
(AshutoshKumar)
LinkJudge,DwarkaCourts,
15.5.2015

DENo.01/15
DepartmentvsHarinder
15.5.2015
Present:

Sh. Ajay Mehrol, Presenting Officer for the

Department.
Sh. Harender Kumar,Delinquent Official is present
withDefenceAssistant,Sh.GurmukhSingh.
DepartmentWitnessSh.AchintPrakash,Jr.Judicial

Assistant,thethenAhlmadinthecourtofMs.ManiVedwan,Ld.
CivilJudge01(Central),TisHazariCourts,Delhiispresentandis
partly examined in chief. His further examination is chief is
deferred at the request of Presenting Officer, for want of all the
records including Parcha Yardast, pertaining to Civil Suit no.
552/08titledas'MTNLvsGurbachanKaur',decidedon01.8.2014
bySh.VikrantVaidh,Ld.CivilJudge,TisHazariCourts,Delhiand
consignedtoRecordRoomvideGoshwaraNo.357CD,fromRecord
Room (Civil), Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi. The said record be
summoned. Thesaiddepartmentwitnessisbounddownforthe
nextdate.
NoticeissuedtoDepartmentWitnessJagdishPrasad,
the then Reader in the court of Ms. Manu Vedwan, Ld. Civil
Judge01 (Central) Tis Hazari Courts, has been received back
unexecutedwiththereportthattherearenoresidentialquarters
inHotel Imperial.The noticewasissued tothesaid department
witness on the address provided by the office of Ld. District &
SessionsJudge,TisHazariCourts,Delhi(sincethewitnesshas
contd...

retired) at his address Quarter no.47, Imperial Hotel, Janpath

Road,NewDelhi.Howeverinviewofthereportreceivedtoday,itis
clearthatthesaidwitnessisnotresidingthere.Henceissuefresh
notice to the said department witness through the office of Ld.
District&SessionsJudge(Central),TisHazariCourtswithrequest
toprovideanyotheravailableaddressofthesaidwitnessavailable
in department records, except Quarter no.47, Hotel Imperial,
JanpathRoad,NewDelhi,whereheisnotresiding.
Listforremainingdepartmentevidencefor26.5.2015
at02.00pm.
(AshutoshKumar)
ASJ03,DwarkaCourts,
15.5.2015