Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 4

JOURNAL ARTICLE REVIEW

North American University


Education Department
M.Ed. in Educational Leadership and M.Ed. in Curriculum and Instruction
EDUC 5324
Name:Ali Sarioglu

Date: 6-27-2015

Cite the reviewed article in APA format:


Waxman, H., Boriack, A., Yuan-Hsuan, L., & MacNeil, A. (2013). Principals'
Perceptions of the Importance of Technology in Schools. Contemporary
Educational Technology, 4(3), 187-196.
INTRODUCTION
Research Questions (if research questions are not specifically mentioned, what is
the theoretical background or overarching theme):
The present study specifically examines the following two research questions:
(a) What are principals perceptions of the importance of technology? and (b)
Do principals perceptions of technology differ by years of experience and
gender?
Purpose of the research:

Purpose of the research is to find out how school principals perceptions are related
to the major functions of technology in their schools.

METHODOLOGY
What is the methodology for the research or approach used to understand the
issue? Provide information regarding the following:

Participants:

310 principals from a large metropolitan area in the southwest region of the
United States (126 males and 184 females.) A range of years of experience also is
taken into account.
Procedures: Principals were asked via cognitive interview questionnaire that about their
perceptions regarding the importance of technology for their schools.

Data Collection Methods/Data Source: The questionnaire was administered by


graduate students in the Educational Leadership program and they were required to interview a
specific number of current public school principals. They only use the data from the interviews.
Here are the interview questions Has technology had an impact in your school?" and "If so, in
what specific ways has it made a difference?

Data Analysis: Analysis of the interview data began with a process of data
reduction. The participants responses were read several times to become
familiar with the data. The data was then coded into meaningful categories.
Once the categories were established, another researcher independently
coded a 10% sample of responses to determine the consistency of the
coding.
RESULTS
Findings or Results (or main points of the article):
Based on interviews, they listed the principals responses for the major
functions of technology into six categories.
34.5 % of the principals indicated that technology was used as a primary
communication tool.
28% of principals responded that technology was integrated in teachers
classroom instruction.
14% of the principals told that they use technology for data sharing and
management.
15% of the principals indicated that technology was used as a resource to
find information.
10% of principals responded that technology is great tool to use for
administrative tasks.
10% of the principals told that technology was used for student learning.
When they examine the major functions of technology by gender,they found
the results below.
Major Function of Technology
Communication
Instruction
Data sharing and management
Resource
Administrative tasks
Student learning

Male
32.5 %
32.6 %
15.0 %
15.9 %
12.0 %
7.2 %

Female
35.9 %
24.6 %
15.2 %
13.6 %
8.7 %
11.5 %

Female principals believe that technology is better to use for student learning
compared male principals. But on the other hand male principals believe that
they use technology for administrative tasks more. When it comes to use the
technology for communication, female principals find less effective.
They also examine principals perceptions of the major functions of
technology by years of experience.
Major Function of
0-3
4-7
8-11
12-15
> 15
Technology
Yrs
Yrs
Yrs
Yrs
Yrs

Communication

Administrative tasks

38.5
%
24.1
%
10.6
%
21.2
%
6.7 %

Student learning

9.6 %

Instruction
Data sharing &
Management
Resource

32.9
%
30.4
%
18.3
%
7.3 %

30.9 %

28.1 %

35.5 %

23.6 %

31.3 %

38.7 %

14.6 %

21.9 %

19.4 %

9.1 %

12.5 %

25.8 %

12.2
%
14.6
%

3.6 %

15.6 %

19.4 %

3.6 %

12.5 %

6.4 %

Communication is always important no matter how many years of


experience. Percent of technology usage for instruction is getting increased
with more experience. It is obvious that principals would like to use the
technology for Administrative tasks more by years of experience.
DISCUSSIONS
Conclusions/Implications (for your profession): In technology dominated 21st
century, Principals as school leaders are getting challenged with how to
support the integration of technology into meaningful learning activities and
how to evaluate the use of technology within their schools. If the school
administrators act as technology leaders, the teachers and students integrate
and use technology more successfully. Unfortunately many school
administrators have little or lack experience or training in the knowledge and
skills required to be effective technology leaders. Principals need to lead their
school team to integrate technology. They should keep their selves updated
with latest technology. Without this knowledge, administrators find it difficult
to help teachers understand the use of technology in the classroom.
Based on article it is so clear that principals view technology as important for
carrying out communication and instruction. They also see the importance of
using technology for data sharing and management, as a resource, for
administrative tasks and for student learning. So principals have a positive
view of technology and are using technology themselves.
Based on research, principals perceptions of the major functions of
technology differed by sex and years of experience as mentioned in finding
and results section.
Future studies should look at principals in other geographic regions and from
different types of schools (e.g., public, private, and charter).
Principal preparation programs may want to consider addressing technology
leadership so that school leaders are better prepared to effectively
implement technology in their schools (Hines, Edmonson, & Moore, 2008)
REFLECTIONS
Students Reflections (changes to your understanding; implications for your

school/work):
I strongly agree that as mentioned in the article that School administration
including the principals positive attitudes towards technology and use of
technology play important role as technology leaders by teachers as being
supportive of integration of technology into the classroom. Even principals
have a positive view of technology and are using technology, due to the little
or lack experience or training in the knowledge and skills or budget, they
hesitate about technology investments to their schools.
Schools should provide funding and opportunities for principals to attend
technology training. This could increase their technology leadership and lead
to better implementation of technology in entire schools.
Although technology is often viewed as a strategy that will facilitate students
academic achievement, there are many studies that have found that
technology is not being integrated in schools, especially into the teaching and
learning process (Cuban, 2001; Leonard & Leonard, 2006; Padrn, Waxman,
Lee, Lin, & Michko, 2012).As mentioned above in the tables, technology was
used for student learning less.

You might also like