Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Chua-Qua VS. Clave: Iola Vianka M. Piñon English For Specific Purpose Prof. Rafie Paz
Chua-Qua VS. Clave: Iola Vianka M. Piñon English For Specific Purpose Prof. Rafie Paz
VS.
CLAVE
(G.R. NO. L-49549 AUGUST 30, 1990)
She was
the class
adviser of
the grade
six
students.
ISSUE:
Whether or not Evelyns dismissal
for immoral conduct was valid?
Applicable Law:
Code of Ethics for Teachers
Philippine TeachersProfessionalization Act of 1994 (R.A. 7836)
Conclusion / Decision
They held
that:
If the two
eventually fell in
love despite the
disparity in their
ages and
academic level,
this only leads to
the truism that
the heart has
reason of its own
which reason
does not know.
Rationale:
The Supreme Court did not consider
immoral Evelyn Chua-Qua's act of falling
in love with, and later marrying, a boy
who was fourteen years her junior,
scandalous though it may have been.
TheSupreme Court of the Philippines
acknowledged the power of love.
Note:
Sources:
http://en.wikipilipinas.org/index.php/Chu
a-Qua_vs._
Clave
http://
russelmrubia.blogspot.com/2012/07/chuaqua-vs-clave.html
Google.com
Lawphil.net