Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Two Geometry Problems
Two Geometry Problems
Let begin with problem which appeared in Vietnam IMO training 2009:
Problem 1:
Given triangle ABC and its circumcircle (O), its orthocenter H. P is an arbitrary point inside triangle
ABC. Let A1 , B1 , C1 be the second intersections of AP, BP, CP and (O), A2 , B2 , C2 be the reflections of
A1 , B1 , C1 across the midpoints of BC, CA, AB, respectively. Prove that H, A2 , B2 , C2 are concylic.
Solution:
First we will express a lemma:
Lemma 1
C2 B2 A2 = AP C
Proof:
A
B1
M
C2
Z
B'
A'
C1
A2
P
C'
B2
B
A1
B1
B4
C4
C1
C2
O
P
A2
H
C3
X
B
B2
A4
A1
B3
Construct three lines through A1 , B1 , C1 and perpendicular to AA1 , BB1 , CC1 , respectively. They intersect each other and make triangle A3 B3 C3 , intersect (O) again at A4 , B4 , C4 .
Note that AA4 , BB4 , CC4 are diameters of (O) therefore A4 , C4 are the reflections of H across the midpoints of BC, AB. We get HA2 A4 A1 , HC2 C4 C1 are parallelograms, which follows that HA2 //A1 A4 , HC2 //C1 C4 .
But P C1 B3 A1 is a cyclic quadrilateral and applying lemma 1 we have C2 HA2 = C1 B3 A1 = C1 P A1 =
CAP = C2 B2 A2 or H, A2 , B2 , C2 are concyclic. Our proof is completed.
Corollary 1:
Let A5 , B5 , C5 be the second intersections of AH, BH, CH and (A2 B2 C2 ), respectively. Then A5 B5 C5
ABC.
Proof:
Since A5 , B5 , C5 , H are concyclic then C5 A5 B5 = C5 HB5 = BAC. Similarly we get the result.
Note:
Corollary 1 is only a special case of this problem:
Given triangle ABC and an arbitrary P inside. Let A1 B1 C1 is the pedal triangle of triangle ABC wrt P .
Q is another arbitrary point inside triangle ABC. Let A2 , B2 , C2 be the projections of Q on P A1 , P B1 , P C1
then A2 B2 C2 ABC
Corollary 2:
A2 A5 , B2 B5 , C2 C5 are concurrent.
Proof:
A3
B1
B4
C4
B5
C1
C2
O
A5
A2
H
C5
C3
B2
A4
B3
A1
F
E
B
E
H
See on the figure, IJ, HG are the Simson lines of two points E and F , respectively. IJ HG = {K}
Denote L the projection of K on BC.
We have KL//F G and F HGC is a cyclic quadrilateral thus GKL = HGF = ACF (1)
Similarly, LKJ = EBA(2)
E
M
F
P
E''
F'
L
O
F''
D'
E'
B
D''
Let M, N be the reflections of F 0 , D0 across the line AC. It is easy to see that EN = E 0 D0 , EM =
E F 0 , M N = F 0 D0 . So we only need to prove that M EN F ED.
Now denote R = D0 N AC, Q = D0 D BC, U = RQ ED, S = BC ED, L = BE AC.
We have RQ//N D hence N DE = RU E = QDS D0 QR = 90o BSD D0 CR = 90o
BSD (ACB BCD) = 90o ACB EDC = 90o ACB EBC = 90o (AC, BE).
Similarly, M F E = 90o (AC, BE) thus N DE = M F E(3)
2RQ
D0 C. sin C
DC. sin C
JC. sin C
ND
On the other side,
=
= 0
=
=
(4)
MF
2T P
F A. sin A
F A. sin A
JA. sin A
0
Let D00 E 00 F 00 be the pedal triangle of triangle ABC wrt J. This result is well-known (it also appeared
in Mathvn magazine No.3): D00 E 00 F 00 DEF .
DE
D00 E 00
JC. sin C
Therefore
= 00 00 =
(5)
FE
F E
JA. sin A
DE
FE
DE
FE
From (3), (4) and (5) we get DN E F M E. Then
=
or 0 0 = 0 0
NE
ME
DE
F E
DE
FE
EF
Similarly we claim 0 0 = 0 0 = 0 0 and the result follows.
DE
F E
EF
Return to our problem:
A4
A
B1
C1
C2
C3
C4
A2
B2
A3
A1
Denote A3 , C3 the reflections of H across the lines BC, AB, respectively then A3 , C3 lie on (O). Let
A1 A2 (O) = {A4 , A1 }, C1 C2 (O) = {C4 , C1 }
Since AA3 //A1 A4 and A, A3 , A1 , A4 are concyclic we get AA3 A1 A4 is an isoceles trapezoid. But
HA3 A1 A2 is also an isoceles trapezoid too hence HA2 //AA4 .
Similarly, HC2 //CC4 .
Therefore C2 HA2 = (AA4 , CC4 ). Applying lemma 1, if we denote da , dc the Simson lines of A1 , C1
then (AA4 , CC4 ) = (d1 , d2 ).
Applying lemma 2, (d1 , d2 ) = C1 B1 A1 . So C2 HA2 = C1 B1 A1 .
Applying lemma 3, A1 B1 C1 A2 B2 C2 then C1 B1 A1 = C2 B2 A2 . Therefore C2 HA2 = C2 B2 A2
which follows that A2 , B2 , C2 , H are concylic.
We complete the proof.
Note:
Problem 2 is the generalization of the Fuhmann circle.
Corollary 3:
Let A3 , B3 , C3 be the second intersections of AH, BH, CH and (A2 B2 C2 ), respectively. Then A2 A3 , B2 B3 , C2 C3
concur at P .
Proof:
B1
C1
B3
C2
Z
A3
P
A2
C3
B
C
B2
A1
B4
B1
C1
B3
C2
C4
O
A3
A2
S
H
C3
B2
A4
A1
As that result above we came to the following conclusion: Problem 1 and 2 are equivalent. Therefore
there are at least two solutions for each problem and its corollary!
At the end we will prove another result about those nice problems:
Corollary 4:
Let I be the circumcenter of triangle A2 B2 C2 . K is the reflection of H across I. AK, BK, CK cut (I)
again at A5 , B5 , C5 . Then A3 A5 , B3 B5 , C3 C5 are concurrent.
Proof:
C2
C5
B3
A5
O
A3
A2
B5
C3
B2