Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Private Nuisance
Private Nuisance
1.
2.
3.
4.
Even if the plaintiff has no title to sue in the problem question, we should still
consider the other elements. If I were to be incorrect, I would consider the other
elements and it would be
Mario Nuisance Problem
1. Title to sue- It appears as though he was only a tenant and would not have
a potential title to sue
2. Substantial and unreasonable interferencea. Smoke makes him sick
b. Dust annoyance cleaning time
c. Trucks noise less sleep work is affected
Factors:
Time to clean
Duration/frequency
Location
Change in production levels
New staff building
Sensitivity
3. Defendant created/authorised/continued/adopted the nuisance
a. Quarry only put out chairs and didnt tell the workers to stop
smoking altogether
b. The dust and trucks were authorised by the contract with the yacht
company
4. Remedies
a. Mario has already placed sticky tar himself (abatement/self-help)
b. His actions were not reasonable as he did not give notice
c. He could be sued for trespass
5. Decision
Probably wont be able to sue for private nuisance