The document summarizes key assumptions of the location quotient approach for economic analysis and identifies limitations. It notes that the location quotient assumes: 1) no cross-hauling between locations, 2) countries are self-sufficient with no international trade, and 3) equal productivity and consumption patterns across regions. However, these assumptions do not reflect real-world economic complexities of trade between locations, globalization, and differences in efficiency and demand across places. While flawed, the location quotient still provides a useful indicator to compare industries regionally within a national economy.
The document summarizes key assumptions of the location quotient approach for economic analysis and identifies limitations. It notes that the location quotient assumes: 1) no cross-hauling between locations, 2) countries are self-sufficient with no international trade, and 3) equal productivity and consumption patterns across regions. However, these assumptions do not reflect real-world economic complexities of trade between locations, globalization, and differences in efficiency and demand across places. While flawed, the location quotient still provides a useful indicator to compare industries regionally within a national economy.
The document summarizes key assumptions of the location quotient approach for economic analysis and identifies limitations. It notes that the location quotient assumes: 1) no cross-hauling between locations, 2) countries are self-sufficient with no international trade, and 3) equal productivity and consumption patterns across regions. However, these assumptions do not reflect real-world economic complexities of trade between locations, globalization, and differences in efficiency and demand across places. While flawed, the location quotient still provides a useful indicator to compare industries regionally within a national economy.
The document summarizes key assumptions of the location quotient approach for economic analysis and identifies limitations. It notes that the location quotient assumes: 1) no cross-hauling between locations, 2) countries are self-sufficient with no international trade, and 3) equal productivity and consumption patterns across regions. However, these assumptions do not reflect real-world economic complexities of trade between locations, globalization, and differences in efficiency and demand across places. While flawed, the location quotient still provides a useful indicator to compare industries regionally within a national economy.
Appendix 7 - Assumptions in Location Quotient Approach
The first is the assumption that there is no cross hauling. The assumption is that a community will first use a product from the local economy and then export the rest. The community will not import a product that they produce for export. This is not true because a local economy may import a different brand of product or may import a product that is within the same industry for which they export. The problem with the assumption gets larger when there is greater product mix and the industries are aggregated and not well refined. The second assumption is that the national economy is self-sufficient and that the nation does not import or export items outside the nations boundaries. This is problematic because the world is becoming increasingly global and the United States is a major trade partner with several other countries. The third assumption is that there is an equal amount of productivity across regions. This assumption can only be made if it is known that the rate of productivity is equal for one region compared to another. This is a problem related to using employment as a measure because it accounts only for the number of workers and not their efficiency. The last assumption made when using the location quotient approach is regions have equal consumption patterns. One region may have a need or preference for a product and that will effect the consumption of the product for the area and, in turn, may affect the location quotient. This can be adjusted for by taking into account income share. Although there are flaws with this method, the location quotient does serve as an indicator of an industry compared to other places in the United States and can be an effective tool in measuring the strength of a regional economy.
Prepared by Genesee/Finger Lakes Regional Planning Council