Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Lifeport Sciences LLC v. Endologix, Inc., C.A. No. 12-1791-GMS (D. Del. Jul. 29, 2015)
Lifeport Sciences LLC v. Endologix, Inc., C.A. No. 12-1791-GMS (D. Del. Jul. 29, 2015)
Lifeport Sciences LLC v. Endologix, Inc., C.A. No. 12-1791-GMS (D. Del. Jul. 29, 2015)
ENDOLOGIX, INC.,
Defendant.
At Wilmington, this
11
c.~day
ORDER
amendment on the grounds that the defendant unduly delayed in filing the motion. The plaintiff
also contends that it would prejudiced if the court were to allow the amendment at this stage of
litigation.
The court rejects both of the plaintiffs arguments for the same reason: the parties
specifically built into their scheduling order a deadline for this exact purpose: "For motions to
amend the pleadings to allege inequitable conduct, whether by affirmative defense or in a
counterclaim, all such motions shall be filed on or before June 8, 2015."
(D.I. 24.)
The
defendant indeed filed its motion on June 8, 2015. Even assuming the plaintiff is correct that the
defendant could have filed it motion sooner, the court cannot say the delay was undue or that the
plaintiff will be prejudiced when this was explicitly contemplated as a possibility. Following the
guidance of Rule 15, the court gives the defendant leave to amend.