The Political Brain _Bijo Thomas Ittiarah_1424007The Political Brain _Bijo Thomas Ittiarah_1424007The Political Brain _Bijo Thomas Ittiarah_1424007The Political Brain _Bijo Thomas Ittiarah_1424007The Political Brain _Bijo Thomas Ittiarah_1424007
The Political Brain _Bijo Thomas Ittiarah_1424007The Political Brain _Bijo Thomas Ittiarah_1424007The Political Brain _Bijo Thomas Ittiarah_1424007The Political Brain _Bijo Thomas Ittiarah_1424007The Political Brain _Bijo Thomas Ittiarah_1424007
The Political Brain _Bijo Thomas Ittiarah_1424007The Political Brain _Bijo Thomas Ittiarah_1424007The Political Brain _Bijo Thomas Ittiarah_1424007The Political Brain _Bijo Thomas Ittiarah_1424007The Political Brain _Bijo Thomas Ittiarah_1424007
The Political Brain _Bijo Thomas Ittiarah_1424007The Political Brain _Bijo Thomas Ittiarah_1424007The Political Brain _Bijo Thomas Ittiarah_1424007The Political Brain _Bijo Thomas Ittiarah_1424007The Political Brain _Bijo Thomas Ittiarah_1424007
The Political Brain: The Role of Emotion in Deciding the Fate of the Nation, Drew Westen
Bijo Thomas Ittiarah
1424007 The political brain is an emotional brain. That is the central thesis of Westen's book, backed by an explanation of how our brains evolved, scientific studies, including studies of brain scans of people presented with political information, and dissection of numerous failed and successful political campaigns. Democrats have gotten it all wrong. Voters make decisions with their feelings, not their brains. If the voters' heads tell them one thing they will go with the heart. Republicans win because they have a near-monopoly in the marketplace of emotions, says Westen. The Democrats, in contrast, have continued to place their stock in the marketplace of ideas. And in so doing, he says, they have been trading in the wrong futures. Westen gives a great deal of fascinating data about both how individuals see political issues and competitors and diverse frames that could be connected to political issues. His primary point is that individuals don't vote objectively, rather becoming tied up with stories and predispositions. This is sensibly well supported, in spite of the fact that he does contend against a strawman of the discerning personality that nobody has truly trusted in for a century. A great deal of the methods he proposes for the Democrats are undeniably great thoughts. One powerful factor at work in our brains determining how we vote is networks of association. These are bundles of thoughts, feelings, images and ideas that have become connected over time. Effective campaigns work to create positive associations with their candidate, and negative associations with the other guy. Although this appeal to the subconscious can be used legitimately, it can lend itself to unethical advertising, by activating associations to appeal to what would be deemed improper motives and attitudes. Westen concludes that what motivates people are their wishes, fears, and values. This means a successful campaign has to appeal to and manage the voters' emotions. In deciding whom to vote for, voters ask themselves first how they feel about the candidate's party and its principles.When Democrats have been able to connect emotionally with voters, like Bill Clinton, they win. Overall, though, Republicans have been much more successful in appealing to voters' raze feelings, which is why, Westen says, they win elections.