Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Making A Great Poster: Marilee P. Ogren PHD Ogren@Mit - Edu
Making A Great Poster: Marilee P. Ogren PHD Ogren@Mit - Edu
Legible
Illegible = small font, fancy font, too much text
Well organized
Disorganized = takes too much time to find the main idea, next idea, or data
Succinct
Not succinct = doesnt direct attention to punch line within 11 sec
COMPACT:
Focus on ONE, clearly stated question with a clear
take-home message.
VISUAL:
Use diagrams, arrows, and other graphics to direct
attention rather than text.
Consider:
1. Audience
2. Content
3. Graphics
4. Text (Language)
5. Colors
6. Layout
Title
Text
Graphics
Conclusions
Example
Total Ink > Information Ink
Grid lines: Your audience is unlikely to care about the exact values at
each data point, and the grid lines compete with the datas graphic pattern.
Legend: Why make the reader look back and forth between lines and
legend? Just label the lines - then eliminate the legend.
Axes: The labeling between major tick marks is unnecessary.
As with Graphics
Make Total Ink = Information Ink
Consider:
1. Time
Software generated posters can take whole day to
print
2. Software
3. Title and Text
4. Editing
5. Assembly
Special Advantage of
Software Generated Posters
Title Mechanics
Create a banner:
Title (largest)
Authors (smaller)
Institution(s) (same or smaller still)
Use
10
Text Mechanics
Use
for Headings
Use 24 or 28 point type for accompanying text
Left justify with ragged right margins (no centering)
Use a serif font (e.g., Times or Times New Roman)
Use sentence case and AVOID BLOCKS OF TEXT IN
ALL CAPS
Use bold, underline, and italics sparingly
Editing
Posters ALWAYS have too much text.
Strive for:
Best text
comes from
here
20% text
40% graphics
40% empty space
11
Finally
Always acknowledge other contributors and
funding organizations
Use small type (14 - 18 point)
Always SAVE your work and make a BACKUP
Spell-check Spell-check Spell-check Spell-check
Get feedback (use 60 checklist)
1.
2.
3.
Smile.
12
Checklist
Appearance
1. Display attracts viewer's attention.
2. Words are easy to read from an appropriate distance (3-5 feet).
3. Poster is well organized and easy to follow.
4. Graphics and other visuals enhance presentation.
5. The poster is neat and appealing to look at.
Content
6. Content is clear and easy to understand.
7. Purpose (question) is stated clearly.
8. It is possible to see why someone might be interested in the results.
9. There is enough detail about methods to understand the results.
10. The approach taken is appropriate for the problem and technically sound.
11. Poster is free of unnecessary detail.
12. Conclusions are stated clearly.
13. Conclusions are supported by results.
Presentation
14. Presenter's response to questions demonstrated knowledge of subject matter
and project.
Cluttered or sloppy appearance. Gives the impression of a solid mass of text and graphics, or pieces are scattered
and disconnected. Little white space.
Very little. Gives the impression of a solid mass of text and graphics.
Too much text. The poster gives an overwhelming impression of text only.
Not enough text. Cannot understand what the graphics are supposed to relate.
Balanced. Text and graphics are evenly dispersed in the poster. There seems to be enough text to explain the
graphics.
Text Size
13
Implicit. Headings (Introduction, Methods, etc) or other device implies organization and flow.
None.
Partial. Not enough information to contact author without further research. This includes missing zip codes on
addresses.
Complete. Enough information to contact author by mail, phone, or e-mail without further research.
Research Objective
Can't find.
Can't find.
Absent.
14