Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 2 views

    Thieseen Kitty Excell

    Uploaded by

    Syndell Avalos Aparicio
    This document compares two methods for calculating the average precipitation (P) across six weather stations: the Thiessen polygon method and the isohyetal map method. The Thiessen polygon method calculates a weighted average of 93 mm based on the recorded precipitation and polygon area of each station. The isohyetal map method draws contour lines between stations and calculates a weighted average of 99.8 mm based on the precipitation within each contour area.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Thieseen Kitty Excell

    Uploaded by

    Syndell Avalos Aparicio
    2 views9 pages
    This document compares two methods for calculating the average precipitation (P) across six weather stations: the Thiessen polygon method and the isohyetal map method. The Thiessen polygon method calculates a weighted average of 93 mm based on the recorded precipitation and polygon area of each station. The isohyetal map method draws contour lines between stations and calculates a weighted average of 99.8 mm based on the precipitation within each contour area.

    Original Description:

    Thieseen

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document compares two methods for calculating the average precipitation (P) across six weather stations: the Thiessen polygon method and the isohyetal map method. The Thiessen polygon method calculates a weighted average of 93 mm based on the recorded precipitation and polygon area of each station. The isohyetal map method draws contour lines between stations and calculates a weighted average of 99.8 mm based on the precipitation within each contour area.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
    2 views9 pages

    Thieseen Kitty Excell

    Uploaded by

    Syndell Avalos Aparicio
    This document compares two methods for calculating the average precipitation (P) across six weather stations: the Thiessen polygon method and the isohyetal map method. The Thiessen polygon method calculates a weighted average of 93 mm based on the recorded precipitation and polygon area of each station. The isohyetal map method draws contour lines between stations and calculates a weighted average of 99.8 mm based on the precipitation within each contour area.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
    of 9

    1.

    MtododelospolgonosdeThiessen
    ESTACIN
    E1
    E2
    E3
    E4
    E5
    E6

    MM
    93
    90
    99
    95
    93
    105

    REA
    A1
    A2
    A3
    A4
    A5
    A6

    KM2-PLANO
    29371819.9166
    36427227.7258
    32664177.317
    17205671.4422
    34911883.9825
    22945483.2976

    KM2-REAL
    29.37181992
    36.42722773
    32.66417732
    17.20567144
    34.91188398
    22.9454833

    P= 95.28472921

    mm

    2.MtododelasIsoyetas
    REA
    A1
    A2
    A3
    A4
    A5
    A6
    A7
    A8
    A9
    A10

    CURVA

    88

    km2-plano
    5194701.45
    6974827.77
    5837571.39
    10787682.2
    26619207.4
    32654216.2
    30677890.5
    22011890
    15410230.6
    17572628.4

    km2-real
    5.19470145
    6.97482777
    5.83757139
    10.7876822
    26.6192074
    32.6542162
    30.6778905
    22.01189
    15.4102306
    17.5726284
    173.740846

    90

    92

    Primera curva: 88 mm
    ltima Curva: 108 mm

    94

    96

    Primera curva: 88 mm
    ltima Curva: 108 mm

    98

    100

    102

    104

    106

    108

    =(5.19((88+90)/2)+6.97((90+92)/2)+5.84((92+94)/2)+10.79((94+96)/2)+26.62((96+98)/2)+32.6
    +106)/2)+17.57((106+108)/2))/173.74

    P= 99.8247084

    9((94+96)/2)+26.62((96+98)/2)+32.65((98+100)/2)+30.68((100+102)/2)+22.01((102+104)/2)+15.41((104

    You might also like