Nebraska Fact Sheet

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 2

BUILDING CODES

& ENERGY EFFICIENCY:


NEBRASKA
Updated November 30, 2009

ECONOMIC BENEFITS
Consumers save money by reducing utility bills,
minimizing the negative impacts of fluctuations in
energy supply and cost, and by conserving available
energy resources. Retail and office buildings con-
structed to meet the requirements of the IECC can
be over 30 percent more energy efficient than
typical buildings not constructed to meet national
model energy standards.

B
Monetary savings derived from codes increase a
uildings account for roughly 40 percent of the
consumer's purchasing power, and help expand the
total energy use in the United States and 70
state’s economy by keeping local dollars in Ne-
percent of our electricity use, representing a
braska.
significant opportunity for energy savings. Energy effi-
ciency—through the adoption and enforcement of BUILDING INDUSTRY BENEFITS
strong building energy codes—is the quickest, cheap-
est, and cleanest way to reduce energy consumption The national model code, the 2009 IECC, offers
and achieve a sustainable and prosperous future. For flexibility to Nebraska builders and design profes-
the state of Nebraska, the next step should be the adop- sionals, allowing them to optimize the cost-
tion of the U.S. model energy codes—the 2009 Inter- effectiveness of energy efficient features in their
national Energy Conservation Code (2009 IECC) building products, and to satisfy a variety of con-
and ASHRAE Standard 90.1-2007. sumer preferences.

In February 2009, the American Recovery and Rein- The 2009 IECC also simplifies guidelines for build-
vestment Act (Recovery Act) – the federal stimulus ers, providing a uniform code across the state with
legislation appropriating funds for a variety of state multiple options for compliance.
initiatives – allocated $3.1 billion for the U.S. Depart-
Uniformity throughout Nebraska will enable local
ment of Energy’s State Energy Program (SEP) to assist
states with building energy efficiency efforts. As one jurisdictions to pool limited resources and combine
of the requirements to receive this funding, Gov. Dave personnel to form county-wide, regional, and state-
Heineman certified to DOE1 that Nebraska would im- wide enforcement and educational programs.
plement energy standards of equal or greater strin- UTILITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL BENEFITS
gency than the latest national model codes—the 2009
edition of the IECC and Standard 90.1-2007. Energy codes improve the energy efficiency per-
formance of new buildings and reduce demand on
Having already received $15.45 million2 in federal power generators, therefore improving the air qual-
SEP funding, Nebraska is eligible to receive an addi- ity of local communities throughout Nebraska.
tional $15.45 million in grants upon demonstration of
the successful implementation of its energy plans sub- Electricity use is a leading generator of air pollution.
mitted to DOE. It is in Nebraska’s best economic inter- Rising power demand increases emissions of sul-
est to adopt the 2009 IECC and Standard 90.1-2007 fur dioxide, nitrous oxides and carbon dioxide. En-
statewide and begin enjoying the benefits of an effi- ergy codes are a proven, cost-effective means for
cient building sector. addressing these and other environmental impacts.
1850 M St. NW Suite 600
Washington, DC 20036
www.bcap-ocean.org
A MODELForSmore information, please visit www.bcap-energy.org.
TATE ENERGY CODE FOR NEBRASKA

N ebraska’s current energy code3 for resi-


dential and commercial construction—the
Nebraska Energy Code—is based on the
2003 IECC. It became effective July 1, 2005. The
2009 IECC, however, is simpler to use and
achieves significant energy savings above the
2003 IECC.
The 2009 IECC4 improves substantially upon the
2003 IECC and will provide Nebraska households
and businesses lower utility costs, increased com-
fort, and better economic opportunity. A limited
DOE analysis5 of the changes from the state's cur- Chimney Rock in western Nebraska (Credit—Northern Magnolia)
rent code to the 2009 IECC resulted in estimated
energy savings of 13 percent, or about $236 a
come one of the more efficient states in the na-
year for an average new house at recent fuel prices.
tion.
When states regularly update and enforce their en-
AN UNTAPPED RESOURCE
ergy codes in coordination with the three-year
model code update cycles, they ensure the consis- Energy prices are projected to rise sharply over the
tency and continued enhancement of the benefits of next decade. By using energy codes to increase
model building practice. By maintaining this com- the significant potential energy supply improved
mitment, Nebraska can demonstrate leadership building energy efficiency produces, Nebraska can
on energy efficiency issues by meeting national enhance its energy security by reducing energy de-
standards. mand within its borders. Wise management of state-
wide energy policy should include seizing the low-
ENERGY RESOURCES AND EFFICIENCY
hanging fruit that is the energy savings improved
Nebraska does not have abundant fossil fuel re- building energy codes offer. Among the opportuni-
sources, depending on coal, natural gas, and oil ties:
transported across state lines. Coal-fired power If Nebraska updated its energy code to the 2009
plants supply two-thirds of Nebraska’s electricity
IECC and required adoption and enforcement by
generation market, with virtually all of its coal im-
all local jurisdictions, businesses and homeowners
ported by rail from Wyoming.6 Despite its low
would save an estimated $31 million annually
population size (ranked 38th in 2007), Nebraska has
by 2020 and an estimated $61 million annually
a high per capita energy consumption (16th) and a
by 2030 in energy costs (assuming 2006 energy
fairly energy-intensive economy, ranking compara-
prices).
tively high in energy consumption per real dollar of
GDP (21st).7 This can leave the state vulnerable Additionally, adopting and implementing the 2009
to future fluctuations in energy costs and peak IECC statewide would help avoid roughly 10 tril-
demand. By adopting national baseline standards lion Btu of primary annual energy use by 2030
for building energy performance, Nebraska can and annual emissions of roughly 670,000 metric
mitigate the impacts of price uncertainty and be- tons of CO2 by 2030.
** NOTES ** For more information, please visit www.bcap-ocean.org
1 5
US DOE (http://www.energy.gov/media/NE_Gov.pdf) US DOE (http://www.energycodes.gov/implement/state_codes/reports/
2
US DOE (http://apps1.eere.energy.gov/news/progress_alerts.cfm/pa_id=202) IECC2009_Residential_Nationwide_Analysis.pdf) (page 109)
3 6
BCAP (http://bcap-energy.org/node/80) US EIA (http://tonto.eia.doe.gov/state/state_energy_profiles.cfm?sid=NE)
4 7
BCAP (http://bcap-energy.org/node/330) US EIA (http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/states/sep_sum/html/pdf/rank_use_gdp.pdf)

1850 M St. NW Suite 600


Washington, DC 20036
www.bcap-ocean.org

You might also like