Science & Technology Development, Vol 13, No.

M2- 2010
X L MU V COD CA NC THI SN XUT CN T MT R NG
BNG H KEO T V C
L c Trung
Vin Mi trng v Ti nguyn, HQG-HCM
(Bi nhn ngy 11 thng 08 nm 2010, hon chnh sa cha ngy 07 thng 10 nm 2010)

TM TT: Qu trnh sn xut cn t mt r ng to ra mt lng ln nc thi vi ti lng

cc cht nhim cao, in hnh l mu v COD, c th gy nhim mi trng nghim trng nu
khng c x l trit . Phn ln cc quy trnh cng ngh hin hu x l loi nc thi ny ch yu
ch da trn phng php sinh hc, do vy cht lng nc sau x l khng m bo tiu chun x
thi. hon thin hn quy trnh cng ngh, vic b sung qu trnh tin x l trc khi x l sinh hc
l cn thit mang tnh quyt nh nng cao hiu qu x l ca ton h thng. Nghin cu ny c
thc hin vi mc tiu nh gi hiu qu qu trnh tin x l kh mu v COD trong nc thi sn
xut cn t mt r ng bng phng php keo t quy m phng th nghim. Kt qu thc nghim
cho thy, di iu kin mi trng pH 9,5 Al2(SO4)3 c kh nng kh mu v COD vi hiu qu
cao nht l 83% v 70% theo th t; h FeSO4 Al2(SO4)3 pH 8,5 c kh nng x l mu v
COD vi hiu qu ln lt l 82% v 70% ; hiu qu x l ca h FeSO4 Al2(SO4)3 c b sung
cht tr keo t Polyacrylamit thay i khng ng k t 87%, 73,1%, v 94,1% t n g n g v i
m u , C O D v c. Hn th na, trong iu kin c b sung cht tr keo t qu trnh x l
thng to ra lng bn kh lng khi s dng cc h phn khc nhau.
Key words: mt r ng, nhu cu oxy sinh ha, kh mu.
1. M U

so snh vi tinh bt v xenluloza. Hn th na

n nm 2005 Vit nam c kh nng sn

i vi hai loi nguyn liu ny th quy trnh

xut khong 180 n 200 triu lt cn ru cc

cng ngh sn xut cn b sung thm mt bc

loi. Trong , cn t ngun nguyn liu tinh

tin x l chuyn i chng thnh ng c

bt chim 30 40%, cn li l cn t mt r

th ln men [1],[2],[3],[4].

ng [1]. Trn th gii, ngun nguyn liu

Mt r l ph phm ca qu trnh sn xut

sn xut cn rt a dng bao gm ng (mt

ng, chim t l 3 5% tu thuc vo cht

c ci ng v ma, nc p ma), tinh bt

lng ma. Thng thng, hm lng cht kh

(bp, la m, sn, go, la mch) v xenluloza

trong mt r ng l 70 85% (theo khi

(nhng cht d t v ma, b ma ng v

lng), cn li ch yu l nc. Trong ,

g). Nguyn liu c ngun gc t ng cha

ng chim khong 60%, bao gm 35 - 40%

lng ng c kh nng ln men cao hn khi

saccarosa, 20 25% ng kh; lng cn li

Trang 92

Bn quyn thuc HQG-HCM

TP CH PHT TRIN KH&CN, TP 13, S M2 - 2010

l cht phi ng: 30 32% l hp cht hu c

kh) v h sinh hc hiu kh. Do vy, nc thi

v 8 10% l cht v c [2],[3]. Cht hu c

sau x l vn c hm lng COD cao gp

khng cha nit gm c pectin, cht nhy

khong 200 ln tiu chun, SS cao gp khong

furfunol, acid. ngoi ra cn c cc hp cht

10 ln tiu chun, c bit mu th vt xa

khng ln men c nh caramen, cht mu.

tiu chun khong 1000 ln [1],[5]. Do mc

Hp cht hu c cha nit ch yu l dng

nhim ca nc thi u vo qu cao, qu

amin nh acid glutamic, alanine. Lng nit

trnh x l k kh d c t hiu sut x l tt

trong mt r ng ch khong 0,5 n 1%. Do

nhng vn khng th m bo x l trit

cha t nit nn trong qu trnh ln men mt r

hm lng cht nhim, do vy vic b sung

ng thng phi b sung ngun nit dng

qu trnh tin x l nhm gim thiu nng

ur hoc amoni sulfate [2],[3],[10],[11]. Nc

cht nhim trc khi x l sinh hc va to

thi sn xut cn t mt r ng chnh l dung

iu kin thun li cho cc cng on x l

dch hm thi pht sinh t qu trnh chng ct

tip theo l ht sc cn thit. Nghin cu ny

kt hp vi nc thi t qu trnh v sinh thit

tp trung nghin cu hiu qu tin x l

b nh thng ln men, thp chng ct tinh v

mu v COD trong nc thi sn xut cn t

th [1],[2].

mt r ng ca nh my ng Hip Ha
bng phng php keo t vi cc h phn khc

Tng lng nc thi sn xut cn t mt

r ng ca Nh my ng Hip Ha khong

nhau.

200 m /ngy. Nc thi ny c cha hm

2. VT LIU V PHNG PHP

lng cht hu c rt cao, ch yu l xc nm

2.1. Vt liu

men, polysaccarides, ng kh, lignin, m,

Nc thi dng trong nghin cu thc

Melanoidin, cht sp. Nc thi c mu nu

nghim c ly t b lng men ca h thng

sm,

nhit

cao

(71

sn xut nh my ng Hip Ha. Kt qu

81 C)

phn tch cc thng s COD, BOD5, pH,

[1],[4],[5],[10],[11].

mu, SS, ca nc thi c tng hp trong

H thng x l nc thi hin hu ca nh

my ch gm b biogas (phn hy sinh hc k

Bng 2.1.

Bng 2.1 Thnh phn v tnh cht ca nc thi s dng trong nghin cu
Thng s

n v

Gi tr

Gi tr

trung bnh

(Nc thi pha long 2 ln)

COD

mg/l

86.250

43.125

BOD5

mg/l

49.160

24.580

mu

Pt - Co

115.000

57.500

NTU

7.856

3.928

SS

mg/l

1.750

875

pH

3,3

3,57

Bn quyn thuc HQG-HCM

Trang 93

Science & Technology Development, Vol 13, No.M2- 2010

Gi tr

Gi tr

trung bnh

(Nc thi pha long 2 ln)

mg/l

1.860

930

mg/l

68

34

Thng s

n v

Nit tng
Phospho tng

(Ngy ly mu 08/06/2009 v 15/11/2009)

2.2. M hnh thc nghim

 Thng s ca m hnh:

Qu trnh keo t to bng c tin hnh

- Tc khuy iu chnh: 10-120

trn m hnh Jartest. Mu th nghim c

vng/pht

ng trong cc cc thu tinh 500 ml. H thng

- Thi gian khuy iu chnh: 5-90 pht

cnh khuy c th chnh c tc vng

quay.
Bng 2.2. Thit b v ha cht s dng
Loi

Thit b ph tr

M hnh

Ha cht s dng

Tn gi

Hng sn xut/ Xut x

Thit b o pH

Metrohm 744

Cn phn tch

Adventurer - Ohaus

L nung COD

Nabertherm - c

My o mu, c

Hach DR/2010

T sy

Ecocell

My Jartest

Velp

Dung dch FAS 0,1M

Trung Quc

Axit H2SO4 98% + Ag2SO4

Trung Quc

Dung dch K2C2O7

Trung Quc

Ch th Ferolin

Trung Quc

Phn cc loi

Vit Nam, Trung Quc (AlCl3)

H2SO4

Vit Nam

NaOH

Vit Nam

 Cc bc tin hnh thc nghim xc

nh pH, liu lng phn thch hp:

cng lng phn nh xc nh th nghim

trn v khuy u. Dng dd NaOH hoc H2SO4

- Ly 500ml mu nc thi ( pha long

iu chnh pH ca dd trong cc cc ti cc gi

2 ln) vo cc thu tinh. Cho phn vo v

tr mong mun. Khuy tc 120 vng/pht

khuy u cho n khi thy s xut hin ca

trong 1 pht. Sau , chnh tc khuy xung

bng cn, dng v ghi nhn lng phn s

15 vng/pht trong vng 20 pht. Dng khuy

dng. Gi gi tr lng phn ny c nh trong

v lng trong 3gi. Ly mu nc trong

thc nghim xc nh gi tr pH ph hp.

phn tch COD, o mu v c

- Ly 500ml mu nc thi ( pha long

(4),(13),(14).

2 ln) vo 6 cc thu tinh. Cho vo cc cc

Trang 94

Bn quyn thuc HQG-HCM

TP CH PHT TRIN KH&CN, TP 13, S M2 - 2010

 Th nghim 3: Xc nh liu lng b

2.3. Ni dung nghin cu

 Th nghim 1: Xc nh pH v liu

sung cht tr keo t Polyacrylamit thch hp

khi thm vo h phn c xc nh.

lng thch hp i vi cc loi phn (FeSO4,

Al2(SO4)3, FeCl3 v AlCl3).

2.4. Phng php phn tch

 Th nghim 2: Xc nh pH v liu

- Phng php quy hoch thc nghim

lng thch hp i vi cc h phn (FeSO4 -

[4],[9]
- Phng php x l s liu : s dng

Al2(SO4)3, FeSO4 - AlCl3, FeCl3 - Al2(SO4)3 v

FeCl3 - AlCl3).

phn mm Design-Expert 7.0.0

Bng 2.3. Cc ch tiu v phng php phn tch

Ch tiu

Phng php th

Thit b s dng
Metrohm 744, c hiu chnh vi dung dch chun

pH

4500-H+ APHA 2005

mu

2120 (C) APHA 2005

Hach DR/2010, chng trnh 120, bc sng 455nm

2130 (B) APHA 2005

Hach DR/2010, chng trnh 750, bc sng 860nm

COD

5220 (C) APHA 2005

Nabertherm - c

pH 7,00 v pH 4,00

i pH. Sau c nh pH tm c, thay i

3. KT QU V THO LUN

lng phn. Qu trnh c thc hin lp li 2

3.1. Th nghim 1: Xc nh pH v liu

ln, v kt qu c trnh by trong Bng 3.1.

lng thch hp i vi cc loi phn: FeSO4,

Al2(SO4)3, FeCl3 v AlCl3
Tin hnh c nh hm lng phn, thay
Bng 3.1. iu kin thch hp cho qu trnh keo t nc thi mt r ng bng h phn n

Loi phn

pH

Hm lng phn
thch hp (g/l)

Hiu sut

Hiu sut

Hiu sut

Hm lng

kh mu

kh

kh c

NaOH s/d

(%)

COD (%)

(%)

(g/l)

FeSO4

11,5

75

88

66

92

26

Al2(SO4)3

9,5

130

83

70

97

47,3

FeCl3

3,5

100

96

82

87

61,9

AlCl3

5,5

125

94

77

95

54,7

Thc nghim cho thy, trong cc loi phn

hp cn lng NaOH ng k. iu ny nh

th phn gc clorua lm gim pH ca nc thi

hng nhiu n gi thnh x l, thi gian keo

xung rt thp khi tin hnh keo t. Do ,

t v tnh kh thi ca cng ngh. Hn na,

iu chnh pH ca nc thi n gi tr thch

m bo tnh kh thi cng ngh, gi tr pH

Bn quyn thuc HQG-HCM

Trang 95

Science & Technology Development, Vol 13, No.M2- 2010

thch hp cho qu trnh keo t cng nn gn
khong trung tnh (7,0) nh vy s khng nh

Vi x1, x2v x3 ln lc l cc bin s

m ho ca cc bin t nhin Z1, Z2 v Z3
Cc yu t yu t nh hng c xt:

hng ti hiu qu x l sinh hc tip theo v

c bit lm gim nh yu cu i vi thit b

- Z3 l bin t nhin, pH.

cng trnh x l trong thc t p dng. Phn

- i vi h phn FeSO4 v Al2(SO4)3:

Al2(SO4)3 gn nh tha mn c c hai yu

Z1 l bin t nhin, liu lng phn FeSO4

cu quan trng trn vi hiu qu x l cao i

(g/l); Z2 l bin t nhin, liu lng phn

vi mu v COD ln lt l 70% v 83%. Tuy

Al2(SO4)3 (g/l);

nhin kt qu thc nghim cng cho thy, khi

- i vi h phn FeSO4 v AlCl3: Z1 l

s dng tng loi phn th bng cn to thnh

bin t nhin, liu lng phn FeSO4 (g/l); Z2

mn, kh lng.

l bin t nhin, liu lng phn AlCl3 (g/l)

3.2. Th nghim 2: Xc nh pH v liu

- i vi h phn FeCl3 v Al2(SO4)3:

lng thch hp i vi cc h phn (FeSO4 -

Z1 l bin t nhin, liu lng phn FeCl3

Al2(SO4)3, FeSO4 - AlCl3, FeCl3 - Al2(SO4)3 v

FeCl3 - AlCl3).
xc nh iu kin ti u cho hiu qu

(g/l); Z2 l bin t nhin, liu lng phn

Al2(SO4)3 (g/l);
- i vi h phn FeCl3 v AlCl3: Z1 l

x l COD v mu trong nc thi bng h

phn, thc nghim c tin hnh theo m
hnh bc mt yu t ton phn (23) vi cc yu

bin t nhin, liu lng phn FeCl3 (g/l); Z2

l bin t nhin, liu lng phn AlCl3 (g/l);
Hm mc tiu: yCOD : hiu qu x l

t c kho st l liu lng phn v pH.

Hm mc tiu c chn l hiu qu x l mu

COD ; ymu: hiu qu x l mu

a. Xc nh phng trnh hi quy tuyn

v COD. Phng trnh hi quy c dng nh

tnh

sau:
y = bo + b1x1 + b2x2 + b3x3 + b12x1x2 +

T kt qu th nghim 1, cc mc tin
hnh thc nghim c trnh by bng 3.2.

b13x1x3 + b23x2x3 + b123x1x2x3

Trong :

Bng 3.2. Cc mc tin hnh th nghim

Cc mc th nghim

Z1(g/l)

Z2(g/l)

Z3

Mc cao (+1)

60

85

12

Mc gc (0)

40

65

10

Mc thp (-1)

20

45

Khong bin thin

20

20

FeSO4 v Al2( SO4)3

Trang 96

Bn quyn thuc HQG-HCM

TP CH PHT TRIN KH&CN, TP 13, S M2 - 2010

Cc mc th nghim

Z1(g/l)

Z2(g/l)

Z3

Mc cao (+1)

60

85

12

Mc gc (0)

40

65

Mc thp (-1)

20

45

Khong bin thin

20

20

Mc cao (+1)

70

85

10

Mc gc (0)

50

65

Mc thp (-1)

30

45

Khong bin thin

20

20

Mc cao (+1)

70

85

Mc gc (0)

50

65

Mc thp (-1)

30

45

Khong bin thin

20

20

FeSO4 v AlCl3

FeCl3 v Al2( SO4)3

FeCl3 v AlCl3

Kt qu thu c cc phng trnh sau:

i vi h phn FeSO4 v Al2( SO4)3

yCOD = 60,69 + 1,09 x1 + 1,76 x2 1,76 x3

(3.1)

yMu = 69,54 + 2,86 x1 + 2,79 x2 8,01x3 + 13,16 x1 x3 2,06 x2 x3

(3.2)

i vi h phn FeSO4 v AlCl3

yCOD = 63,19 + 5,14 x1 + 6,56 x2 7,16 x3 5,94 x1 x 2 + 4,94 x1 x3 + 3,11x2 x3

y Mu = 71.29 + 7.31x1 + 3.26 x 2 10.89 x3 8.99 x1 x3 2.46 x 2 x3

(3.3)
(3.4)

i vi h phn FeCl3 v Al2( SO4)3

yCOD = 71,91 + 4,06 x1 + 0,062 x2 + 4,16 x3 1,04 x1 x2 1,59 x1 x3 + 0,46 x2 x3 (3.5)

y Mu = 78,09 + 7,21x1 + 1,49 x2 + 10,09 x3 4,24 x1 x2 3,59 x1 x3 + 0,037 x2 x3 (3.6)
i vi h phn FeCl3 v AlCl3

Bn quyn thuc HQG-HCM

Trang 97

Science & Technology Development, Vol 13, No.M2- 2010

yCOD = 79,83 + 2,4 x1 + 1,47 x2 + 0,8 x3

(3.7)

y Mu = 79,22 2,32 x1 2,92 x2 + 15,13 x3

(3.8)
Vi 1 = 0.4 v 2 = 0.6

b.Ti u ha hm a mc tiu bng chp

tuyn tnh

Sau khi tin hnh th nghim leo dc thu

Hm mc tiu yL = 1.yCOD + 2 .y m u

c bng kt qu sau:

Bng 3.3. Kt qu theo hng leo dc ca hm chp yL ca 4 h phn

Hm mc tiu
Cc yu t nh hng
Th nghim

Theo tnh ton

FeSO4 v Al2( SO4)3

FeSO4 v AlCl3
FeCl3 v Al2( SO4)3
FeCl3 v AlCl3

Theo thc nghim

Z1

Z2

Z3

yCOD

yMu

yL

yCOD

yMu

yL

48

73,8

8,48

63,2

74,7

70

69,9

81,7

77

48

70,6

7,26

69

68,1

68,4

71,7

89,2

82,2

54

65,6

7,78

73,7

82,2

79

80,4

93,9

88,5

49,2

63,4

5,8

80,3

91,7

87,1

85,4

94,8

91

Kt qu sau khi chp tuyn tnh, ti u ha v t chc th nghim leo dc nh sau:

Hm mc tiu yL
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
1

Th nghim

FeSO4 v Al2( SO4)3

FeCl3 v Al2( SO4)3

FeSO4 v AlCl3
FeCl3 v AlCl3

Hnh 3.1. th biu din ti u ha hm a mc tiu yL theo hiu qu x l COD v mu khi s dng cc h
phn kp khc nhau

Da vo kt qu hnh 3.1, khi ti u ho

Al2(SO4)3) l cao nht tip n l h phn

hm a mc tiu th hiu qu x l COD v

FeSO4 - AlCl3 v thp nht l hiu qu x l

mu ca h phn (FeCl3 - AlCl3) v (FeCl3 -

ca h phn FeSO4 v Al2(SO4)3. Kt qu tnh

Trang 98

Bn quyn thuc HQG-HCM

TP CH PHT TRIN KH&CN, TP 13, S M2 - 2010

ton ti u ha theo l thuyt kt hp vi kt

COD v mu ca nc thi c trnh by

qu thc nghim kim chng liu lng phn

trong Bng 3.3 v 3.4.

s dng t hiu qu x l cao nht i vi

Bng 3.4. Liu lng cc h phn ti u hiu qu kh COD v mu ca nc thi (kt qu chp tuyn
tnh, ti u ha v t chc th nghim leo dc)
yCOD

yMu

(%)

(%)

8,48

70

82

FeSO4 - AlCl3

7,36

72

89

FeCl3 - Al2(SO4)3

7,78

80

94

FeCl3 - AlCl3

5,8

85

95

H phn

pHti u

FeSO4 - Al2(SO4)3

Hm lng phn (g/l)

48

73,8

48

70,6
54

65,6
49,2

63,4

Kt qu ny cho thy rng, h phn FeCl3 -

3.3. Th nghim 3: Xc nh liu lng b

AlCl3 c hiu sut x l COD 85% v mu t

sung cht tr keo t (Polyacrylamit) thch

94,8% l cao nht so vi cc h phn khc. Tuy

hp.

nhin trong thc tin x l th tnh kh thi v

T th nghim 2 ta chn c h phn

k thut v kinh t khi p dng thp do h phn

FeSO4 Al2(SO4)3 vi pH v liu lng phn

ny (c bit l FeCl3) khng phi l dng

sau:

thng phm ph bin, gi thnh cao, lu cha

FeSO4 = 48g/l

v s dng phc tp, nguy him. Trn c s hai

Al2(SO4)3 = 73,8g/l

yu cu c bn nh gi l hiu qu x l v

pH = 8,48.

hiu qu kinh t k thut th h phn FeSO4 -

Cho 300ml nc thi ( pha long 2 ln)

Al2(SO4)3 nn c chn la, vi hiu qu x

vo cc thy tinh 500ml, c nh h phn nh

l COD v mu ln lt l 70% v 82%.

trn (liu lng, pH), tip cho thm cht tr

Thc nghim cng cho thy, vic s dng h

keo t vo hn hp vi cc hm lng: 3, 13,

phn ny tuy t yu cu x l nhng pht sinh

23, 33, 43, 53 mg/l. Tin hnh thc nghim

lng bn thi ln.

Jartest, lng v ly phn nc trong sau lng

i phn tch.

Bn quyn thuc HQG-HCM

Trang 99

Science & Technology Development, Vol 13, No.M2- 2010

Gi tr COD, mu

Gi tr c

Hiu sut,%
100

14000

700

12000

600

95

10000

500

90

8000

400

85

6000

300

80

4000

200

75

2000

100

70

65

0
0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Liu lng Polyacriamit, mg/l

COD, mg/l

mu, Pt-Co

c, NTU

(a)

10

20
30
40
Liu lng Polyacriamit, mg/l
COD

mu

50

60

(b)

Hnh 3.2. th biu din hiu qu x l COD, mu v c ca nc thi chng ct cn bng h phn
FeSO4 Al2(SO4)3 khi cho thm cht tr keo t Polyacrylamit

Kt qu phn tch cho thy vic b sung

cht tr keo t hu nh khng lm thay i

trong mi trng pH 8,48 cho hiu qu x l

COD v mu ln lt l 70% v 82%.

hiu qu x l COD, mu v c ca

- Vic b sung cht tr keo t i vi h

nc thi khi so snh vi mu ch s dng h

phn FeSO4 Al2(SO4)3 hu nh khng lm

phn (FeSO4 Al2(SO4)3) (Hnh 3.2a). Vic b

thay i hiu qu x l COD, mu v

sung cht tr keo t vi hm lng 13 mg/l,

c ca nc thi sn xut cn t mt r ng.

hiu qu x l COD, mu v c ca

- Qu trnh tin x l bng phng php

nc thi t c l 70%; 82% v 87,27%

keo t s dng h phn thng thng FeSO4

(Hnh 3.2b).

Al2(SO4)3 l rt hiu qu, lm gim ng k

4. KT LUN

hm lng COD, mu v c ca nc
thi sn xut cn t mt r ng, do gp

- Trong mi trng pH 9,5, Al2(SO4)3 c

kh nng x l COD v mu ca nc thi
sn xut cn t mt r ng vi hiu qu cao
(70% v 83% theo th t).

phn quan trng mang tnh quyt nh to iu

kin thun li nng cao hiu sut ca qu trnh
x l sinh hc tip theo trong quy trnh cng
ngh ca h thng x l.

- H phn thch hp l FeSO4 Al2(SO4)3

vi hm lng 48g/l v 73,8g/l theo th t,

Trang 100

Bn quyn thuc HQG-HCM

TP CH PHT TRIN KH&CN, TP 13, S M2 - 2010

DECOLOURIZATION AND COD REMOVAL OF WASEWATER FROM ETHANOL

PRODUCTION PROCESS FROM MOLASSES BY COAGULANTION USING
INORGANIC ALUM
Le Duc Trung
Institute for Environment &Natural Resources, VNU-HCM

ABSTRACT: The industrial production of ethanol by fermentation using molasses as main

material that generates large quantity of wastewater. This wastewater contains high levels of colour
and chemical oxygen demand (COD), that may causes serious environmental pollution. Most available
treatment processes in Vietnam rely on biological methods, which often fail to treat waste water up to
discharge standard. As always, it was reported that quality of treated wastewater could not meet
Vietnameses discharge standard. So, it is necessary to improve the treatment efficiency of whole
technological process and therefore, supplemental physico-chemical treatment step before
biodegradation stage should be the appropriate choice. This study was carried out to assess the effect of
coagulation process on decolourization and COD removal in molasses-based ethanol production
wastewater using inorganic coaglutant under laboratory conditions. The experimental results showed
that the reductions of COD and colour with the utilization of Al2(SO4)3 at pH 9.5 were 83% and 70%,
respectively. Mixture FeSO4 Al2(SO4)3 at pH 8.5 reduced 82% of colour and 70% of COD. With the
addition of Polyacrylamide (PAM), the reduction efficiencies of colour, COD and turbidity by FeSO4
Al2(SO4)3 were 87%, 73.1% and 94.1% correspondingly. It was indicated that PAM significantly
reduced the turbidity of wastewater, however it virtually did not increase the efficiencies of colour and
COD reduction. Furthermore, the coagulation processes using PAM usually produces a mount of
sludge which is hard to be deposited.
Key words: Molasses, chemical oxigen demand, colour reduction.
TI LIU THAM KHO
[1]. Nguyn Cnh, Quy hoch Thc nghim,
Nh xut bn i hc Quc gia TP.HCM,
(2004). TP.HCM
[2]. L Vn Ct. C s ha hc v k thut x
l nc. Nh xut bn Thanh nin (2005).
H ni.

[3]. KS. V H Bo Chu, Thit k h thng

x l nc thi Cng ty ng Hip Ha
Long An, (2002).
[4]. Mai Hu Khim. Ha keo. Nh xut bn
i hc Quc gia Tp. H Ch Minh
(1998). TP.HCM.
[5]. Nguyn Ng v cc cng s. Cng ngh
sn xut ng ma. Nh xut bn Khoa
hc v K thut. (2001). H ni.

Bn quyn thuc HQG-HCM

Trang 101

Science & Technology Development, Vol 13, No.M2- 2010

[6]. GS.TS Trn Hiu Nhu, Thot nc v x
l nc thi cng nghip, Nh xut bn
Khoa hc K thut, H Ni (2001).

generation. Bioresource Technology, In

Press, Corrected Proof, (2009).
[13]. Zhen Liang, Yanxin Wang, Yu Zhou, Hui

[7]. PGS. TS Nguyn nh Thng v cng

Liu, Coagulation removal of melanoidins

s. Cng ngh sn xut v kim tra cn

from

Etylic. Nh xut bn Khoa hc v K

wastewater

thut. (2005). H ni.

Chemical Engineering Journal, Volume

[8]. KS. V Th Phng Trm. Nghin cu

cng ngh x l nc thi sn xut cn t
mt r ng. Trng i hc Bch Khoa

[9]. Bo co Gim st Mi trng nh k

12/2008 ca Nh my ng Hip Ha

Mishra, Shri Chand, Decolourization and

removal of chemical oxygen demand
(COD) with energy recovery: Treatment of
biodigester effluent of a molasses-based
using

inorganic

coagulants. Colloids and Surfaces A:

Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects,
Volume 296, Issues 1-3, Pages 238-247,
(2007).
[11]. Y.

treated

molasses

ferric

chloride.

152, Issue 1, Pages 88-94, (2009).

[14]. Zhen Liang, Yanxin Wang, Yu Zhou, Hui
Liu, Zhenbin Wu, Variables affecting
removal

from

molasses

wastewater by coagulation/flocculation,
Separation and Purification Technology,
In Press, Corrected Proof, (2009).

[10]. Parmesh Kumar Chaudhari, Indra Mani

distillery

using

melanoidins

- HQG-HCM (2007).

alcohol

biologically

[15]. Ram Chandra, Ram Naresh Bharagava,

Vibhuti

Rai,

Melanoidins

as

major

colourant in sugarcane molasses based

distillery effluent and its degradation,
Bioresource Technology, Volume 99,
Issue 11, Pages 4648-4660, (2008)
[16]. Ken-ichi Hatano, Satoshi Kikuchi, Takuya
Miyakawa,

Masaru

Tanokura,

Kenji

Kubota, Separation and characterization

of the colored material from sugarcane

Satyawali,

M.

Balakrishnan,

Wastewater treatment in molasses-based

molasses, Chemosphere, Volume 71, Issue

9, April 2008, Pages 1730-1737, (2008).

alcohol distilleries for COD and color

removal:

review.

Journal

of

Environmental Management, Volume 86,

Issue 3, Pages 481-497, (2008).
[12]. Baogang Zhang, Huazhang Zhao, Shungui
Zhou, Chunhong Shi, Chao Wang, Jinren
Ni, A novel UASBMFCBAF integrated
system

for

high

strength

molasses

wastewater treatment and bioelectricity

Trang 102

Bn quyn thuc HQG-HCM