Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Shabaz Hasan
Shabaz Hasan
On
Adeeb Rizvi
13-MBA-30
Under the Supervision of
Table of contents
Acknowledgement
Executive Summary
1. Introduction11-20
1.1 YAMAHA Motor Company...13
1.2 India YAMAHA Motor Pvt. Ltd. ...17
2. Research Methodology...21-23
2.1 Objectives of the study.22
2.2 Research Design...22
2.3 Research Approach..22
2.4 Sources of data.22
2.5 Duration of study..22
2.6 Research Process..23
3. Purchase Department at India Yamaha Motor...24-35
3.1 Introduction to purchase department25
3.1.1 Part Development...25
3.1.2 Purchase Planning......................25
3.1.3 Non-Productive Purchase.......................25
3.1.4 Productive Purchase...26
3.2 Job Rules for Productive Purchase...27
3.2.1 For PYMAC card delivery confirmation.27
3.2.2 For control and monitoring of PYMAC manual order27
3.2.3 For controlling parts from vendor to stores.28
3.2.4 To ensure defect free components for assembly in case of
lot rejection.29
3.2.5 For initiating alternate source 30
3.3 Formats for Productive Purchase..31
3.3.1 Format for CKD planning sheet.......................31
3.3.2 Format for Order Confirmation Sheet.32
3.3.3 Format for vendor selection approval- existing part...33
3.3.4 Format for emergency air shipping.34
3.3.5 Format for Payment of Supplementary Bills...35
Page 2
4. PYMAC Education....36-63
4.1 A brief background of MRP....37
4.2 PYMAC @ YAMAHA...46
4.3 Purchase Procedures- Application of PYMAC...53
4.3.1 Gate Entry Invoice Checklist Retrieval..53
4.3.2 Before Shipment Order Retrieval..55
4.3.3 Order Retrieval...58
4.3.4 Y-Com System for Suppliers......61
5. Daily Operations...64-77
6. Conclusion, Recommendations & Limitations.78-80
Bibliography..81-82
Appendix...83-93
(A)
(B)
(C)
(D)
Page 3
List of tables
Table No.
Table Title
Page No.
1.
Pending orders for Hemsons Engg. as on 14th July up to 30th July 2014
66
2.
Pending orders for J.L. Auto as on 14th July up to 30th July 2014
67
3.
68
4.
68
5.
69
6.
69
7.
70
8.
70
9.
71
10.
71
11.
72
12.
72
13.
73
14.
73
15.
74
16.
74
17.
75
18.
75
19.
76
20.
76
21.
77
22.
77
Page 4
List of figures
Figure No.
Figure Title
Page No.
1.1
12
1.2
13
1.3
16
2.1
23
3.1
27
3.2
27
3.3
28
3.4
29
3.5
Job rule to ensure defect free component for assembly in case of lot
rejection
Job rule for initiating alternate source
3.6
31
3.7
32
3.8
33
3.9
34
3.10
35
4.1
39
4.2
44
4.3
PYMAC system
46
4.4
47
4.5
47
4.6
48
4.7
48
4.8
49
4.9
50
4.10
50
4.11
51
30
Page 5
4.12
51
4.13
52
4.14
52
4.15
53
4.16
54
4.17
54
4.18
55
4.19
56
4.20
56
4.24
4.25
59
4.26
Screenshot showing the procedure to retrieve parts list when part no.
is unknown
Screenshot showing the part list with part list starting from 54B
60
61
4.29
4.30
62
4.31
63
4.32
63
4.21
4.22
4.23
4.27
4.28
57
57
58
59
60
62
Page 6
Acknowledgement
First of all I would like to thank The Almighty for He gave me this opportunity to work with Yamaha and led
to the successful completion of my training.
Next, I would like to extend my heartfelt gratitude to my supervisor Mr. Satyendra Jha, Executive EngineerPurchase, India Yamaha Motors Pvt. Ltd. for he took time from his busy schedule and spent time with me to
teach various things about the purchase operations.
I would also like to thank Mr. Anil Jain, Senior Manager-Purchase, India Yamaha Motor Pvt. Ltd., for his
never ending support during the entire course of this training.
I would also like the thank Mr. Parwez Hussain, Corporate Head-HR, Continental Devices India Limited, and
Mr. Neil Mani Malla for they arranged for my training and for their continuous support during the entire
training.
I would be failing in my duty if I do not thank my parents, my siblings and my friends for their constant
encouragement in the accomplishment of this report.
Lastly, I would like to thank my teachers, Prof. Jamal A. Farooqui and Dr. Asif Akhtar for they imparted
knowledge of operations management without which it would have been next to impossible for me to
understand the intricacies of the purchase operations at India Yamaha Motor Pvt. Ltd.
Adeeb Rizvi
Page 7
Executive Summary
This report is about the things I have learnt and the work that I have done during my 2 months stay at India
Yamaha Motor Pvt. Ltd., Surajpur plant.
It gives a description about the working of Yamahas own Manufacturing Resource Planning (MRP) system,
PYMAC (PAN Yamaha Manufacturing Control) which is used to place the orders according to the production
schedule and to coordinate with the vendors to ascertain the on time supply of raw material and other parts.
It also discusses about the purchase department of Yamaha and its functioning which includes placing of
orders according the production schedule, cost planning of spare parts and other integral parts and to
communicate this change in prices to the vendors through a price confirmation sheet (PCS), procurement of
non-productive parts and procurement of productive parts, with a special description of the productive part
procurement.
This report also details about the day-to-day purchase operations. I was working in the productive part
procurement department, where in the last week. I was supposed to monitor the condition of the parts in the
inventory on a daily basis and coordinate with the vendors to ensure immediate supply of the critical parts.
Page 8
Declaration
I, Adeeb Rizvi, hereby declare that this report is an original work of mine and contains details about the things
I have learnt and the work I have done during my two months stay at India Yamaha Motor Pvt. Ltd.
I also declare that this report will only be submitted in the ALIGARH MUSLIM UNIVERSITY for the partial
fulfillment of the award of the degree of Master Of Business Administration (M.B.A.) and will not be
submitted anywhere else for the award of any other degree.
Adeeb Rizvi
Page 9
Chapter-1
Introduction
Page 10
Introduction
India is the second largest manufacturer of motorbikes in the world after China. The motorbikes market is
considered as a big bull of Indian automobiles industry. In India, the share of motor bikes in the two-wheeler
industry has risen to 80% from 30% in the last decade and a half, during which annual period sales of
motorbikes in the country have grown by a multiple of 13.
Strong players like Hero Honda, Bajaj Auto, TVS, Yamaha India etc. aim to provide efficiency and comfort
ability without compromising on the fun and thrill of riding. These companies provide various variants of
motorbikes to satisfy all the types of consumers in the country. In India, four different variants of motorbikes
are available in the market with the power engines of 100cc, 125cc, 150-250cc and above 250cc bike.
Page 11
1.1
Yamaha Motor Company Limited, is a Japanese manufacturer of motorcycles, marine products such as boats
and outboard motors, and other motorized products. The company was established in 1955 upon separation
from Yamaha Corporation, and is headquartered in Iwata, Shizuoka, Japan. Yamaha Motor conducts global
development, production and marketing operations through 109 consolidated subsidiaries as of 2012.
Led by Genichi Kawakami, the companys first president, Yamaha Motor began production of its first product,
the YA-1 , in 1955. The 125cc motorcycle won the 3rd Mount Fuji Ascent Race in its class, and launched a
legacy by which the company continues to pursue motorsports as a means to accelerate development.
Page 12
Yamaha Motors current lineup of products includes motorcycles, scooters, electrically power assisted
bicycles, boats, sail boats, personal watercrafts, pools, utility boats, fishing boats, outboard motors, 4-wheel
ATVs, recreational off-highway vehicles, racing kart engines, golf cars, multi-purpose engines, generators,
water pumps, snowmobiles, small-sized snow throwers, automobile engines etc.
The company is also involved in the import and sales of various types of products, development of tourist
businesses and management of leisure, recreational facilities and related services.
Yamaha Motors has two core areas of technology small engine technology originating from motorcycle
development, and FRP process technology originating from boat manufacturing. Further to this, Yamaha
Motor has expanded into developing control technology and component technology in order to build a multiaxial business structure while at the same time pursuing globalization of our corporate activities. Small engine
technology is now implemented in new fields such as marine engines, RVs, and other power products, while
FRP process technology is now used for pool manufacturing and personal vehicle exteriors.
The motorcycle, used as a daily mode of transport or as an essential partner in leisure and sporting activities,
has been at the core of Yamaha motor since the founding of the company. The demand in the type of
motorcycle varies between regions, for instance the North American market demands cruisers, the European
market tourers, and the Oceania market requires dual-purpose sports models (both on and off road). To meet
these varying demands of the worldwide market, we have a wide range of motorcycle lineups available.
Key Products
Motorcycles
Yamaha's first motorcycle was the 1 YA-1, which was a copy of the German DKW RT125, and had a 125 cc,
single-cylinder two-stroke engine. It was launched in February 1955 and the bike won its first race, the Mount
Fuji Ascent Race, in July 1955.[3] Yamaha continued producing two-stroke engines until it launched the XS1 in 1969, with a 650 cc two-cylinder four-stroke engine, using expertise that it gained doing engine
development work for Toyota. In 1998 Yamaha marketed a revolutionary 1000cc four cylinder road bike
called the YZF 'R1', this model introduced a new style of gearbox design which shortened the overall length of
the motor/gearbox case, thereby allowing a more compact unit. This, in turn allowed the motor to be placed in
the frame far enough forward to compliment good handling in a short wheel-based frame, a revolutionary step
forward in motorcycle design[4] In 1979, the XT500 won the first Paris-Dakar Rally.[5]
Page 13
In 1995, Yamaha announced the creation of Star Motorcycles, a new brand name for its cruiser
series of motorcycles in the American market. In other markets, Star motorcycles are sold
under the Yamaha brand.
In 2007, Yamaha officially established the Philippine operations and distributes Yamaha
motorcycles under the corporate name of Yamaha Motor Philippines, Inc.
Today, Yamaha produces scooters from 50 to 500 cc, and a range of motorcycles from 50 to
1,900 cc, including cruiser, sport touring, sport, dual-sport, and off-road.
Racing
In motorcycle racing Yamaha has won 36 world championships, including 3 in Moto-GP and 9 in the
preceding 500 cc two-stroke class, and 1 in World Superbike. Yamaha riders include Giacomo Agostini, Bob
Hannah, Heikki
Mikkola, Kenny
Roberts, Eddie
Lawson, Wayne
Rainey, Jeremy
McGrath, Stefan
Merriman, Phil Read, Chad Reed, Ben Spies, James Stewart and currently Jorge Lorenzo and Valentino Rossi.
The Yamaha YZ450F won the AMA Super-cross Championship two years in a row, in 2008 with Chad Reed,
and 2009 James Stewart. Yamaha was the first to build a production mono-shock motocross bike (1975 for 250
and 400, 1976 for 125) and one of the first to have a water-cooled motocross production bike (1977 in works
bikes, 1981 in off-the-shelf bikes).
Since 1962, Yamaha made production road racing Grand Prix motorcycles that any licensed road racer could
purchase. In 1970, non-factory privateer teams dominated the 250 cc World Championship with Great
Britain's Rodney Gould winning the title on a Yamaha TD2.
Yamaha also sponsors several professional ATV riders in several areas of racing, such as cross country racing
and motocross. Yamaha has had success in cross country with their YFZ450, ridden by Bill Ballance, winning
9 straight titles since 2000. Yamaha's other major rider, Traci Cecco, has ridden the YFZ450 to 7 titles, with
the first in 2000. In ATV motocross, Yamaha has had success with Dustin Nelson and Pat Brown, both who
race the YFZ450. Pat Brown's best season was a 3rd place title in 2007, while Nelson has had two 1st place
titles in the Yamaha/ITP Quadcross, one in 2006 and the other in 2008.
Yamaha produced Formula One engines from 1989 to 1997, initially for the Zakspeed team, in 1991 for
the Brabham BT60Y, in 1992 for the Jordan 192, from 1993 to 1996 for Tyrrell, and in 1997 for the Arrows
Page 14
A18. These never won a race, but drivers including Damon Hill, Ukyo Katayama, Mark Blundell and Andrea
de Cesarisscored some acceptable results with them.
Automobile Engines
Yamaha has built engines for other manufacturers' vehicles beginning with the development and production of
the Toyota 2000GT (1967) with the Toyota Motor Corporation. Also, the cylinder head from the Toyota 4AGE
engine was developed by Yamaha Motor Corporation and was built at Toyota's Shimayama plant alongside the
4A and 2A engines. [6] Some other high performance Toyota engines developed by Yamaha are the 1LR-GUE
engine found on the 2010-2012 Lexus LFA and the 2ZZGE engine found on the 1999-2006 Toyota Celica GTS. In 1984, executives of the Yamaha Motor Corporation signed a contract with the Ford Motor Company to
develop, produce, and supply compact 60 3.0 Liter DOHC V6 engines fortransverse application for the 1989
'95 Ford Taurus SHO.[7][8] From 1993 to 1995, the SHO engine was produced in 3.0 and 3.2 Liter versions.
Yamaha jointly designed the 3.4 Liter DOHC V-8 engine with Ford for the 1996'99 SHO. Since 2005
Yamaha produces a 4.4 Liter V8 for Volvo. The B8444S engines are used in the XC90 and S80 models. British
sportscar maker Noble also uses a bi-turbo version of the Volvo V8 in their M600.
Yamaha also tunes engines for other manufacturers, Toyota being one of them. Yamaha logos are, for instance,
found on the Toyota S engines.
Snowmobiles
In 2010, Yamaha was the only snowmobile manufacturer to use four-stroke engines across its range.[10] In
Canada though, there are still three models that Yamaha manufactures that are still two-stroke. They are the
Bravo, VK 540 and the Venture XL. Yamaha had introduced four-strokes to their line-up in 2003, and the lineup became four-stroke based for model year 2005. The RX-1, released in 2003, was the first performanceoriented four-stroke snowmobile on the market. It was not, however, the first modern four-stroke snowmobile
produced. That honor belongs to Arctic Cat for their Yellowstone Special, released in 2000, which was
designed as a rental sled that could meet Yellowstone National Park's stringent emission requirement.
However, Yamaha received much criticism for its weight disadvantage when compared to similar two-
strokes, despite its fuel economy and low-range torque. Yamaha is now on the cutting edge of four-stroke
technology with the introducing of their 80FI engine, which is equipped on the Phazer and Venture Lite
models. This engine has one of the highest specific output of any four-stroke in production, with 160 HP/L,
Page 15
Yamaha achieves this even without the use of a forced induction system. Yamaha is also a key player in the
"four-stroke wars", which are a series of advertisements from opponent Ski-Doo, who claim their E-tec and
power-tec equipped two-strokes are still cleaner and more efficient than four-strokes, while Yamaha still
claims the four-strokes are cleaner. Yamaha also broke a multi-year absence from sno-cross in the winter of
2006/2007 with their introduction of a factory race team headed by former Arctic Cat racer Robbie Malinoski.
Yamaha was the first brand to win with a 4-stroke in a professional snowcross race. This happened in 2006 at
the WPSA snow cross championship.
1.2
Page 16
This fully integrated assembly plant is built on the lines of Yamahas globally tried, tested and
successfully implemented standards and meets the global quality benchmarks. The plant has 3 vehicle
assembly lines and 4 engine assembly lines.
The Faridabad Plant was established in 1965 and was upgraded in 2008 for manufacturing of machined
parts like Gears & shafts, Crank, Clutch Assembly, Crank Case, Body Cylinder, Head Cylinder.
In April 2013, IYM established 2 functionally independent entities namely Yamaha Motor India Sales
Pvt. Ltd. (YMIS) that will cater to the sales and marketing needs of the company and Yamaha
Motor Research and Development India Pvt. Ltd. (YMRI) that is intended to increase Yamahas
manufacturing competitiveness through the establishment of an R&D headquarters in India.
With a strong workforce of more than 2,000 employees, IYM is highly customer-driven and has a
countrywide network of over 400 dealers. Presently, its product portfolio includes YZF-R15 Version 2.0
(150cc), Fazer (153cc), FZ-S (153cc), FZ (153cc), SZ-X, SZ-R & SZ-RR (153cc), SS125 (123cc), YBR
125 (123cc), YBR 110 (106cc), Crux (106cc) and scooter Ray (113cc) and Ray Z (113cc). Its import
portfolio includes VMAX (1,679cc), YZF-R1 (998cc) and FZ1 (998cc).
Build the Winning Team with capabilities for success, thriving in a climate for action and delivering
results. Our employees are the most valuable assets and we intend to develop them to achieve
international level of professionalism with progressive career development. As a good corporate citizen,
we will conduct our business ethically and socially in a responsible manner with concerns for the
environment.
Grow through continuously innovating our business processes for creating value and knowledge across
our customers thereby earning the loyalty of our partners & increasing our stakeholder value.
Core Competencies
Customer #1
We put customers first in everything we do. We take decisions keeping the customer in mind.
Challenging Spirit
We strive for excellence in everything we do and in the quality of goods & services we provide. We
work hard to achieve what we commit & achieve results faster than our competitors and we never give
up.
Team-work
We work cohesively with our colleagues as a multi-cultural team built on trust, respect, understanding &
mutual co-operation. Everyones contribution is equally important for our success.
Frank & Fair Organization
We are honest, sincere, open minded, fair & transparent in our dealings. We actively listen to others and
participate in healthy & frank discussions to achieve the organizations goals.
Page 19
Chapter-2
Research methodology
Page 20
To study the productive purchase operations at India Yamaha Motor Pvt. Ltd.
To study and analyze the application of the PYMAC system in the Purchase Department at India
Yamaha Motor Pvt. Ltd.
To monitor the material supplied by the vendors
To propose/suggest improvements in the existing system
Page 21
Page 22
Chapter-3
Purchase department at India
Yamaha motor
Page 23
Part Development
Purchase Planning
Non-Productive Purchase
Productive Purchase
Selection of alternate vendors from existing suppliers of India Yamaha Motors(IYM) for cost
reduction/capacity enhancement or quality improvement
Page 24
Scheduling and procurement for all existing direct parts as per PYMAC orders.
Coordination with SQA for vendor quality issues and with the stores for logistics improvement
and control of lot size for controlling the inventory.
Liasoning with finance for settlement of vendors financial issues like reconciliation/issuance of
Sales Tax forms.
Page 25
3.2.2 Job rule for control and monitoring of PYMAC manual order
Fig. 3.5 Job rule for control and monitoring of PYMAC manual order
Page 26
Fig. 3.3 Job rule for controlling parts from vendor to stores
Page 27
3.2.4 Job rule to ensure defect free component for assembly in case of lot rejection
This job rule is somewhat similar to the previous one. Here the Production Quality
Engineering (PQE) department intimates the purchase department about the non-conformance of parts
and necessary actions as shown in the flow chart are taken by the purchase department.
Fig.3.4 Job rule to ensure defect free component for assembly in case of lot rejection
Page 28
Page 29
Receipt at IYM
Page 30
N+1
N+2
N+3
N+4
Page 31
Part No.
Category
Vendor Details
Name of Vendor
Vendor Code
Existing SOB
Proposed SOB
Price per pc.
Mould cost
Annual Volume
Quality/Delivery Rating
Cost impact to IYM
Address
Quality issue with the existing supplier
Others (specify)
Page 32
Qty.
Vendor Name
Location
IYM
Vendor
Estimated Time
The above material is being purchased on urgent basis due to the following reasons
Reason & Background
Machine under break-down
Urgent requirement to adjust against rejection
preventive maintenance during shut-down
Sudden requirement etc.
Others (please specify)
Remarks:
Page 33
Date
Part
Name
Part No.
Supplementary
Invoice No.
Date
Invoice
Amount
Invoice
Qty.
Remarks
Page 34
Chapter-4
Pymac education
Page 35
Ensure materials are available for production and products are available for delivery to customers.
History
Prior to MRP, and before computers dominated industry, reorder-point/reorder-quantity (ROP/ROQ) type
methods like EOQ (Economic Order Quantity) had been used in manufacturing and inventory management. In
1964, as a response to the TOYOTA Manufacturing Program, Joseph Orlicky developed Material
Requirements Planning (MRP). The first company to use MRP was Black & Decker in 1964, with Dick Alban
as project leader. In 1983 Oliver Wight developed MRP into manufacturing resource planning (MRP
II).[1] Orlicky's book is entitled The New Way of Life in Production and Inventory Management (1975). By
1975, MRP was implemented in 700 companies. This number had grown to about 8,000 by 1981. In the 1980s,
Joe Orlicky's MRP evolved into Oliver Wight's manufacturing resource planning (MRP II) which brings
master scheduling, rough-cut capacity planning, capacity requirements planning, S&OP in 1983 and other
concepts to classical MRP. By 1989, about one third of the software industry was MRP II software sold to
American industry ($1.2 billion worth of software).
Companies need to control the types and quantities of materials they purchase, plan which products are to be
produced and in what quantities and ensure that they are able to meet current and future customer demand, all
at the lowest possible cost. Making a bad decision in any of these areas will make the company lose money.
A few examples are given below:
If company purchases insufficient quantities of an item used in manufacturing (or the wrong item) it may
be unable to meet contract obligations to supply products on time.
If a company purchases excessive quantities of an item, money is wasted - the excess quantity ties up cash
while it remains as stock and may never even be used at all.
Beginning production of an order at the wrong time can cause customer deadlines to be missed.
MRP is a tool to deal with these problems. It provides answers for several questions:
MRP can be applied both to items that are purchased from outside suppliers and to sub-assemblies, produced
internally, that are components of more complex items.
The data that must be considered include:
The end item (or items) being created. This is sometimes called Independent Demand or Level 0 on BOM
(Bill of materials).
How much is required at a time.
Inventory status records. Records of net materials available for use already in stock (on hand) and
Bills of materials. Details of the materials, components and sub-assemblies required to make each product.
Planning Data. This includes all the restraints and directions to produce the end items. This includes such
items as: Routing, Labor and Machine Standards, Quality and Testing Standards, Pull/Work Cell and Push
commands, Lot sizing techniques (i.e. Fixed Lot Size, Lot-For-Lot, Economic Order Quantity), Scrap
Percentages, and other inputs.
Page 37
Outputs
There are two outputs and a variety of messages/reports:
Output 1 is the "Recommended Production Schedule" which lays out a detailed schedule of the required
minimum start and completion dates, with quantities, for each step of the Routing and Bill Of Material
required to satisfy the demand from the Master Production Schedule (MPS).
Output 2 is the "Recommended Purchasing Schedule". This lays out both the dates that the purchased items
should be received into the facility AND the dates that the Purchase orders, or Blanket Order Release
should occur to match the production schedules.
Reschedule notices. These recommend cancelling, increasing, delaying or speeding up existing orders.
Page 39
The other major drawback of MRP is that takes no account of capacity in its calculations. This means it will
give results that are impossible to implement due to manpower or machine or supplier capacity constraints.
However this is largely dealt with by MRP II.
Generally, MRP II refers to a system with integrated financials. An MRP II system can include finite / infinite
capacity planning. But, to be considered a true MRP II system must also include financials.
In the MRP II (or MRP2) concept, fluctuations in forecast data are taken into account by including simulation
of the master production schedule, thus creating a long-term control.[3] A more general feature of MRP2 is its
extension to purchasing, to marketing and to finance (integration of all the functions of the company), ERP has
been the next step.
Solutions to Data Integrity issues
Bill of material - The best practice is to physically verify the bill of material either at the production site or by
un-assembling the product.
Cycle count - The best practice is to determine why a cycle count that increases or decreases inventory has
occurred. Find the root cause and correct the problem from occurring again.
Scrap reporting - This can be the most difficult area to maintain with any integrity. Start with isolating the
scrap by providing scrap bins at the production site and then record the scrap from the bins on a daily basis.
One benefit of reviewing the scrap on site is that preventive action can be taken by the engineering group.
Receiving errors
Manual systems of recording what has been received are error prone. The best practice is to implement the
system of receiving by ASN from the supplier. The supplier sends an ASN (Advanced Shipping Notification).
When the components are received into the facility, the ASN is processed and then company labels are created
for each line item. The labels are affixed to each container and then scanned into the MRP system. Extra labels
reveal a shortage from the shipment and too few labels reveal an over shipment. Some companies pay for ASN
by reducing the time in processing accounts payable.
Shipping Errors
The container labels are printed from the shipper. The labels are affixed to the containers in a staging area or
when they are loaded on the transport.
Page 40
Production reporting
The best practice is to use bar code scanning to enter production into inventory. A product that is rejected
should be moved to an MRB (material review board) location. Containers that require sorting need to be
received in reverse.
Replenishment
The best replenishment practice is replacement using bar code scanning, or via pull system. Depending upon
the complexity of the product, planners can actually order materials using scanning with a min-max system.
Purchasing management
Business planning
Lot traceability
Contract management
Tool management.
Configuration management
General ledger
Project management
Technical records
Estimating
CAPP
Page 42
The MRP II system integrates these modules together so that they use common data and freely exchange
information, in a model of how a manufacturing enterprise should and can operate. The MRP II approach is
therefore very different from the point solution approach, where individual systems are deployed to help a
company plan, control or manage a specific activity. MRP II is by definition fully integrated or at least fully
interfaced.
Material requirements planning (MRP) and manufacturing resource planning (MRPII) are both incremental
information integration business process strategies that are implemented using hardware and modular software
applications linked to a central database that stores and delivers business data and information.
Page 43
MRP is concerned primarily with manufacturing materials while MRPII is concerned with the coordination of
the entire manufacturing production, including materials, finance, and human relations. The goal of MRPII is
to provide consistent data to all players in the manufacturing process as the product moves through the
production line.
Paper-based information systems and non-integrated computer systems that provide paper or disk outputs
result in many information errors, including missing data, redundant data, numerical errors that result from
being incorrectly keyed into the system, incorrect calculations based on numerical errors, and bad decisions
based on incorrect or old data. In addition, some data is unreliable in non-integrated systems because the same
data is categorized differently in the individual databases used by different functional areas.
MRPII systems begin with MRP, material requirements planning. MRP allows for the input of sales forecasts
from sales and marketing. These forecasts determine the raw materials demand. MRP and MRPII systems
draw on a master production schedule, the breakdown of specific plans for each product on a line. While MRP
allows for the coordination of raw materials purchasing, MRPII facilitates the development of a detailed
production schedule that accounts for machine and labor capacity, scheduling the production runs according to
the arrival of materials. An MRPII output is a final labor and machine schedule. Data about the cost of
production, including machine time, labor time and materials used, as well as final production numbers, is
provided from the MRPII system to accounting and finance (Monk and Wagner).
Benefits
MRP II systems can provide:
Improved scheduling
Page 44
Introduction
BOM structure
Basic of Inventory
Code Structure
Introduction
Like many other manufacturing companies, India Yamaha Motor also uses indigenously developed MRP
system which they call as PAN YAMAHA Manufacturing Control or the PYMAC. It is an MRP system that
connects Yamaha Motor Company with its subsidiaries all over the world and with the suppliers as well.
Before I go any further in this chapter, I would like to explain a very important component of the PYMAC
system- the PYMAC cards. Knowledge of PYMAC cards is a must to understand the whole PYMAC system.
These are the cards which contain all the information about the parts and the material being sent to the Yamaha
plant and are of four types:
1. Delivery Slip
This slip will be issued to the vendor at the time of MRP run
for 15 days. This slip will be scanned at the time of receipt
of material which subsequently will update the stocks on real
time. This slip contains all the details regarding the supplier,
the user, quantity of the material delivered, delivery date,
item number and order number.
Page 46
3. Inspection Report
This is the card for Quality Assurance judgment. This card contains, along with others, the details regarding
the quality of the material delivered. This card help helps the workers and the vendors to know the level of
quality and take decisions on whether to accept or reject the material.
B.O.M Structure
Bills Of Material (B.O.M) structure for the PYMAC module is based on the manufacturing group. For
example, if we wish to produce a motor cycle with model number 2S2700 which has two different colors with
model numbers 2S2700-010A for color A and 2S2700-010B for color B, then for colored motorcycle, similar
operations will be performed at a single spot on the assembly line. It is very clear from the figure below that,
for both the colors, engine operations are performed at one spot and the body group operations are performed
on another spot.
Page 48
Inventory Control
In the PYMAC module, we have a two point
reporting system, where the real time inventory,
along with the inventory in transfer can be
checked. Once the receipt report is provided to the
vendor, the same is updated at P/F (a place where
the parts are received). From the platform, these
parts are then supplied to the work center where
the manufacturing processes take place. From the
work centers, the finished goods are the.
Fig. 4.10 Inventory Control procedure at Yamaha
Code Structure
Policy for the SU code setup (SJP)
This code is used to indicate the function that is to be
performed on the material. It is a 4-digit code where the
first digit is classified into three types- in-house shop,
local vendor and overseas procurement. The second
digit is classified according to the producing functions,
e.g. assembly, machining, painting etc. and the third and
the fourth digits are taken as the continued numbers. By
default, Surajpur factory shop has the digit for the
Fig. 4.12 Supplier/User (SU) Code of In-House
in-house shop as nine and the 3rd digit as zero. For example, if in a PYMAC schedule, the S/U code is
given as 9101, then it means that the particular assembly shop of the Surajpur factory for body assembly. Other
S/U codes for in-house shop of the Surajpur factory are shown in the table below.
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Fig. 4.16 Screenshot showing Gate Entry Invoice Option in the IC Menu
4.3.2. Before Shipment Order Retrieval (details about the pending quantity)
1. Open the PYMAC Launcher.
2. From the IC menu select Before Shipment Order Retrieval.
3. Choose the extraction period.
4. If we wish to get details about a particular supplier, we select the Supplier Code
5. .If we wish to get details about a particular list of suppliers which we deal with, we enter our
own person code (it was 32 in my case).
6. Hit retrieve.
7. Right click within the dialog box.
8. Select save as and save it as an excel file.
9. Monitor
from
the
supply
and
the
inventory
from
these
excel
files.
Fig. 4.19 Screenshot showing Before Shipment Order Retrieval in the IC Menu
Fig. 4.20 Screenshot showing the Before Shipment Order Details for a particular supplier
Page 55
Fig .4.21 Screenshot showing the Before Shipment Order Details for a particular person
Fig. 4.22 Screenshot showing the procedure to save Before Shipment Order Data
Page 56
Fig. 4.23 Screenshot showing the procedure to save Before Shipment Order Data
Page 57
Fig. 4.24 Screenshot showing the MRP menu in the main PYMAC menu
Fig. 4.26 Screenshot showing the procedure to retrieve parts list when part no. is unknown
Fig. 4.27 Screenshot showing the part list with part no. starting from 54B
Page 59
Fig. 4.28 Screenshot showing the home page of Yamaha Communication System
Page 60
Fig. 4.29 Screenshot showing Parts Ordering System among other options
Fig. 4.30 Screenshot showing the Main Menu of Parts Ordering System
Page 61
Fig. 4.31 Screenshot showing the components of the Order and Delivery
Fig. .4.32 Screenshot showing the process of reprinting the delivery cards
Page 62
Chapter-5
Daily operations @ Yamaha
Page 63
Introduction
This chapter details about the work done in the last two weeks of the summer internship. In the second last
week i.e. from 14th July 2014 to 20th July 2014, I attended meetings with two of the suppliers, Hemsons
Engineering and J.L.Auto Parts, one in Faridabad and the other one in Noida. These meetings were organized
in order to take commitment from the suppliers about the pending orders till 31st July 2014.
In the last week i.e. from 21st July 2014 to 26th July 2014, I had to monitor the supplies from Hemsons
Engineering with supplier code 3814 and Nicks India Tools with supplier code 3823, and report to my
supervisor The whole data regarding the pending orders and amount of raw material and parts provided by
these vendors from 21st July 2014 till 25th July 2014 is provided in the form of excel sheet.
This data was directly taken from the PYMAC software twice a day, once in the morning and once in the
evening and reported to the supervisor. The excel sheets comprise of the details like the Item name, Item
number, supplier code, platform code, order number, indicated quantity, remaining quantity etc.
As soon as the material is received at the gate and is updated in the Gate Entry Invoice of the PYMAC
system, the excel files automatically get updated depending upon the order size.
For example, if the indicated quantity of a particular order is 200 units and the supplier dispatches only 100,
then this part will be shown in the excel file, but if the supplier dispatches 200 units for the same order, then
this part gets automatically removed from the excel files.
To explain the thing better, the whole data is shown as the snapshots of the original excel files in the next
few pages of this chapter.
Page 64
Pending orders for Hemsons Engineering as on 14th July up to 30th July 2014
Table.1 Pending orders for Hemsons Engineering as on 14th July up to 30th July 2014
Page 65
Table 2 Pending orders for J.L.Auto as on 14th July up to 30th July 2014
Page 66
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Chapter-6
Conclusion, recommendations &
Limitations
Page 77
6.1 Conclusion
The current PYMAC system, PYMAC-III, used by YAMAHA is a complete MRP system which
provides services like inventory control, gate entry invoice checklist, pending orders, PYMAC card
printing etc. for the vendors
This system also provides the Bills Of Materials (BOM) structure, the supplier-user codes, the platform
codes and also helps in developing the item code structure for a particular component.
The PYMAC cards contain every information about a particular order like which part is being supplied
and in what number , where and by whom it is supplied, on what platform it is supposed to be
unloaded, whether the inspection is required or not etc.
With the help of PYMAC, Yamaha is able to establish a hassle free network of its vendors and is trying
to educate them so that they become self-reliant in printing the PYMAC cards and PYMAC orders.
The Divisional Functional Manual- Purchase consists all the job rules which are to be performed by the
Purchase Executives, e.g. selecting an alternate vendor, to ensure defect free component for assembly,
for new part procurement etc. along with the specified formats for CKD planning sheet, Emergency Air
Shipping etc.
The PYMAC software used in the Purchase department is easy-to-use software where from the data
about the orders can be downloaded and the suppliers can be contacted accordingly.
India Yamaha Motor gives purchase orders to its vendors indicating the requirements for the next 75
days and this MRP is generated twice a month
The suppliers that I worked upon during 21st July- 25th July 2014 were Hemsons Engg. based in
Faridabad and Nicks India Tools based in Ludhiana. These suppliers could not provide the requisite
material as specified to them to be delivered in this duration.
Page 78
6.2 Recommendations
In the gate entry invoice retrieval of PYMAC-III, it was observed that the material received in the
morning was, sometimes not even updated till evening. This lead to a mismatch in the inventory levels
of different shop floor and at the vendor end. This problem could be solved easily by fastening the
process of updating the material entry.
More stress could be given on vendor training so that they can print and understand the PYMAC
purchase order and the PYMAC cards. Whenever they fail to do so, the managers in the purchase
department get compelled to provide the suppliers with a manual Purchase Order, thereby taking a lot
of extra time.
One of the features in the PYMAC system is that, if we download the material entry data from the
PYMAC system for a particular vendor and a particular part is supplied as per the order, then that part
gets automatically removed from the PYMAC system thereby creating confusion. It would have been
much easier to understand, if instead of erasing the whole data, the remaining quantity field be made
zero.
6.3 Limitations
Due to its round the clock production, there are no live projects as such in Yamaha, so
number
crunching was not possible to a greater extent and only a study could be conducted.
Working in the purchase department was a bit tough, as it was difficult to engage with the supervisor
due to his busy schedules.
As a company policy, confidential data was not revealed so as to maintain privacy standards and details
of only 4 suppliers were revealed in the last week of my training.
Due to a lag in updating the data of the material received at the gate, it happens sometimes that the
material received in the morning was, sometimes not even updated till evening. Allotted time frame
was not sufficient to record the data of all the suppliers.
Page 79
Bibliography
Page 80
Online sources:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
www.yamaha-motor-india.com/about/profile/index.html
www.yamaha-motor.com/corporate/home.aspx
www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yamaha_Motor_Company
www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Material_requirements_planning
www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manufacturing_resource_planning
Books:
1. Operations Management- Processes and Value Chain 8th Edition by Lee Krajewski
2. Marketing Research- An Applied Orientation 6th Edition by Naresh K Malhotra
Offline Sources:
1. Divisional Functional Manual- Purchase
2. PYMAC-III Official Manual
Data Resources:
1. Real-time data from the PYMAC Software
Page 81
Appendix
Page 82
Abbreviation
Abbreviation Detail
1.
Addl.
Additional
2.
Al.
Aluminum
3.
AM
Assistant Manager
4.
AMC
Annual Maintenance
5.
ASSY
Assembly
6.
AVO
7.
AVP
8.
AWB
9.
BRG
Bearing
10.
BL
Bill of Lading
11.
BOM
Bill Of Material
12.
BOP
13.
CAT
Category
14.
CST
Casting
15.
C&F
16.
CDI
17.
CFT
18.
CGM
19.
CGM
20.
CKD
21.
C/M
Counter Measure
22.
CZP
23.
DA
Dispatch Advice
24.
DEPTT
Department
25.
DFM
26.
DGM
27.
Dim.
Dimensional
28.
Div.
Division
29.
DOL
Direct On Line
30.
DR
Design Revision
31.
Drg.
Drawing
32.
DRM
33.
ELE
Electricals
34.
ER
Engg. Release
35.
Est.
Estimation
36.
FBD
Faridabad
37.
FIFO
First-In First-Out
38.
FIN
Finance
39.
FOB
Free-On Board
40.
FOC
Free of Cost
41.
GPM
42.
GR/LR/RR
Goods/Lorry/Railway Receipt
43.
GRA
Graphics
44.
HOD
Head of Deptt.
45.
H/W & SP
46.
FOR
Free On Rail
Page 84
47.
IE
Industrial Engg.
48.
IOM
49.
IT
Information Technology
50.
LC
Letter Of Credit
51.
LOI
Letter Of Intent
52.
MAN COM
53.
Matl.
Material
54.
MCM
55.
MDF
56.
ME
Mfg. Engg.
57.
MFG
Manufacturing
58.
Min.
Minimum
59.
MIS
60.
MKT
Marketing
61.
MOM
Minutes Of Meeting
62.
MOQ
63.
MR
Mgmt. Representative
64.
MRN
65.
MRP
66.
NC
Non-Conformance
67.
NCR
Non-Conformance Report
68.
NP
Non-Productive
69.
NP PUR
Non-Productive Purchase
70.
ODR
71.
OE
Original Equipment
72.
OMP
73.
OSP
Outside Processing
74.
P/I
Performa Invoice
75.
Part Dev.
Part-Development
76.
PDIR
77.
PE
Purchase Enquiry
78.
PECM
79.
PED
80.
PFB
Product Feedback
81.
PLA
Plastics
82.
PPMT
83.
PP DRG
84.
PPC
85.
PEM
86.
PR
Purchase Requisition
87.
Prod. PUR
Productive Purchase
88.
Prodn.
Production
89.
RPQ
90.
PROP
Proprietary
91.
Pt.
Point
92.
PUR
Purchase
93.
PUR PLNG
Purchase Planning
94.
PLNG
Planning
Page 86
95.
PCS
96.
PDS
97.
P & SA
98.
QA
Quality Assurance
99.
QCD
100.
QCD TM
101.
QE
Quality Engg.
Supplier Code
Supplier Name
1.
3807
2.
3809
3.
3814
4.
3816
Indoschottle, Pune
5.
3817
6.
3819
7.
3822
8.
3823
9.
3827
10.
3830
11.
3832
12.
3839
13.
3841
14.
3843
15.
3847
16.
3849
17.
3850
18.
3855
Part Code
Part Name
1.
1CKE2156000080
SHAFT,ROCKER 2
2.
1CKF5186000080
COLLAR,WHEEL
3.
1CKF5386000080
COLLAR,SPROCKET
4.
1GCE2146000080
SHAFT,ROCKER 1
5.
1GCE2662000080
COLLAR
6.
1GCE4638000080
COLLAR,1
7.
1GCE5521000080
SHAFT,1
8.
1GCE5598000080
COLLAR
9.
1GCE5659000080
SHAFT
10.
1GCE7412000080
BRG.,1
11.
1GCE7645000080
COLLAR
12.
1GCF4727000080
PIN,SEAT FITTING
Page 88
13.
1GCF7121000080
BUSH.
14.
1GCF7254000080
HOOK
15.
1SDE2257100080
SHAFT,2
16.
1SDE5372000080
COLLAR,UNION
17.
20PF5377000080
COLLAR,SHAFT
18.
20PF7435000080
BOLT
19.
21CE2156000080
SHAFT,ROCKER 2
20.
21CE5521000080
SHAFT,1
21.
21CE7258000080
COLLAR,1
22.
21CF1414000080
BOSS,ENGINE
23.
21CF1422000080
TUBE,BRKT. CROSS
24.
21CF510C100080
COLLAR ASSY.
25.
21CF530S100080
COLLAR ASSY.
26.
38BE5521000080
SHAFT,1
27.
38BE7258000080
COLLAR,1
28.
54BE7258000080
COLLAR,1
29.
54BE8115000080
ROD,SHIFT
30.
54BF1422000080
TUBE,BRKT. CROSS
31.
54BF1545000080
COLLAR,2
32.
54BF2123000080
BUSH.,1
33.
54BF2126000080
COLLAR,DISTANCE
34.
54BF5183000080
COLLAR,WHEEL
35.
54BF5377000080
COLLAR,SHAFT
36.
54BF5386000080
COLLAR,SPROCKET
Page 89
37.
54BF7112000080
SHAFT
38.
54BF7231000080
ROD,BRAKE
39.
5DGH2516000080
COLLAR,MAIN
40.
5KAE1167000080
PIPE,BREATHER 2
41.
5KAE1445000080
SPACER
42.
5KAE3586100080
JT.,CARBURETOR 1
43.
5KAF3448100080
SPACER
44.
5REE7258000080
COLLAR,1
45.
5REF5183000080
COLLAR,WHEEL
46.
5TSF7231000080
ROD,BRAKE
47.
5USE5521000080
SHAFT,1
48.
5YYE7258000080
COLLAR,1
49.
5YYF2126000080
COLLAR,DISTANCE
50.
5YYF511X000080
COLLAR SET
51.
5YYF7231000080
ROD,BRAKE
52.
90109082020080
BOLT
53.
90170208010080
NUT,HEX.
54.
90173068060080
NUT,SQUARE
55.
90179068060080
NUT
56.
90179068350080
NUT
57.
90179128000080
NUT
58.
90179162260080
NUT
59.
90179250020080
NUT
60.
90179256150080
NUT
Page 90
61.
90179258120080
NUT
62.
90249120080080
PIN
63.
90387060230080
COLLAR
64.
90387067V10080
COLLAR
65.
90387158100080
COLLAR
66.
90387208130080
COLLAR
67.
90560121380080
SPACER
68.
93605068000080
PIN,DOWEL
69.
93612162540080
PIN,DOWEL
Part Code
Part Name
1.
20PF6121000080
HANDLE, LH.
2.
20PF6122000080
HANDLE, RH.
3.
21CE5620000080
4.
36LE5611000080
CRANK,KICK
5.
54BE5620000080
6.
5DGE5621000080
BOSS,KICK CRANK
7.
5KAE5620100080
8.
5YYE5620100080
Page 91
S. No.
Model Name
Model No.
1.
R 15
1CK
2.
Crux
5KA
3.
YBR-110
5TS
4.
Gladiator
35B
5.
YBR-135
5YY
6.
SZR
1PM
7.
FZ-S
21CH
8.
FZ-16
21CG
9.
Fazer
45SB
10.
Scooter
1GC
Production on
Line A
Line B
Line C
Page 92