AEW Peer Evaluation Fall

You might also like

Download as doc, pdf, or txt
Download as doc, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 1

Peer Academic Excellence Workshop Evaluation

Workshop Evaluated:

Mark Gschwind

Date:

2/17/15

Detailed Agenda:
Has a very detailed agenda. Mark even includes the games and icebreakers they will be doing
during the session.
Movement Around Room:
Mark is faster than Flash Gordon. He moves with ease to help his participants individually or
moves to the center of the board to work with the group as a whole.
Time at the Board:
He spends an adequate amount of time at the board, but still allows the participants to work
together and explain problems at the board as well.
Use of Open-Ended Questions:
Mark utilizes open-ended questions to stimulate his groups thought process on the problem at
hand. His questions allow them to get started after getting stuck on an intuitive integration
method often appear in MAT 296 material.
Use of Periods of Silence:
When it is silent mark either works with another participant, or uses the time to set up another
problem for the participants to work together to solve.
Dynamics Between Facilitator/Participants and Participants/Participants:
They seem to work well together in a group setting. Mark and his participants work together on
problems after theyve attempted them on their own to fully master the style of problem.
Workshop Preparation:
Very prepared for the session, has all solutions to packet problems and is able to solve them
using multiple integration techniques.
Recommendation(s) for Improvement:
Get the quiet participants to talk more. Stop stealing packets too.
Other Comments:
Pack thief. Good session.
Matthew Gomez
Evaluation Performed By:

You might also like