Professional Documents
Culture Documents
PSR Liberty Canyon Wildife Corridor
PSR Liberty Canyon Wildife Corridor
Vicinity Map
On Route
At
US-101
0.2 miles West of Liberty Canyon Road
ii
07-LA-101-PM 33.0
Table of Contents
1.
INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................1
2.
BACKGROUND ....................................................................................................................2
3.
4.
DEFICIENCIES ......................................................................................................................3
5.
6.
ALTERNATIVES...................................................................................................................4
7.
8.
9.
FUNDING/PROGRAMMING ...............................................................................................9
iv
07-LA-101-PM 33.0
1. INTRODUCTION
Project Description:
This project proposes to construct a vegetated bridge across US-101 near Liberty Canyon
Road in the City of Agoura Hills to function as a wildlife crossing. The project is sponsored
by the Mountains Recreation and Conservation Authority (MRCA), which is a local
partnership between the Santa Monica Mountains Conservancy, the Conejo Recreation and
Park District, and the Rancho Simi Recreation and Park District. A cooperative agreement
between MRCA and the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) was executed on
February 12, 2015. MRCA requested that Caltrans develop a Project Initiation Document
(PID) for the project and agreed to fund the cost of the PID. MRCA and the Resource
Conservation District of the Santa Monica Mountains (RCDSMM), project architect,
provided the location and design elements of the bridge. Caltrans subsequently prepared this
Project Study Report (PSR) to evaluate the cost and structural feasibility of the bridge and
associated improvements.
One no build and one build alternative were evaluated and documented in this report.
The build alternative, Alternative 2, proposes to build a 165-foot wide by 200-foot long
bridge across US-101 west of Liberty Canyon Road. The bridge will be vegetated to provide
a passage that resembles the natural habitat of wildlife. The slope between end of the bridge
and Agoura Road south of the freeway will be built up to grade to allow the crossing to
extend over Agoura Road before descending to join existing ground. A tunnel and associated
retaining wall systems would be constructed along Agoura Road to keep the road operational
and to accommodate the fill material needed to construct the wildlife crossing. The costs for
the recommended alternative are summarized in the table below. An escalation rate of 3%
per year is used to estimate the escalated cost. The capital funding source for the project is to
be determined (TBD), as the project sponsor is actively seeking funding opportunities.
Project Limits
Number of Alternatives
Programmable Project
Alternative
07-LA-101-PM 33.0
Two (2)
Alternative 2
Current Cost
Escalated Cost
Estimate:
Estimate:
$10,152,500
$10,152,500
$33,410,000
$37,603,000
$6,140,000
$9,085,000
TBD
2017/2018
8 Lane Freeway
Two (2)
Negative Declaration (ND)/
Finding of No Significant Impact
4
07-LA-101-PM 33.0
2. BACKGROUND
US-101 is a freeway that runs mostly north-south in the State of California. It is also known
as the Hollywood/Ventura Freeway and is a heavily travelled commuter route serving the
Greater Los Angeles area and connecting Los Angeles and Ventura Counties. It also acts as
the primary access route to and from downtown Los Angeles, various residential
communities, and tourist destinations in Los Angeles, as well as the central California coast.
Within the project limits, US-101 is a 8-lane freeway that runs east-west through the City of
Agoura Hills separating the Santa Monica Mountains (to the south) from the Simi Hills and
Santa Susana Mountains (to the north). US-101 is a formidable and virtually impenetrable
barrier for many wildlife species including mountain lions, bobcats, gray foxes, coyotes, and
mule deer that inhabit and travel between these two mountain ranges. In particular, mammals
with large home ranges such as mountain lions and bobcats need large connected habitats in
order to hunt, breed, and thrive. The construction of US-101 divided this previously
continuous habitat range into isolated habitat fragments and resulted in severely restricted
movement between the two mountain ranges. For mountain lions in particular, the
consequences of this restriction results in increased inbreeding and territorial fighting, and
very low genetic diversity, within the Santa Monica Mountains.
The wildlife crossing is critical in the linkage between the Santa Monica Mountains and the
Sierra Madre Range, which is one of the few coastal to inland connections remaining in
Southern California. Both the South Coast Missing Linkages Project and the California
Essential Habitat Connectivity Project identified the need to preserve and enhance this
critical linkage in order to sustain ecological and evolutionary processes in Californias South
Coast Ecoregion. Additionally, the National Park Service has been collecting and publishing
data on carnivore movement for over a decade, thereby validating the importance of a
linkage for sustaining wildlife populations in the Santa Monica Mountains.
Analysis of genetics and tracking of ranges size conducted by the National Park Service has
indicated that providing wildlife connectivity through intervening natural areas in the Simi
Hills, Santa Susana Mountains, and ultimately to the larger ecosystem of the Sierra Madre
Range is imperative for preserving a viable mountain lion population in the Santa Monica
Mountains. The genetic diversity of mountain lions in the Santa Monica Mountains was
determined to be lower than anywhere else in the state of California, or anywhere else
throughout the species range in the Western United States. Moreover, connectivity is not just
important for mountain lions, as National Park Service data has shown that bobcats and
coyotes are also exhibiting significant genetic effects in the relatively short period since the
freeway was built and research has shown that smaller species including lizards and birds are
affected by the habitat fragmentation caused by roads and urban development. Without a safe
and sustainable wildlife crossing, movement between these remaining areas of natural habitat
is severely restricted and wildlife within the Santa Monica Mountains is essentially trapped.
The Liberty Canyon area was identified by scientists and experts working in the field of
wildlife movement as the optimal location for a safe and sustainable wildlife crossing across
US-101. Prime habitat has already been protected on both sides of the freeway at this
07-LA-101-PM 33.0
location that is contiguous with large swaths of protected habitat to the north and south of
this connection. In addition, a tragic indicator that Liberty Canyon is the appropriate location
for a wildlife crossing is the death of a male puma that was killed while attempting to migrate
into the Santa Monica Mountains in October 2013.
4. DEFICIENCIES
Environmental impacts and mitigation measures were not considered nor required when US101 and most of Southern Californias freeways were built in the 1950s. As a result the
construction of US-101 bisected the previously connected natural habitat ranges of many
wildlife species. Presently, a safe and sustainable wildlife crossing across US-101 is not
available. Without the addition of a wildlife crossing, the ecological and environmental
impact on wildlife that resulted from the construction of US-101 will persist and the fate of
many wildlife species within the Santa Monica Mountains will remain in jeopardy.
07-LA-101-PM 33.0
The latest Transportation Concept Report (TCR) for US-101 was completed in July 2013.
The TCR identifies the existing and future route conditions as well as future needs for each
route on the SHS. Currently, US-101 within the project limits has four mixed flow lanes
(MFL) and an auxiliary lane in each direction. The existing Level of Service (LOS) for this
segment of the freeway is F0. Due to financial, environmental, right of way, and other
constraints, it is very difficult for Caltrans to continue to add more lanes to the highway
systems. With these limitations, Caltrans District 7 has established LOS F0 as the minimum
acceptable LOS on the freeway system. In accordance with the CONCEPT 2035 Facility
table in the TCR, eight (8) total MFLs (four [4] MFLs in each direction) are needed in the
year of 2035 to maintain LOS of F0 within the project segment of the freeway. Thus, no
widening of this segment of the freeway is planned at this time.
6. ALTERNATIVES
A. Viable Alternatives
The two viable alternatives for this project are Alternative 1: No Build; and Alternative 2:
Build.
Alternative 1: No Build
This alternative does not satisfy the purpose and need for this project and will result in the
continued restriction of wildlife movement into and out of the Santa Monica Mountains and
threaten the long-term viability of wildlife species within it.
Alternative 2: Build
This alternative proposes to build a vegetated bridge across US-101 west of Liberty Canyon
Road to provide a safe passage for wildlife to cross the freeway. The scope of work includes:
Construct a two span 165-foot wide by 200-foot long bridge with columns on spread
footings in the freeway median.
Construct retaining walls at both the north and south end of the bridge.
Construct soundwalls along the outer edges of the bridge to mitigate traffic noise and
block light in order to make the crossing more conductive to wildlife crossing.
Plant vegetation on the bridge to provide a passage that resembles the natural habitat
for wildlife.
Install irrigation and drainage system on the bridge.
Fill and grade the slope and open area between the freeway and Agoura Road to
provide a continuous grade thereby allowing the wildlife crossing to extend over
Agoura Road before descending to join existing ground.
Construct a tunnel and associated retaining wall systems along Agoura Road to keep
the road operational and to support the fill materials required by the wildlife crossing.
07-LA-101-PM 33.0
The Structure Advance Planning Study (APS) for the proposed bridge, tunnel, and associated
improvements are included in Attachment B.
This alternative can be constructed in two phases if funding is limited. The first phase would
consist of the construction of the bridge over US-101. This would meet the immediate need
to provide a wildlife crossing across the busy freeway. The capital and support cost for this
phase is approximately $30 million dollars.
The second phase would consist of the construction of the Agoura Road tunnel and grading
of the open area between US-101 and Agoura Road to allow the wildlife crossing to extend
over Agoura Road, which is currently a two-lane road that does not have high traffic
volumes. If traffic volumes increase due to nearby residential and commercial development,
Agoura Road would be widened per City of Agoura Hillss requirements and have higher
traffic volumes that may result in undesirable conditions for wildlife seeking to cross Agoura
Road. The second phase of the project would allow the wildlife crossing to extend over
Agoura Road. The capital and support cost for this phase is approximately $20 million
dollars.
This is the recommended alternative for programming and it is recommended that the project
proceed to the Project Approval/Environmental Document (PA/ED) phase. The
implementation of the two phases of this alternative will be furthered studied in the PA/ED
phase.
Design Exceptions
Based on the scope of work proposed by this project, on April 7, 2015, the HQ Design
Reviewer concurred that the preparation of a Fact Sheet Exceptions to Mandatory Design
Standards for the features described below would be deferred to the PA/ED Phase.
The identified nonstandard features proposed by this project are as follows:
1. Nonstandard Shoulder Width, SB Mainline Shoulder
The existing left shoulder width for SB US-101 within the project limits is 10 feet. The
widths of the proposed bridge columns (5 feet 6 inches in diameter) and associated
concrete barrier (Type 60F) will reduce the left shoulder width from 10 feet to 6 feet 6
inches, for a distance of 155 feet along the freeway centerline.
The standard for which this exception would be requested from is Index 302.1 of the
Highway Design Manual (HDM) (last updated 9/22/14). Index 302.1 states, The
shoulder widths given in Table 302.1 shall be the minimum continuous usable width
of paved shoulder on highway. Table 302.1 calls for a left paved shoulder width of 10
feet for freeways with 6 or more lanes.
07-LA-101-PM 33.0
07-LA-101-PM 33.0
for supporting the bridge. If groundwater elevation is below the endpoints of piles, the site
should not have any issues; otherwise it will need to be screened for potential contaminants
for disposal purpose.
Landscaping
The bridge across US-101 and fill area between the freeway and Agoura Road will be
landscaped to provide a continuous passage that resembles a natural habitat for the wildlife.
The landscape designs will be provided by MRCA in the next phase of the project.
Stormwater
The Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board (LARWQCB) has jurisdiction over
the project area. The total disturbed area (TDA) for the project is 4.44 acres.
A long-form Storm Water Data Report (SWDR) was prepared in accordance with the July
2010 Edition of Storm Water Quality Handbook-Project Planning Design Guide (PPDG) and
approved on April 23, 2015. The SWDR Cover Sheet is presented in Attachment E.
Right of Way
The recommended alternative would require right of way from MRCA, City of Agoura Hills,
and private property owners. The Right of Way Data Sheet is presented in Attachment F.
Utilities
Existing utilities along Agoura Road will be impacted by this alternative. Overhead utility
lines and poles on both the north and south side of Agoura Road will need to be modified
and/or relocated. Water lines along Vendell Place will need to be relocated. Sewer lines
along Agoura Road will also need to be relocated if they are in conflict with the proposed
retaining wall systems and associated footings. Drainage facilities impacted by construction
of the project will be modified and/or relocated.
Railroad
Railroad impacts are not anticipated for this project since no rail systems exist within the
project limits.
Other Agencies Involved
The Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board (LARWQCB) will oversee
401 Certification and the projects compliance with storm water regulations.
The City of Agoura Hills will be involved for the improvements within their city
limits, in the vicinity of Agoura Road.
Army Corps of Engineers will be involved with the Section 404 Permit.
California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) will be involved with the
07-LA-101-PM 33.0
7. COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT
This project is a result of collaborative effort between many government agencies and local
communities. In addition to MRCA, RCDSMM, and Caltrans, National Wildlife Federation,
National Park Service, City of Agoura Hills, City of Malibu, and local communities have
contributed their support to the need of this project.
MRCA, RCDSMM, and Caltrans have been working with City of Agoura Hills on the design
of the bridge and potential impact to the city road and related facilities.
There will be more public involvement when this project proceeds to the next phase,
including general public and stakeholder meetings.
8. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION/DOCUMENT
The April 2015 Preliminary Environmental Analysis Report (PEAR) that was prepared for
this project concludes that the project is expected to be classified as follows:
07-LA-101-PM 33.0
9. FUNDING/PROGRAMMING
It has been determined that this project may be eligible for federal-aid funding.
Capital Outlay Support and Project Estimates
Fund Source
TBD
Prior 2015/16
Component
700.00
PA&ED Support
PS&E Support
Right-of-Way
Support
Construction
Support
Right-of-Way
Construction
700.00
Total
The support cost ratio is 25.67%.
Total
2171.65
1200.00
3341.00
300.00
300.00
600.00
1754.02
2140.00
4109.35
3006.90
250.58
4000.00
20046.00 13364.00
6140.00
33410.00
250.58 49702.50
10. SCHEDULE
Project Milestones
BEGIN ENVIRONMENTAL
NOTICE OF PREPARATION (NOP)
NOTICE OF INTENT (NOI)
CIRCULATE DPR & DED EXTERNALLY
PA/ED
DRAFT STRUCTURES PS&E
PROJECT PS&E
RIGHT OF WAY CERTIFICATION
READY TO LIST
M020
M030
M035
M120
M200
M378
M380
M410
M460
5011.50
07-LA-101-PM 33.0
Project Milestones
AWARD
APPROVE CONTRACT
CONTRACT ACCEPTANCE
END PROJECT
M495
M500
M600
M800
11. RISKS
Pursuant to District Directive 35 (DD-35), risk management activities were conducted. The
resulting Risk Register is presented in Attachment H.
Reza Fateh
Darwin Vargas
Barbara Marquez
Brian Frazer
Derek Higa
Quality Review Meeting
Project Sponsor
Santa Monica Mountain Conservancy
Paul Edelman
Project Architect
Resource Conservation District of Santa Monica Mountains
Clark Stevens
10
07-LA-101-PM 33.0
Title
Phone Number
Reza Fateh
Project Manager
213-897-8316
Marco Ruano
213-897-9863
Rafael Molina
213-897-7945
213-897-5995
Barbara Marquez
213-897-0791
15. ATTACHMENTS
A.
B.
C.
D.
E.
F.
G.
H.
I.
11
07-LA-101-PM 33.0
Attachment A
Dist
COUNTY
ROUTE
LA
101
SHEET
POST MILES
TOTAL PROJECT
No.
TOTAL
SHEETS
33.0
FESSIO
RO
N
P
A
L
E
DATE
R E G IS T
IN E E R
No.
D
R
Y
N
D
O
L
O
C
T
A
T
E
CIVIL
IA
N
OF
OR
F
CALI
DE RD
ROADSI
A
G
O
U
R
A
TO
DR
RD
URA
AGO
ST
CANWOOD
D
R
A
R
U
O
G
A
CANWOOD ST
ROUTE 101
R
D
101
VE
ND
EL
L
PL
L
O
S
T
UNIT
0000
00000000001
NOT TO SCALE
LAST REVISION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
00-00-00
CT
SA
GE
HI
LL
S
CAC
TUS
TR
RD
LI
VE
OAK
CT
LO
ST
JOELTON DR
PATRICK HENRY PL
D
MA
O
L
DI
L
E
SO
Y
N
LN
Y
FAN
TIF
CT
REVERE WY
L
O
O
S
A
T
K
C
T
TR
ROVE
OD D
ONWO
COTT
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Y
R
T
N
U
O
C
CALABASAS HILLS RD
AGOURA HILLS
N
E
L
G
C
O
L
D
S
D
P
E
R
IN
E
R
G
W
S
T
R EE
S
D
T
R
NG D
SPRI
LOST
TR CT
TED RD
UNI
LN
WN
ETO
FRE
D
R
DEER
E RD
JIM BOWI
COUNTRY GLEN RD
L
IL
H
S
D
N
A
L
G
N
GREE
R LN
CI
D
T R
DEN
VI
PRO
RD
CANYON
LIBERTY
LN
OK
BRO
SEA
DR
KEE
YAN
DEFENDER DR
K
OA LN
RL
BU
PL
NGS
SPRI
HOT
RONDELL ST
CHESTERBROOK WY
TE
WHI
WAY
ELM
RD
LLS
HI
BU
I
MAL
W LN
ILLO
YO W
ARRO
BURGUNDY
FARM WY
ENDEAVOR ST
LN
SPRING
INDIAN
RAFAEL MOLINA
IL
L
S
TA
I
AR
RG
MA
DANTES VIEW DR
LEWIS RD
CHECKED BY
CALCULATEDDESIGNED BY
FUNCTIONAL SUPERVISOR
DR
ET
RR
GA
DR
S
SA
BA
A
L
CA
S RD
HILL
LOST
E
LL
CA
AM
IS
TO
SA
NE
MI
LA
CA
E DR
AMBRIDG
CALL
E MO
NTEC
I
LLO
LUDGATE DR
E
E
N
E
R
10
1
VI
A
CALLE ROBLEDA DR
R
D
RD
CANYON
LIBERTY
DR
WY
DR
YON
CAN
KN
IG
HT
07-LA-101 PM 33.0
LAURA LA
PLANTE DR
PROJECT LOCATION
RO
EB
ES
CH
Y DR
DOROTH
DR
R
D
D
ON
LM
HE
AV
LOS
T H
ILL
S R
D
DR
RY
BER
DE
AGOURA HILLS
LEWI
S PL
R
VE
I
DR
PARKVILLE RD
TO THOUSA
ND OAKS
EDGEWARE
DR
RD
CANGAS DR
CA
NY
ON
DANTES
CO
MA
DO
VIEW DR
C
O
L
O
D
N
Y
R
D
LEWIS RD
REVISED BY
PA
LO
AMBRIDGE DR
DATE REVISED
07-LA-101-PM 33.0
Attachment B
ST RUC T URES
EB
100-0"
6
FG
FG
OF
- D IV IS IO N
ABUT 3
07
COUNTY
ROUTE
POST MILE
101
34.3
LA
10+00
11+00
12+00
ABUT 5
ABUT 4
13+00
14+00
ASSUMPTIONS:
15+00
TUNNEL
ELEVATION
1" = 30
T R A N S PO R T A T IO N
ABUT 1
DATUM
EL. = 790.0
LEGEND:
1
10
2
:
1
203000" SKEW
00810" SKEW
2%
2%
2%
12+00
2:1
EB
01
-1
LA
OF
1 2
42
17
- D E PA R T M E N T
AGOURA RD
e
Rt
3.5:1
3.5:1
"A1" LINE Sta 13+86.16
"B1" LINE Sta 11+12.00
13+00
14+00
"B1" LINE
2%
3.5:1
2:1
OF
"
-0
48
12
@
4
T =
691.33
L =
1320.12
12:46
12
12
Shld
Varies
DESIGNED BY
1800.00
420114.8" (RT)
3.5:1
10+00
44
17
WB
01
-1
LA
14
CURVE DATA
Shld
Varies
12
"
-0
8
4
12
d
@
l
4
Sh
R =
1
:
2
C A LIFO R N IA
1 2
EB 12+00.00
Elev 883.21
2%
2%
43
17
BB 10+00.00
Elev 883.21
15+00
18-MAR-2015
S390725.02"W
DATE
03-18-15
U. Smpardos
d
l
Sh
DRAWN BY
03-18-15
T. Trefz
PLAN
CHECKED BY
BRANCH
DATE
03-18-15
G. Galo
1" = 30
DATE
APPROVED
03-18-15
STRUCTURES DESIGN ADVANCE PLANNING STUDY SHEET (ENGLISH) (REV. 08-09-10)
STRUCTURE
DESIGN
DATE
15
PLANNING STUDY
LIBERTY CANYON
WILDLIFE CROSSING, 1 0F 4
UNIT: 3604
SCALE: AS NOTED
CONTRACT No.: X
"A1" LINE
12+00
11+00
11+00
N5101 32.08"W
10+00
STA TE
DIST
NOTES:
BB
ST RUC T URES
DIST
07
COUNTY
LA
ROUTE
POST MILE
101
34.3
LEGEND:
Indicates existing
grade contour
Indicates final
grade contour
790
OF
Indicates extent of
imported soil fill
82
0
EB
01
-1
LA
- D IV IS IO N
81
0
e
Rt
83
0
1
10
2
:
1
84
0
850
79
0
2%
860
80
0
2%
2:1
86
0
870
87
0
2%
2%
2%
2%
2%
12+00
T R A N S PO R T A T IO N
85
0
3.5:1
3.5:1
"A1" LINE Sta 13+86.16
OF
BB 10+00.00
Elev 883.21
13+00
14+00
EB 10+00.00
Elev 883.21
15+00
3.5:1
3.5:1
12:46
TIME PLOTTED =>
2%
2%
2%
2%
18-MAR-2015
2%
1
:
2
1
:
2
10+00
2:1
2%
2
0
WB
01
-1
LA
9
10
89
0
STA TE
88
0
87
0
8
6
0
DESIGNED BY
85
0
DATE
03-18-15
U. Smpardos
DRAWN BY
03-18-15
T. Trefz
CONTOUR PLAN
CHECKED BY
BRANCH
DATE
03-18-15
G. Galo
1" = 25
DATE
APPROVED
03-18-15
STRUCTURES DESIGN ADVANCE PLANNING STUDY SHEET (ENGLISH) (REV. 08-09-10)
STRUCTURE
DESIGN
DATE
15
PLANNING STUDY
LIBERTY CANYON
WILDLIFE CROSSING, 2 0F 4
UNIT: 3604
SCALE: AS NOTED
CONTRACT No.: X
9
4
0
90
0
OF
12+00
11+00
11+00
C A LIFO R N IA
- D E PA R T M E N T
10+00
ST RUC T URES
DIST
07
101
34.3
Architectural Treatment
82-6"
"
FG
1 4
Typ
2%
- D IV IS IO N
4 FILL
5-6"
OF
PG
2%
1-0"
6"
Typ
2-2"
Typ
22 @ 6-7" = 144-10"
4-11"
Typ
BB/EB
FG
WILDLIFE CROSSING
4-3"
2-3"
Abut SEAT
BRIDGE SECTION
4-6"
" = 1-0"
12:46
OVERCROSSING
DESIGNED BY
DATE
03-18-15
U. Smpardos
DRAWN BY
CHECKED BY
ABUTMENT SECTION
" = 1-0"
STRUCTURES DESIGN ADVANCE PLANNING STUDY SHEET (ENGLISH) (REV. 08-09-10)
03-18-15
T. Trefz
18-0"
" = 1-0"
BRANCH
DATE
03-18-15
G. Galo
DETAIL 1
STRUCTURE
DESIGN
DATE
DATE
APPROVED
03-18-15
FILE => 30710k-ap_03.dgn
15
PLANNING STUDY
LIBERTY CANYON
WILDLIFE CROSSING, 3 0F 4
UNIT: 3604
SCALE: AS NOTED
CONTRACT No.: X
8"
3-0"
Typ
4-0"
WATERPROOF MEMBRANE
1 4
18-MAR-2015
5-6"
CONCRETE BARRIER
TYPE 60
3-0"
1-6"
6"
Typ
8-0"
2-0"
5-6"
VARIES
OF
T R A N S PO R T A T IO N
POST MILE
165-0"
- D E PA R T M E N T
C A LIFO R N IA
OF
LA
ROUTE
NOTES:
FG
STA TE
COUNTY
ST RUC T URES
DIST
07
224-0"
36-0"
112-0"
112-0"
RETAINING WALL
COUNTY
LA
ROUTE
POST MILE
101
34.3
36-0"
RETAINING WALL
"A1" LINE
FG
DETAIL 2
BOTTOM OF LINTEL
OF
822.38
BOTTOM OF LINTEL
812.74
AGOURA RD = PG
PG
798.74
BOTTOM OF Ftg
802.24
"B1" Line
DATUM El
11+00
10+00
12+00
TUNNEL SECTION
BOTTOM OF Ftg
BOTTOM OF Ftg
796.24
794.24
1" = 10
Architectural Treatment
1 4
1 4
OF
12+00
11+00
10+00
"B1" LINE
+40
+60
+20
+80
+40
+60
+20
+80
+40
+60
END TUNNEL
BEGIN TUNNEL
"B1" LINE
Sta 12+24.00
"B1" LINE
Sta 10+00.00
14+00
PLAN
9-0"
4-0"
Typ
1" = 10
FG
6"
WATERPROOF MEMBRANE
Conc COUNTERFORT
12-0"
4 SIDEWALK,
Typ
Typ
1"
-1
35
18-MAR-2015
Abut SEAT
VARIES
7-3"
3-0"
1-6"
Typ
1 4
FG
CIP 6" CONCRETE
SLAB w/WATERPROOF
MEMBRANE
PG
OF
1-6"
Approx OG
ABUT 4
ABUT 5
TYPICAL OF 30
7-4"
" = 1-0"
TUNNEL
03-18-15
U. Smpardos
"A1" Line
DATUM El
790.00
+60
SECTION B-B
DETAIL 2
" = 1-0"
" = 1-0"
03-18-15
T. Trefz
+20
CHECKED BY
STRUCTURE
DESIGN
DATE
DRAWN BY
14+00
+80
BRANCH
DATE
03-18-15
G. Galo
DATE
APPROVED
03-18-15
FILE => 30710k-ap_04.dgn
15
PLANNING STUDY
LIBERTY CANYON
WILDLIFE CROSSING, 4 0F 4
UNIT: 3604
SCALE: AS NOTED
CONTRACT No.: X
"B1" LINE
12:46
Conc COUNTERFORTS
DESIGNED BY
STA TE
NOTES:
+80
- D E PA R T M E N T
BOTTOM OF Ftg
798.24
790.00
+20
C A LIFO R N IA
BOTTOM OF Ftg
800.24
"A1" LINE
T R A N S PO R T A T IO N
- D IV IS IO N
PG
808.38
07-LA-101-PM 33.0
Attachment C
PRELIMINARY
PROJECT COST ESTIMATE
PSR
4050.400.000
LA-101-PM 33.0
Route 101 Liberty Canyon Wildlife Crossing
Construction of a bridge across US-101; a tunnel over Agoura Road; fill and grading in
between US-101 and Agoura Road.
Scope :
Alternative :
Current Cost
Escalated Cost
ROADWAY ITEMS
12,174,500
13,702,507
STRUCTURE ITEMS
21,235,000
23,900,180
33,409,500
37,602,687
6,139,848
9,084,821
39,550,000
46,688,000
RIGHT OF WAY
1,200,000
1,200,000
PS&E SUPPORT
3,341,000
3,341,000
600,000
600,000
CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT
5,011,500
5,011,500
10,152,500
10,152,500
49,702,500
56,900,000
Month
/ Year
April / 2015
Nov / 2018
Approved by Project
Manager
PID Approval
May-2015
PA/ED Approval
Dec-2016
PS&E
Mar-2018
RTL
Jun-2018
Begin Construction
Nov-2018
(213) 897-8316
Reza Fateh
Project Manager
Date
1 of 11
Phone
5/5/2015 9:53 AM
PRELIMINARY
PROJECT COST ESTIMATE
Cost
Earthwork
1,693,500
161,900
Drainage
735,000
Specialty Items
224,400
Environmental
2,797,000
Traffic Items
185,000
Detours
Minor Items
Roadway Mobilization
579,700
10
Supplemental Work
359,900
11
State Furnished
300,000
12
Contingencies
2,434,900
13
Overhead
2,703,200
12,174,500
Estimate Prepared By
4/24/2015
Date
(213) 897-5995
Phone
Estimate Reviewed By
Reza Fateh, PM
Name and Title
4/24/2015
Date
(213) 897-8316
Phone
By signing this estimate you are attesting that you have discussed your project with all functional units
and have incorporated all their comments or have discussed with them why they will not be
incorporated.
2 of 11
5/5/2015 9:53 AM
PRELIMINARY
PROJECT COST ESTIMATE
SECTION 1: EARTHWORK
Item code
160101
170101
190101
190103
190105
192037
193013
193031
194001
198001
198007
XXXXXX
Unit Quantity
Unit Price ($)
LS
1
x
50,000.00
LS
x
CY
235
x
100.00
CY
x
CY
x
CY
x
CY
x
CY
x
CY
x
CY 216,000 x
7.50
TON
x
x
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
Cost
$
50,000
$
$
23,500
$
$
$
$
$
$
$ 1,620,000
$
$
-
1,693,500
161,900
150771
150860
153103
1532XX
250401
260203
280000
365001
374002
374492
3750XX
377501
390095
390132
390136
390137
393003
39405X
394071
394090
397005
401050
401108
404092
404094
413112A
413115
420102
420201
731521
731530
XXXXXX
Unit Quantity
LF
200
Remove Asphalt Concrete Dike
Remove Base and Surfacing
CY
Cold Plane Asphalt Concrete Pavement
SQYD
CY
Remove Concrete (type)
Aggregate Subbase
CY
115
Class 2 Aggregate Base
CY
125
CY
145
Lean Concrete Base
Sand Cover
TON
Asphaltic Emulsion (Fog Seal Coat)
TON
Asphaltic Emulsion (Polymer Modified)
TON
Screenings (Type XX)
TON
Slurry Seal
TON
CY
Replace Asphalt Concrete Surfacing
TON
120
Hot Mix Asphalt (Type A)
Minor Hot Mix Asphalt
TON
TON
Rubberized Hot Mix Asphalt (Gap Graded)
SQYD
Geosynthetic Pavement Interlayer
Shoulder Rumber Strip (HMA, Type XX Indent STA
Place Hot Mix Asphalt Dike
LF
Place Hot Mix Asphalt (Misc. Area)
SQYD
Tack Coat
TON
Jointed Plane Concrete Pavement
CY
175
Replace Concrete Pavement (Rapid Strength CY
LF
Seal Pavement Joint
Seal Longitudinal Isolation Joint
LF
Repair Spalled Joints (Polyester Grout)
SQYD
Seal Existing Concrete Pavement Joint
LF
Groove Existing Concrete Pavement
SQYD
Grind Existing Concrete Pavement
SQYD
Minor Concrete (Sidewalk)
CY
25
Minor Concrete (Textured Paving)
SQFT
Some Item
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
Cost
3,000
17,250
12,500
36,250
21,600
52,500
18,750
-
3 of 11
5/5/2015 9:53 AM
PRELIMINARY
PROJECT COST ESTIMATE
SECTION 3: DRAINAGE
Item code
150206
150805
150820
152430
155003
193114
510502
510512
62XXXX
64XXXX
65XXXX
66XXXX
68XXXX
69XXXX
70XXXX
70XXXX
70XXXX
703233
72XXXX
721420
721430
729010
750001
XXXXXX
XXXXXX
Abandon Culvert
Remove Culvert
Modify Inlet
Adjust Inlet
Cap Inlet
Sand Backfill
Minor Concrete (Minor Structure)
Minor Concrete (Box Culvert)
XXX" APC Pipe
XXX" Plastic Pipe
XXX" RCP Pipe
XXX" CSP Pipe
Edge Drain
XXX" Pipe Downdrain
XXX" Pipe Inlet
XXX" Pipe Riser
XXX" Flared End Section
Grated Line Drain
Rock Slope Protection (Type and Method)
Concrete (Ditch Lining)
Concrete (Channel Lining)
Rock Slope Protection Fabric
Miscellaneous Iron and Steel
Drainage
Some Item
Unit Quantity
LF
LF
EA
LF
EA
CY
CY
CY
LF
LF
LF
LF
LF
LF
LF
LF
EA
LF
CY
CY
CY
SQYD
LB
LS
1
735,000.00
Cost
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
735,000
-
735,000
224,400
070012
150662
150668
153221
153250
190110
49XXXX
510060
510133
510524
5110XX
511048
5136XX
518002
520103
800360
832001
839310
839521
839541
8395XX
8395XX
8395XX
839561
839XXX
83XXXX
839576
839578
Unit Quantity
Unit Price ($)
LS
1
x
5,000.00
LF
200
x
20.00
EA
x
LF
195
x
50.00
SQFT
x
LS
x
LF
x
CY
x
CY
x
CY
x
SQFT
x
SQFT
x
SQFT
x
SQFT
x
LB
x
LF
3,000
x
65.00
LF
x
LF
x
LF
x
EA
2
x
4,500.00
EA
x
EA
x
EA
x
EA
x
EA
x
LF
x
LF
2
x
350.00
EA
2
x
450.00
= $
= $
= $
= $
= $
= $
= $
= $
= $
= $
= $
= $
= $
= $
= $
= $
= $
= $
= $
= $
= $
= $
= $
= $
= $
= $
= $
= $
Cost
5,000
4,000
9,750
195,000
9,000
700
900
4 of 11
5/5/2015 9:53 AM
PRELIMINARY
PROJECT COST ESTIMATE
SECTION 5: ENVIRONMENTAL
5A - ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION
Item code
XXXXXX
071325
071325
XXXXXX
XXXXXX
XXXXXX
Biological Mitigation
TEMPORARY REINFORCED SILT FENCE
Temporary Fence (Type ESA)
Long Term Biological Monitoring
Permits and Agreements
Wildlife Fencing, Ramps
Unit Quantity
Unit Price ($)
Cost
LS
1
x 250,000.00 = $
250,000
LF
x
= $
LF
x
$
LS
1
x 1,050,000.00
$ 1,050,000
LS
1
x
6,912.00
$
6,912
EA
6
x
5,000.00
$
30,000
Subtotal Environmental
1,336,912
960,000
500,000
2,797,000
200001
20XXXX
20XXXX
201700
2030XX
203021
203026
204099
204101
Highway Planting
XXX" (Insert Type ) Conduit (Use for
Extend XXX" (Insert Type) Conduit
Imported Topsoil
Erosion Control (Type __)
Fiber Rolls
Move In/ Move Out (Erosion Control)
Plant Establishment Work
Extend Plant Establishment (X Years)
Unit Quantity
LS
1
LF
LF
CY
SQYD
LF
EA
LS
1
LS
LS
EA
EA
LS
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
Cost
270,000
305,000
-
385,000.00
385,000
x
x
x
=
=
=
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
Cost
5,000
5,000
490,000
$
$
$
5,000
-
074016
074017
074019
074023
074027
074028
074032
074033
074035
074037
074038
074041
074042
XXXXXX
Unit Quantity
Construction Site Management
LS
1
Prepare WPCP
LS
Prepare SWPPP
LS
1
Temporary Erosion Control
SQYD
Temporary Erosion Control Blanket
SQYD
Temporary Fiber Roll
LF
Temporary Concrete Washout Facility
EA
1
Temporary Construction Entrance
EA
1
Temporary Check Dam
LF
Move In/ Move Out (Temporary Erosion Contr EA
Temp. Drainage Inlet Protection
EA
Street Sweeping
LS
Temporary Concrete Washout (Portable)
LS
Construction Site BMPs
LS
1
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
TOTAL ENVIRONMENTAL
5 of 11
5/5/2015 9:53 AM
PRELIMINARY
PROJECT COST ESTIMATE
150760
151581
152641
5602XX
5602XX
56XXXX
860090
860810
86055X
8607XX
8609XX
860XXX
8611XX
8611XX
86XXXX
XXXXX
Unit Quantity
Unit Price ($)
EA
x
EA
x
EA
x
LB
x
LB
x
LF
x
LS
x
EA
x
LS
x
LS
x
LS
x
LS
x
LS
x
LS
x
LS
x
Cost
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
5,000
180,000
185,000
120090
150701
150710
150713
150742
152320
152390
566011
566012
560XXX
560XXX
82010X
84XXXX
Unit Quantity
Unit Price ($)
LS
1
x
5,000.00
LF
x
LF
x
SQFT
x
EA
x
EA
x
EA
x
EA
x
EA
x
SQFT
x
SQFT
x
EA
x
LS
x
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
Cost
5,000
-
120100
120120
120143
12016X
128650
129000
129100
129099A
839603A
XXXXXX
Unit Quantity
Unit Price ($)
LS
1
x 125,000.00
EA
x
LF
x
EA
x
EA
x
LF
2,200
x
25.00
EA
x
EA
x
EA
x
6 of 11
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
Cost
125,000
55,000
-
5/5/2015 9:53 AM
PRELIMINARY
PROJECT COST ESTIMATE
SECTION 7: DETOURS
Include constructing, maintaining, and removal
Item code
0713XX
07XXXX
120143
1286XX
129000
190101
198001
198050
250401
260201
390132
XXXXXX
Unit
LF
LS
LF
EA
LF
CY
CY
CY
CY
CY
TON
LS
Quantity
Cost
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
TOTAL DETOURS
SUBTOTAL SECTIONS 1-7
5,796,800
579,700
359,900
5,796,800
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
SECTIONS 9: MOBILIZATION
Item
d
999990
5,796,800
10%
579,680
TOTAL MOBILIZATION
066015
066063
066090
066094
066204
066222
066670
066700
066866
066920
Unit
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
Quantity
Cost
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
50,000
15,000
-
5,000
289,840
1
1
5,796,800
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
50,000.00
15,000.00
5%
5/5/2015 9:53 AM
PRELIMINARY
PROJECT COST ESTIMATE
066063
066105
066803
066838
066901
066062A
06684X
06684X
06684X
XXXXXX
Public Information
RE Office
Padlocks
Reflective Numbers and Edge Sealer
Water Expenses
COZEEP Expenses
Ramp Meter Controller Assembly
TMS Controller Assembly
Traffic Signal Controller Assembly
Some Item
Unit
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
Quantity
1
1
5,796,800
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
0%
Cost
$50,000
$160,000
$0
$0
$0
$90,000
$0
$0
$0
$300,000
Unit
Quantity
WD
440
10%
Unit Price ($)
6143.63636
Cost
=
$2,703,200
$2,703,200
9,739,600
25%
$2,434,900
TOTAL CONTINGENCY
8 of 11
$2,434,900
5/5/2015 9:53 AM
PRELIMINARY
PROJECT COST ESTIMATE
DATE OF ESTIMATE
Bridge Name
Bridge Number
Structure Type
Width (Feet) [out to out]
Total Bridge Length (Feet)
Total Area (Square Feet)
Structure Depth (Feet)
Footing Type (pile or spread)
Cost Per Square Foot
Bridge 1
Bridge 2
03/27/15
03/27/15
Agoura Road Tunnel
TBD
TBD
CIP/PS Box Girder
165.00
LF
200.00
LF
33000 SQFT
5.50
LF
Spread
$460.82
COST OF EACH
STRUCTURE
DATE OF ESTIMATE
Name
Bridge Number
Structure Type
Width (Feet) [out to out]
Total Length (Feet)
Total Area (Square Feet)
Structure Depth (Feet)
Footing Type (pile or spread)
Cost Per Square Foot
224.00
0.00
0
2.00
LF
LF
SQFT
LF
N/A
$0.00
00/00/00
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
57-XXX
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
0.00
LF
0.00
LF
0 SQFT
0.00
LF
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
$0.00
$15,207,000.00
$6,028,000.00
$0.00
00/00/00
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
57-XXX
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
0.00
LF
0.00
LF
0 SQFT
0.00
LF
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
$0.00
00/00/00
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
57-XXX
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
0.00
LF
0.00
LF
0.00 SQFT
0.00
LF
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
$0.00
00/00/00
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
57-XXX
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
0.00
LF
0.00
LF
0.0 SQFT
0.00
LF
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$21,235,000.00
$0.00
COST OF EACH
STRUCTURE
$21,235,000.00
Add more sheets if needed. Call them 9a, 9b, 9c, , etc
9 of 11
5/5/2015 9:53 AM
07-LA-101-PM 33.0
Attachment D
1. Project Information
District
County
Route
07
LA
101
Project Title:
Liberty Canyon Wildlife Crossing Project
Project Manager
Reza Fateh
Project Engineer
Siew Mei Tan
Environmental Office Chief/Manager
Garrett Damrath
PEAR Preparer
Fiona Nagle
PM
33.0
EA
30710K
Phone #
213-897-8316
Phone #
213-897-5995
Phone #
213-897-9016
Phone #
213-897-2956
2. Project Description
Purpose and Need
The purpose of the project is to provide a safe and sustainable passage for wildlife across US-101
near Liberty Canyon Road in the City of Agoura Hills that reduces wildlife mortality and allows
for the exchange of genetic material. The need for the proposed project is based on genetic and
tracking data that show US-101 is a barrier to wildlife that historically traveled between the
Santa Monica Mountains and the Sierra Madre mountain range in this area. In particular, large
mammals such as mountain lions and bobcats need large connected habitats in order to hunt,
breed, and thrive. US-101 divides this previously contiguous range into isolated habitat
fragments, resulting in inbreeding, territorial fighting, and a decrease in genetic diversity.
Description of work
This project proposes to construct a vegetated bridge across US-101 near Liberty Canyon Road
in the City of Agoura Hills for the purpose of a wildlife crossing. The project is sponsored by
Mountains Recreation and Conservation Authority (MRCA). A cooperative agreement between
MRCA and California Transportation Department (Caltrans) was executed on February 12,
2015. MRCA requested Caltrans to develop a Project Initiation Document (PID) for the project
and agreed to fund the cost of the PID. MRCA provided Caltrans the location and design
elements of the overcrossing. Caltrans prepared a Project Study Report (PSR) to evaluate the
cost and structural feasibility of the bridge and associated improvements.
The bridge will be approximately 165 feet wide and 200 feet long. It will be vegetated to
provide a passage that resembles the natural habitat of wildlife. The slope between the end of the
bridge and Agoura Road south of the freeway will be filled up to grade to allow the crossing to
extend over Agoura Road before descending to join existing ground. A culvert and associated
Revised April 2011
rev. 11/08
6,912
Environmental Commitments
Build Alternative
Estimated Cost in $1,000s
Phases
Design ROW Construction
Notes
SubTotal
Long-term Biological
monitoring
1,050
225
Biological monitoring
during construction
WBS 160 (120 hrs total)
WBS 165 (3815 hrs tot)
WBS 175 (887 hrs total)
WBS 180 (484 hrs total)
WBS 205 (251 hrs total)
WBS 235 (1174 hrs tot)
WBS 255 (194 hrs total)
WBS 280 (1244 hrs tot)
WBS 295 (1254 hrs tot)
Total (enter zeros if no
cost)
$200-300
$200-300
2 yrs pre-construction +
5 yrs post-construction
3000 ft fence @ $65/ft
+ 6 ramps @ $5k/ramp
full-time monitor for
any work near the
valley oaks/streambed
07-LA-101-PM 33.0
Attachment E
07-LA-101-PM 33.0
Attachment F
State of California
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Memorandum
Serious Drought!
Help Save Water!
To:
From:
Subject:
Date: 4/24/2015
EA: 30710K
Data Sheet ID NO: ds1230
Project ID # 0714000213
Right of Way Certificate (RWC) lead time will require a minimum of 24 months after maps to
appraisal (MA). Completed Appraisal maps include HMDD, COS, HW Memo, and RE-49. An
executed copy of the new freeway agreement if required for the project. When utility relocation is
warranted, utility conflict maps will be required. Additionally a minimum of 18 months will be
required after receiving the last revision to the appraisal map. Shorter lead times will require either
more right of way resources or an increased number of condemnation suits to be file and present a
risk to the RWC project delivery milestone. Due to the passage of Map 21 and the Buy America
provision, the Right of Way Certification process will be longer, if Utility Relocation is necessary.
Current Schedule: PRSM
PAED (M 200)
MA (M 224)
RWC (M 410)
RTL (M 460)
CCA (M 600)
12/30/2016
5/1/2017
3/30/2018
6/30/2018
6/30/2020
TO Rafael Molina
ID NO ds1230
4/24/2015
Project Description
PM_KM 33.0
EA 30710K
Project ID # 0714000213
ALT
This cost estimate is valid for the above scoping report only. This is an estimate only and not an appraisal. It may be based on worse case
scenarios.
The estimate is subject to change and revision.
The mapping did not provide sufficient nor adequate detail to determine the limits of thr Right of Way required and effects on the
improvements.
The transportation facilities have not been sufficiently designed for our estimator to determine the damages to any of the remainder parcels
affected by
This cost estimate is pursuant to the following responses supplied by Rafael Molina to the Data Sheet
Request Form.
YES
NO
RW COST ESTIMATE
CURRENT VALUE
R/ w acq.(incl.contingency
G.w-condem.-adm.s'tl.)Permits
ESCALATED VALUE
$268,240
$329,948
$5,608
$6,898
$5,860,000
$8,741,975
$6,000
$6,000
$6,139,848
$9,084,821
Clearance
RAP (cont rate.)
Comment
Milestone dates per PMs Report.
Data Sheet revised on 4-24-15 to reflect correct 33 post mile (pm.)
ROUTE 101
PM_KM 33.0
EA 30710K
PARCEL DUAL
TYPES APPR.
RIGHTS
NEEDED
FEE
A
B
EASE
TCE
DISPLACEMENT
OF UNITS
TAKES
FULL
PART
TOTAL
ALT
PARCELS WITH
RAP
POTENTIAL
CLEARANCE
PARCELS
POTENTIAL
CONDEMNATION
PARCELS
POTENTIAL
EXCESS
PARCELS
u4-1
SFR
1.2
BUS
u4-2
MULTI
u4-3
u4-4
D
F
UTILITY IMPACTS
u5-7
Function
Hours
Appraisals
675
Acquisitions
735
200
Utilities
1,908
185.20.40
Utility Potholing
205
Railroads
Condemnation
Clearance
Relocation
RW Engineering
1,200
Total
4,866
u5-8
u5-9
348
UTILITY INFORMATION
Please See the Utility Conflict Addendum for Complete Utility Information
Number of easements
$5,860,000
6/30/2020
8%
$8,741,975
Utility Conflicts
Id- ds1230
EA- 30710K
Description
Quantity
$/Unit
Total Cost
30" Water (Las Virgenes Municipal Water) MWD, Vendell PL; (1500
1500
1500
2250000
6" M gas (Southern California Gas Co.) Agoura Road; (300 Ft)
300
1200
360000
25000
50000
300
1350
405000
200000
200000
200000
200000
30000
30000
400000
400000
150000
150000
10
200000
200000
11
30000
30000
12
200000
200000
13
30000
30000
14
200000
200000
15
30000
30000
16
30000
30000
17
30000
30000
18
30000
30000
19
30000
30000
20
30000
30000
21
1500
200
300000
22
1500
200
300000
23
600
600
360000
24
15000
15000
07-LA-101-PM 33.0
Attachment G
07-LA-101-PM 33.0
Risk Register
Attachment H
Active
Active
Active
Active
Active
ID
24144
24151
24146
24162
24145
Risk
RBS
Type Category
PM
CON
Gen
DGN
ENV
WBS
Impacted
Critical
Path
Impacted?
0.100
5.270.20
0.100
0.100.10
Title
Funding
Uncertainties
Cost
Maintenance
Agreement
and Cost of
Maintaining
the
Structure
Design
Exceptions
Environmental
Permits
Risk
Statement
Funding- No
funding
source has
been
identified for
the PS&E
phase nor for
construction
of the
project.
Cost of the
project may
be increased
largely due to
environmental
mitigation
requirements,
utility
relocations,
design
changes and
right of way
acquisitions.
Impact
Description
If funding is
not secured
for the
project, it will
not get built.
The
construction
of the tunnel
over the
Agoura Road
as well as
relocating
high voltage
overhead
power lines
will add
substantial
costs to the
project.
This is a
relatively
major
structure that
is being built
within the
State ROW
The
which will
maintenance
require
cost and
substantial
responsibilities
Maintenance
of the bridge,
throughout its
Agoura Hill
service life.
culvert and
The cost of
associated
that
structures
maintenance
need to be
is of concern
clearly
to the State
defined and
and the
agreed upon
keeping the
by involving
bridge in good
parties.
repair is also
a concern as
it can have
safety
implication for
the traveling
public.
the bridge is
located at a
horizontal
curve and the
row of bents
in the median
as well as the
abutment
wall on the
north side
create nonstandard sight
distance and
shoulder
widths within
the project
limits. A
mandatory
design
exception fact
sheet will be
required prior
to finalizing
the scope of
work. This is
being
deferred to
the PA/ED
phase.
The existence
of a live
stream within
the project
limits may
require
extensive and
lengthy
permitting
process from
various
environmental
agencies.
Proposed nonstandard
features will
have to be
approved
prior to
finalizing
scope of
work.
Delivery of
milestone
PAED might
be delayed.
Linear/
NonLinear
Linear
Linear
Linear
Linear
Linear
Risk
Probability
Risk
Impact
Impact
Consequence
Cost/Time
40-59%
40-59%
60-99%
40-59%
20-39%
High
High
Moderate
Moderate
Moderate
Cost
Cost
Cost
Cost
Time
Cost/
Time
Score
16 (HIGH)
16 (HIGH)
15 (HIGH)
12 (MEDIUM)
9 (MEDIUM)
Cost
$K
(Low)
32500
3000
1000
1000
Cost
Cost
$K
$K
(Most (High)
Likely)
37000
5000
10000
1500
42000
8000
25000
2000
Probable
Cost
Impact
($K)
18397.50
2640.00
9540.00
742.50
Time
in
Mos
(Low)
Time
Time
in
in
Mos
Mos
(Most (High)
Likely)
Probable
Time
Impact
(Mos.)
00.98
Rationale Response
(for
Strategy
Rating)*
Response
Action
Avoid
Several
environmental
and
conservation
organizations
as well as
local
politicians
have shown
keen interest
in the project
and we are
hopeful that
they will
collectively
be able to
fund it.
Mitigate
All utilities
need to be
identified
early on
during the
PS&E phase
and efforts to
relocate
them should
begin quickly
to minimize
their impacts
on the
schedule.
The cost of
the
relocations
will be
minimized if
it done in a
manner that
would
minimize or
eliminate any
construction
delays.
Mitigation
Option
(Minimize Prob
or Impact)
Risk
Triggers
Residual
Risks
Secondary
Risks
Probability
A signed PSR
is the trigger
to begin the
efforts to
secure funds
for the
project as
the
document
will lay out
what is
needed to
build the
project.
none
none
Impact
As soon as
the project
footprint is
finalized
utility
research
needs to
begin and
the
necessary
relocation
work
identified and
coordinated
with utility
companies.
delays in
construction
none
Risk
Interaction
none
none
Risk
Owner
Reza
Fateh
Comments
Last
Updated
04/20/2015
09:43:00
Celina
Aviles
Celina needs
to keep an
eye on the
project and
begin her
04/17/2015
utility
11:26:00
engineering
work to help
minimize the
impacts as
discussed
above.
PM to make
sure
negotiations
on the
Maintenance
agreement
begin in a
timely
04/20/2015
manner so
10:12:00
that it can be
fully
executed
before the
encroachment
permit is
issued.
Avoid
To mitigate
this risk a
maintenance
agreement
needs to be
negotiated
Probability,Impact
with the
project
sponsor
(MRCA) to
fully address
this aspect of
the project.
Prior to
issuing the
encroachment
permit the
maintenance
agreement
needs to be
fully
executed.
none
none
none
Reza
Fateh
Accept
The proposed
non-standard
features will
be mitigated
by moving
the abutment
wall to the
extent
feasible.
Impact
Start of PAED
phase
none
none
none
Orlance
Lee
04/29/2015
07:45:00
Probability
Completion of
draft plans
that fully
describe the
project
footprint.
none
none
none
Barbara
Marquez
04/17/2015
10:54:00
Mitigate
The PD team
will begin
working with
the agencies
early on to
help
maximize the
use of the
available
time so that
all questions
and concerns
of the
resource
agencies can
be addressed
in a timely
manner and
Active
Active
Active
24148
24150
24161
LEG
DGN
CON
0.100
2.160.10.80
There is
potential of
legal liability
for the State
in case a
hiker is
attacked by
any of the
wildlife such
as the
mountain
lions
especially if
the attack is
fatal.
Liability
Concerns have
been raised
about the
possibility of
hikers using
the
overcrossing
getting
attacked by
wildlife, and
the liability
arising from
such event.
Lack of a
Geotechnical
Report
No field
testing of the
soil to
determine the
geotechnical
profile of the
soil in the
project area
has been
conducted.
This exposes
the project to
additional
potential
foundation
costs if
undesirable
soil conditions
are
discovered.
Additional
foundation
cost may be
involved if
upon
completion of
the Geotech
and
Foundation
Linear
Report it is
determined
that the
ground in the
project area is
of undesirable
strength or
characteristics.
Utility
Relocation
Utility
Relocation
costs may
end up
exceeding the
initial
estimates due
to
unexpected
complications
that may
arise during
construction.
Potential
additional
cost and
schedule
delays upon
discovery of
unanticipated
field
conditions.
Linear
Linear
10-19%
20-39%
10-19%
Moderate
Low
Moderate
Cost
Cost
Cost
6 (LOW)
6 (LOW)
6 (LOW)
200
100
1000
2000
500
2000
10000
1000
3000
589.67
157.33
290.00
$32357(K)
0.98 (Mos.)
MRCA as the
project
sponsor will
have to
accept any
such
liabilities as
they own the
project hence
are liable for
all of the
project
liabilities
including the
one being
discussed
here.
Will have to
negotiate a
maintenance
coop which
will be the
same
instrument
04/20/2015
used to
07:46:00
transfer all
liabilities
stemming
from the
project to the
project
owner.
None
None
None
None
Reza
Fateh
Avoid
will perform
several test
borings that
will study the
actual soil
conditions.
Start of the
PAED phase.
unforeseen
field
conditions
during
construction
that may
cause
additional
mitigation
work.
none
none
John
Ehsan
04/20/2015
09:22:00
Mitigate
Prior field
investigation
and potholing
in addition to
coordinating
the utility
Probability,Impact
work with the
utility
companies
will eliminate
most of this
risk.
Start of PAED
phase during
which more
detailed
utility
coordination
and
potholing will
take place to
establish
exactly what
is needed in
regard to
utilities.
none
none
none
Celina
Aviles
04/20/2015
09:49:00
Transfer
Probability
07-LA-101-PM 33.0
Attachment I
Item Description
Section 2 Pavement Structural Section
Asphalt Concrete
Aggregate Base
Item Description
Section 3 Drainage
Large Drainage Facilities (13 ft x 13 ft RCB, jacked)
Storm Drains
Headwalls/Wingwalls
Item Description
Section 4 Specialty Items
Barriers and Guardrails
Utility Coordination/Potholing
Hazardous Waste Investigation and/or Mitigation Work
Removal of Structure (Building)
Environmental Compliance (NPS Monitoring)
Item Description
Section 5 Traffic Items
Transportation Management Plan (Roadway Emergency
Monitoring/Plan)
Quantity
Unit
Unit Price
10,000
6
4,300
CUYD
ACRE
CUYD
$15.00
$3,000.00
$20.00
Quantity
Unit
Unit Price
Item Cost
$150,000.00
$20,000.00
$90,000.00
Subtotal Earthwork
Item Cost
Item Description
Section 7 Roadside Management and Safety
Section
Erosion Control Slope Protection
Maintenance Vehicle Pull outs
Roadside Facilities (Gates, Pedestrian Crossings, Trails,
etc.)
Wildlife Fencing
$260,000.00
Section Cost
TON
$125.00
$125,000.00
CUYD
$65.00
$105,000.00
Subtotal Pavement Structural Section
$230,000.00
Quantity
Unit
Unit Price
Item Cost
Section Cost
305
1
1
LNFT
LPSM
LPSM
$10,000.00
$60,000.00
$75,000.00
$3,050,000.00
$60,000.00
$75,000.00
Subtotal Drainage
1,000
1,600
Quantity
Unit
Unit Price
700
1
1
1
1
LNFT
LPSM
LPSM
LPSM
LPSM
Item Cost
$45.00
$35,000.00
$100,000.00
$100,000.00
$100,000.00
$100,000.00
$50,000.00
$50,000.00
$100,000.00
$100,000.00
Subtotal Speciality Items
Quantity
Unit
Unit Price
LPSM
$150,000.00
Item Cost
Quantity
1
1
Unit
Unit Price
Item Cost
LPSM
$150,000.00
$150,000.00
LPSM
$50,000.00
$50,000.00
Subtotal Planting and Irrigation Section
Quantity
Unit
Unit Price
1
1
LPSM
LPSM
$30,000.00
$50,000.00
$30,000.00
$50,000.00
Item Cost
LPSM
$75,000.00
$75,000.00
4,000
LNFT
$10.00
$40,000.00
Subtotal Roadside Management and Safety Section
TOTAL SECTIONS: 1 thru 7:
10%
10%
1 of 2
$3,185,000.00
Section Cost
$385,000.00
Section Cost
$150,000.00
Section Cost
$150,000.00
Section Cost
$200,000.00
Section Cost
$195,000.00
$4,605,000.00
$470,000.00
$470,000.00
TOTAL MINOR ITEMS:
$470,000.00
$510,000.00
$510,000.00
TOTAL ROADWAY MOBILIZATION:
$510,000.00
4/17/2015 9:26 AM
Quantity
Unit
Unit Price
Item Cost
Section Cost
I. ROADWAY ITEMS
Section 10 Roadway Additions
Supplemental Work
Contingencies
10%
25%
$510,000.00
$510,000.00
$1,270,000.00
$1,270,000.00
TOTAL ROADWAY ADDITIONS:
$1,780,000.00
$7,365,000.00
Low
High
$65,000.00
$350,000.00
$250,000.00
$590,000.00
$890,000.00
$9,510,000.00
$9,600,000.00
$8,700,000.00
$10,600,000.00
2 of 2
Low
High
$9,100,000.00
$11,200,000.00
4/17/2015 9:26 AM