This is a file of the last 3 filings in The Neighbors case since Guy Neighbors filed his civil action in Federal Court In Topeka.
The Government was refusing to return any property, and now the prosecutor is in a huge all fired hurry to return evidence. The problem is I'm not jumping up to get anything back because it is now evidence in a Federal Civil Case Filed in Topeka Kansas.
Yep the bottom line is the evidence is Now Evidence in a civil case and will need to be transferred to a different court, in a different town, with a different Judge in a different venue. Pretty slick move if I may say so myself!
But 1st we will need to do a complete inventory of the evidence, and that will be one big job for my new pittbull investigator, lol.
The prosecutor is now asking the Judge to grant the order so the police can destroy stuff before Neighbors has the chance to inventory it. Humm do you think they have figured out the evidence is now evidence in a civil case, and cannot lawfully be destroyed?
The bigger problem the Government has is Neighbors tied the Federal misconduct to his civil seatbelt traffic ticket case to show a pattern of abuse. So now if the government cannot argue the issue of the federal misconduct, they will have admitted. There is an old saying in legal "he who does not deny, admits" and so it will be much easier for me to win the Federal civil action. So I have set this up so the Government will not get a chance to argue the Federal (if all goes to plan).
So let me break it down.. this case originally was from two seat belt violation that were filed in Municipal without any evidence on the record that Neighbors violated any ordinance. So a motion for summary judgment is in order soon as the Marshals serve the defendant's. The motion for summary judgment will be based on the fact there is no issues of material fact in dispute because they do NOT have any evidence filed in court on the record to prove that Neighbors violated an ordinance or any other silly corporate rule.
The other problem the Judge has is the evidence hearing he needs to have to get me out of his face should be a fact finding mission, but the judge does NOT want to discuss the issues with the "Forged Search Warrants" because he is working to help the prosecutor keep Carrie locked up. Those forged search warrants look serious enough to warrant in investigation. Neighbors will request the gov. file any correspondence addressing the evidence in the civil case in Topeka, as a New Judge is In the house, lol.
I will let the gov. know that I will need to have all of the communication filed on the record in the civil case. They are desperate to file a document requesting the judge grant an order to destroy evidence before it is inventoried. Things are getting very interesting up in here!
You can see I have been studying.
Original Title
Judge Murguia's Fraudulent Orders In Federal District Court In Kansas City Kansas in The Neighbors Case
This is a file of the last 3 filings in The Neighbors case since Guy Neighbors filed his civil action in Federal Court In Topeka.
The Government was refusing to return any property, and now the prosecutor is in a huge all fired hurry to return evidence. The problem is I'm not jumping up to get anything back because it is now evidence in a Federal Civil Case Filed in Topeka Kansas.
Yep the bottom line is the evidence is Now Evidence in a civil case and will need to be transferred to a different court, in a different town, with a different Judge in a different venue. Pretty slick move if I may say so myself!
But 1st we will need to do a complete inventory of the evidence, and that will be one big job for my new pittbull investigator, lol.
The prosecutor is now asking the Judge to grant the order so the police can destroy stuff before Neighbors has the chance to inventory it. Humm do you think they have figured out the evidence is now evidence in a civil case, and cannot lawfully be destroyed?
The bigger problem the Government has is Neighbors tied the Federal misconduct to his civil seatbelt traffic ticket case to show a pattern of abuse. So now if the government cannot argue the issue of the federal misconduct, they will have admitted. There is an old saying in legal "he who does not deny, admits" and so it will be much easier for me to win the Federal civil action. So I have set this up so the Government will not get a chance to argue the Federal (if all goes to plan).
So let me break it down.. this case originally was from two seat belt violation that were filed in Municipal without any evidence on the record that Neighbors violated any ordinance. So a motion for summary judgment is in order soon as the Marshals serve the defendant's. The motion for summary judgment will be based on the fact there is no issues of material fact in dispute because they do NOT have any evidence filed in court on the record to prove that Neighbors violated an ordinance or any other silly corporate rule.
The other problem the Judge has is the evidence hearing he needs to have to get me out of his face should be a fact finding mission, but the judge does NOT want to discuss the issues with the "Forged Search Warrants" because he is working to help the prosecutor keep Carrie locked up. Those forged search warrants look serious enough to warrant in investigation. Neighbors will request the gov. file any correspondence addressing the evidence in the civil case in Topeka, as a New Judge is In the house, lol.
I will let the gov. know that I will need to have all of the communication filed on the record in the civil case. They are desperate to file a document requesting the judge grant an order to destroy evidence before it is inventoried. Things are getting very interesting up in here!
You can see I have been studying.
This is a file of the last 3 filings in The Neighbors case since Guy Neighbors filed his civil action in Federal Court In Topeka.
The Government was refusing to return any property, and now the prosecutor is in a huge all fired hurry to return evidence. The problem is I'm not jumping up to get anything back because it is now evidence in a Federal Civil Case Filed in Topeka Kansas.
Yep the bottom line is the evidence is Now Evidence in a civil case and will need to be transferred to a different court, in a different town, with a different Judge in a different venue. Pretty slick move if I may say so myself!
But 1st we will need to do a complete inventory of the evidence, and that will be one big job for my new pittbull investigator, lol.
The prosecutor is now asking the Judge to grant the order so the police can destroy stuff before Neighbors has the chance to inventory it. Humm do you think they have figured out the evidence is now evidence in a civil case, and cannot lawfully be destroyed?
The bigger problem the Government has is Neighbors tied the Federal misconduct to his civil seatbelt traffic ticket case to show a pattern of abuse. So now if the government cannot argue the issue of the federal misconduct, they will have admitted. There is an old saying in legal "he who does not deny, admits" and so it will be much easier for me to win the Federal civil action. So I have set this up so the Government will not get a chance to argue the Federal (if all goes to plan).
So let me break it down.. this case originally was from two seat belt violation that were filed in Municipal without any evidence on the record that Neighbors violated any ordinance. So a motion for summary judgment is in order soon as the Marshals serve the defendant's. The motion for summary judgment will be based on the fact there is no issues of material fact in dispute because they do NOT have any evidence filed in court on the record to prove that Neighbors violated an ordinance or any other silly corporate rule.
The other problem the Judge has is the evidence hearing he needs to have to get me out of his face should be a fact finding mission, but the judge does NOT want to discuss the issues with the "Forged Search Warrants" because he is working to help the prosecutor keep Carrie locked up. Those forged search warrants look serious enough to warrant in investigation. Neighbors will request the gov. file any correspondence addressing the evidence in the civil case in Topeka, as a New Judge is In the house, lol.
I will let the gov. know that I will need to have all of the communication filed on the record in the civil case. They are desperate to file a document requesting the judge grant an order to destroy evidence before it is inventoried. Things are getting very interesting up in here!
You can see I have been studying.
U.S. Department of Justice
Barry R. Grissom
United States Aomey
Disirict of Kansas
Kansas City Office Wichita Office
500 State Avenue 1200 Epic Center
Suite 360) 30LN. Main
Kansas City, Kansas 66101-2433 Wichita, Kansas 67202-4812
TEL: (913) 351-6730 Topeka OMfce
FAX: (913) 351-6541 4444 SE Quincy
Suite 290
92
Topeke, Kansas 66683:
August 25, 2015
Guy Neighbors
1309 Sunchase Dr.
Lawrence, KS. 66044
Via Email
Dear Mr. Neighbors:
Now that all litigation in United States v. Carrie Neighbors is concluded and the case
against yourself has been dismissed, the government is able to return to you certain property
ized during the search warrants. As I mentioned in documents filed with the Court, you are not
entitled to receive any property that was stolen, or that constitutes illegal drugs or drug
paraphernalia. [ have attached a copy of the Lawrence Police Department's inventory of the
items being held, Property that is highlighted in blue may be returned to you. Property that is
highlighted in yellow is contraband and property highlighted in green is stolen property. Stolen
property or contraband will not be returned to you.
Further, some of the items that may be returned are firearms or ammunition. Itis a
violation of federal and state law for certain persons, including those who are an unlawful user of
a controlled substance, to possess a firearm, If you are still unlawfully using marijuana or
another controlled substance, you are an unlawful user of a controlled substance and it is a
violation of both federal and state law for you to receive or possess a firearm or ammunition,
Likewise, if you fit any of the other categories of prohibited person under federal or state law, it
is illegal for you to possess or receive a firearm or ammunition.
If you have any questions regarding your ability to lawfully receive or possess a firearm,
you need to consult an attorney. The offer to return any firearm or ammunition does not
necessarily give you the lawful ability to possess the firearm or ammunition, and if you are
determined to be prohibited person, you may be subject to criminal prosecution in federal and/or
state courtAugust 24, 2015
Page 2
If you choose to allow a third party to pick up and dispose of any firearm or ammunition,
you will need to provide the Police Department consent to transfer the items to a third party who
is not a prohibited person.
1D. Christopher OakleyCase 2:07-cr-20124-CM Document 737 Filed 08/27/15 Page 1 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS
‘ATES OF AMERICA, )
)
Plaintiff, )
)
v. )
) Case No, 07-20124-02-CM
GUY NEIGHBORS, )
)
Defendant. )
eee |
ORDER
In January 2015, this court took Guy Neighbors’s motion for return of property (Doc. 684)
under advisement and set the motion for hearing, The court cancelled the hearing when Mr. Neighbors
appealed the court’s order. ‘The Tenth Circuit has since dismissed that appeal for lack of jurisdiction
In the court’s order on the motion for return of property, the court cited the continuing case of
Carrie Neighbors as one reason that all of the seized property could not be returned. (Doc. 707 at 2.)
The court believes that the disposition of Mrs. Neighbors’s habeas petition is now final, If this
understanding is correct, the government may now take a different position on what property is eligible
for return to Mr. Neighbors.
In an effort to resolve Mr. Neighbors’s motion for return of property, the court orders the
government to file a notice with the court showing the property that has been or will be returned to Mr.
Neighbors. ‘The government should file this notice within fourteen days of the date of this order. If
Mr. Neighbors objects to the government’s proposed disposition of the property, he may file a
response within fourteen days of the date the government files the notice. The response, however,
should not address the propriety of the underlying searches or seizures. ‘The court has already
determined that such a challenge is not proper in this context.I
Case 2:07-cr-20124-CM Document 737 Filed 08/27/15 Page 2 of 2
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that within fourteen days of the date of this order, the
government must file a notice showing the property that has been or will be returned to Mr. Neighbors.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that within fourteen days of the date the government files the
notice, Mr. Neighbors may file a response, without addressing the propriety of the searches or seizures.
Dated this 27th day of August, 2015, at Kansas City, Kansas.
s/ Carlos Murguia
CARLOS MURGUIA
United States Distriet JudgeCase 2:07-cr-20124-CM Document 738 Filed 08/27/15 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )
)
Plaintitt, )
)
’ )
) Case No. 07-20124-02-CM.
GUY NEIGHBORS, )
)
Defendant. )
eee)
ORDER
‘This closed criminal case is before the court on Guy Neighbors’s Memorandum in Support of
Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 736), which the court construes liberally as a motion for
summary judgment. In this motion, Mr, Neighbors again raises the issue of the court’s jurisdiction.
Mr. Neighbors’s jurisdictional challenge is not a proper basis for summary judgment in the criminal
case against him—a case that was dismissed in May 2014, Indeed, a summary judgment motion is a
civil motion; not a criminal motion, See Fed. R. Civ. P. 56; Fed. R. Civ. P. 1; Fed. R. Crim. P. 1. Mr.
Neighbors is not entitled to relief,
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the motion for summary judgment (Doe. 736) is
denied.
Dated this 27th day of August, 2015, at Kansas City, Kansas.
s/ Carlos Murguia
CARLOS MURGUIA
United States District JudgeCase 2:07-cr-20124-CM Document 739 Filed 09/03/15 Page 1 of 4
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, _)
Plaintiff, :
vs. } No. 07-20124-CM
GUY 8, NEIGHBORS, )
Defendant.
UNITED STATES’ NOTICE REGARDING STATUS OF PROPERTY.
AND MOTION FOR ORDER
‘The United States of America, by and through D. Cl
istopher Oakley,
Assistant United States Attorney, provides this report in response to the court’s Order
ditecting the government to file a notice showing the property that has ot will be
returned to Mr. Neighbors (Doc. 737, filed 8/27/15). Vurther, the government
requests the Court issue an order authorizing the Lawrence Police Department to
dispose of the remaining property consistent with state law and the Department's
internal policies.
Status of Seized Property
"The government previously indicated that it would return certain property to
the defendant following the conclusion of co-defendant Carrie Neighbor's appeal.
(See United States Designation of Property Related to Defendant's Motion for Return of Property,Case 2:07-cr-20124-CM Document 739 Filed 09/03/15 Page 3 of 4
contraband shall be destroyed, except that any such articles the
disposition of which is otherwise provided by law shall be dealt with as
so provided and any such articles the disposition of which is not
otherwise provided of law and which may be capable of innocent use
may in the discretion of the court be sold and the proceeds disposed of
as provided in subsection (c)(3).
‘Therefore, the government requests that any remaining property in the custody
of the Lawrence Police Department which is not able to be returned the defendant be
disposed of consistent with State law and the Department's internal policies.
Respectfully submitted,
BARRY R. GRISSOM
United States Attorney
hhristopher Oakk
D. Christopher Oakley, #19248
Assistant United States Attorney
500 State Avenue, Suite 360
Kansas City, Kansas 66101
Telephone: 913-551-6730
Fax: 913-551-6541
Email: chris.oakley@usdoj.gov
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
Attorneys for Plaintiff