Criteria

Skill One

Excellent
Students provided a
rational of why each
material is used with
reference to the
sustainability in the
countries climate, access
to resources and frequent
natural disasters. This is
supported through
technological evidence and
data.

Good
Students provided a
rational of why each
material is used with
reference to the
sustainability in the
countries climate, access
to resources and frequent
natural disasters.
Students have attempted
to support through
technological evidence,
however not seen as
relevant to the materials
used.

Satisfactory
Students provided a
rational of why each
material is used with
reference to the
sustainability in the
countries climate, access
to resources and frequent
natural disasters. No
effort has been made to
support material through
researched evidence.

Unsatisfactory
Students have provided a
rational of why each
material is used however
with no reference to the
specific countries climate,
access to resources and
frequent natural
disasters. No effort has
been made to support
material through
researched evidence.

Skill Two

Students have depicted a

high degree of reference to
their prior knowledge and
unit of work completed in
class.

Students have depicted a

sound effort to support
their notions with
reference to their prior
knowledge and unit of
work completed in class.

Students have attempted

to reference to their prior
knowledge and unit of
work completed in class.

Students have made no

reference to their prior
knowledge and unit of
work completed in class.

Skill Three

Students have worked

cooperatively in their
group setting, dividing the
work fairly and supporting
team members in research
and implementation of
plans.

Students have worked

cooperatively in their
group settings and
supported team
members, however
showed a lesser effort in
completing a fair amount
of work each.

Students have completed

their fair share of the
work, however have not
worked cooperatively in
their group and supported
team members in
research and
implementation of plans.

There has been no

cooperation amongst the
group, displaying a
disproportioned dividing
of work and research
implementation.

Teacher comments

Group reflection
How well do you think your group had worked together? Rate your group on a scale of 1 (quite poorly) to 10 (was a fair and
supportive group setting).

Will you work differently the next time you are put in a group project? Why? /Why not?