Professional Documents
Culture Documents
J.V. Uspensky-Introduction To Mathematical Probability - McGraw-Hill (1937) - 2 PDF
J.V. Uspensky-Introduction To Mathematical Probability - McGraw-Hill (1937) - 2 PDF
J.V. Uspensky-Introduction To Mathematical Probability - McGraw-Hill (1937) - 2 PDF
0, ‘{10) yr=g if #20. ‘The first set of equations is obvious; the second set is the expression i( the fact that if there are no successes in ¢ trials, the failures oceur ¢ nes in succession, and the probability for that is q'. Following Laplace, we introduce for a given ¢ the generating function Vout} Yae3 You. . +» that is, the power series (8) = Yor + Yrck + you bo = Deeb. z=0 king t — 1 instead of t, separating the first term and multiplying by we have Gel) = Mora +S yess eel wimilarly pee) =D) pensark. eat ing and noting equation (9) we obtain (DE + gee a(k) = giC8) + QYoe41 — Yous i, because of (10). Wor — Yu= ga —g =O hence, gilt) = (pE + a) gr-a€8)86 INTRODUCTION TO MATHEMATICAL PROBABILITY [Cuap. V ' for every positive t. Taking! = 1, 2,3, . . . and performing successive substitutions, we get el) = (PE + )*e0(€) and it remains only to find golf) = Yoo + yro& + yok +--+ * Y But on account of (10), yzo = 0 for @ > 0, while yoo = 1. Thus, (= 1 4 and elt) = (pe + Ot To find yz, it remains to develop the right-hand member in a power of £ and to find the coefficient of &. The binomial theorem readily git _i¢-)- ++ @- 24+) = “Tg - eS Ye, peg. 10. Poisson’s Series of Trials. The analytical method thus enable us to find the same expression for probabilities in a Bernoullian sei of trials as that obtained in Chap. IIT by elementary means. Consider how simple it is to arrive at this expression, it may appear that a new deduction of a known result is not a great gain. But one must bear i mind that a little modification of the problem may bring new difficultie which may be more easily overcome by the new method than by a general imation of the old one. Poisson substituted for the Bernoullian serie another series of independent trials with probability varying fron trial to trial, so that in trials 1, 2,3, 4, . . . the same event has differen probabilities pi, pa, ps, ps, . . - and correspondingly, the opposite even has probabilities q1, g2, ¢s, qs, . . . where gx = 1 — px, ingeneral. Now for the Poisson series, the same question may be asked: what. is th probability y., of obtaining x successes in ¢ trials? The solution of thi generalized problem is easier and more elegant if we make use of differ ence equations. First, in the same manner as before, we can establish the equation i finite differences ah Ya ‘The corresponding set of i Ys0 = 0 tem mtg =D (12) Yr Ong t>0 mow le Giving y.(£) the same meaning as above, we have PYertat + WYaie itial conditions isfive. 11) USB OF DIFFERENCE EQUATIONS IN SOLVING PROBLEMS 87 qealE) = galema + 3S) gitecnab? a piboilt) = Dpyeunik’s iat (pee + qdeea(E) = 8) + Qatirss — Yous; nit because of (12) Gone — Yor = M92 Ge Gide qe = 0, ot) = (iE + era) et) = (Die + H)(Dak + G2) «+ > (DE + qdea(8). However, by virtue of (12), go(£) = 1 so that finally ot) = (ik + q(pot +H) + > GE + Ge ‘To find the probability of successes in ¢ trials in Poisson's case, one yuils only to develop the product (pié + G)(Pat + a2) > (DE + Ge) cording to ascending powers of £ and to Snd the coefficient of £+ 11. Solution by Lagrange’s Method. We shall now apply to equa- iin (9) the ingenious method devised by Lagrange, with a slight modifica- vit intended to bring into full light the fundamental idea underlying this wthod. Equation (9) possesses particular solutions of the form are! «and B are connected by the equation af = p+ qa. ving this equation for 6, we find infinitely many particular solutions a(q + party | wie a is absolutely arbitrary. Multiplying this expression by an bilrary function g(a) and integrating between arbitrary limits, we nin other solutions of equation (Q)., Now the question arises of how s vlicose ¢(c) and the path of integration to satisfy not only equation (9) | also initial conditions (10). We shall assume that (a) is a regular tion of a complex variable @ in a ring between two concentric circles, } their center at the origin, and that it can therefore be represented in ring by Laurent’s series wa) =X) ena,88. INTRODUCTION TO MATHEMATICAL PROBABILITY (Crap. If cis a circle concentric with the regularity ring of g(a) and situated inside it, the integral Yat = Hy J 7G + par''e(a)de is perfectly determined and represents a solution of (9), To satisfy the initial conditions, we have first the set of equations ay fer telelia =0 for 2=1,2,3,... which show that all the coefficients c, with negative subscripts vanish, and that o(q) is regular about the origin. ‘The second set of equatio obtained by setting 2 = 0 ale + pe" Daq = 9! for 150,1,2,.., serves to determine y(a). If ¢ is a sufficiently small complex parameter, this set of equations is entirely equivalent to a single equation: Now the integrand within the circle ¢ has a single pole a» determined by the equation. a = e(p + goo) und the corresponding residue is Plas), 1 ge At the same time, this is the value of the left-hand member of the aboy equation, so that 1 ~ ge 1 — ge or elas) = 1 for all sufficiently small € or ao, That is, e(a) = 1 and wide fageai(gaeyi Yor = Ble (0 +o) de in the required sohition. Jf reniains to find the residue of the integrant that is, the coefficient of 1/é in the development af oy + n'fine. 12] USE OF DIFFERENCE EQUATIONS IN SOLVING PROBLEMS 89 series of ascending powers of «. That can be easily done, using the hinomial development, and we obtain Yat = Ciptq* ‘mit should be. 12. Problem 4. Two players, A and B, agree to play a series of james on the condition that A wins the series if he succeeds in winning ¢ umes before B wins 6 games. ‘The probability of winning a single game pfor A and q = 1 — p for B, so that each game must be won by either or B. What is the probability that A will win the series? Solution. This historically important problem was proposed as an xercise (Prob. 12, page 58) with a brief indication of its solution based ys elementary principles. To solve it analytically, let us denote by Yar the probability that A will win when x games remain for him to win, while his adversary B has ¢ games left to win. Considering the result wf the game immediately following, we distinguish two alternatives: () A wins the next game (probability p) and has to win z ~ 1 games lore B wins ¢ games (probability yz-1,.); (6) A loses the next game (yrobability q) and has to win 2 games before B can win ¢ — 1 games jjrobability y21). The probabilities of these two alternatives being ae and qy,.-1 their sum is the total probability y... Thus, yz+ Yat = PYeaet Yor Now, yzo = 0 for 2 > 0, which means that A cannot win, B having on all his games. Also, yo, = 1 for ¢ > 0, which means that A surely is when he has no more games to win. The initial conditions in our ablem are, therefore, Y20 = 0 if x >0; You = 1 if t>Q Iie symbol yoo has no meaning as a probability, and remains undefined. ur tho sake of simplicity we shall assume, however, that yoo = 0. Application of Laplace’s Method. Again, let elt) = Yao + York + yeak + + the generating function of the sequence Yz0} Yz15 Ya +» - COr- jonding to an arbitrary z > 0. We have dkox(8) = Yaverrt! a Pems(8) = PYas.0 + Spysss8 mt