Dr. Bradley Boswell, a veterinarian, was charged with falsifying test records, failing to properly supervise employees, violating FDA regulations regarding illegal animal drugs, improperly extending medications, and overcharging clients based on testimony from former employees and another vet. A hearing panel found Boswell violated statutes but he appealed, successfully arguing a higher evidentiary standard should have been used. On remand, the panel's findings were upheld under the clear and convincing standard. This supports animal rights as no animal should be harmed by a veterinarian.
Dr. Bradley Boswell, a veterinarian, was charged with falsifying test records, failing to properly supervise employees, violating FDA regulations regarding illegal animal drugs, improperly extending medications, and overcharging clients based on testimony from former employees and another vet. A hearing panel found Boswell violated statutes but he appealed, successfully arguing a higher evidentiary standard should have been used. On remand, the panel's findings were upheld under the clear and convincing standard. This supports animal rights as no animal should be harmed by a veterinarian.
Dr. Bradley Boswell, a veterinarian, was charged with falsifying test records, failing to properly supervise employees, violating FDA regulations regarding illegal animal drugs, improperly extending medications, and overcharging clients based on testimony from former employees and another vet. A hearing panel found Boswell violated statutes but he appealed, successfully arguing a higher evidentiary standard should have been used. On remand, the panel's findings were upheld under the clear and convincing standard. This supports animal rights as no animal should be harmed by a veterinarian.
falsifying test records, failing to supervise his employees, violating FDA regulations regarding the use of illegal animal drugs, extending medications with the use of water instead of approved diluents, and overcharging clients for animal feed based on the testimony of Boswells former employees and another veterinarian.
How it ended in court:
A hearing panel found that Boswells acts violated several state and federal statutes. He petitioned for judicial review, successfully convincing the district court that a standard of clear and convincing evidence should have been used. The district court remanded the matter to the hearing panel, which filed a supplemental decision holding that its previous findings were justified even under the higher standard of proof. Boswell appealed.
How this impacts our cause:
This
impacts our animal rights cause
because no animal should be treated in a way that harms them, especially by a veterinarian. The court case shows that they have the same views as our cause.
Dr. Sebi's Reborn Bible for Beginners: Embrace a Healthier You with Dr. Sebi's Alkaline and Anti-Inflammatory Regimen | Revitalize, Detox, and Transform Your Life [II EDITION]
Martha Cramer Lewis, Guardian of The Person and Estate of Richard Paul Fields, A Minor, and Dennis Fields and Joan Fields, Husband and Wife v. H. Leo Owen, M.D., 395 F.2d 537, 10th Cir. (1968)
Lewis Coleman Cowley v. Larry Stricklin, Director, Taylor Hardin Secure Medical Facility, and The Attorney General of The State of Alabama, 929 F.2d 640, 11th Cir. (1991)