BATONGBACAL v.

SATURDAY MORNINGS
August 20, 1994 | Fernan, CJ. | Possession
Digester: Roa, Annamhel Monique C.
SUMMARY: This case is one for [action]/ This case is about
[topic]. Synopsis of facts. Court ruling.
DOCTRINE: Doctrine related to the topic + Other doctrinal
pronouncements laid out by the SC in response to the main
arguments of parties.
FACTS:
The first set of bullets shall consist of the antecedent facts
narrated chronologically. If there are many important ones,
they may be broken down in sequential bullets.
ARGUMENTS OF PLAINTIFF
If you are looking for ransom, I can tell you I don't have money.
But what I do have are a very particular set of skills, skills I
have acquired over a very long career. Skills that make me a
nightmare for people like you.
ARGUMENTS OF RESPONDENT/DEFENDANT
We all want to help one another. Human beings are like that.
We want to live by each other's happiness, not by each other's
misery
ARGUMENTS OF AMICI CURIAE/ INTERVENING PARTIES, if any
My name is Maximus Decimus Meridius, commander of the
Armies of the North, General of the Felix Legions and loyal
servant to the true emperor, Marcus Aurelius, father to a
murdered son, husband to a murdered wife. And I will have my
vengeance, in this life or the next.

RTC The ruling shall clearly show how the court treated the
arguments presented by the parties.
CA - Oh no, it wasnt the airplanes. It was Beauty killed the
Beast.

RULING: Full dispositive portion here.

Whether we ought to include every issue, bearing any
relation to the topic at hand, however remote. Yes.
One morning I shot an elephant in my pajamas. How he got in
my pajamas, I don't know.
Of all the gin joints in all the towns in all the world, she walks
into mine.
Whether we ought to paraphrase the Courts rulings No.
As much as possible, copy-paste the doctrinal pronouncements.
Jbats appears to like to note the cadence of words and asks for
statements in verbatim at times.
If the Court cites a number of cases in support of their rulings,
provide for them individually, thus: INC v De Lima Im gonna
make him an offer he cant refuse.
Epifanio de los Santos v Soliven Toto, Ive a feeling were not
in Kansas anymore.
NOTES:
Synopsis of the facts of cited cases go here, if any, to better
appreciate their relation to the case at hand.
Provisions of law not found in the NCC also must be
reproduced in full here.