Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Mech ANL 16.0 L06 Advanced Models
Mech ANL 16.0 L06 Advanced Models
Advanced Models
16.0 Release
ANSYS Mechanical
Advanced Nonlinear Materials
1
Release 14.0
A. Mullins Effect
Mullins effect is a stretch softening phenomenon
observed in elastomeric materials undergoing
cyclic loading.
When an elastomer is loaded in simple tension
from its virgin state, unloaded and then reloaded,
the stress required on reloading is less then that
on the initial loading for stretches up to the
maximum stretch achieved on the initial loading.
During reloading, as the reloading strain
approaches the maximum strain seen in its prior
strain history, the stress-strain behavior begins to
stiffen and rejoin the reference virgin curve; upon
reaching the reference virgin curve, the stressstrain behavior follows that of the virgin stressstrain behavior.
Mullins Effect
Phenomenon typically observed in compliant filled polymers.
Characterized by a decrease in material stiffness during loading
Readily observed during cyclic loading as the material response along the
unloading path differs noticeably from the response that along the loading path.
Although the details about the mechanisms responsible for the Mullins
effect have not yet been settled, they might include:
Debonding of the polymer from the filler particles
Separation of particle clusters
Rearrangement of the polymer chains and particles.
Mullins Effect
The Ogden Roxburgh pseudo-elastic model of the Mullins effect is a modification
of the standard thermodynamic formulation for hyperelastic* materials and is
given by:
WO( Fij )
( )
* The virgin material is modeled using one of the available hyperelastic potentials, and
the Mullins effect modifications to the constitutive response are proportional to the
maximum load in the material history.
5
Mullins Effect
The arbitrary limits 0 1.0
are imposed with 1 defined as the
state of the material without any changes due to the Mullins effect.
Then along with equilibrium, the damage function is defined by:
(1) 0
( ) WO( Fij )
Which implicitly defines the Ogden Roxburgh parameter
Mullins Effect
The 2nd Piola-Kirchoff stress tensor is:
W
WO
Sij 2
2
Cij
Cij
The modified Ogden-Roxburgh damage function available in ANSYS has the
following functional form of the damage variable
Wm WO
1
1 erf
r
m
b
L
m
Where:
Mullins Effect
The parameters used in the Ogden-Roxburgh damage can be defined in
Engineering Data provided a hyperelastic material model is first defined.
Mullins Effect
Effect can be plotted via Chart Tool
LS07
LS05
LS03
LS08
LS01
LS02
LS04
LS06
Mullins Effect
References on Mullins Theory:
1. Section 4.8 of ANSYS 14.0 Theory Manual
2. Ogden & Roxburgh; Pseudo-elastic model for Mullins effect in filled rubber, 1999
10
Workshop Exercise
Please refer to your Workshop Supplement:
Workshop 6A: Mullins Effect
11
B. Anisotropic Hyperelasticity
Anisotropic Hyperelasticity can be used to model
materials that exhibit direction-dependent large
elastic strains, such as biomaterials or reinforced
elastomer composites.
One way to view anisotropic hyperelasticity is that
there may be fibers (or reinforcements) in an
elastomer-like matrix.
Up to two preferred fiber directions A and B, with
corresponding material parameters, can be
specified.
12
Anisotropic Hyperelasticity
Recall that there are several isotropic hyperelastic
constitutive models available in ANSYS. Many of
these (e.g., Mooney-Rivlin, Yeoh, Arruda-Boyce,
Gent, Blatz-Ko) are based on the first three strain
invariants, as shown on the left
13
I1 trC
1 2
I 2 tr C trC 2
2
I 3 det C J 2
Anisotropic Hyperelasticity
Two material directions (vectors A and B) in the
undeformed configuration characterize the
anisotropy of the material.
I 4 A CA
I5 A C A
2
I 6 B CB
I 7 B C2B
I 8 A B A CB
I 9 A B
14
Anisotropic Hyperelasticity
In the case of fibers in a matrix that produce
anisotropy in two directions A and B, one can
ascribe some meaning to the various strain
invariants:
I1 trC
1 2
I 2 tr C trC 2
2
I 3 det C J 2
I 4 A CA
I 5 A C2 A
I 6 B CB
I 7 B C2B
I 8 A B A CB
I 9 A B
15
Anisotropic Hyperelasticity
The strain energy density function for anisotropic hyperelasticity can be
decomposed into two parts deviatoric Wd and volumetric Wv. Moreover,
the deviatoric term can be separated into both isotropic and anisotropic
parts:
WAHYPER Wd Wv
Wd ,iso Wd ,aniso Wv
The volumetric term Wv is a familiar equation arising in other nearly-/fullyincompressible strain energy density functions and is a function of J (third
strain invariant) only:
1
2
Wv J 1
d
16
Anisotropic Hyperelasticity
The anisotropic hyperelastic material model can be defined via APDL
commands only (TB,AHYPER, TBTEMP and TBDATA):
Can also be combined with viscoelasticity (TB,PRONY)
Viscoelastic behavior is assumed to be isotropic
The volumetric term Wv is a familiar equation arising in other nearly-/fullyincompressible strain energy density functions and is a function of J (third strain
invariant) only
1
2
Wv J 1
d
One can estimate d=2/ko, where ko is the initial bulk modulus of the material.
For fully-incompressible behavior, d=0.
17
Anisotropic Hyperelasticity
Two expresssions are available for characterizing the isochoric part of the
strain energy potential
Polynomial (Defined with TB,AHYPER,,,Poly):
18
Anisotropic Hyperelasticity
Note: The first two terms of the expressions on previous slide represent the
deviatoric component related to isotropic behavior Wd,iso This is very similar
to the general polynomial form without cij cross-terms:
Wd ,iso ai I1 3 b j I 2 3
3
i 1
j 1
TBDATA,1,a1,a2,a3,b1,b2,b3
If bi=0, the isotropic term becomes the 3rd order Yeoh model. If only a1 is present,
it is like the neo-Hookean model.
19
Anisotropic Hyperelasticity
The A material direction constants (AX, AY, AZ) are input via TB,AHYPER,,,3,AVEC and
TBDATA,1,AX,AY,AZ
The B material direction constants (BX, BY, BZ) are input via TB,AHYPER,,,3,BVEC and
TBDATA,1,BX,BY,BZ
The material anisotropy is defined with these two vectors A and B, not with the
element coordinate system ESYS
Vectors A and B can have arbitrary directions and need not be orthogonal
The magnitude of the vectors |A| and |B| will be scaled internally to be equal to 1.
For the case when the hyperelastic material is orthotropic:
Constants go are not required because I8=I9=0
If the hyperelastic material is transversely isotropic:
Constants em, fn, and go are not required because I6=I7=I8=I9=0
Constants (BX, BY, BZ) are not required
20
Anisotropic Hyperelasticity
Sample input script for
Anisotropic Hyperelasticity:
21
C. Bergstrom-Boyce Hyperelasticity
When rubber material is compressed for extended period of time, sometimes it
loses its ability to return to its undeformed state. This loss of elasticity may
reduce the efficiency of an elastomeric gasket, seal or cushioning pad to perform
over its operating life. The resulting permanent set that a gasket/seals may cause
a leak or reduce cushioning effect of a pad.
Bergstrom-Boyce material model can be used for predicting permanent set. The
time dependent material properties (C5, C7,C8) of BB model can be adjusted such
that the viscoelastic strains can be treated as Pseudo plastic strains.
-1.8
-1.6
-1.4
True Stress
-1.2
-1
Permanent
set
-0.8
-0.6
-0.4
-0.2
0
0
22
-0.2
-0.4
-0.6
True Strain
-0.8
-1
23
Bergstrom-Boyce Hyperelasticity
The stress state in A can be found in the tensor form of the deformation
gradient tensor (F = dxi / dXj) and material parameters, as follows:
24
Bergstrom-Boyce Hyperelasticity
L-1(X) is the inverse Langevin function given by:
This approximation will differ from the polynomial approximation used for
the Arruda-Boyce model.
25
Bergstrom-Boyce Hyperelasticity
The stress in the viscoelastic component of the material (B) is a function of
the deformation and the rate of deformation.
- Of the total deformation in B, a portion takes place in the elastic component while
the rest of the deformation takes place in the viscous component.
- Because the stress in the elastic portion is equal to the stress plastic portion, the
total stress can be written merely as a function of the elastic deformation
- All variables in this equation are analogous to the variables for s A
The stress tensor from component B is added to the stress tensor from
component A to find the total stress
26
Bergstrom-Boyce Hyperelasticity
The Bergstrom-Boyce (or BB) material model can be defined via APDL
commands only (TB,AHYPER, TBTEMP and TBDATA):
Issue the TBDATA data table command to input the constant values in the
order shown:
27
Bergstrom-Boyce Hyperelasticity
Sample input script for BB model
28
-2
-1.8
-1.6
-1.4
-1.2
-1
-0.8
-0.6
-0.4
-0.2
0
0.4
C1_b = 5
C1_b = 1
C1_b = 0.5
C1_b = 0.1
C1_b = 0.05
3.As the value of C7 increases, hysteresis also increases and thus high Pseudo
plastic strains.
0.35
0.3
0.25
0.2
0.15
0.1
0.05
0
0
0.00
-0.20
-0.40
-0.60
-0.80
-1.00
True Strain
-1.8
C = -2.5
-1.4
C = -2
-1.2
0.12
C = -1.5
-1
C = -1
-0.8
C = -0.8
-0.6
C = -0.6
-0.4
C = -0.4
-0.2
0.14
Pseudo Plastic Strain
-1.6
-0.2
-0.4
-0.6
-0.8
0.08
0.06
0.04
0.02
0
C = -0.2
0.1
-1
-0.5
-1
-1.5
-2
-2.5
-3
True Strain
-1.4
m=2
-1.2
m = 2.5
-1
m=3
-0.8
m = 3.5
-0.6
-0.4
m=4
-0.2
m = 4.5
-0.2
-0.4
-0.6
True Strain
30
-0.8
-1
0.09
-1.6
0.07
0.05
0.03
0.01
-0.01
2
2.5
3.5
4.5
31
Workshop Exercise
Please refer to your Workshop Supplement:
Workshop 6B: Hysteresis under Uniaxial tension loading
32
Workshop Exercise
Please refer to your Workshop Supplement:
Workshop 6C: Permanent Set in O-ring
33
www.jmmedical.com
Martensite plates are formed within the austenite phase. The formation of these
martensite plates generally do not involve dislocation motion or diffusional flow
Consider the case of an elevated temperature where only austenite exists at the stressfree state. If a material is loaded, the higher stress induces a phase change to
martensite (path ABC). Unloading will result in a reverse transformation from
martensite back to austenite with hysteresis (path CDA). This is the superelastic effect.
35
Compression
Complete implant
36
Heating
residual strain
recovery
Remove loading
elastic recovery
Accounts for austenite to martensite (AS) and martensite to austenite (SA) phase
transformations.
37
xS x A 1
xS xA 0
The first two equations reflect that fraction rate of one phase is
based on the fraction rate during either transformation process
(SA or AS).
38
xS xSAS xSSA
xA xAAS xASA
x AS x AS
A
xASA xSSA
F q 3ap
where q is the deviatoric stress, p is the hydrostatic pressure, and a is
a material parameter.
F
AS
AS
xS H 1 x S
F s fAS 1 a
for AS transformation with HAS defined as:
H AS
s sAS 1 a F s fAS 1 a
1 if
F 0
0 otherwise
H SA
40
F s SA
f 1 a
SA
s SA
f 1 a F s s 1 a
1 if
F 0
0 otherwise
level
and ends at
100% is martensite.
sASf
when
sASf
sASs
41
eL
sSAs
sSAf
process.
eL
42
strain.
For Nitinol, this is typically between 0.07 and 0.10 (7-10%).
The material parameter a discussed earlier affects the material response in tension
and compression.
If tensile and compressive behaviors are the same, a=0.
For Nitinol, this is usually taken to be around 0-0.1.
43
The alpha value affects the compressibility of transformation strain (i.e., degree of
which transformation strains are dependent on hydrostatic pressure)
This parameter also produces different response in tension and compression
44
45
Where:
46
b M aterial Parameter
T Temperature
To Temperature which no twinning martensite
is observed
h material parameter related to the hardening
of the material during phase transformation
Where:
47
48
49
50
51
h
To
R
b
eL
Em
m
SMA cannot be combined with other materials for the same material.
52