Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • WCT 33 WellCAP Instructor Evaluation Form

    Uploaded by

    Marcelo Veronez
    7 views2 pages
    This instructor evaluation form contains sections to rate an instructor on their lesson effectiveness, motivation and interaction skills, preparation and materials, and presentation style. The form collects information on the instructor's name, course title, date and duration. It uses a rating scale to evaluate if the instructor exhibited adequate knowledge, enthusiasm, attention holding skills, clarification abilities, example use, question answering skills, purpose establishment, questioning techniques, participant comfort, question encouragement, diplomacy, involvement, supplies/equipment, timeliness, aids/plan use, voice, speech rate, mannerisms, eye contact and professionalism. Space for comments is provided under each section. An overall evaluation of outstanding, highly effective, effective or needs improvement is also requested.

    Original Description:

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This instructor evaluation form contains sections to rate an instructor on their lesson effectiveness, motivation and interaction skills, preparation and materials, and presentation style. The form collects information on the instructor's name, course title, date and duration. It uses a rating scale to evaluate if the instructor exhibited adequate knowledge, enthusiasm, attention holding skills, clarification abilities, example use, question answering skills, purpose establishment, questioning techniques, participant comfort, question encouragement, diplomacy, involvement, supplies/equipment, timeliness, aids/plan use, voice, speech rate, mannerisms, eye contact and professionalism. Space for comments is provided under each section. An overall evaluation of outstanding, highly effective, effective or needs improvement is also requested.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf or txt
    7 views2 pages

    WCT 33 WellCAP Instructor Evaluation Form

    Uploaded by

    Marcelo Veronez
    This instructor evaluation form contains sections to rate an instructor on their lesson effectiveness, motivation and interaction skills, preparation and materials, and presentation style. The form collects information on the instructor's name, course title, date and duration. It uses a rating scale to evaluate if the instructor exhibited adequate knowledge, enthusiasm, attention holding skills, clarification abilities, example use, question answering skills, purpose establishment, questioning techniques, participant comfort, question encouragement, diplomacy, involvement, supplies/equipment, timeliness, aids/plan use, voice, speech rate, mannerisms, eye contact and professionalism. Space for comments is provided under each section. An overall evaluation of outstanding, highly effective, effective or needs improvement is also requested.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 2

    WellCAP Instructor Evaluation Form

    Instructor Name:_________________

    Lecture/Simulator time: ________________hrs

    Course Title: ____________________

    Course Date: __________________________

    Lesson Effectiveness

    Strongly
    Agree

    Agree

    Strongly
    Disagree

    Disagree

    N/A

    Exhibited a level of knowledge adequate to teach the


    training material.
    Demonstrated enthusiasm and credibility for the
    subject being taught.
    Gained and maintained attention of trainees.
    Kept the course focused on the subject material.
    Clarified, summarized and amplified important
    information.
    Used clear and relevant examples to explain ideas.
    Answered trainee questions satisfactorily, providing
    clear and complete answers.
    Established the purpose for learning the material and
    related it to the job.

    Comments
    ____________________________________________________________________________
    ____________________________________________________________________________
    ____________________________________________________________________________
    Motivation/Interaction

    Strongly
    Agree

    Agree

    Disagree

    Strongly
    Disagree

    N/A

    Asked trainees questions to reinforce key information


    and phrased them to get adequate response.
    Made trainees comfortable to participate.
    Encouraged trainee questions.
    Handled hostile questions diplomatically.
    Involved as many participants as possible in classroom
    discussions.

    Comments___________________________________________________________________
    ____________________________________________________________________________
    ____________________________________________________________________________

    WCT-33
    Revision 1

    Page 1
    Last updated: 12 Aug 2010

    Preparation/Materials

    Strongly
    Agree

    Agree

    Disagree

    Strongly
    Disagree

    N/A

    All needed supplies, materials, and equipment were


    readily available.
    Started class on time and held breaks that were
    appropriate in frequency and length.
    Instructional presentation aids and lesson plan were
    used effectively and strongly reinforcing learning

    Comments___________________________________________________________________
    ____________________________________________________________________________
    ____________________________________________________________________________

    Presentation

    Strongly
    Agree

    Agree

    Disagree

    Strongly
    Disagree

    N/A

    Voice could be easily heard.


    Rate of speech was neither too fast nor too slow.
    Instructor's gestures and mannerisms aided
    communication.
    Eye contact was direct and included all trainees.
    Presentation style was professional and enhanced
    learning.

    Comments___________________________________________________________________
    ____________________________________________________________________________
    ____________________________________________________________________________
    Overall, what is your evaluation of this Instructor?
    Outstanding (Performance exceeds expectations by a highly significant level.)
    Highly Effective (Performance exceeds expectations.)
    Effective (Performance meets expectations.)
    Needs Improvement (Recommend supervision by Approved Instructor)

    Evaluator Signature: ___________________________________

    WCT-33
    Revision 1

    Page 2
    Last updated: 12 Aug 2010

    You might also like