Umts Traning 3g Basic 2

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 107

October 2012

Arum Setyo
sweet.arum@gmail.com

3G

Performance Analysis
3G RF Optimization
3G RF Optimization Cases
3G RF Formula
Capacity Management Concept
Expansion Criteria
Capacity counters & optimization
methodology

Low CSSR CS
Low CSSR PS
High DCR CS
High DCR PS
Low CS ISHO Success Rate
Low PS ISHO Success Rate
Low IFHO Success Rate
Low HSDPA Throughput
Low HSUPA Throughput
Low coverage (low RSCP vs. propagation delay)
High interference (low EcNo (CQI) vs. good RSCP)

Problem Classification

Congestion

RF Problem

Transmission Problem

Measurement Item

RRC.FailConnEstab.Cong

RRC.FailConnEstab.NoReply
VS.RRC.Rej.Redir.Dist
VS.RRC.Rej.Redir.InterRat
VS.RRC.Rej.Redir.IntraRat
VS.RRC.Rej.Redir.Service
VS.RRC.Rej.RL.Fail
VS.RRC.Rej.TNL.Fail

Sub Items
VS.RRC.Rej.ULIUBBand.Cong,
VS.RRC.Rej.DLIUBBand.Cong
VS.RRC.Rej.ULPower.Cong,
VS.RRC.Rej.DLPower.Cong
VS.RRC.Rej.ULCE.Cong,
VS.RRC.Rej.DLCE.Cong
VS.RRC.Rej.Code.Cong

Transmission Problem:

Congestion Problem:

Relative alarms to identify faults on the transmission


path or the transmission boards of RNC/NodeB.
Check the Admission Control thresholds.
Take appropriate measures to relieve congestion, e.g.
activate LDR (Load Reshuffling), OLC (Overload Control)
algorithms, and to increase capacity.

RF Problem:

Check coverage in the failure points.


Check if most failures occur in cell border (most
probably they are).
Check FACH power.
Check DL interference in the cell: is there a pilot
pollution issue?
Check UL interference in the cell.

Problem Classification

Measurement Item

Sub Items

Sub Items

Sub Items

Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Level 4
VS.RAB.FailEstabCS.RNL VS.RAB.FailEstCS. VS.RAB.FailEstabCS. VS.RAB.FailEstCs.ULPower.Cong
Unsp
Cong
VS.RAB.FailEstCs.DLPower.Cong
VS.RAB.FailEstCs.Code.Cong
VS.RAB.FailEstab.CS.DLIUBBand.

Congestion
VS.RAB.FailEstab.CS.ULIUBBand.
VS.RAB.FailEstCs.ULCE.Cong
VS.RAB.FailEstCs.DLCE.Cong

VS.RAB.FailEstabCS.UuFail
RF Problem
Transmission

VS.RAB.FailEstabCS.IubFail
VS.RAB.FailEstabCS.TNL

Transmission Problem:

Check transmission issue on Iu-CS interface; check


relative alarms and its history.

RF Problem:
Check invalid parameters
Check inter-RAT HO and if the failure point is in RNC

border
Check the relative RB Setup failure counters to get
more details on the failure cause

Congestion Problem:
Check the Admission Control thresholds.
Take appropriate measures to relieve congestion, e.g.
activate LDR, OLC algorithms, and to increase
capacity.
Refer to 3G Capacity Optimization document

Problem Classification

Congestion

RF Problem

Transmission Problem

Measurement Item

RRC.FailConnEstab.Cong

RRC.FailConnEstab.NoReply
VS.RRC.Rej.Redir.Dist
VS.RRC.Rej.Redir.InterRat
VS.RRC.Rej.Redir.IntraRat
VS.RRC.Rej.Redir.Service
VS.RRC.Rej.RL.Fail
VS.RRC.Rej.TNL.Fail

Sub Items
VS.RRC.Rej.ULIUBBand.Cong,
VS.RRC.Rej.DLIUBBand.Cong
VS.RRC.Rej.ULPower.Cong,
VS.RRC.Rej.DLPower.Cong
VS.RRC.Rej.ULCE.Cong,
VS.RRC.Rej.DLCE.Cong
VS.RRC.Rej.Code.Cong

Transmission Problem:

Congestion Problem:

Relative alarms to identify faults on the transmission


path or the transmission boards of RNC/NodeB.
Check the Admission Control thresholds.
Take appropriate measures to relieve congestion, e.g.
activate LDR (Load Reshuffling), OLC (Overload Control)
algorithms, and to increase capacity.

RF Problem:

Check coverage in the failure points.


Check if most failures occur in cell border (most
probably they are).
Check FACH power.
Check DL interference in the cell: is there a pilot
pollution issue?
Check UL interference in the cell.

Problem Classification

Congestion

Measurement Item

Sub Items

Sub Items

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

VS.RAB.FailEstPS.RNL

VS.RAB.FailEstPS.Unsp

VS.RAB.FailEstPs.ULPower.Cong
VS.RAB.FailEstPs.Code.Cong

VS.RAB.FailEstab.PS.DLIUBBand.Cong
VS.RAB.FailEstab.PS.ULIUBBand.Cong
VS.RAB.FailEstPs.ULCE.Cong
VS.RAB.FailEstPs.DLCE.Cong
VS.RAB.FailEstPs.DLPower.Cong
RF Problem

VS.RAB.FailEstabPS.UuFail
VS.RAB.FailEstabPS.IubFail

Transmission

VS.RAB.FailEstPS.TNL

Transmission

Check relative alarms transmission issue on Iub


interface;

RF

Problem:

Check coverage in the failure points. Check if


it is in cell border (most probably it is).

Congestion

Problem:

Problem:

Check the Admission Control thresholds. Take


appropriate measures to increase capacity.
Refer to this docs

Problem
Classification
RF Problem

Abnormal Release Indicator


VS.RAB.AbnormRel.CS.RF

Sub-indicator (Level 2)

Note

VS.RAB.AbnormRel.CS.RF.
ULSync
VS.RAB.AbnormRel.CS.RF.
UuNoReply
VS.RAB.AbnormRel.CS.RF.S
RBReset

Non-RF Problem VS.RAB.AbnormRel.CS.OM

CS RAB drops due to OM intervention,


e.g. cell was blocked

VS.RAB.AbnormRel.CS.Preempt

CS RAB drops due to preemption

VS.RAB.AbnormRel.CS.UTRANgen

CS RAB drops due to UTRAN generated


reasons; indicates hardware failure on
RAN equipment; check alarms in order
to identify the faulty part; repair or
replace the faulty part once identified.
Released Due to congestion for Cell

VS.RAB.AbnormRel.CS.OLC
VS.RAB.AbnormRel.CS.IuAAL2

CS RAB drops due to AAL2 failure;


check transmission alarms to identify
possible faults in the Iu-CS transmission
path

Check for missing neighbors


Check for pilot pollution (adjust physical config)
Check for UL interference. Check VS.MeanRTWP counter in
order to see the value of UL interference in the cell. If the
value is higher than -97 dBm, then interference exists in
the UL.

Check internal interference

Check external interference

Internal interference is usually caused by faulty connections in the


antenna line. Check thoroughly all relative connection
External interference is caused by external sources (e.g. TV/Radio
stations, military equipment, other networks equipment, etc.).
External interference will appear randomly throughout the day. Its
direction will be specific and it will affect more than one sites in
the area.
Check neighbouring sites to see if they face the same problem.

In case of poor coverage, adjust physical config.

Drops

due to OM intervention, cell was


blocked
Drops due to preemption
Drops due to UTRAN generated reasons

Indicates hardware failure on RAN equipment


Check alarms in order to identify the faulty part
Repair or replace the faulty part once identified.

Drops

due to congestion for Cell


Drops due to AAL2 failure

Check transmission alarms to identify possible


faults in the Iu-CS transmission path

Problem
Classification
RF Problem

Abnormal Release Indicator


VS.RAB.AbnormRel.PS.RF

Sub-indicator (Level 2)

Note

VS.RAB.AbnormRel.PS.RF.SRBReset

VS.RAB.AbnormRel.PS.RF.ULSync
VS.RAB.AbnormRel.PS.RF.UuNoReply

VS.RAB.AbnormRel.PS.RF.TRBReset
RF Problem

PS RAB drops due to RLC reset

VS.RAB.AbnormRel.PS.OM

PS RAB drops due to OM


intervention, e.g. cell was blocked

VS.RAB.AbnormRel.PS.Preempt

PS RAB drops due to preemption

VS.RAB.AbnormRel.PS.OLC

Released Due to congestion for


Cell
PS RAB drops due to GTPU failure;
check transmission alarms to
identify possible faults in the IuPS transmission path

VS.RAB.AbnormRel.PS.GTPULoss

Check for missing neighbors


Check for pilot pollution (adjust physical config)
Check for UL interference. Check VS.MeanRTWP counter in
order to see the value of UL interference in the cell. If the
value is higher than -97 dBm, then interference exists in
the UL.

Check internal interference

Check external interference

Internal interference is usually caused by faulty connections in the


antenna line. Check thoroughly all relative connection
External interference is caused by external sources (e.g. TV/Radio
stations, military equipment, other networks equipment, etc.).
External interference will appear randomly throughout the day. Its
direction will be specific and it will affect more than one sites in
the area.
Check neighbouring sites to see if they face the same problem.

In case of poor coverage, adjust physical config.

Drops

due to OM intervention, cell was


blocked
Drops due to preemption
Drops due to UTRAN generated reasons

Indicates hardware failure on RAN equipment


Check alarms in order to identify the faulty part
Repair or replace the faulty part once identified.

Drops

due to congestion for Cell


Drops due to GTPU failure

Check transmission alarms to identify possible


faults in the Iu-PS transmission path.

Problem Classification
Preparation phase

Failure Indicator
VS.IRATHO.FailRelocPrepOutCS.TAlExp.GCell

VS.IRATHO.FailRelocPrepOutCS.TgtFail.GCell

IRATHO.FailRelocPrepOutCS.ReloNoSup

IRATHO.FailRelocPrepOutCS.NoResAvail

Execution phase

Note
TRELOCalloc expiry (the timer that waits for
the RELOCATION COMMAND after the
REOCATION REQUIRED expires; check if the
RNC-MSC links are normal; check CN
transmission parameters)
Relocation Failure in target CN/RNC or target
system (check the CN configuration; check if
the BSS supports the relocation)
Relocation not supported in target RNC or
target system
No Resource Available (the BSC has no
resources for the UE access or the 2G MSC has
no information about the target cell)

IRATHO.FailRelocPrepOutCS.HigherTrafficLod Traffic load in the target cell higher than in the


source cell
IRATHO.FailRelocPrepOutCS.UKnowRNC
Unknown Target RNC (the LAI of the 2G target
cell is not configured in the MSC)
IRATHO.FailOutCS.CfgUnsupp
Configuration Unsupported (the configuration
assigned in the HANDOVER FROM UTRAN
COMMAND is not supported by the UE; check
configuration of the encryption parameters;
might also be UE problem)
IRATHO.FailOutCS.PhyChFail
Physical Channel Failure (indicates poor 2G
signal check the handover thresholds in both
3G and 2G configurations; check for
interference in the 2G target cell)
VS.IRATHO.FailOutCS.NoReply
Timeout of waiting for IU RELEASE COMMAND
messages during an outgoing inter-RAT CS
handover

Check

if the RNC-MSC links are normal


Check if theres any relocation failure
Check if relocation not supported in target
RNC or target system
No Resource Available

BSC has no resources for the UE access


MSC has no information about the target cell
Need consistency checking between 2G and 3G
NDB

Congestion

Check if there are any missing 2G neighbors


Check the inter-RAT handover parameters

Improper settings may cause the handover not to be


performed on time: events 2D/2F parameters, events
3A, 3C parameters

Check

the handover thresholds in both 3G and 2G


configurations

Database 2G-3G Consistecy Check


Cross check 2G CFGMML with External 2G on 3G
CFGMML (parameter check on 2G: MCC, MNC, LACCI,
NCC, BCC, BCCH, RAC)
Old database still not yet erased

Check

for Interference in the 2G target cell


Check for SD and TCH blocking in the 2G target cell

Problem Classification
Preparation phase

Failure Indicator
VS.IRATHO.FailRelocPrepOutPS.NoResAvail

Note
No Resource Available (the BSC has no resources for
the UE access or the 2G MSC has no information
about the target cell)

VS.IRATHO.FailRelocPrepOutPS.ReloUnSupp

Relocation not supported in target RNC or target


system
TRELOCalloc expiry (the timer that waits for the
RELOCATION COMMAND after the REOCATION
REQUIRED expires; check if the RNC-MSC links are
normal; check CN transmission parameters)
Relocation Failure in target CN/RNC or target system
(check the CN configuration; check if the BSS
supports the relocation)
Traffic load in the target cell higher than in the source
cell
Unknown Target RNC (the LAI of the 2G target cell is
not configured in the MSC)
Configuration Unsupported (the configuration
assigned in the HANDOVER FROM UTRAN
COMMAND is not supported by the UE; check
configuration of the encryption parameters; might
also be UE problem)
Physical Channel Failure (indicates poor 2G signal
check the handover thresholds in both 3G and 2G
configurations; check for interference in the 2G
target cell)

VS.IRATHO.FailRelocPrepOutPS.TAlExp

VS.IRATHO.FailRelocPrepOutPS.TgtFail

VS.IRATHO.FailRelocPrepOutPS.TgtHighLoad
VS.IRATHO.FailRelocPrepOutPS.UnKnowRNC
Execution phase

IRATHO.FailOutPSUTRAN.CfgUnsupp(none)

IRATHO.FailOutPSUTRAN.PhyChFail(none)

VS.IRATHO.FailOutPSUTRAN.NoReply

Timeout of waiting for IU RELEASE COMMAND


messages during an outgoing inter-RAT CS handover

Check

if the RNC-SGSN links are normal


Check if theres any relocation failure
Check if relocation not supported in target
RNC or target system
No Resource Available

BSC has no resources for the UE access


MSC has no information about the target cell
Need consistency checking between 2G and 3G
NDB

Congestion

Check if there are any missing 2G neighbors


Check the inter-RAT handover parameters

Improper settings may cause the handover not to be


performed on time: events 2D/2F parameters, events
3A, 3C parameters

Check

the handover thresholds in both 3G and 2G


configurations

Database 2G-3G Consistecy Check


Cross check 2G CFGMML with External 2G on 3G
CFGMML (parameter check on 2G: MCC, MNC, LACCI,
NCC, BCC, BCCH, RAC)
Old database still not yet erased

Check

for Interference in the 2G target cell


Check for PDCH blocking in the 2G target cell

Failure Indicator
VS.HHO.FailInterFreqOut.CfgUnsupp

Note
Configuration unsupported (the UE doesnt support the
configuration assigned by the RNC in the PHYSICAL CHANNEL
RENONFIGURATION message indicates possible UE problem
however this case almost never happens in commercial
networks)

VS.HHO.FailInterFreqOut.PyhChFail
VS.HHO.FailInterFreqOut.ISR

Physical channel failure (indicates poor coverage)


Incompatible simultaneous reconfiguration (the UE feedbacks
that the HHO procedure is not compatible with other concurrent
processes. This case almost never happens; it indicates defective
UE)

VS.HHO.FailInterFreqOut.CellUpdt

Cell update occurred (this case never happens in commercial


network)

VS.HHO.FailInterFreqOut.InvCfg

Invalid configuration (some IEs in the PHYSICAL CHANNEL


RENONFIGURATION message are invalid for the UE; this case
almost never happens; indicates possible UE problem)

VS.HHO.FailInterFreqOut.NoReply

No response on the air interface (indicates poor coverage or


even a UE problem)

VS.HHO.FailInterFreqOut.PrepFail
VS.HHO.FailInterFreqOut.RLSetupFail

Optimizing

Neighbor based on scenario given


Blind HO setting
Check availability/alarm on surroundings
Check if there are any missing neighbors
Check the inter-frequency handover
parameters

Improper settings may cause the handover not to


be performed on time

Check events 2D/2F parameters


Check events 2B, 2C parameters

RNC

HSDPA Throughput Kbps (RNC) =


[VS.HSDPAPSLoad.DLThruput.RNC]

Cell

level formula:

level formula:

HSDPA Throughput Kbps (Cell) =


[VS.HSDPA.MeanChThroughput]

Check radio environment in the problematic cell


Poor coverage is directly related with low HSDPA throughput.
Enhance coverage by appropriate tuning of antenna parameters (tilt,
azimuth).

Check for pilot pollution

In case pilot pollution exists in the area, try to adjust tilts and/or
azimuths of relative sites

Check for ping-pong serving cell change based on 1D event: pingpong limits throughput
If this is the problem, tune event 1D parameters in order to eliminate
ping-pong.
Consider also the value of the HspaTimerLen parameter.

Check for hardware/software alarm in the site


Check transmission whole network thoroughly

Possibility of bottleneck in the transmission chain (e.g. too many sites


are served by a single low capacity router).

Check Iu-PS interface.

Check for faults (relative alarms) and its capacity. Make sure that the
configured Iu-PS capacity is not a bottleneck for PS service demands.

RNC

HSUPA Throughput Kbps (RNC) =


[VS.HSUPAPSLoad.ULThruput.RNC]

Cell

level formula:

level formula:

HSUPA Throughput Kbps (Cell) =


[VS.HSUPA.MeanChThroughput]

Check radio environment in the problematic cell

Check for UL interference in the problematic area

poor coverage is directly related with low HSUPA throughput.


Enhance coverage by appropriate tuning of physical config
VS.MeanRTWP will provide average RTWP of cell (UL
interference give limits to HSUPA throughput)

Check for ping-pong serving cell change based on 1D event


If this is the problem, tune event 1D parameters in order to
eliminate ping-pong.
Consider also the value of the HspaTimerLen parameter.

Check for hardware/software alarm


Check transmission whole network thoroughlyPossibility of
bottleneck in the transmission chain (e.g. too many sites
are served by a single low capacity router).

Check the NodeB hardware equipment.


Check the alarms.
Conduct DT in the area of poor coverage to confirm the problem.

Survey the environment

Check for shadowing effect caused by object obstacles in the area.


This might cause low signal strength close to NodeB.
Analyse the multipath environment in the area (in dense urban strong multipath
may cause deep signal fades (fast fading))

Adjust physical config (tilt, azimuth) appropriately in order to optimise


the coverage in the problematic area.
Check the CPICH power setting.

Measure RSCP and Propagation delay.


If RSCP is low while Propagation delay is low as well, this indicates poor coverage
close to the base station.

Default value is 33 dBm.


Consider increase/decrease if needed

Increase the power amplifier output

usually initial 3G output is 20W. Consider upgrading to 40W or even to 60W.


This will give extra margin to increase CPICH power and RL power.

Check

for pilot pollution in the area


In case pilot pollution exists in the area

Adjust tilts and/or azimuths of relative sector

Check

for missing neighbours

Missing neighbours can cause increase of


interference in the source cell.

Check

whether the interference is from an


external source

Check for nearby sources of E/M radiation:


TV/Radio stations, Military, Civil aviation, etc.

Log

file & Necessary picture from field (by

DT)
Plot PSC from scanner for pilot pollution
analyze
Plot idle mode, short call, and long call for
analyzing network first symptoms before
optim
Alarm list on the specific date
Latest network data base (contains: TSSR,
physical configuration of the network,
neighbor)
Contour Map

Index

Reference

Remarks
Test on the acceptance route

Coverage rate

95%

CPICH Ec/Io 12dB

95%

CPICH RSCP 95dBm

95%

SHO Factor based on DT 30%40%

Pilot pollution ratio

5%

The planned continuous coverage


service:
CPICH Ec/Io 12 dB
CPICH RSCP 95 dBm
Test result by scanner in outdoor
unloaded conditions
Test result by scanner in outdoor
unloaded conditions
The SHO Factor based on DT
should be 5% to 10% lower than
the goal, because the following
optimizations cause the soft
handover factor to increase

1525 NodeBs in a cluster is recommended


A cluster must cover different areas based on density of user
traffic/clutter
A cluster can define based on landform factor
Mountains block signal propagation, so they are natural borders for
dividing clusters.
Rivers causes a longer propagation distance, so they affect dividing
clusters in various aspects.

If a river is narrow, the signals along two banks will interact. If the
transportation between two banks allows, divide sites along the two banks in
the same cluster.
If a river is wide, the upstream and downstream will interact. In this
situation, the transportation between two banks is inconvenient, dividing
clusters by the bank according to actual situation.

A cluster can define based on network project maintenance


A cluster can define based on Administrative areas
A cluster can define based on DT workload

The DT must be performed within a day for a cluster

Confirm the KPI DT acceptance route with the operator


before DT.
If the operator already has a decided DT acceptance route, you
must consider this upon deciding the KPI DT acceptance route.
If the objective factors like network layout cannot fully meet
the coverage requirements of decided test route by the
operator, you must point this out.

The KPI DT acceptance route must cover major streets,


important location, VIP, and VIC (Very Important Cell). The
DT route should cover all cells as possible.
Round-trip DT is performed if possible.
Consider actual factors like lanes and left-turn restriction
while deciding test route.
Before negotiating with the operator, communicate these
factors with local drivers for whether the route is
acceptable.

Weak

coverage
Cross-cell coverage
Unbalance uplink and downlink
No primary pilot cell

Weak

coverage define with RSCP smaller than


95 dBm. It might be in:

Valley areas
Hillside back
Elevator well
Tunnel
Underground garage
Basement
Areas inside high buildings

Physical configuration changes:

Hole coverage:

Increase pilot transmit power,


Adjust antenna down tilt and azimuth,
Increase antenna height,
Use antennas with higher gain to optimize coverage.
Construct new NodeBs or expand the coverage range of
neighbor NodeBs.
Pay attention to that increasing of coverage areas might cause
intra-frequency and inter-frequency interference.
Add RRU in valley and hillside back areas with weak coverage
to expand coverage range.

Dead Zone Area:


Use RRU,
Indoor distributed system,
Leakage cable,
Directional antenna

Cross-cell

coverage means the signal from


one NodeB hits the other signal from the
other nodeB.
Drops happen due to delayed handover often
occurred because of this problem.
Interference might occurs as well.

Reduce

cross-cell coverage areas by using


sheltering effect of adjacent buildings.
Meanwhile you must avoid intra-frequency
interference to other NodeBs.
For over high NodeBs, change the site.

Too large mechanism down tilt causes aberration


of antenna direction maps.
Eliminate the "island" effect and reduce NodeB
coverage areas by adjusting pilot transmit power
and using electric down tilt.

Unbalanced uplink and downlink refers to the


following situations:

The downlink coverage is good but the uplink


coverage is restricted.

The downlink coverage is restricted.

More specific: the UE transmit power reaches the


maximum which still cannot meet uplink BLER
requirements.
More specific, the downlink DCH transmit power reaches
the maximum which still cannot meet downlink BLER
requirements.

If the uplink and downlink are unbalanced, call


drops easily. The probable cause is restricted
uplink coverage.

Check

for interference by monitoring RTWP


alarms of NodeB

Brief:

In no primary pilot areas, UE hands over


frequently, so the system efficiency is lowered
and probability of call drop increases.

Solution:

Adjusting antenna down tilt and azimuth.

Pilot Pollutions

Poor Coverage

Optimum Area

Poor Coverage

RSCP Threshold -95dBm; Ec/No Threshold -12dB

There

Downgrade/Degrowth
Upgrade/Growth

This

are 2 type of capacity:

type decided by 3 factors:

Blocking
Utilization

3G

Resources related to blocking and


utilization:

CE, IuB, Power, and Code

Basic

Formula

UPGRADE
Blocking High
Utilization High

DOWNGRADE
Blocking Low
Utilization Low
Resource Configured more than 2

Cek Parameter Setting if:


Blocking High
Utilization Low

Cek Alarm and license:


Blocking Low
Utilization High

Resource
Iub
CE
Power
HSDPA Code

Verification
No improper
coverage/
Configuration
issue

Action
Iub Expansion/ Modernization and Expansion
CE Board/License Expansion
40W/New Site/2nd Carrier
License Expansion

Index

Triggering Criteria (Busy Hour)

Iub Utilization (Max of average in BH 5 conservative days) > 70%

RAB Blocking Rate due to Iub > 1%

HSDPA UE Mean Utilizations per NodeB > 70%

Iub

Expansion Notice

Criteria of 1 AND 2 OR 3 triggered for 2


consecutive weeks
Criteria must be fulfilled at least 3 days a week
Coverage exercise must be done before proposing
action

Index

Triggering Criteria (Busy Hour)

CE Utilization (Max of average in BH 5 conservative days) > 70%

RRC + RAB Blocking Rate due to CE > 1%

CE Expansion Notice

Both criteria of 1 AND 2 triggered for 2


consecutive weeks
Criteria must be fulfilled at least 3 days a week
Coverage exercise must be done before proposing
action

Index

Triggering Criteria (Busy Hour)

Power Utilization (Max of average in BH 5 conservative days) > 70%

RAB Blocking Rate due to Power > 1%

Power Expansion Notice

Criteria 1 AND 2 triggered for 2 consecutive


weeks
Criteria must be fulfilled at least 3 days a week
Coverage exercise must be done before proposing
action

Index

Triggering Criteria (Busy Hour)

HSDPA Code Utilization (Max of BH 5 conservative days) > 80%

HSDPA

Code Expansion Notice

Criteria triggered for 2 consecutive weeks


Criteria must be fulfilled at least 3 days a week
Coverage exercise must be done before proposing
action

BLOCKING:

VS.RRC.Rej.UL.CE.Cong: Number of RRC Connection Reject.


VS.RAC.NewCallRequest.Fail.ULCE.Cong: Number of failures in the RRC/RAB
SETUP procedure.
VS.RAB.FailEstCs.ULCE.Cong: Number of CS RABs unsuccessfully established.
VS.RAB.FailEstPs.ULCE.Cong: Number of PS RABs unsuccessfully established.
VS.RAC.SHO.Fail.ULCE.Cong: Number of failures in the SHO procedure.
VS.RAC.HHO.Fail.ULCE.Cong: Number of failures in the HHO procedure.
VS.RAC.TrChSwitch.Fail.ULCE.Cong: Number of failures in the Channel Switch
procedure.
VS.RAC.DCCC.Fail.ULCE.Cong: Number of failures in the DCCC procedure.
VS.LCC.LDR.Num.ULCE: Number of times a cell is in LDR (Load Reshuffling) State
due to UL CE Resource Congestion.
VS.LCC.LDR.Time.ULCE: Duration in seconds of LDR State due to UL CE Resource
Congestion.

UTILIZATION:

VS.LC.ULCreditUsed.CELL.Max: Maximum UL credit usage.


UL CE Utilization Ratio(NodeB) = (VS.LC.ULMax.LicenseGroup.Shared /
VS.LC.ULCreditAvailable.Shared)*100%.
VS.LC.ULMax.LicenseGroup.Shared: Max usage of UL CEs.
VS.LC.ULCreditAvailable.Shared: Number of UL CEs licensed.

If the congestion is spread among different hours and days,


and on the same NodeB, the following parameters can be
used to decrease the usage of UL CEs:

UlMidRateThd (DCCC): Uplink Mid Bit Rate Threshold.


UlDcccRateThd (DCCC): Uplink Bit Rate Threshold for DCCC.
UlFullCvrRate (DCCC): Uplink Full Coverage Bit Rate.
UlGBR (USERGBR): Uplink GBR for BE service.
UlRateDnAdjLevel (DCCC): Uplink Rate Decrease Adjust Level.
If set to 3_Rates can be reduced to 2_Rates.
UlRateUpAdjLevel (DCCC): Uplink Rate Increase Adjust Level. If
set to 2_Rates can be increased to 3_Rates.

Additional options are:


Decrease the Max Bit Rate
Add more UL CEs

Direction Spreading
Number of
Corresponding Typical Traffic
Factor
CEs Consumed
Credits
Class
Consumed
UL
256
1
2
3.4 kbit/s SRB
UL
64
1
2
13.6 kbit/s SRB
UL
64
1
2
12.2 kbit/s AMR
UL
16
3
6
64 kbit/s VP
UL
32
1.5
3
32 kbps PS
UL
16
3
6
64 kbit/s PS
UL
8
5
10
128 kbit/s PS
UL
4
10
20
384 kbit/s PS

BLOCKING:

VS.RRC.Rej.DL.CE.Cong: Number of RRC Connection Reject.


VS.RAC.NewCallRequest.Fail.DLCE.Cong: Number of failures in the RRC/RAB
SETUP procedure.
VS.RAB.FailEstCs.DLCE.Cong: Number of CS RABs unsuccessfully established.
VS.RAB.FailEstPs.DLCE.Cong: Number of PS RABs unsuccessfully established.
VS.RAC.SHO.Fail.DLCE.Cong: Number of failures in the SHO procedure.
VS.RAC.HHO.Fail.DLCE.Cong: Number of failures in the HHO procedure.
VS.RAC.TrChSwitch.Fail.DLCE.Cong: Number of failures in the Channel Switch
procedure.
VS.RAC.DCCC.Fail.DLCE.Cong: Number of failures in the DCCC procedure.
VS.LCC.LDR.Num.DLCE: Number of times a cell is in LDR State due to DL CE
Resource Congestion.
VS.LCC.LDR.Time.DLCE: Duration in seconds of LDR State due to DL CE Resource
Congestion.

UTILIZATION:

VS.LC.DLCreditUsed.CELL.Max: Maximum DL credit usage.


DL CE Utilization Ratio(NodeB) = (VS.LC.DLMax.LicenseGroup.Shared /
VS.LC.DLCreditAvailable.Shared)*100%.
VS.LC.DLMax.LicenseGroup.Shared: Max usage of DL CEs.
VS.LC.DLCreditAvailable.Shared: Number of DL CEs licensed.

If congestion is spread among different hours and days,


and on the same NodeB, the following parameters can be
used to decrease the usage of DL CEs:

DlMidRateThd (DCCC): Downlink Mid Bit Rate Threshold.


DlDcccRateThd (DCCC): Downlink Bit Rate Threshold for DCCC.
DlFullCvrRate (DCCC): Downlink Full Coverage Bit Rate.
DlGBR (USERGBR): Downlink GBR for BE service.
DlRateDnAdjLevel (DCCC): Downlink Rate Decrease Adjust
Level. If set to 3_Rates can be reduced to 2_Rates.
DlRateUpAdjLevel (DCCC): Downlink Rate Increase Adjust
Level. If set to 2_Rates can be increased to 3_Rates.

Additional options are:


Decrease the Max Bit Rate
Add more DL CEs

Direction Spreading
Number of
Corresponding Typical Traffic
Factor
CEs Consumed
Credits
Class
Consumed
DL
256
1
1
3.4 kbit/s SRB
DL
128
1
1
13.6 kbit/s SRB
DL
128
1
1
12.2 kbit/s AMR
DL
32
2
2
64 kbit/s VP
DL
64
1
1
32 kbps PS
DL
32
2
2
64 kbit/s PS
DL
16
4
4
128 kbit/s PS
DL
8
8
8
384 kbit/s PS

BLOCKING:

VS.RRC.Rej.Code.Cong: Number of RRC Connection Reject.


VS.RAB.FailEstCs.Code.Cong: Number of CS RABs unsuccessfully established.
VS.RAB.FailEstPs.Code.Cong: Number of PS RABs unsuccessfully established.
VS.RAC.SHO.Fail.OVSF.Cong: Number of failures in the SHO procedure.
VS.RAC.TrChSwitch.Fail.OVSF.Cong: Number of failures in the Channel Switch procedure.
VS.RAC.DCCC.Fail.OVSF.Cong: Number of failures in the DCCC procedure.
VS.LCC.LDR.Num.DLCode: Number of times a cell is in LDR State due to Code Resource Congestion.
VS.LCC.LDR.Time.DLCode: Duration in seconds of LDR State due to Code Resource Congestion.
VS.LCC.LDR.CodeAdj: Number of UEs for Code Adjustment in Basic Congestion

UTILIZATION:

Code Utilization Ratio(Cell) = (VS.RAB.SFOccupy.MAX / 256)*100%.


VS.RAB.SFOccupy.MAX: Maximum number of SFs codes in a cell. Code are occupied by the common
channels, R99 users and HS-DSCH. The code number is normalized to SF = 256, that is, converted to the
code number when SF = 256.
Soft Handover Overhead(Cell) =
[(VS.SHO.AS.1RL+VS.SHO.AS.2RL+VS.SHO.AS.3RL+VS.SHO.AS.4RL+VS.SHO.AS.5RL+VS.SHO.AS.6RL)/(VS.S
HO.AS.1RL+VS.SHO.AS.2RL/2+VS.SHO.AS.3RL/3+VS.SHO.AS.4RL/4+VS.SHO.AS.5RL/5+VS.SHO.AS.6RL/6)1]*100%.
VS.SHO.AS.xRL: Mean Number of UEs with x RL. Code resources could be wasted because of too many
cells in SHO. Optimal value is Soft Handover Overhead = 1.3 1.4, but it depends also on the area
(urban/rural).
NodeB Performance Counters: VS.PdschCodeUsed.Max: Maximum number of codes used by HS-PDSCHs
in a cell during a measurement period.
VS.PdschCodeAvail.Max: Maximum number of codes available for HS-PDSCHs in a cell during a
measurement period.

In case of CAC based on code resources, the only parameter controlling triggering is:

In case of LDR based on code resources, triggering can be controlled through:

CELLLDRSFRESTHD (CELLLDR): Cell LDR SF reserved threshold.


[Code reshuffling could be triggered only when the minimum available SF of a cell is higher than this
threshold]
ULLDRCREDITSFRESTHD, DLLDRCREDITSFRESTHD(CELLLDR): UL/DL LDR Credit SF reserved threshold.
[UL/DL credit LDR could be triggered only when the SF factor corresponding to the UL/DL reserved
credit is higher than the UL or DL credit SF reserved threshold. Low value means Higher admission
success rate but easier congestion status and then Easier LDR action trigger]

Many LDR actions can be performed. Particularly for Code Basic Congestion, Code Reshuffling is
controlled through:

DlHoCeCodeResvSf (CELLCAC): DL Handover Credit and Code Reserved SF.


[Quantity of DL code (SF) and CE resources reserved for handover UEs]
Rule: DlHoCeCodeResvSf max(DLLDRCREDITSFRESTHD, CELLLDRSFRESTHD).

MAXUSERNUMCODEADJ (CELLLDR): Max user number of code adjust.


[Number of users selected in code reshuffling]
LdrCodePriUseInd (CELLLDR): LDR code priority indicator.
[If TRUE, the codes with high priority are reserved during code reshuffling]

Other relevant LDR actions to control code shortage are Inter-Frequency Load Handover and BE
Rate Reduction.

BLOCKING:

VS.RRC.Rej.Power.Cong: Number of RRC Connection Reject.


VS.RAB.FailEstCs.Power.Cong: Number of CS RABs unsuccessfully established.
VS.RAB.FailEstPs.Power.Cong: Number of PS RABs unsuccessfully established.
VS.RAC.Total.Power.Cong: Number of admission failures due to Total Power resource insufficiency.
VS.RAC.R99.Power.Cong: Number of admission failures due to R99 Power resource insufficiency.
VS.RAC.HSDPA.Power.Cong: Number of admission failures due to HSDPA Power resource insufficiency.
VS.RAC.HSUPA.Power.Cong: Number of admission failures due to HSUPA Power resource insufficiency.
VS.RAC.SHO.Fail.ULLD.Cong, VS.RAC.SHO.Fail.DLLD.Cong: Number of failures in the SHO procedure.
VS.RAC.HHO.Fail.ULLD.Cong, VS.RAC.HHO.Fail.DLLD.Cong: Number of failures in the HHO procedure.
VS.RAC.TrChSwitch.Fail.ULLD.Cong, VS.RAC.TrChSwitch.Fail.DLLD.Cong: Number of failures in the
Channel Switch procedure.
VS.RAC.DCCC.Fail.ULLD.Cong, VS.RAC.DCCC.Fail.DLLD.Cong: Number of failures in the DCCC
procedure.
VS.LCC.LDR.Num.ULPower, VS.LCC.LDR.Num.DLPower: Number of times a cell is in LDR State due to
Power (Equivalent Number of Users) Congestion.
VS.LCC.LDR.Time.ULPower, VS.LCC.LDR.Time.DLPower: Duration in seconds of LDR State due to Power
(Equivalent Number of Users) Congestion..

UTILIZATION:

VS.MeanTCP: Mean Transmitted Carrier Power (dBm).


VS.MaxTCP: Max Transmitted Carrier Power (dBm).
UL Interference Cell Ratio(RNC) = [(Number of Cells where VS.MeanRTWP>-98dBm)/Total Number Of
Cells In RNC]*100%.
VS.MeanRTWP: Mean Received Total Wideband Power (dBm).

In case of CAC based on power resources, the controlling parameters depend


on the Algo used.

For Algo1&3:

UlNonCtrlThdForAMR, DLCONVAMRTHD (CELLCAC): UL/DL threshold of Conv AMR.


UlNonCtrlThdForNonAMR, DLCONVNAMRTHD (CELLCAC): UL/DL threshold of Conv non_AMR.
UlNonCtrlThdForOther, DLOTHERTHD (CELLCAC): UL/DL threshold of other service.
UlNonCtrlThdForHo, DLHOTHD (CELLCAC): UL/DL Handover access threshold.
[These thresholds are a percentage of the 100% downlink load. If the UL/DL load of a cell is
higher than these
thresholds after the access of a service, this service will be
rejected]
Rules:

For Algo2:

DLHOTHD > max(DLCONVAMRTHD, DLCONVNAMRTHD) > DLOTHERTHD


UlNonCtrlThdForHo > max(UlNonCtrlThdForAMR, UlNonCtrlThdForNonAMR) >
UlNonCtrlThdForOther

ULTOTALEQUSERNUM, DLTOTALEQUSERNUM (CELLCAC): UL/DL total equivalent user number.


[Total equivalent user number corresponding to the 100% uplink load]

RRC connection request is rejected upon UL or DL admission decision by RRM.

Check VS.MeanRTWP and VS.MaxTCP of the cell to determine whether the rejection
is due to UL or DL congestion.

In case of LDR based on power resources, triggering can be controlled through:

Many LDR actions can be performed. Particularly for Power Basic Congestion,
MBMS (Multimedia Broadcast Multicast Service) Power Reduction is controlled
through:

ULLDRTRIGTHD, DLLDRTRIGTHD (CELLLDM): UL/DL LDR trigger threshold.


[If (UL Load / UL Capacity) of the cell is not lower than this threshold, UL load
reshuffling is triggered]
ULLDRRELTHD, DLLDRRELTHD (CELLLDM): UL/DL LDR release threshold.
[If (UL Load / UL Capacity) of the cell is lower than this threshold, UL load
reshuffling is stopped]

MBMSDECPOWERRABTHD (CELLLDR): MBMS descend power RAB threshold.


[MBMS provides unidirectional point-to-multipoint multimedia services. When the
priority of the RAB of MBMS services exceeds this threshold, reconfigure the
MBMS power to the minimum power]

Other relevant LDR actions to control power shortage are Inter-Frequency


Load Handover, BE Rate Reduction and Inter-RAT Handover in the CS Domain.

BLOCKING:

VS.RAC.NewCallRequest.Fail.HSDPANum.Cong: Number of failures in the RRC or RAB SETUP procedure.


VS.RAB.RelReqPS.BE.HSDPA.Cong.Golden, VS.RAB.RelReqPS.BE.HSDPA.Cong.Silver,
VS.RAB.RelReqPS.BE.HSDPA.Cong.Copper: Number of released PS BE RABs beared on HSDPA.
VS.RAC.HHO.Fail.HSDPANum.Cong: Number of failures in the HHO procedure.
VS.RAC.TrChSwitch.Fail.HSDPANum.Cong: Number of failures in the Channel Switch procedure.
VS.HSDPA.LDR.InterFreq: Number of HSDPA UEs that perform inter-frequency handover because of
Basic Congestion.
VS.HSDPA.LDR.InterRATPS: Number of HSDPA UEs that perform PS inter-RAT handover because of Basic
Congestion.
VS.HSDPA.OLC.UserRel: Number of UEs released due to Overload Congestion.

UTILIZATION:
VS.HSDPA.UE.Mean.Cell: Number of UEs in CELL_HSDPA state in a cell.
In case of CAC based on the number of HSDPA users, the controlling parameter is:

MaxHsdpaUserNum (CELLCAC): Maximum HSDPA user number (based on cell type and available HSDPA
power and code resources). Its value is related to the presence of the following features:

WRFD-01061016: 16 HSDPA Users per Cell.


WRFD-010622: 32 HSDPA Users per Cell.
WRFD-010623: 64 HSDPA Users per Cell.

HSDPA Utilization Ratio(Cell) = [maxHours(VS.HSDPA.UE.Mean.Cell) / MaxHsdpaUserNum]*100%.

If Basic Congestion is triggered, make sure that VS.HSDPA.LDR.InterFreq is


incremented, but not VS.HSDPA.LDR.InterRATPS (typically the PS inter-rat
handover algorithm switch is disabled, and HSDPA calls are preferred dropping
rather than handing over to 2G).
Basic Congestion is a normal situation and the ideal LDR action for HSDPA
users is inter-frequency handover to balance the load. Overload Congestion
instead requires the release of HSDPA users. Overload Congestion is triggered
by:

ULOLCTRIGTHD, DLOLCTRIGTHD (CELLLDM): UL/DL OLC trigger threshold.


[If (UL Load / UL Capacity) of the cell is not lower than this threshold, UL
overload is triggered]
ULOLCRELTHD, DLOLCRELTHD (CELLLDM): UL/DL OLC release threshold.
[If (UL Load / UL Capacity) of the cell is lower than this threshold, UL overload is
stopped]

Additional actions to increase capacity:

Divide users between Gold, Silver and Copper and/or modify their priorities:
UserPriority (SCHEDULEPRIOMAP).
Specify a HSDPA-only carrier to avoid basic congestion conditions being triggered.
Introduce an additional carrier.

BLOCKING:

VS.RAC.NewCallRequest.Fail.HSUPANum.Cong: Number of failures in the RRC or


RAB SETUP procedure.
VS.RAB.RelReqPS.BE.HSUPA.Cong.Golden,
VS.RAB.RelReqPS.BE.HSUPA.Cong.Silver,
VS.RAB.RelReqPS.BE.HSUPA.Cong.Copper: Number of released PS BE RABs beared
on HSUPA.
VS.RAC.SHO.Fail.HSUPANum.Cong: Number of failures in the SHO procedure.
VS.RAC.HHO.Fail.HSUPANum.Cong: Number of failures in the HHO procedure.
VS.RAC.TrChSwitch.Fail.HSUPANum.Cong: Number of failures in the Channel
Switch procedure.

UTILIZATION:

VS.HSUPA.UE.Mean.Cell: Number of UEs in CELL_HSUPA state in a cell.


In case of CAC based on the number of HSUPA users, the controlling parameter is:

MaxHsupaUserNum (CELLCAC): Maximum HSUPA user number (based on cell type and
available HSUPA power and code resources). Its value is related to the presence of
the following features:
WRFD-01061211: 20 HSUPA Users per Cell.
WRFD-010634: 60 HSUPA Users per Cell.

HSUPA Utilization Ratio(Cell) = [maxHours(VS.HSUPA.UE.Mean.Cell) /


MaxHsupaUserNum]*100%.

Basic Congestion is a normal situation and the ideal


LDR action for HSUPA users is inter-frequency
handover to balance the load. Overload Congestion
instead requires the release of HSUPA users. Overload
Congestion is triggered by:
ULOLCTRIGTHD, DLOLCTRIGTHD (CELLLDM): UL/DL OLC
trigger threshold.
ULOLCRELTHD, DLOLCRELTHD (CELLLDM): UL/DL OLC
release threshold.

Additional actions to increase capacity:


Divide users between Gold, Silver and Copper and/or
modify their priorities: UserPriority (SCHEDULEPRIOMAP).
Specify a HSUPA-only carrier to avoid basic congestion
conditions being triggered.
Introduce an additional carrier.

BLOCKING:

VS.RRC.Rej.ULIUBBandCong: Number of RRC Connection Reject.


VS.RAB.FailEstab.CS.ULIUBBand.Cong: Number of CS RABs unsuccessfully established.
VS.RAB.FailEstab.PS.ULIUBBand.Cong: Number of PS RABs unsuccessfully established.
VS.RAC.SHO.Fail.ULIub.Cong: Number of failures in the SHO procedure.
VS.RAC.HHO.Fail.ULIub.Cong: Number of failures in the HHO procedure.
VS.RAC.TrChSwitch.Fail.ULIub.Cong: Number of failures in the Channel Switch procedure.
VS.LCC.LDR.Num.ULIub: Number of times a cell is in LDR State due to UL Iub Transmission Resource
Congestion.
VS.LCC.LDR.Time.ULIub: Duration in seconds of LDR State due to UL Iub Transmission Resource
Congestion.
VS.IUB.CongUL: Number of UL congestions on Iub Interface.

UTILIZATION:

Consumed vs. configured Iub bandwidth:


IUB UL Bandwidth Utilizing Ratio =
[(VS.ATMUlAvgUsed.1+VS.ATMUlAvgUsed.2+VS.ATMUlAvgUsed.3+VS.ATMUlAvgUsed.4+VS.IPUlAvgUsed.1+
VS.IPUlAvgUsed.2+VS.IPUlAvgUsed.3+VS.IPUlAvgUsed.4)/(VS.ATMUlTotal.1+VS.ATMUlTotal.2+VS.ATMUlT
otal.3+VS.ATMUlTotal.4+VS.IPUlTotal.1+VS.IPUlTotal.2+VS.IPUlTotal.3+VS.IPUlTotal.4)]*100%.
VS.ATMUlAvgUsed.x: Average used UL bandwidth on an ATM physical port during a measurement
period.
VS.IPUlAvgUsed.x: Average used UL bandwidth on an IP physical port during a measurement period.
VS.ATMUlTotal.x: Available UL bandwidth of an ATM physical port during a measurement period.
VS.IPUlTotal.x: Available UL bandwidth of an IP physical port during a measurement period.

In case of CAC based on Iub resources:

In case of LDR based on Iub resources, triggering can be controlled through:

Reserved BW for RT service (signalling, voice, streaming) = MBR x Activity Factor


Reserved BW for NRT service (interactive, background) = GBR x Activity Factor
Only GBR could be an option to avoid CAC being triggered.

FWDCONGBW, BWDCONGBW: Forward/Backward congestion threshold.


[If the available forward/backward bandwidth is less than or equal to this value, forward/backward congestion
control is triggered]
FWDCONGCLRBW, BWDCONGCLRBW: Fwd/Bwd congestion clear threshold.
[If the available forward/backward bandwidth is greater than this value,forward/backward congestion control is
stopped]

Iub congestion control is implemented in a separate processing module, so its functionality is not
controlled by LDR switches. In the case of Iub congestion, however, LDR actions are applied to congestion
resolution.
Type of Service
UL/DL Default Activity
When Iub congestion counters are not null:

Control that NodeB was not unavailable during the period of congestion:

VS.NodeB.UnavailTime.OM
Optimize triggering thresholds.
Optimize LDR actions.
Eventually increase Iub capacity.

General common channel

UL

Factor (%)
70

IMS SRB

UL

15

SRB

UL

15

AMR voice

UL

70

R99 CS conversational

UL

100

R99 CS streaming

UL

100

R99 PS conversational

UL

70

R99 PS streaming

UL

100

R99 PS interactive

UL

100

R99 PS background

UL

100

HSUPA SRB

UL

50

HSUPA IMS SRB

UL

15

HSUPA voice

UL

70

HSUPA conversational

UL

70

HSUPA streaming

UL

100

HSUPA interactive

UL

100

HSUPA background

UL

100

BLOCKING:

VS.RRC.Rej.DLIUBBandCong: Number of RRC Connection Reject.


VS.RAB.FailEstab.CS.DLIUBBand.Cong: Number of CS RABs unsuccessfully established.
VS.RAB.FailEstab.PS.DLIUBBand.Cong: Number of PS RABs unsuccessfully established.
VS.RAC.SHO.Fail.DLIub.Cong: Number of failures in the SHO procedure.
VS.RAC.HHO.Fail.DLIub.Cong: Number of failures in the HHO procedure.
VS.RAC.TrChSwitch.Fail.DLIub.Cong: Number of failures in the Channel Switch procedure.
VS.LCC.LDR.Num.DLIub: Number of times a cell is in LDR State due to DL Iub Transmission Resource
Congestion.
VS.LCC.LDR.Time.DLIub: Duration in seconds of LDR State due to DL Iub Transmission Resource
Congestion.
VS.IUB.CongDL: Number of DL congestions on Iub Interface.

UTILIZATION:

Consumed vs. configured Iub bandwidth:


IUB DL Bandwidth Utilizing Ratio =
[(VS.ATMDLAvgUsed.1+VS.ATMDLAvgUsed.2+VS.ATMDLAvgUsed.3+VS.ATMDLAvgUsed.4+VS.IPDLAvgUsed.1+VS.I
PDLAvgUsed.2+VS.IPDLAvgUsed.3+VS.IPDLAvgUsed.4)/(VS.ATMDLTotal.1+VS.ATMDLTotal.2+VS.ATMDLTotal.3+
VS.ATMDLTotal.4+VS.IPDLTotal.1+VS.IPDLTotal.2+VS.IPDLTotal.3+VS.IPDLTotal.4)]*100%.

VS.ATMDLAvgUsed.x: Average used DL bandwidth on an ATM physical port during a measurement


period.
VS.IPDLAvgUsed.x: Average used DL bandwidth on an IP physical port during a measurement period.
VS.ATMDLTotal.x: Available DL bandwidth of an ATM physical port during a measurement period.
VS.IPDLTotal.x: Available DL bandwidth of an IP physical port during a measurement period.

METHODOLOGY:

In case of CAC based on Iub resources:

Reserved BW for RT service (signalling, voice, streaming) = MBR x Activity Factor


Reserved BW for NRT service (interactive, background) = GBR x Activity Facto

Only GBR could be an option to avoid CAC being triggered.

In case of LDR based on Iub resources, triggering can be controlled through:

FWDCONGBW, BWDCONGBW: Forward/Backward congestion threshold.


FWDCONGCLRBW, BWDCONGCLRBW: Fwd/Bwd congestion clear threshold.

Iub congestion control is implemented in a separate processing module, so its

functionality is not controlled by LDR switches. In the case of Iub


congestion, however, LDR actions are applied to congestion resolution.

Type of Service

When Iub congestion counters are not null:

Control that NodeB was not unavailable during the period of congestion:
VS.NodeB.UnavailTime.OM
Optimize triggering thresholds.
Optimize LDR actions.
Eventually increase Iub capacity.

UL/DL

Default Activity
Factor (%)
70

General common channel

DL

IMS SRB

DL

15

MBMS common channel

DL

100

SRB

DL

15

AMR voice

DL

70

R99 CS conversational

DL

100

R99 CS streaming

DL

100

R99 PS conversational

DL

70

R99 PS streaming

DL

100

R99 PS interactive

DL

100

R99 PS background

DL

100

HSDPA SRB

DL

50

HSDPA IMS SRB

DL

15

HSDPA voice

DL

70

HSDPA conversational

DL

70

HSDPA streaming

DL

100

HSDPA interactive

DL

100

HSDPA background

DL

100

EFACH channel

DL

20

You might also like