Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Umts Traning 3g Basic 2
Umts Traning 3g Basic 2
Umts Traning 3g Basic 2
Arum Setyo
sweet.arum@gmail.com
3G
Performance Analysis
3G RF Optimization
3G RF Optimization Cases
3G RF Formula
Capacity Management Concept
Expansion Criteria
Capacity counters & optimization
methodology
Low CSSR CS
Low CSSR PS
High DCR CS
High DCR PS
Low CS ISHO Success Rate
Low PS ISHO Success Rate
Low IFHO Success Rate
Low HSDPA Throughput
Low HSUPA Throughput
Low coverage (low RSCP vs. propagation delay)
High interference (low EcNo (CQI) vs. good RSCP)
Problem Classification
Congestion
RF Problem
Transmission Problem
Measurement Item
RRC.FailConnEstab.Cong
RRC.FailConnEstab.NoReply
VS.RRC.Rej.Redir.Dist
VS.RRC.Rej.Redir.InterRat
VS.RRC.Rej.Redir.IntraRat
VS.RRC.Rej.Redir.Service
VS.RRC.Rej.RL.Fail
VS.RRC.Rej.TNL.Fail
Sub Items
VS.RRC.Rej.ULIUBBand.Cong,
VS.RRC.Rej.DLIUBBand.Cong
VS.RRC.Rej.ULPower.Cong,
VS.RRC.Rej.DLPower.Cong
VS.RRC.Rej.ULCE.Cong,
VS.RRC.Rej.DLCE.Cong
VS.RRC.Rej.Code.Cong
Transmission Problem:
Congestion Problem:
RF Problem:
Problem Classification
Measurement Item
Sub Items
Sub Items
Sub Items
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Level 4
VS.RAB.FailEstabCS.RNL VS.RAB.FailEstCS. VS.RAB.FailEstabCS. VS.RAB.FailEstCs.ULPower.Cong
Unsp
Cong
VS.RAB.FailEstCs.DLPower.Cong
VS.RAB.FailEstCs.Code.Cong
VS.RAB.FailEstab.CS.DLIUBBand.
Congestion
VS.RAB.FailEstab.CS.ULIUBBand.
VS.RAB.FailEstCs.ULCE.Cong
VS.RAB.FailEstCs.DLCE.Cong
VS.RAB.FailEstabCS.UuFail
RF Problem
Transmission
VS.RAB.FailEstabCS.IubFail
VS.RAB.FailEstabCS.TNL
Transmission Problem:
RF Problem:
Check invalid parameters
Check inter-RAT HO and if the failure point is in RNC
border
Check the relative RB Setup failure counters to get
more details on the failure cause
Congestion Problem:
Check the Admission Control thresholds.
Take appropriate measures to relieve congestion, e.g.
activate LDR, OLC algorithms, and to increase
capacity.
Refer to 3G Capacity Optimization document
Problem Classification
Congestion
RF Problem
Transmission Problem
Measurement Item
RRC.FailConnEstab.Cong
RRC.FailConnEstab.NoReply
VS.RRC.Rej.Redir.Dist
VS.RRC.Rej.Redir.InterRat
VS.RRC.Rej.Redir.IntraRat
VS.RRC.Rej.Redir.Service
VS.RRC.Rej.RL.Fail
VS.RRC.Rej.TNL.Fail
Sub Items
VS.RRC.Rej.ULIUBBand.Cong,
VS.RRC.Rej.DLIUBBand.Cong
VS.RRC.Rej.ULPower.Cong,
VS.RRC.Rej.DLPower.Cong
VS.RRC.Rej.ULCE.Cong,
VS.RRC.Rej.DLCE.Cong
VS.RRC.Rej.Code.Cong
Transmission Problem:
Congestion Problem:
RF Problem:
Problem Classification
Congestion
Measurement Item
Sub Items
Sub Items
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
VS.RAB.FailEstPS.RNL
VS.RAB.FailEstPS.Unsp
VS.RAB.FailEstPs.ULPower.Cong
VS.RAB.FailEstPs.Code.Cong
VS.RAB.FailEstab.PS.DLIUBBand.Cong
VS.RAB.FailEstab.PS.ULIUBBand.Cong
VS.RAB.FailEstPs.ULCE.Cong
VS.RAB.FailEstPs.DLCE.Cong
VS.RAB.FailEstPs.DLPower.Cong
RF Problem
VS.RAB.FailEstabPS.UuFail
VS.RAB.FailEstabPS.IubFail
Transmission
VS.RAB.FailEstPS.TNL
Transmission
RF
Problem:
Congestion
Problem:
Problem:
Problem
Classification
RF Problem
Sub-indicator (Level 2)
Note
VS.RAB.AbnormRel.CS.RF.
ULSync
VS.RAB.AbnormRel.CS.RF.
UuNoReply
VS.RAB.AbnormRel.CS.RF.S
RBReset
VS.RAB.AbnormRel.CS.Preempt
VS.RAB.AbnormRel.CS.UTRANgen
VS.RAB.AbnormRel.CS.OLC
VS.RAB.AbnormRel.CS.IuAAL2
Drops
Drops
Problem
Classification
RF Problem
Sub-indicator (Level 2)
Note
VS.RAB.AbnormRel.PS.RF.SRBReset
VS.RAB.AbnormRel.PS.RF.ULSync
VS.RAB.AbnormRel.PS.RF.UuNoReply
VS.RAB.AbnormRel.PS.RF.TRBReset
RF Problem
VS.RAB.AbnormRel.PS.OM
VS.RAB.AbnormRel.PS.Preempt
VS.RAB.AbnormRel.PS.OLC
VS.RAB.AbnormRel.PS.GTPULoss
Drops
Drops
Problem Classification
Preparation phase
Failure Indicator
VS.IRATHO.FailRelocPrepOutCS.TAlExp.GCell
VS.IRATHO.FailRelocPrepOutCS.TgtFail.GCell
IRATHO.FailRelocPrepOutCS.ReloNoSup
IRATHO.FailRelocPrepOutCS.NoResAvail
Execution phase
Note
TRELOCalloc expiry (the timer that waits for
the RELOCATION COMMAND after the
REOCATION REQUIRED expires; check if the
RNC-MSC links are normal; check CN
transmission parameters)
Relocation Failure in target CN/RNC or target
system (check the CN configuration; check if
the BSS supports the relocation)
Relocation not supported in target RNC or
target system
No Resource Available (the BSC has no
resources for the UE access or the 2G MSC has
no information about the target cell)
Check
Congestion
Check
Check
Problem Classification
Preparation phase
Failure Indicator
VS.IRATHO.FailRelocPrepOutPS.NoResAvail
Note
No Resource Available (the BSC has no resources for
the UE access or the 2G MSC has no information
about the target cell)
VS.IRATHO.FailRelocPrepOutPS.ReloUnSupp
VS.IRATHO.FailRelocPrepOutPS.TAlExp
VS.IRATHO.FailRelocPrepOutPS.TgtFail
VS.IRATHO.FailRelocPrepOutPS.TgtHighLoad
VS.IRATHO.FailRelocPrepOutPS.UnKnowRNC
Execution phase
IRATHO.FailOutPSUTRAN.CfgUnsupp(none)
IRATHO.FailOutPSUTRAN.PhyChFail(none)
VS.IRATHO.FailOutPSUTRAN.NoReply
Check
Congestion
Check
Check
Failure Indicator
VS.HHO.FailInterFreqOut.CfgUnsupp
Note
Configuration unsupported (the UE doesnt support the
configuration assigned by the RNC in the PHYSICAL CHANNEL
RENONFIGURATION message indicates possible UE problem
however this case almost never happens in commercial
networks)
VS.HHO.FailInterFreqOut.PyhChFail
VS.HHO.FailInterFreqOut.ISR
VS.HHO.FailInterFreqOut.CellUpdt
VS.HHO.FailInterFreqOut.InvCfg
VS.HHO.FailInterFreqOut.NoReply
VS.HHO.FailInterFreqOut.PrepFail
VS.HHO.FailInterFreqOut.RLSetupFail
Optimizing
RNC
Cell
level formula:
level formula:
In case pilot pollution exists in the area, try to adjust tilts and/or
azimuths of relative sites
Check for ping-pong serving cell change based on 1D event: pingpong limits throughput
If this is the problem, tune event 1D parameters in order to eliminate
ping-pong.
Consider also the value of the HspaTimerLen parameter.
Check for faults (relative alarms) and its capacity. Make sure that the
configured Iu-PS capacity is not a bottleneck for PS service demands.
RNC
Cell
level formula:
level formula:
Check
Check
Check
Log
DT)
Plot PSC from scanner for pilot pollution
analyze
Plot idle mode, short call, and long call for
analyzing network first symptoms before
optim
Alarm list on the specific date
Latest network data base (contains: TSSR,
physical configuration of the network,
neighbor)
Contour Map
Index
Reference
Remarks
Test on the acceptance route
Coverage rate
95%
95%
95%
5%
If a river is narrow, the signals along two banks will interact. If the
transportation between two banks allows, divide sites along the two banks in
the same cluster.
If a river is wide, the upstream and downstream will interact. In this
situation, the transportation between two banks is inconvenient, dividing
clusters by the bank according to actual situation.
Weak
coverage
Cross-cell coverage
Unbalance uplink and downlink
No primary pilot cell
Weak
Valley areas
Hillside back
Elevator well
Tunnel
Underground garage
Basement
Areas inside high buildings
Hole coverage:
Cross-cell
Reduce
Check
Brief:
Solution:
Pilot Pollutions
Poor Coverage
Optimum Area
Poor Coverage
There
Downgrade/Degrowth
Upgrade/Growth
This
Blocking
Utilization
3G
Basic
Formula
UPGRADE
Blocking High
Utilization High
DOWNGRADE
Blocking Low
Utilization Low
Resource Configured more than 2
Resource
Iub
CE
Power
HSDPA Code
Verification
No improper
coverage/
Configuration
issue
Action
Iub Expansion/ Modernization and Expansion
CE Board/License Expansion
40W/New Site/2nd Carrier
License Expansion
Index
Iub
Expansion Notice
Index
CE Expansion Notice
Index
Index
HSDPA
BLOCKING:
UTILIZATION:
Direction Spreading
Number of
Corresponding Typical Traffic
Factor
CEs Consumed
Credits
Class
Consumed
UL
256
1
2
3.4 kbit/s SRB
UL
64
1
2
13.6 kbit/s SRB
UL
64
1
2
12.2 kbit/s AMR
UL
16
3
6
64 kbit/s VP
UL
32
1.5
3
32 kbps PS
UL
16
3
6
64 kbit/s PS
UL
8
5
10
128 kbit/s PS
UL
4
10
20
384 kbit/s PS
BLOCKING:
UTILIZATION:
Direction Spreading
Number of
Corresponding Typical Traffic
Factor
CEs Consumed
Credits
Class
Consumed
DL
256
1
1
3.4 kbit/s SRB
DL
128
1
1
13.6 kbit/s SRB
DL
128
1
1
12.2 kbit/s AMR
DL
32
2
2
64 kbit/s VP
DL
64
1
1
32 kbps PS
DL
32
2
2
64 kbit/s PS
DL
16
4
4
128 kbit/s PS
DL
8
8
8
384 kbit/s PS
BLOCKING:
UTILIZATION:
In case of CAC based on code resources, the only parameter controlling triggering is:
Many LDR actions can be performed. Particularly for Code Basic Congestion, Code Reshuffling is
controlled through:
Other relevant LDR actions to control code shortage are Inter-Frequency Load Handover and BE
Rate Reduction.
BLOCKING:
UTILIZATION:
For Algo1&3:
For Algo2:
Check VS.MeanRTWP and VS.MaxTCP of the cell to determine whether the rejection
is due to UL or DL congestion.
Many LDR actions can be performed. Particularly for Power Basic Congestion,
MBMS (Multimedia Broadcast Multicast Service) Power Reduction is controlled
through:
BLOCKING:
UTILIZATION:
VS.HSDPA.UE.Mean.Cell: Number of UEs in CELL_HSDPA state in a cell.
In case of CAC based on the number of HSDPA users, the controlling parameter is:
MaxHsdpaUserNum (CELLCAC): Maximum HSDPA user number (based on cell type and available HSDPA
power and code resources). Its value is related to the presence of the following features:
Divide users between Gold, Silver and Copper and/or modify their priorities:
UserPriority (SCHEDULEPRIOMAP).
Specify a HSDPA-only carrier to avoid basic congestion conditions being triggered.
Introduce an additional carrier.
BLOCKING:
UTILIZATION:
MaxHsupaUserNum (CELLCAC): Maximum HSUPA user number (based on cell type and
available HSUPA power and code resources). Its value is related to the presence of
the following features:
WRFD-01061211: 20 HSUPA Users per Cell.
WRFD-010634: 60 HSUPA Users per Cell.
BLOCKING:
UTILIZATION:
Iub congestion control is implemented in a separate processing module, so its functionality is not
controlled by LDR switches. In the case of Iub congestion, however, LDR actions are applied to congestion
resolution.
Type of Service
UL/DL Default Activity
When Iub congestion counters are not null:
Control that NodeB was not unavailable during the period of congestion:
VS.NodeB.UnavailTime.OM
Optimize triggering thresholds.
Optimize LDR actions.
Eventually increase Iub capacity.
UL
Factor (%)
70
IMS SRB
UL
15
SRB
UL
15
AMR voice
UL
70
R99 CS conversational
UL
100
R99 CS streaming
UL
100
R99 PS conversational
UL
70
R99 PS streaming
UL
100
R99 PS interactive
UL
100
R99 PS background
UL
100
HSUPA SRB
UL
50
UL
15
HSUPA voice
UL
70
HSUPA conversational
UL
70
HSUPA streaming
UL
100
HSUPA interactive
UL
100
HSUPA background
UL
100
BLOCKING:
UTILIZATION:
METHODOLOGY:
Type of Service
Control that NodeB was not unavailable during the period of congestion:
VS.NodeB.UnavailTime.OM
Optimize triggering thresholds.
Optimize LDR actions.
Eventually increase Iub capacity.
UL/DL
Default Activity
Factor (%)
70
DL
IMS SRB
DL
15
DL
100
SRB
DL
15
AMR voice
DL
70
R99 CS conversational
DL
100
R99 CS streaming
DL
100
R99 PS conversational
DL
70
R99 PS streaming
DL
100
R99 PS interactive
DL
100
R99 PS background
DL
100
HSDPA SRB
DL
50
DL
15
HSDPA voice
DL
70
HSDPA conversational
DL
70
HSDPA streaming
DL
100
HSDPA interactive
DL
100
HSDPA background
DL
100
EFACH channel
DL
20