Network latency

ETX performs
better than OF0
because it
considers link level
detail

Energy Consumption

LLN has a lossy natute the

rank quality changes frequently
and there ETX for path also
changes frequently. ETX takes
into account the path ETX and
can reflect the link status more
precisely at any time in RPL
network

Every Consumption of
network is more at the
start with more lossy
network., decrease the
lossyness in network the
energy consumption.
Because the lossy
environment has more
retransmissions than a
lossless environment

Packet Delivery Ratio

The Packet Delivery Ratio

of ETX is better than OF0
in this small sized
simulation

Network convergence

Network setup Time

with respect to
DIO_INTERVAL_MIN

Energy Consumption

For DIO interval

minimum, between 5
and 7 energy
consumption keeps on
descreasing in a linear
fashion. The best
Energy comsumption
can be observed for
DIO Interval
minimum of 8 and
higher.

Latancy

The Latency decrease from

3.5s to 1.7s between 3 and 6s.
This sudden decrease is due
to to the reason that lower
values DIO gennerated heavy
control traffic . Which causes
more radio collisions and the
packets need to be buffered
which increase overall latency
of the packet along the path

Packet Deliver Ration

- Which means to high

control overhead the RPL
network suffer collisions
and therefore PDR is Poor.
- However as we increase
the DIO interval (6-14)
RPL provider a good
PDR ratio of more 70%.
- PDR falls for DIO of 15
and greaser, The reasin is
that the value DIO higher
than 14 does not provide q
quick network
convergence

We can observe that ETX

provides better latency
and PDR using less
Energy than OF0