Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Excellent 4 Good 3 Satisfactory 2 Needs Improvement 1

    Uploaded by

    api-292658060
    23 views1 page
    This document outlines four criteria for evaluating projects: subject knowledge, citing sources, originality, and technical. Each criterion is rated on a scale from excellent to needs improvement based on definitions provided. For example, to receive an excellent rating in subject knowledge, the subject knowledge must be evident throughout the project with all information being clear, appropriate and correct.

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    publicserviceannoucementrubric

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document outlines four criteria for evaluating projects: subject knowledge, citing sources, originality, and technical. Each criterion is rated on a scale from excellent to needs improvement based on definitions provided. For example, to receive an excellent rating in subject knowledge, the subject knowledge must be evident throughout the project with all information being clear, appropriate and correct.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf or txt
    23 views1 page

    Excellent 4 Good 3 Satisfactory 2 Needs Improvement 1

    Uploaded by

    api-292658060
    This document outlines four criteria for evaluating projects: subject knowledge, citing sources, originality, and technical. Each criterion is rated on a scale from excellent to needs improvement based on definitions provided. For example, to receive an excellent rating in subject knowledge, the subject knowledge must be evident throughout the project with all information being clear, appropriate and correct.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 1

    Excellent4

    Good3

    Satisfactory2

    Needs
    Improvement1

    Subject
    Knowledge

    Subjectknowledge
    isevident
    throughoutthe
    project.All
    informationisclear,
    appropriate,and
    correct.

    Subjectknowledge
    isevidentinmuch
    oftheproject.Most
    informationisclear,
    appropriate,and
    correct.

    Somesubject
    knowledgeis
    evident.Some
    Informationis
    confusing,
    incorrect,orflawed.

    Subjectknowledge
    isnotevident.
    Informationis
    confusing,
    incorrect,orflawed.

    CitingSources

    Allsourcesare
    properlycited.

    Mostsourcesare
    properlycited.

    Fewsourcesare
    properlycited.

    Nosourcesare
    properlycited.

    Originality

    Theprojectshows
    significantevidence
    oforiginalityand
    inventiveness.The
    majorityofthe
    contentandmany
    oftheideasare
    fresh,original,and
    inventive.

    Theprojectshows
    someevidenceof
    originalityand
    inventiveness.

    Theworkisan
    extensivecollection
    andrehashofother
    people'sideas,
    products,and
    images.Thereis
    littleevidenceof
    newthoughtor
    inventiveness.

    Theworkisa
    minimalcollection
    orrehashofother
    people'sideas,
    products,and
    images.Thereisno
    evidenceofnew
    thought.

    Technical

    Projectruns
    perfectlywithno
    technicalproblems.
    Forexample,there
    arenoerror
    messages,all
    sound,video,or
    otherfilesare
    found.

    Projectruns
    adequatelywith
    minortechnical
    problems.

    Projectruns
    minimally.There
    aremanytechnical
    problemswhen
    viewingtheproject.

    Projectdoesnot
    runsatisfactorily.
    Therearetoomany
    technicalproblems
    toviewtheproject.

    You might also like