This document summarizes Shannon Myers' second unit paper for their ART 133 class. The main ideas discussed are that visual culture needs to be interpreted through different lenses, and that the most applicable project was using clear paper over maps to add meaning. The author argues that Gude's approach of using art as investigation rather than just exercises gives more freedom for self-expression and discovery. Gude's principles of questioning what constitutes art are also cited as being helpful guidelines.
This document summarizes Shannon Myers' second unit paper for their ART 133 class. The main ideas discussed are that visual culture needs to be interpreted through different lenses, and that the most applicable project was using clear paper over maps to add meaning. The author argues that Gude's approach of using art as investigation rather than just exercises gives more freedom for self-expression and discovery. Gude's principles of questioning what constitutes art are also cited as being helpful guidelines.
This document summarizes Shannon Myers' second unit paper for their ART 133 class. The main ideas discussed are that visual culture needs to be interpreted through different lenses, and that the most applicable project was using clear paper over maps to add meaning. The author argues that Gude's approach of using art as investigation rather than just exercises gives more freedom for self-expression and discovery. Gude's principles of questioning what constitutes art are also cited as being helpful guidelines.
This document summarizes Shannon Myers' second unit paper for their ART 133 class. The main ideas discussed are that visual culture needs to be interpreted through different lenses, and that the most applicable project was using clear paper over maps to add meaning. The author argues that Gude's approach of using art as investigation rather than just exercises gives more freedom for self-expression and discovery. Gude's principles of questioning what constitutes art are also cited as being helpful guidelines.
ART 133 9/24/15 Unit Paper #2 The Big Idea that I found in this unit was that there is visual culture all around us that needs to be interpreted and understood, and to be able to do this as both a student and teacher you need to have different ways to interpret so that any fellow colleagues in a class might be able to understand. I think that Gude was most helpful for me as a reader because it gave me an idea of how further a project and make it more of a statement rather than just a piece that I would normally create. I think that the most applicable project for me this unit was when we as a class chose different maps from around the world and used the clear paper over it to make the piece more powerful and have a specific and purposeful meaning rather than just for pure aesthetic purposes. I feel like I would use this Big Idea as a consistent one. I think that Gude had some really evolved ideas on how to get anyone to think outside of the box. I never really truly thought of using art as a for of investigation, but when Gude brought that up I really liked it when he said, not as exercises, but as research that produces new visual and conceptual insights. (Gude, 2004, pg. 8) This thought can be utilized because it could help students and teachers not do the same things that happen in art classes, but it gives the teacher and students more freedom, to express and find themselves through art, which may be one of the reasons that a student is there in the first place. I also like Gudes Founding Principles. These are helpful because they create questions that bring up the overall questions of, Is that art? As well as, Why is that art? Gude, O. (2004). Postmodern principles: In search of a 21st century art education. Art Education, 57(1), 6-14.