Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Huuli Deedleh Yos 2014-1new
Huuli Deedleh Yos 2014-1new
Huuli Deedleh Yos 2014-1new
2014 , 1 (47)
/ , /
:
.
,
- , .
11
,
.
19
, : ,
,
, .
,
16
.
,
.
10
.
25
33
39
45
, ,
1- .-
,
3
.
48
54
2013 ,
- ,
.
61
- .
75
Mongolias Arbitration Law: Some Challenging Issues of Legal Regulation
of Arbitration
- ,
.
89
CONTENT
BEFORE CREATING A LAW
(UNDERLINING ARTICLE, INTERVIEW)
The Draft Law on Land Privatization for Citizens of Mongolia: Some
Innovative Regulations
(P.Zolzaya, Judge of Appellate Court for Civil Cases)
11
19
25
33
39
45
48
54
RESEARCH OVERVIEW:
Analysis of 2013 Statistical Information of Crimes and Administrative
Offences
(B.Dorjpagma, Sociology-researcher of National Legal Institute)
61
INTERNATIONAL PRACTICE
Mongolias Competition Law: A Comparative Study
(B.Mergen, Masters Student of School of Law of National University
of Mongolia)
75
89
- -
.
.
.
:279
ISSN:2226-9185
. 6
.
: - 46,
, -7
: +(976)-11-315735
: 315735
: www.legalinstitute.mn
: lawjournal@legalinstitute.mn
EDITORIAL BOARD
J.Amarsanaa
B.Amarsanaa
A.Bakei
B.Bayarsaikhan
D.Bayarsaikhan
J.Bayartsetseg
B.Bilegt
J.Byambadorj
D.Ganbat
B.Gunbileg
D.Dorligjav
N.Jantsan
Ts.Zorig
V.Oyumaa
Ch.Unurbayar
D.Solongo
Sh.Tuvdendorj
Kh.Temuujin
B.Temuulen
P.Tsagaan
Ch.Enkhbaatar
A.Erdenetsogt
:
,
, ,
.
9
55 .
7
41 .
,
,
.
122
, 51 ,
46 ,
, 3 ,
3 .
,
,
,
.
,
,
,
, ,
1-
.
2002
5
.
.
2014 1 (47)
,
,
.
, ,
,
,
.
.
. , , ,
,
.
.
, ,
,
.
,
, ,
,
, ,
,
.
,
, ,
,
.
,
,
.
,
,
, ,
,
.
,
,
,
.
1
7 . 1-
,
, ,
,
,
,
.
17-23
.
,
-
,
13.2.1:
; 13.2.2:
;13.2.3:
.
3.1.2-
,
, , , ,
.
.
/3.1.3/,
, ,
, ,
, ,
,
,
, ,
, ,
, ,
/8.2/
6.1-
,
, , , ,
, , ,
,
.
4
4.1-
: 4.1.1.
4.1.2.
.
4.1.2-
, -
,
2014 1 (47)
13.2.2-
.
5
5.3.2-
,
, ,
5.1.7-
.
.
.
5.3.1 .
.
197.6, 197.9-
.
,
,
84.3, 85.2-
.
7
7.2.1- 5.3.1-
,
,
,
5.1.7-
. 85
85.2-
,
,
,
.
.
10
1.
,
,
,
, ,
,
, ,
,
2.
. 1995-05-16-
3.1-
,
.
2011 10
,
,
,
/
,
-
, .
.
,
, ,
,
.
, , ,
.
-
, ,
.
.2010.
2
. 2002.
1
11
2014 1 (47)
3.
22 1- ,
,
,
12.1.2 12.1.1.4-
.
.
26.1-
,
,
,
.
,
,
.
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
3
16.1-
, ,
.
16.2- ,
,
,
,
.
-
38- 1-
,
2- ,
,
4.
-
5- ,
49- ,
.
.
.5
6
. 14
.2002. (2003-02-01 )..
5
1991-04-09 2007-10-28
. - ,
. .2010.
.. ..
211 .
6
. .
4
. 2011-10-21.252.
12
.
2010-06-02 03
,
(
,
)
- 26
.
22 22.1, 12
12.1.2-12.1.4-
,
,
,
,
, ,
29 29.2
,
7. 2010
3
. :
1. ,
,
22.1-
.
2.
12- 12.1.1-
.
3.
12-
12.1.2-
, ,
31.1
,
25-
,
31.2- ,
,
25-
.
31.3-
,
.
4.
12-
12.1.3-
13
2014 1 (47)
.
.
,
,
(
)
,
.
, ,
. ,
, ,
,
.
, , ,
,
.
5. 12-
12.1.4-
4.1,
4.2- ,
.
,
12.1.4-
.
4.1-
,
,
,
,
.
.
:
- ,
..
,
,
8.
.
,
,
,
9.
. ...
,
...
29.2-
,
.
. ....1996..60
9
. .
.
.2008. 93 .
8
14
,
10.
.
,
,
11.
.
,
,
,
.
,
,
12 .
,
,
. ,
,
,
.
, ,
,
,
,
,
.
,
,
.
,
,
.
.
1926-07-02
38,39-
44-
, 55-
. 195205-27
2-
. 196706-29
34-
38-
,
, ,
. 1994-05-09
..
-
-
. .
. 2011 . 5- . 2003. 32
11
..
. .
.2009. 134 .
12
., ., . .
.
. .2011. 66 .
10
15
2014 1 (47)
20-
...
.
.
26-
, ,
,
.
,
,
,
,
,
.
. :
1. ,
.
2.
,
.
3.
.
4.
.
-
.
5. 26.2
//
,
, ,
, ,
,
, ,
,
.
6.
.
7.
.
8.
.
9.
.
10.
.
16
11.
/
,
,
/
.
. ,
:
, ,
.
:
1.
,
;
2.
, ,
;
3.
/ / ;
4.
;
5.
.
.
7
,
,
,
, ,
6. 13
.
. :
-
,
;
-
,
;
- ,
14.
. ,
,
.
,
(,
) ,
/ /
. . .
.
. .2008. 21
.
.. .
.
, ,
. .2010.236
14
. . .
. .2008. 94
13
17
2014 1 (47)
:
1.
, ,
;
2.
/
/
,
;
3.
,
;
4.
,
;
5.
15
.
6.
.
.
:
1.
22-
, 26-
,
;
2.
25-
,
25.1.2-
,
.
---0---
. . ...
.1999. 62.
15
18
.
,
,
,
.
,
,
.
, ,
.
.
. ,
,
,
,
.
,
, , ,
,
19
2014 1 (47)
,
,
, ,
,
.
, ,
.
,
. ,
,
, ,
. 1994
01 13-
1, 2- 42
2
14 . . . . . .
1
,
64 9
3
1
,
1998 07
23- 77
1-
...
...,
...
.
,
.
,
,
.
,
,
. :
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
20
,
,
.
.
, ,
.
/a living
Constitution/
.
,
, ,
,
.1
,
,
.
,
, ,
,
,
,
, ,
,
.
.
, .
,
,
,
,
, ,
, , ,
,
.
,
.
: ,
,
,
Civic death
,
. 20
, 2,
,
21
2014 1 (47)
3, ,
,
,
,
, 4, ,
.
,
.
,
. ,
,
/
/
.
,
.
.
,
,
,
.5
,
.6
, ,
,
.
,
.
,
. :
-
;
-
,
,
2006
.
4
2006
.
3
22
;
-
,
,
.
,
.
,
.
,
,
,
, -
, ,
,
.
,
,
. 2011
2007 250 3
,
,
2 ,
20
.
,
,
,
,
.
.
,
.
,
.
,
,
. ,
23
2014 1 (47)
.
1-
,
.
,
,
,
.
---0---
24
, : ,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
.
,
, .
.
,
,
, ,
.
, , ,
1
.
,
,
.
2012
-
,
,
.
,
,
,
.2
David Stanway , Key political risks for mining investment in Mongolia, Tuesday , 01 Nov 2011, Re2
25
2014 1 (47)
.
2014 -
9.6
2011 12.3%, 2013
11.8
.3
- ,
,
,
,
,
,
. :4
.
,
,
.5
1990-
. -
, ,
,
:6
,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Market_economy
A market economy is an economy in which decisions regarding investment, production and distribution are based on supply and demand, and prices of
goods and services are determined in a free price
system. In contrast, a planned economy is an economy in which investment and production decisions are
embodied in a plan of production.
6
Murray Rothbard, Making Economic Sense, Auburn, AL: Ludwig von Mises Institute, 2007, Chapter
99, The Collapse of Socialism
5
uters.
3
http://www.imf.org/external/np/sec/pr/2013/
pr13526.htm
4
Torsten Persson and Guido Tabellini, Political Economics: Explaining Economic Policy, Massachusetts
Institute of Technology Press in 2000.
26
, : ,
-
//
.
,
7.
,
.
,
.
,
1982
.8
,
.
.
.
,
.
,
.
,
,
.
,
.
,
.
,
.
, ,
,
, ,
.
2009
,
.
,
.
8
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constitutional_economics
7
27
2014 1 (47)
.
,
.
,
.
.10
,
,
,
,
.
, ,
/
orthodox/
,
.11
,
.
1982 -
. -
.
1986
.9
/
superior/
.
.
, ,
.
.
Ludwig Van den Hauwe
http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/economicsciences/laureates/1986/buchanan-facts.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constitutional_economics
11
.,
-2009
.
10
28
, : ,
.
.
. :
,
.
.
.
,
,
. :
1.
;
2.
, ,
,
;
3.
.
,
12
., .
1980
.
.13
,
.
(1),
(2),
(3)
3
.14
.
.
.,
, 18-19, .,
2010, 20 .
13
.,
, 18-19, .,
2010, 21 .
14
., , ., 2001 ,
30 .
12
29
2014 1 (47)
. 15
.
.
16
,
17 .
.
.
,
.
5
5.3
,
5.4
,
.
25
25.1
, ,
, 25.7
, , ,
,
,
,
,
,
.
,
.
,
.
,
.
,
.
,
,
,
superior
.
. 2006
.
., , ., 2001
, 26 .
16
., , .,
2008 , 196 .
15
., , ., 2001
, 17 .
17
30
, : ,
,
.
.
:18
, ,
. ,
,
,
,
180
.
,
,
.
.
,
.
.
,
.
, , ,
.
,
,
.
.
.
,
,
. ,
?
.
,
.
,
.
,
. , ,
2006.05.29- .
18
31
2014 1 (47)
. - ,
.19
,
,
.20
, ,
,
.
,
.
---0---
.,
, 18-19, .,
2010, 23 .
20
Persson, Torsten and Guido Tabellini. 2002. Political Economics and Public Finance. In Handbook of
Public Economics. Volume 3, ed. Alan J. Auerbach
and Martin Feldstein. Amsterdam: North Holland.
19
32
, : ,
,
.
,
2
.
.
.
1.1.
,
,
,
, ,
/, /
,
16
.
48 1 ...
, ,
.
,
,
,
10
.
,
,
33
2014 1 (47)
1.
/
/- 12 12.1
,
.
,
.
.
, ,
/ /-
2
. ...
,
-
3 .
2006 2 06
01
/2006.04.17 43 /
,
- 34
34.1.1-
.
,
,
.
1.2.
/
/
.
,
,
/
/
.
. 48
80
.
.
,
.
1.3.
,
,
,
,
,
2004 33
2
2004 37
3
2006, 161
1
34
, : ,
.4
,
.
,
.
,
.
/
/
71
,
?
.
,
,
.
,
/
/,
,
.
. ,
.6
,
.5
.
,
,
.
.
,
4
5
80 ,
57 57.1
54 54.2
31 31.1
35
2014 1 (47)
.
80
80.1-:
,
52-60
,
,
.
-
.
,
.
.
.
82
82.1-
,
162
162.1-162.3-
162.4-
57
57.1-
.
2
,
,
,
.
2003
11
.
- 162
162.4, 173
173.3-: ...
57
57.1-
57
57.1
.
18 3
.7
,
.
2003
4
7
36
, : ,
,
,
;
-
,
,
;
-
,
, ,
,
,
,
,
;
-
,
,
,
;
-
, ,
,
,
,
.
,
,
.
,
/ ,
/
,
.
, :
,
,
-
,
,
.
.
-
37
2014 1 (47)
93
;
-
,
,
,
,
,
,
---0---
38
, : ,
-
*
2
.
,
(
)
3 .
,
,
,
4 .
.
/ ,
,
-
,
.
?
?
?
?
,
1
,
,
...
..,20028-9.
.47 .
3
Regelsberger, Pandakten.1893.,p156
4
.. ,
.
2
*
. ., ., 1990.,118
1
39
2014 1 (47)
,
,
,
/.
,
,
.
,
,
, ,
.
,
,
,
5
.
,
.
,
.
.
.
, ,
.
,
XIII
- 1992
1 13-
/
/, / /,
/
/
. -
,
6 ,
/,
, ,
/
,
,
.
,
, ,
1
.
,
,
, .
6
.. ,
. . 2
5
40
, : ,
,
(1924, 1940,1960 )
,
.
.
1
,
,
.
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
.
, ,
7 ,
,
8
..
: .
. .,2009. 4
8
..
.
.
2011. 4
2
,
,
9;
4 1
, ,
,
10
.
()
30
.
,
.
,
,
:
1.1 ,
:
.
,
1992
1997
10
41
2014 1 (47)
2.1
(,) 1952
13
1954
.
,
14
:
, , , ,
, 15 .
2
16
,
,
40
,
,
17
.
,
.
1.2.
:
.
.
1.3.
40 :
,
,
, ,
. 23-25
15-17
11.
2.
,
,
12
:
.. II .
., 2010. 348
14
.. III .
., 2010. 237
15
348
16
., ..
..,1995
17
,
,
.
13
.
.,2000.256
12
.
,
. ,
. ., 2005. ..
.
. 16 .
11
42
, : ,
2.2.2
:
,
.
,
,
,
;
, , ,
.
,
, ,
.
,
,
.
,
,
.
.
. ,
,
.
,
,
18
.
.
2.2 19
.
.
2.2.1.
:
,
;
.
: ..
,
..,2007. 337
19
.
. ..
:
.
. .,2009. 49
18
43
2014 1 (47)
-
,
,
,
20
,
,
,
,
,
, ,
.
21
,
22 23
,
.
---0---
.
.
22
.
23
.
21
..
. 3
20
44
, : ,
..., ...
, ,
...
,
.
. :
1. - 34
,
,
,
, ,
,
10
.
1
1.2- ...
... .
. ,
,
,
, ,
,
/
//- 17
17.1- ...
,
... /.
17.2, 17.3, 17.4
...
..., ...
45
2014 1 (47)
-
17
34 262
278
,
.
- 262-278
,
.
,
,
,
.
, , ,
.
.
,
.
,
,
,
,
. ,
,
.
, ,
,
.
,
,
,
.
,
.
,
:
-
;
-
,
;
-
;
-
46
, : ,
,
;
-
.
.
.
.
.
:
,
,
,
,
.
-
,
.
,
- 34
,
.
.
,
.
---0---
47
2014 1 (47)
1
. -
1.
,
,
.
,
.
.
,
,
.
, ,
,
.
,
,
48
,
.
: ,
,
,
,
, , ,
,
,
, ,
,
,
,
, ,
, ,
,
,
.
, ,
, , , ,
23-
,
, ,
,
.
, ,
2.
,
,
,
,
.
,
.
:
,
.
,
,
.
,
, ,
.
.
.
, ,
.
1. 23
207.1 ,
, ,
, , ,
,
,
,
, 3 6 ,
1 .
-
.
,
- 29.1- ......
51-125
2 ,
9,6
2002 . ., 23-
, 207
2
2002 . .,29.1
. 2013.09.01- 1 192000
49
2014 1 (47)
, , ,
29
,
, ,
(
,
..)
.
, ,
4
.
,
208.1-
.
,
.
- 208.1
,
.
.
, ,
,
,
.
207.1-
, ,
,
.
,
,
.
. ,
,
.
2.
208.1
, ,
,
.
, ,
- 29.1
125-200
,
24.0
. 2008
06 25- -
208.1 30
. :
, ,
23 ,
30. .,2008.06.25
4
2002 . ., 23-
, 208
3
50
, ,
3.
2004
,
,
, ,
6.
2009 08
25- .
37
.
,
,
,
.
,
.
10000-30000
, ,
50000-250000
.
,
,
.
. :
34.1-
,
, ,
, ,
3.
208.2
5 .
208.1
,
,
. - 30
,
, ,
.
,
,
, ,
.
.
,
/ /
.
,
,
.
208.2
,
,
,
,
5
51
2004 ., 1.1
2014 1 (47)
7
37.1.8-
,
,
20000,
, 50000200000 .
.
.
.
,
.
,
.
34.2- ,
,
,
8
,
. :
70
,
,
.
20-30
7
8
,
.
,
,
,
.
,
. ,
.
4.,
, ,
,
.
,
. ,
, ,
.
,
,
.
2004 ., , 34 .
52
, ,
.
1.
207-
.....
,
. :
-
;
2.
208-
....
,
30
.
;
3.
,
,
.
,
.
:
, ,
.
,
,
.
,
,
. :
,
.
,
.
---0---
53
2014 1 (47)
. ,
.
,
,
.
,
,
,
1
2 . ,
,
,
3
.
.
,
,
.
( )-
...
: .-2- ., . . .:
, 2009. .67.
2
: / .
... .: ,
2005. .591.
1
54
, ,
. ,
( ),
3
.
.
,
.
.
. -
.
.
5.
.
:
-
;
-
;
-
;
- ,
,
;
,
.
1. .
- 1957
/United States
v Howard/
,
4
.
- , ,
,
.
...
: .-2- ., . . .:
, 2009. .68. , -
,
.
4
:
, 6, , 2005, 6
3
:
, 6, , 2005, 6
5
55
2014 1 (47)
- ,
;
-
.
,
,
.
.
.
,
.
2.
.
-
,
,
,
. , - 1997
3
3.2.1
,
,
6.
3. .
,
.
, 1998
.
4.
.
. ,
:
- 1992 492
;
- 2001
376
;
- 2005
34/5
.
.
6
56
, ,
5. .
- 1997
1009
.
,
,
, ,
,
.
.
.
.
,
.
-
,
,
. ,
- ,
8.
9
.
62 2
,
/
...
7 .
., .., ...
:
. .: ,
2002. .245.
9 2002
.
.
.
8
.. :
. . , 2009. 15, 19
7
57
2014 1 (47)
2010 5
19- 119
.
,
, ,
,
,
,
,
,
1.3
.
,
10.
,
-
,
11,
,
.
-
.
,
,
,
-
/
,
11
10
58
, ,
/-
.,
,
,
,
,
.
-
,
,
,
,
,
- ,
,
.
,
,
,
.
, ,
( )
.
,
, ,
.
2010 5 19-
119
-
,
.
-
.
,
59
2014 1 (47)
.
. ,
,
.
,
,
,
.
,
,
,
.
,
.
,
,
,
,
.
, ,
, 12,
.
- , 6
---0---
12
60
2013 ,
(2013 )
, ,
, , ,
,
.
.
,
.
-
,
.
2013
,
,
.
, , ,
1. , :
1
61
2014 1 (47)
2010-2013 86473
49965, 35668 . 2010-2013
41,2% 57,7%
. 2010-2011 3,2% 2012 15,1%-, 2013 14,8%-
.
2013 60.7% ,
38.4% , .
25.3%, 19.4% .
,
.
1
, ,
, 2013
25362
2,867,744
0,8
1538
361,000
0,4
2912
530,193
0,5
3798
467,034
0,8
1492
191,387
0,7
15149
1,318,130
1,1
2521
192,615
1,3
3742
294,908
1,2
2416
132,117
1,8
2778
261,917
1236
127,477
0,9
2115
153,933
1,3
278
27,440
31
3,691
0,8
302
32,893
0,9
1%- .
1,8%- .
62
, 2
.
2013
, :
-3742 ;
-2778 ;
-2521 .
3
2013 56,8% , ,
. : /145/ 32.1%, /96-100/ -26.4%,
/181/ -10.4%, -8.7% .
63
2014 1 (47)
,
.
2013
3 :
- 50,7% ;
- 41,3% ;
- 35,1%- .
3 :
- -32% ;
- - -25,3% ;
- -15,3%-, -4,8% -4,0% 3,6%- .
3
:
- 922 ;
- -754 ;
-751 ;
5
64
2013 24.9% , -, .
: /145/ 36%, /96-100/ -28.2%, /215225/ 21.6%
.
2. ;
6
2013 20.9%-,
14.7%- -7.7%-,
-12.7%- .
7
65
2014 1 (47)
25362
45%, ,
- 42%- .
:
2
, ,
, 2012-2013
, 91-107
, , , 108113
, , 114-129
,
130-144
145-155
156-176
177-191
192-201
- 215-225
226229
230-244
245-262
263-273
2012
7155
2013
8156
14
46
55
19.6
405
425
4.9
126
124
-1.6
9023
185
1749
295
1999
11118
234
1894
318
2148
23.2
26.5
8.3
7.8
7.5
332
100
110
22089
278
104
106
25362
-16.3
4
-3.6
14.8
2013 2012 ,
. 145155 23.2%-, 156-176 26.5%-, ,
, , 108-113 19.6%-
230-244 -16.3%-,
263-273 -3.6%- .
3. ,
8
66
2
.
. 2013 25.2%-
.
10
2013 36.1-
97.1%- , 2.4%-
, 0.4%-
.
67
2014 1 (47)
11
68
13
-4.8%-,
-6.3%- -2.9%-
46.8%, 42.4%-,
15.3%-, 15%-, 8.9%-, 8.8%-
. :
14
2013 10597
80% 8478 2013
25362 67.1% 16872
.
15
69
2014 1 (47)
22-06 2013
9884 38.9% .
17
2013 57%
, .
65% , ,
. ,
:
18
70
42.5% -6.2%
. 5363 70%
.
,
, , ,
.
,
,
.
,
,
,
, , ,
,
,
2013
.
,
,
.
1.
,
1.1. 2013
25362
71
15419 60.7%,
9740 38.4
.
25.3%-,
19.4%- .
,
.
:
,
,
.
,
,
.
.
. :
- ,
,
;
-
5
,
;
2014 1 (47)
;
- ,
,
, , ,
;
- ,
, ,
;
-
, ,
;
- ,
;
-
.
:
192,615
15.6%,
294,908 22.3%,
261,917
19.8%- .
1.2.
2013
3
50,7% ,
41,3%, 35,1%-
-32%, - 25.3%, -15,3%-
.
3
:
- - 922 ;
- - -754 ;
- -751 ;
2013
24.9%- , -,
. : /145/
36%,
/96-100/ -28.2%,
/215-225/
72
21.6%
.
1538
-1.9%
2912 10%-,
3798
11.8%-, 1492
5.4%-
.
69% .
,
,
,
(
, , ,
)
,
.
2. ,
?
2.1.
:
43.8% , 32.1%
,
91-107, 8.4% -
215-225, 7.4%
177-191, 1.6% ,
,
114-129, 1.2%
192-201,
156-176 0.9% .
2013 2012
, .
145-155 23.2%-,
156-176 26.5%, , ,
,
108-113 19.6%-
230-244 -16.3%-,
263-273 -3.6%-
.
.
.
/96100/ /145/
.
2.2.
2012
36.8% ., 25.1% ,
2013 43% ., 20.7%
.
34%- .
2012
4.4%-
2012 14.8%
.
,
.
,
,
.
, ,
73
,
,
.
,
.
.
,
.
.
(broken windows)
,
.
3.
. 2013
57% ,
65%
, ,
. ,
.
--
. ,
.
2014 1 (47)
. 2013
6406
26.5%-
2447 0,8%-
.
,
2012 4
29,8%-
.1
3
,
,
.
, .
, , .,
2012 12 .
1
74
2013 1-
9.3%- .
2013
51%
.
40
69.7%- ,
,
,
.
.2 ,
1973 Fair Trading Act
.3
1993
/
/ , 2000
.
,
,
.
,
2007
78
,
,
-
.
.
19
,
- ,
,
,
,
1
. II
1945
. .
.
Cambridge University Press - Antitrust and Global
Capitalism in America, Japan, Europe, and Australia, 19302004 - by Tony A. Freyer
3
- Antitrust law (Sherman Act, 1890, Clayton
Act, 1914, Federal Trade Commission Act, 1914);
Restrictive Trade Practice 1976, Fair
Trading Act, 1973, Resale Price Act, 1978 Competition Act 1980; - Gesetz gegen der Wettbewerbsbeschraenkungen, Kartellrecht; -
Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act, 1981;
Prohibition of Monopoly and Maintenance
of Fair Trade Act, 1947;
,
.
2
2005-2007 /, ,
/ ., 2007. 4 .
1
75
2014 1 (47)
. 2007
66%
,
50%,
37%
.4 2010
.
,
.
.
,
, ,
, ,
5,
.
,
, -
.
2007. ., 2007. 97
.
5
.
. www.asuult.net.
4
76
.6
,
,
.7
,
,
,
,
,
.8
,
,
9
10:
1. ,
.
. www.mergenii.blog.banjig.net
7
. .
. ., 2008.
8
, -
.
2007.
9 Asch, Industrial Organisation and Antitrust Policy,
Wiley, 1983, ch 1; Lypsey and Chrystal, Principles of
Economics, Oxford University Press, 1999, ch 9
10
.
. www.mergenii.blog.banjig.net
6
. - LG
Samsung
.
2.
.11
,
.
, 2000
2006
7000
.
3. ,
.
,
1-2
. , 1981
10
8
.12
,
,
,
.
.
,
, ,
.
. :13
1.
.
.14
2.
.
. -
. .
., 2007. 8-9 .
13
.
. www.asuult.net.
14
6.1.7, 6.1.9. www.legalinfo.mn ., 2000.
Lypsey and Chrystal, Principles of Economics, Oxford University Press, 1999, p 139
12
.
,
11
77
2014 1 (47)
.
.
AT&T
.
-
.
3. .
,
.15
4.
.
.
,
.
.16
2008 8
.
, ,
, ,
, ,
.
1993 9
2-
8-
3-
, -
10
,
1993 12 01-
.
,
, ,
,
,
,
.
-
, ,
.
20
. 9, 10 .
.
,
, . ., 2009.
-09/206
15
16
78
,
.
.
.
.
,
,
,
,
,
.
.
,
,
, ,
, ,
, ,
,
.
,
,
.
,
50%- ,
67%- ,
75%-
.
1986
1991
.
1991 2 04-
.
,
,
,
,
.
/
FTC/ 1992 1
27-
.
,
9
79
2014 1 (47)
.
.
46 1999
,
.
.
-
- 2008
8- 19-
,
. -
, -
.
,
,
2006 7 8-
9 , 52 .
.
1.
. :
4
,
,
,
,
,
.
2.
19-
.
20- -
.
3.-
,
,
.
4.
, ,
.
5.
.
,
(
80
)-
:
-
(
)-
,
(
)
(
);
-
(
)
,
,
;
-
,
(
), ,
,
,
,
;
-
;
-
;
-
;
-
(
)-
;
-
;
( )-
;
.
,
.
(
,
)
,
.
,
.
35
81
2014 1 (47)
.
-
50-
.
,
.
12
.
, , ,
100
.
.
25
. 50
.
,
.
.
2006
.
,
,
.
-
,
;
-
;
-
;
- ;
- ;
-
,
.
.
-
;
-
;
-
;
-
, ;
-
,
;
-
;
-
,
.
82
. 1980-
,
,
,
. 1980
8
,
,
.
1980
/Monopoly Regulation and
Fair rade Act/ - , 1981
.
.
1980-
,
,
,
,
- 1984
.
.
1996
.
,
,
.
-
,
.
.
.
2
.
. ,
6
1
.
,
.
,
,
,
.
. ,
83
2014 1 (47)
,
.
,
.
.
1993
, 2000
2010
3
.
.
,
,
1990-
,
,
,
,
1993
.
1993
,
,
,
.
,
,
,
2000
.
,
,
,
,
.
. :
1.
.
,
,
,
.
2. 5.1-
84
.
1/3-
1/3-
2000
.
3. 15.1-
,
.
,
,
.
4.
, ,
, ,
.
.
5.
.
,
,
.
6.
.
100000-250000
, ,
,
,
,
30000-60000
,
.
, ,
,
85
2014 1 (47)
7
,
100000-250000
. 17
.
,
-
2007
,
.
,
, ,
,
.
52%
.
18
(47%)
(38%), (21%)
(16%)
,
(14%),
,
(13%),
,
(6%)
. 19
(44%),
,
(33%)
(64%)
(43%)
.
(78%)
(64%)
.
?
44%
.
50-
.
(69%),
( 25%)
(14%)
(12%)
.
,
,
19
, -
.
2007. ., 2007. 94
.
18
.
, ,
. ., 2009. -09/206
17
86
, ,
,
(82-86%)
,
.20
66%
.
2010
.
2000
.
5.2-
,
,
,
. 5.3- 5.2-
,
,
,
,
.
.
1/3-
.
1/3-
.
.
.
1990-
,
2000
,
. 20052007 29
, 40
28 17
, -
.
2007. ., 2007. 96-97
.
20
87
2014 1 (47)
.
,
,
,
. 2010
,
.
.
---0---
88
-
,
.
1. Introduction
The Foreign Trade Arbitration
Court at the Mongolian Chamber of
Commerce and Industry (FTAC) was
the only permanently functioning
court of arbitration in Mongolia until
May 20031. It has been used for the
resolution of commercial disputes
involving foreign legal entities and
settled only three categories of civil
law disputes pursuant to the Foreign
Trade Arbitration Law of 1995.2
The FTACs predecessor, the Foreign Trade Arbitration Commission was formed in 1960 and its
activities were regulated by the Arbitration Rules of
1962.
2
These were (a) disputes arising from international
commercial contracts between Mongolian and foreign legal entities and physical persons; b) disputes
between participants of legal entities with foreign
investment or joint ventures that operated in Mongolia: c) disputes between foreign legal entities. See
The Rules of The Foreign Trade Arbitration Court
,MCCI series, (April 1997).
1
89
2014 1 (47)
For arbitration cases by the types of disputes, nationality and industry see Arbitration and Business
Law Journal, Mongolian National Arbitration Court,
MNCCI, (N 01(06), 2005).
4
The amendments and changes were made to the
Arbitration Law of 2003 respectively in 2007 and
2011. Like other countries the existing Arbitration
Law is based on the UNCITRAL Model Law.
3
90
91
2014 1 (47)
MINAC, 2013, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia. But the existing Arbitration Law does not use this legal term
itself. In my opinion this legal uncertainty may cause
some negative consequences since the existing Arbitration Law applies to domestic and international
arbitration.
10
An arbitral award was final and was not subject
to any appeal or challenge pursuant to the former
Foreign Trade Arbitration Law.
92
93
2014 1 (47)
5. Conclusion
At present MINAC is predominantly
a national arbitral institution and
administers international and domestic
arbitration cases. The activities of the
MINAC and other arbitral institutions
reflect the growing use of arbitration
as the method of dispute resolution
in the present Mongolian business
practice. But arbitral awards rendered
under the Arbitration Law and rules
of arbitral institutions are often
challenged in Mongolian state courts
and the difficulties of enforcing arbitral
awards attract the interests of users of
international and domestic arbitration.
For this reason, it is appropriate to
research legal issues of institutional
94
95