Professional Documents
Culture Documents
3.3 Tibial Fractures
3.3 Tibial Fractures
knee fractures
Tibial Fractures
Morten Schultz Larsen
Odense University Hospital
Incidence
Not as common as distal femur
Distal femur: up to 2,5% primary
(38% revision)
Tibia : up to 0,4 % primary
(more after revision)
Intraoperative 19% (one study)
Classification tibia
A: Stable prosthesis
B: Loose prosthesis
C: Intraoperative fracture
Classification tibia
Type 1
1A
Fixation or non-operative
(immobilisation and
restriction on weight
bearing)
1B
Revision
Type 2
2A
Fixation most often
Proximal fixation is very
challenging but important
Locking plate (maybe two)
Soft tissues !!!!!!!
2B
Revision
Type 2 A/B?
Fixation or revision
?
Type 2 A
Fixation or revision
?
Basic principles also
apply to periprosthetic fracture
Type 2
Fixation or revision
?
Basic principles also
apply to periprosthetic fracture
Stability, bridging,
restoring length,
axis and rotation
Type 2 B
Fixation or revision
?
Basic principles also
apply to periprosthetic fracture
Stability, bridging,
restoring length,
axis and rotation
Healing
Type 3
3A
Fixation
Type 3
3A
Fixation
Same as 2 A
3B
Should not occur, unless
loose before
Type 4
Individual treatment
Extensor mechanism must be
restored
Screws and/or plates
Wires
Semitendinosus or allograft
Revision if loose
Type 4 B
Fracture of
tuberosity
loose implant
Type 4 B
Fracture of tuberosity
Cemented revision and
fixation with parts of a
calcaneal plate
Type 4 B
Fracture of tuberosity
Cemented revision and
fixation with parts of a
calcaneal plate
Seems to heal after 3
months
Summary
Treatment of periprosthetic fractures in tibia is
a surgical challenge
The locking plate is the working horse, when
fixing the fracture, but the toolbox must be
extensive
If the prosthesis is loose, a revision is usually,
but not always, the best treatment
We find it beneficial to collaborate with
arthroplasty surgeons in these cases
Thank you