Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 7

HISTORY

EVOLUTION OF JUDICIARY
The concept of Dharma or law in ancient India was inspired by the Vedas
which contained rules of conduct and rites and compiled in Dharma Sutras,
were practiced in a number of branches of the Vedic schools. Their principal
contents address the duties of people at various stages of life, the rights and
duties of the kings and juridical matters. These were basis of Hindu Law. The
earliest document throwing light on the theory of jurisprudence, which forms
part of practical governance, is the Artha Sastra of Kautilya dating back to circa
300 B.C. The third chapter deals with Vyavahara i.e. transactions between two
or more parties or Vivada or disputation.
During the first seven centuries of Christian era, there evolved a number
of Dharma sastras which dealt extensively with Manu, Yajnavalkya, Narda and
Parashara smiritis etc.
In medieval India, the religious leaders endeavoured to transform Islam
into a religion of law, but as custodian of justice, the rulers made the Sharia, a
court subservient to their sovereign power. Theoretically the rulers had to be
obedient to the Sharia and history speaks about certain cases where sovereigns
unhesistengly submitted to the Qazis decision. The rulers sat in a Court known
as Mazalim (complaints). According to Ibn Battuta, Muhammad bin Tughalaq,

ruler of Tughalaq dynasty, heard complaints each Monday and Thursday. From
13th century onwards, an officer known as Amir-i- dad presided over the secular
Court in sultans absence. He was also responsible for implementing Qazis
decisions and for drawing their attention to the cases which constituted
miscarriage of justice.
The Muftis were the expert on Sharia law and gave Fatwas (formal legal
rulings) on disputes referred to them by members of the public or qazis. The
Chief Judge of the sultanate was known as the qazi i- mamalik also known as
the qazi- ul- quzat.
During Mughals period the secular judge was known as Mir- adl . He
acted as a judge on the Emperors behalf. He was required to make impartial
and personal inquiries. He was also responsible for implementing qazis
decisions. Emperor Akbar also appointed two officers, called tui-begis, to
supervise the adherence to the law and fixed a nominal amount as their fee. The
same system was followed till British took over the power of India.
SUPREME COURT IN MAKING
The promulgation of Regulating Act of 1773 by the King of England
paved the way for establishment of the Supreme Court of Judicature at Calcutta.
The Letters of Patent was issued on 26 March 1774 to establish the Supreme
Court of Judicature at Calcutta, as a Court of Record, with full power &
authority to hear and determine all complaints for any crimes and also to

entertain, hear and determine any suits or actions against any of His Majestys
subjects in Bengal, Bihar and Orissa. The Supreme Courts at Madras and
Bombay was established by King George III on 26 December 1800 and on 8
December 1823 respectively.
The India High Courts Act 1861 was enacted to create High Courts for
various provinces and abolished Supreme Courts at Calcutta, Madras and
Bombay and also the Sadar Adalats in Presidency towns. These High Courts
had the distinction of being the highest Courts for all cases till the creation of
Federal Court of India under the Government of India Act 1935. The Federal
Court had jurisdiction to solve disputes between provinces and federal states
and hear appeal against Judgements from High Courts. After India attained
independence in 1947, the Constitution of India came into being on 26 January
1950. The Supreme Court of India also came into existence and its first sitting
was held on 28 January 1950.
The law declared by the Supreme Court is binding on all Courts within
the territory of India. It has power of judicial review to strike down the
legislative and executive action contrary to the provisions and the scheme of the
constitution, the distribution of power between Union and States or inimical to
the fundamental rights guaranteed by the Constitution.

In formative years, the Apex Court met from 10 to 12 in the morning and
then 2 to 4 in the afternoon for 28 days in a year. Today, it has enormous task
and meeting for 190 days in a year.

SUPREME COURT BUILDING

The main block of Supreme Court building was built on triangular plot of
17 Acres and the building was designed by Chief architect Ganesh Bhikaji
Deolalikar who was the first Indian to head CPWD and designed Supreme
Court Building in an Indo British architectural style. He was succeeded by
Shridher Krishna Joglekar. The foundation stone of the Supreme Court Building
was laid by the first President of India, Dr. Rajendra Prasad on 29 th October
1954.

The broad decision taken at the highest level in 1956 was that the
Supreme Court Building should be constructed in the triangular plot on
Hardinge Avenue opposite Hardinge Bridge in conformity with wishes of the
Prime Minister, the Home Minister, Minister of works, Housing & Supply and
Chief Justice of India. Subsequently, the area has been rechristened and now
the building is surrounded by Tilak Marg in the West, Mathura road in the East
and Bhagwan Dass Road in the South and Tilak Bridge in the North.
The design of the building itself is in the shape of a balance with a pair of
Scales of Justice. Dr. Rajendra Prasad the first president of India on 4th August
1958 while opening the new building of the Supreme Court said I do not
think it will fall to the lot of any of my successors to declare open such a
Temple of Justice. This noble edifice has been conceived and planned by
Engineers and Architects who were trained in their profession according to
western standards. The architecture and construction of Building bear testimony
of their western experience and skill of high order and they have combined with
it our conception of justice. Traditionally we look upon justice as a pair of
scales the two pans of which have to be held evenly without allowing the beam
from which they hang to incline to one side or the other. We see two wings on
the two sides. They will accommodate the offices and the records. At the end of
each wing is a semi circular structure. They represent the pans which are
attached to the beam at the top. This beam will accommodate the Court rooms

wherein the Honble Judges will sit and dispense justice without inkling either
to the right or to the left.
The Central beam from the ends of which the scales hang, comprises the
Chief Justices Court at the Centre with two Court halls on either side. The right
wing of the structure consists of the Bar room, the offices of the Attorney
General & other Law officers and the library of the Court. The left wing
consists of offices of the Court. There were two extensions one in 1979 and
another in 1994.
MOTHER AND CHILD

A black bronze sculpture of 210 centimeter height was installed in lawn of the
Supreme Court on 20 February 1978. It portrays Mother India in the form of the
figure of a lady. The lady is sheltering the young Republic of India represented
by the symbol of a child, who is upholding the laws of land symbolically shown

in the form of an open book. On the book, a balance is shown, which represents
dispensation of equal justice to all. The sculpture was made by the renowned
artist Shri Chintamoni Kar.
DHARMA CHAKRA LOGO OF THE SUPREME COURT

Its design is reproduced from the wheel that appears on the abacus of the
Sarnath Lion capital of Ashoka with 32 spokes. The inscription in Sanskrit
yatodharmastato jayah means Truth alone I uphold. It is also referred to - as
the wheel of righteousness, encompassing truth, goodness and equity.

***

You might also like