Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Enhanced Oil Recovery-Slides-12
Enhanced Oil Recovery-Slides-12
RESERVOIRS
File-12
File-12
Matrix
Fracture
Core
Well test
Well logs
Outcrop
Matrix
effect
Fracture
effect
Monitoring
performance
EOR
Most proper
method
Experiment
(Scaling)
Numerical
simulation
HOMOGENEOUS SYSTEMS
Swept Zone
Unswept Zone
I
I
P
WATER
BREAKTHROUGH
WATER
PRODUCTION
I : INJECTION WELL
P : PRODUCTION WELL
File-12
FRACTURED SYSTEMS
File-12
File-12
OIL
a
X
x
Magnitude of gravity
WATER
Magnitude of capillarity
ko a ( w o ) g Pc
qi
o
a
7
CONVECTION
Result of contrasting oils within the fracture network
Large times are needed to see the effect of convection
High vertical permeability (fractures) accelerates
Oil at the crest is heavier than the base.
Vertical fractures provide communication for convection
DIFFUSION
Contrast in HC properties between fracture and matrix
OIL
Z
H-Z
H
Z
x
WATER
Pc g ( H Z )
kk rw
[ MH (1 M ) Z ]
WATER
WATER
WATER
WATER
x, Core Length (vertical)
min.
66 min.
99 min.
min.
12
12min.
min.
15
min.
15 min.
1
6 min.
30 min.
0
20
40
60
80
100
Sw , Average
File-12
10
OIL
WATER
WATER
WATER
33min.
min.
x, Core Length (vertical)
OIL
OIL
18 min.
18
min.
WATER
OIL
30min.
min.
30
day
11 day
1
3 min
80 min.
00
20
40
60
80
100
Sw , Average
File-12
11
Berea Sandstone
Heavy Crude Oil-Brine
Indiana Limestone
Light Crude Oil -Brine
PROBLEM
Matrix recovery by capillary imbibition is not
EFFECTIVE if
IFT is high
Unfavorable matrix boundary conditions
restricting the contact of matrix and water in
fracture exist
Matrix is oil-wet
and
OIL VISCOSITY IS HIGH
SOLUTION
(Babadagli, Coll. And Surface A: Phys. And Eng. Asp., 2003 SPE 69564)
OBJECTIVE
EXPERIMENTATION AT STATIC CONDITIONS
Most proper EOR method (injection fluid)
Scaling to reservoir scale
PART I-A
SELECTION OF EOR METHODS
for
different boundary conditions, oil type, IFT, oil
viscosity, wettability.
60
ENGINE-OIL (175 cP)
T=26.5 C
50
Recovery, % OOIP
T=50 C
T=80 C
40
30
20
10
Unfired Berea
0
0.1
1.0
10.0
Time, minutes
100.0
80
MINERAL OIL (235 cP)
70
% 1 SURFACTANT (IFT=6 dyn/cm)
Recovery, % OOIP
60
50
40
30
20
10
Unfired Berea
0
0.1
1.0
10.0
Time, minutes
100.0
1000.0
Kerosene
Crude Oil (light)
Engine oil
Mineral Oil
SURFACTANT
1 vol %
POLYMER
0.1 and 0.2 wt %
FLUID PROPERTIES
FLUID
TYPES
Density
g/cc
Viscosity
cP
IFT
with
kerosene
dyne/cm
IFT
with
crude oil
dyne/cm
IFT
with
engine oil
dyne/cm
Brine
(3% NaCl)
Surfactant
Solution (1%)
Surfactant
Solution (2%)
Polymer I
(0.1 wt %)
Polymer II
(0.2 wt %)
Kerosene
1.1
40
25
71
1.1
11
11
15
1.1
14
18
17
23
87
22
24
0.79
1.7
Crude Oil
0.81
5.6
Engine Oil
0.89
633
20
(CCI)
(CCI)
(CCI)
(CCI)
(CCI)
(CCI)
OIL
Capillary imbibition
(water in oil out)
WATER
Movement of water
Movement of oil
N =c
B
k
g H
Gravity
NB-1 > 5
log(t)
log(t)
log(t)
O il R eco very, % O O IP
0.1
Kerosene-Brine
10
100
Time, minutes
1000
10000
Kerosene-Surfactant
(Babadagli, Coll. And Surface A: Phys. And Eng. Asp., 2003 SPE 69564)
BOUNDARY
CONDITIONS
60 BC: COU-C1
50
40
30
20
10
Brine
Surfactant (1 vol %)
0
0.01
0.1
1
10
Time, minutes
100
27
(Babadagli, Coll. And Surface A: Phys. And Eng. Asp., 2003 SPE 69564)
Tayfun Babadagli, PhD, PEng
1000
File-12
60
50
40
30
20
Brine
10
Surfactant (1 vol %)
0
1
10
100
1000
10000
100000
Time, minutes
(Babadagli, Coll. And Surface A: Phys. And Eng. Asp., 2003 SPE 69564)
Tayfun Babadagli, PhD, PEng
28
File-12
STATIC CONDITIONS
Capillary Imbibition Transfer at Static Conditions,
i.e. No Flow of Water in Fracture
60
50
40
30
20
Brine
Heat (40 C)
Heat (80 C)
10
0
0.01
0.1
10
100
Time, minutes
1000
10000
30
(Babadagli, Coll. And Surface A: Phys. And Eng. Asp., 2003 SPE 69564)
Tayfun Babadagli, PhD, PEng
100000
File-12
60
50
40
30
20
Brine
10
Polymer (0.1 wt %)
Polymer (0.2 wt %)
0
0.01
0.1
10
100
1000
10000
100000 1000000
Time, minutes
31
(Babadagli, Coll. And Surface A: Phys. And Eng. Asp., 2003 SPE 69564)
Tayfun Babadagli, PhD, PEng
File-12
30
25
20
15
Brine
Temp. increased to 80 C
10
Surfactant ( 1 vol %)
Surfactant (2.5 vol %)
5
0
100
1000
10000
Time, minutes
100000
32
(Babadagli, Coll. And Surface A: Phys. And Eng. Asp., 2003 SPE 69564)
Tayfun Babadagli, PhD, PEng
1000000
File-12
30
Brine
Temp. increased to 80 C
Brine (40 C)
Temp. increased to 80 C
Brine (80 C)
25
20
15
10
5
0
1
10
100
1000
10000
Time, minutes
100000
33
(Babadagli, Coll. And Surface A: Phys. And Eng. Asp., 2003 SPE 69564)
Tayfun Babadagli, PhD, PEng
1000000
File-12
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
1
10
100
1000
10000
100000
1000000
Time, min.
34
File-12
50
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
1
10
100
1000
10000
100000
1000000
Time, min.
35
File-12
9
Brine-Heavy Crude Oil
5
4
3
2
1
0
1
10
100
1000
10000
100000
1000000
Time, min.
36
File-12
16
DOLOMITIC LIMESTONE
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
1000
10000
100000
Time, minutes
Brine, k=276 mD
Polymer (0.2 wt%), k=155 mD
Surfactant (2.5 vol %), k=24 mD
Heat (80 C), k=4 mD
1000000
(Babadagli, Coll. And Surface A: Phys. And Eng. Asp., 2003 SPE 69564)
Tayfun Babadagli, PhD, PEng
File-12
SELECTION CRITERIA
SANDSTONES
- Light oils: no surfactant. Especially for unfavorable BC.
- Heavy oils: surfactant is desirable. Especially for
unfavorable BC.
- Light oils: polymer is not desirable. For all BCs.
- Heavy oils: polymer is desirable. Especially for
unfavorable BC.
- Thermal is effective to fasten light oil recovery but not
for ultimate recovery.
- Thermal is effective to fasten heavy oil recovery and for
ultimate recovery.
SELECTION CRITERIA
CARBONATES
- They all good!
- Thermal > surfactant > polymer > brine.