The document summarizes a case homework assignment on Roe v. Wade. It provides details on the plaintiffs seeking to declare Texas' criminal abortion statutes unconstitutional on privacy grounds. The court had to decide if the right to abortion was protected under personal liberty in the Constitution. It cited precedents like Griswold and Eisenstadt to establish a right to privacy and autonomy over one's body. While allowing state regulation after the first trimester, the ruling established that a fetus is not a person under the Constitution, legalizing abortion nationwide and starting an ongoing debate.
The document summarizes a case homework assignment on Roe v. Wade. It provides details on the plaintiffs seeking to declare Texas' criminal abortion statutes unconstitutional on privacy grounds. The court had to decide if the right to abortion was protected under personal liberty in the Constitution. It cited precedents like Griswold and Eisenstadt to establish a right to privacy and autonomy over one's body. While allowing state regulation after the first trimester, the ruling established that a fetus is not a person under the Constitution, legalizing abortion nationwide and starting an ongoing debate.
The document summarizes a case homework assignment on Roe v. Wade. It provides details on the plaintiffs seeking to declare Texas' criminal abortion statutes unconstitutional on privacy grounds. The court had to decide if the right to abortion was protected under personal liberty in the Constitution. It cited precedents like Griswold and Eisenstadt to establish a right to privacy and autonomy over one's body. While allowing state regulation after the first trimester, the ruling established that a fetus is not a person under the Constitution, legalizing abortion nationwide and starting an ongoing debate.
Prepare a separate homework sheet for each case that you have been assigned to read for class. Professor will collect these homework sheets at the end of each class session. Name of Case in Proper Legal Citation Format Roe et al. v. Wade, District Attorney of Dallas County Who is/are the plaintiff(s) (i.e. consumer, company, employee, government) and what type of legal relief is/are the plaintiff(s) seeking? Plaintiff: Jane Roe (anonymous), who argued that the Texas criminal abortion statues were unconstitutional because they abridged her right of personal privacy, protected by the First, Fourth, Fifth, Ninth, and Fourteenth Amendments. What legal question must the court decide, and what is the common law rule, constitutional provision or statute that the question will turn on? The court must decide if the right to have an abortion is contained under the right to personal liberty that emanates everywhere within the Constitution. What is the courts reasoning? (Might include reliance on precedent, statutory interpretation and legislative history & societal considerations) The court cited cases such as Griswold v. Connecticut and Eisenstadt v. Baird to bring forth the concept of personal liberty embodied in the Fourteenth Amendments Due Process Clause. They also reviewed the arguments of Dallas County, which cited historical examples of abortion preventing illicit sexual conduct, noted abortion as a hazardous medical procedure, and argued that anti-abortion laws protected prenatal life. However, the court dismissed these arguments by talking about modern medical advances and the meaning of the word persons, according to the Constitution. They argued that based on the Constitutions use of the word person, a fetus does not count as one because it is unborn. That being said, they did maintain that states are allowed to regulate past the first trimester, for the safety of the mother. What is the precedent or holding established by the courts ruling that will be followed in subsequent similar cases? Not just what the court does such as reverses the decision of the court below or awards damages to plaintiff but what is the proposition for which another party might cite the case? This case legalized abortion, and opened up a large debate on abortion that was not present before. Additionally, the vagueness and indecision in the language of the ruling have also become points of contention.