Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Tech Plan of Improvement - Comps
Tech Plan of Improvement - Comps
Plan
of
Improvement
Technology
Plan
of
Improvement
Final
Reflection
Amy
Armstrong
Comps
University
of
Oklahoma
Introduction
In
my
technology
Leadership
class,
we
had
to
evaluate
our
sites
technology
plan
and
then
create
a
plan
of
improvement
for
the
school.
I
created
a
plan
for
my
current
school.
Some
of
the
changes
suggested
in
the
paper
have
been
implemented
while
others
have
not.
After
looking
at
some
of
the
goals
and
motivation
among
educators,
I
have
found
some
alternative
ways
to
make
suggestions
that
will
possibly
be
more
productive
in
changing
technology
integration
in
our
building.
Most
of
the
changes
have
to
do
with
how
to
use
extrinsic
motivation
to
initiate
technology
usage.
Once
more
technology
usage
begins;
the
teachers
will
see
the
value
in
it
and
start
to
feel
more
competent
with
the
technology
leading
to
even
more
usage.
Reflection
&
Changes
My
original
plan
of
improvement
suggested
an
evaluation
system
for
teachers
and
their
technology
use.
Not
many
details
were
given
for
the
evaluation
plan
so
now,
there
is
a
more
of
plan.
Another
concern
with
the
evaluation
plan
is
teachers
feel
attacked
when
the
word
evaluation
is
spoken.
Instead
of
evaluating
their
technology
use,
an
incentive
program
for
technology
should
be
created
that
the
teachers
self-report.
The
tiered
growth
plan
is
modeled
after
an
example
found
in
an
Alaskan
district
(North
Slope
Borough
School
District).
According
to
Ryan
and
Deci,
a
program
to
provide
extrinsic
rewards
for
people
that
do
not
internalize
the
need
for
more
technology
and
lack
enjoyment
when
using
it
could
be
beneficial
(2000).
Until
they
begin
using
technology,
they
may
not
feel
comfortable
using
it.
To
initiate
the
change
in
technology
usage,
the
tiered
system
will
build
on
basic
and
foundational
skills.
The
skills
will
be
scaffolded
and
based
on
a
needs
analysis
(See
Appendix
A
for
an
example
of
the
leveled
steps).
The
items
in
the
tiered
system
will
be
completed
in
a
check
off
list
format
that
teachers
can
easily
self-track
and
report.
They
will
have
the
freedom
to
choose
the
timeframe
of
when
they
complete
the
tasks
required
for
meeting
the
different
tiered
levels.
We
want
to
give
teachers
the
autonomy
for
doing
it
on
their
own
rather
than
doing
it
when
and
how
the
next
teacher
does
it.
This
allows
teachers
to
feel
in
control
of
their
limited
time
(Mezirow,
1997).
As
teachers
become
more
comfortable
and
are
using
it
in
more
and
more
beneficial
ways,
they
will
see
how
it
can
benefit
students,
which
will
show
them
value
in
why
they
should
use
technology.
The
value
of
using
technology
along
with
the
expectancy
of
the
task
is
going
to
be
more
beneficial
than
us
telling
them
they
should
use
technology
(Wigfield
&
Eccles,
2000).
A
huge
portion
of
the
school
improvement
plan
was
to
provide
professional
development
for
the
teachers
in
mini
lessons
at
the
beginning
of
the
faculty
meeting.
Teachers
have
a
variety
of
needs
when
it
comes
to
implementing
technology.
A
short
survey
should
be
sent
out
to
teachers
so
they
can
express
what
they
actually
feel
they
need
or
would
like
training
on.
Based
on
the
results
of
the
survey,
technology
leaders
in
the
building
should
provide
the
professional
development
at
faculty
meetings
or
during
other
times.
If
teachers
have
selected
the
topics,
they
will
be
more
apt
to
come
and
learn
from
them.
Northridge
has
implemented
a
technology
class
that
is
a
part
of
the
specials
rotation.
Each
student
in
the
building
comes
for
55
minutes.
A
part
of
the
curriculum
in
the
classroom
is
digital
citizenship,
which
is
something
huge
the
students
need
to
learn.
One
of
the
main
concerns
of
the
school
improvement
plan
was
that
students
were
getting
pictures
in
ways
that
were
unethical.
Students
are
taught
through
the
digital
citizenship
classes
they
need
to
not
access
pictures
without
permission,
but
along
with
this
digital
training
they
also
need
to
be
shown
the
appropriate
ways
to
access
pictures.
Replacement
behaviors
and
practices
have
been
modeled
for
the
students
and
then
time
is
given
for
students
to
practice
those
behaviors.
Websites
like
www.photosforclass.com
have
been
used
for
educational
purposes.
Students
have
been
taught
how
to
use
the
website
and
had
time
to
practice
on
multiple
occasions.
Although
photosforclass.com
is
a
safe
website
for
kids
to
use,
every
now
and
then
inappropriate
things
come
up.
The
students
have
been
taught
how
to
handle
and
deal
with
accidently
spam
rather
than
solely
keeping
them
from
those
things.
This
is
necessary
because
they
could
encounter
it
at
home
without
the
security
features
provided
by
our
district.
Conclusion
Overall
the
Site
technology
improvement
plan
is
well
written
but
there
are
a
few
things
that
needed
to
be
tweaked
and
changed
to
ensure
technology
usage
increases
over
the
next
couple
of
years.
It
is
also
important
to
make
sure
teachers
feel
as
though
they
have
a
say
in
what
they
are
learning
and
find
value
it
in,
whether
the
value
is
internal
or
because
of
external
rewards.
The
motivation
of
teachers
and
adult
learners
is
one
of
the
biggest
things
to
be
considered
as
technology
integration
is
expected
among
teachers.
References
Mezirow,
J.
(1997).
Transformative
Learning:
Theory
to
Practice.
In
Transformative
Learning
in
Action.
Jossey.
North
Slope
Borough
School
District.
(n.d.).
NSBSD's
Teacher
Technology
Competencies.
Retrieved
October
27,
2015,
from
NSBSD:
http://www.nsbsd.org/Page/739
Ryan,
R.
M.,
&
Deci,
E.
L.
(2000).
Self-Determination
Theory
and
the
Facilitation
of
Intrinsic
Motivation,
Social
Development,
and
Well-Beign.
American
Psychologist
,
55
(1),
68-78.
Wigfield,
A.,
&
Eccles,
J.
S.
(2000).
Expectancy-Value
Theory
of
Achievement
Motivation.
Contemporary
Educational
Psychology
,
68-81.
Appendix
A
Date
Completed
Goal
Mastery Task(s)