Political parties are an organization oI people that seeks to achieve goals common to its members. Political scientists have often argued that the party system has done much to foster democracy.
Political parties are an organization oI people that seeks to achieve goals common to its members. Political scientists have often argued that the party system has done much to foster democracy.
Political parties are an organization oI people that seeks to achieve goals common to its members. Political scientists have often argued that the party system has done much to foster democracy.
Why does the U.S. have a two-
party political system?
(and how well does it work for us?)What is a political party?
e@ an organization of people that
seeks to achieve goals
common to its members
through the acquisition and
exercise of political powerThe Founders Views on Political Parties
“However [political parties] may now and then answer popular ends, they are likely
in the course of time and things, to become potent engines, by which cunning,
ambitious, and unprincipled men will be enabled to subvert the power of the people
and to usurp for themselves the reins of government, destroying afterwards the very
engines which have lifted them to unjust dominion. _- George Washington
“The alternate domination of one faction over another, sharpened by the spirit of
revenge, natural to party dissension, which in different ages and countries has
perpetrated the most horrid enormities, is itself a frightful despotism." - George
Washington
“If I could not go to heaven but with a party, I would not go there at all.” - Thomas
JeffersonThe message to the
right?
Democrats and
Republicans are two
sides of the same coin;
neither are protecting
the American people
H nex Tose ; aN ean
Many critics of our 2- re f zs. 7) VOTE DEMOCRAT?
party system favor a
MULTI-PARTY system.The illusion... (ise)
..0f free choice.And yet, political scientists have often argued that the party system has done
much to foster democracy. Why?
“Political parties created democracy...and democracy is unthinkable
save in terms of parties.”
- 20th c. American political scientist EE. SchattschneiderFunction of Political Parties
e@ Organize ideas to promote the public good
— Articulate a broad political philosophy
— organize a political platform by defining specific concerns
— give cues to voters, ie. what it means to be a Republican, a
Democrat
— Unify similar minded people
e Legitimize opposition by offering an alternative
perspective/policy/approachFunctions of Political Parties
e@ Provide process for
nominating/endorsing political .
candidates
— Until 20th c. this was done by f
parties with little to do with the P
mi VOTE
— Progressive era ushered in the
PRIMARY ELECTION,
a popular vote used to select the
favored party candidateFunctions of Political Parties
e@ Organize and coordinate political campaigns F
>
~
AMERICA
GREAT AGAIN!
cone aon se GROUND
Piro a1 se +2016
4President.usSpoor Campaign Slogans:
nS ae A al
Un raT aT Hill.
ae ya] Just like Bill except no sex stuff
OUT TOGETHER. ff
LOUD!
IRRATIONAL!
/ NOISES!The US is somewhat unique in its use of the two-
party system.Alternative Party Systems
Single Party Systems:
e One party exists
e Other parties typically
made illegal
e No real choice or political
debate as the only
differences that exist are
among the party leaders
Multiparty Systems:
e Allows for unlimited
competing parties
e Allows for a great deal of
competition and choice
e Also can lead to greater
conflict
e Used by the vast majority
of democraciesSo why does the U.S. use the Two Party System?
Political tradition began with competing
visions between two individuals
(Hamilton and Jefferson)
US political conflict has often been | Nag a _|
about the size of government - which 7 as butt |
lends itself more to two two parties thi a “ld ne
other types of conflicts (ie. class)
Winner takes all voting system (as
opposed to proportional representation) -
Why does this encourage a two-party
evetem?Existing Winner-Take-All
parties rules
make rules
to perpetuate
their power Only one
How the winner
(loser gets
fA two-party nothing)
Fewer parties sy) stem
flourish perpetuates
itself Strategic
Voters choose voting and
Lack of voter not to support the "wasted
support discourages parties that they vote' theory
formation do not view
of minor Fas, as viable , a
partiesTwo-Party v. Multi-Party Systems
Multi-Party (used by most
democracies):
Coalition government is necessary
(parties must work together as their
is rarely a majority party in power)
Minor parties have an incentive to
persevere
Proportional representation
Govt is often more responsive to the
will of the people
Greater choice for people
Government tends toward instability
as coalitions get together and fall
apart
Two-Party:
Winner takes all system
“Wasted vote syndrome” discourages
minor parties
Political change tends to be incremental
Promotes centrism as parties must
appeal to the masses too seek more
votes from the “other side” - move away
from extreme positions
Results in a majority of citizens getting
the candidate they voted for (vs. a
plurality)
Government tends toward greater
stabilityArgument for the US to adopt a multiparty system:
=What role do third parties play in a two-party
system? (and why is it so hard for third parties to
gain influence?)Usually third parties are:
e Built it around an ideology or an interest (ie.
Green Party primarily focused on
environmental issues and consumer
protection)
e Split off from one of the two major parties
(ie. Roosevelt’s Bull Moose/Progressive
Party in the 1912 election)
e@ Focused ona charismatic individual (ie
Ross Perot, Reform Party, 1992)Why does America’s electoral system lead to the situation
presented in the cartoon to the left?
How does the cartoon below depict (rather
pessimistically) the way Americans conceive of third
party candidates?
“You can try but its preity small in bere..the
swater’s going cold and the good soap is gone.”PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION new tampstie
Nocer ole. Dede
November 7, 2000
60% Nader vote: 13,312
Victor
HB coe
J cush
ELECTORAL
VOTES
Bush, 271
Gore: 267
BS Needed fo win’ 270
“ POPULAR VOTE
F Gore: 50,996,116 (48.424
Bush, 80466169 (47 9%
Nader “2,537.066 “(27%
Buchanan: “447,798 4%)
. Other: 595,176 6%)
, ist Ae is sar" ame B Biren, Court
ch RE gape Wa) eee Sees So
XN Nader vole 97,d00, ow Seber sara
60% Nader vote: 58. 492 ballots will never be talliedWas it fair for Democrats to blame Nader for Gore’s
i ?
loss in 2000? __..Daily Show Interview with Ralph Nader:
http:/Avww.cc.com/video-clips/dgockh/the-daily-show-with-jon-stewart-ralph-nader
e According to Nader, what strategies do dominant parties in various states use
to diminish the influence of third parties? How some states make it more
difficult for third parties to appear on the ballot?
e@ Why does Nader believer that third parties are an essential element of a
democratic society?Examples of popular third parties in US
History?
Green Party (3% of vote in 2000)
Libertarian Party (1% of vote in 2012)
Socialist Party (Eugene V. Debs, 6% in 1912)
Reform Party (Ross Perot, 19% of vote in
1992)
e Populist Party 1892 and 1896More obscure 3rd parties in the US today:
The Pirate Party (f. 2006)
Ideology:
e Pirate politics
e Hacker ethic
e Techno-progressivism
e Freedom of information
e Civil libertarianism
e Open governmentUS Marijuana Party (f. 2002)
Ideology based on:
e Anti-prohibitionism (cannabis)
e Civil libertarianism
e End of War on Drugs
*Endorsed Libertarian candidate Gary Johnson for president in 2012 electionWhat are the most significant roles third parties
play in a two-party system?Role of Third Parties
While a third party has never won an American presidential
election, they have been quite influential, ie:
e Challenging the major party can change the outcome of
elections (ie. Ralph Nader, Green Party, 2000)
lt] Nader
for the Red, White A Blue
Dame re,Role of Third Parties
e Third parties have won
state and local elections
(ie. when professional
wrestler Jesse Ventura,
Reform Party, became
governor of Minnesota)Role of Third Parties
e Influencing policy/platforms of dominant parties-
MOST IMPORTANT ROLE - (ie. Populist Party
in the late 19th c.)
Party Platform included:
- direct election of Senators
= graduated income tax
= old age pension
- increased reg. of corporations
Never got a member elected to national
office, BUT both Democrats and Republi
pressured to incorporate many Populist issues into their platformIf you’re curious, why the donkey and the
elephant?Why the Donkey and the Elephant?
Presidertial candidate Andrew Jackson was the frst Democrat ever to he associated wih the donkey symbol. His opponents during the election of
+1828 tied to label him a "Jackass" for his populist beliefs and slogan, "Let the people rule." Jackson was entertained by the notion and ended up
Using it to his advantage on his campaign posters.
This isthe frst cartoon depicting the Democratic donkey, 1937Political cartoonist Thomas Nast is credited with
st represented the
press as a donkey
in lion's clothing (though the
party itself is shown as a shy
fox), expressing the cartoonist”
s belief that the media were
acting as fear mongers.
propagating the idea of
Ulysses S. Grant as a
potential American dictator. In
Nast's donkey-in-lion's-
clothing cartoon, the elephant
representing the Republican
vote- was running scared
toward a pit of chaos and
inflation
making the elephant the m
—— we j
“The Third Term Panic: An ass, having put on the Lion’s skin, roamed about in the forest, and
amused himself by frightening all the foolish Animals he met with in his wanderings.”
E