Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 7 views

    Production Summary - Full Simulation: Loader (PRJ) CATERPILLAR 385C (Dec 2006)

    Uploaded by

    Darwin Ajomado
    This document summarizes the projected productivity of a haulage system using a Caterpillar 385C loader and Caterpillar 773E trucks. The system is estimated to produce 857,578 tonnes of waste hard rock per year. To move an excavation target of 797,192 tonnes would take 339.53 days, requiring 4,506 operating hours for the loader and 4,056 hours for the trucks, at a total estimated cost of $2,939,216. The loader is projected to have an average bucket cycle time of 0.58 minutes and the trucks an average cycle time of 15.14 minutes per trip. This simulation uses manufacturer equipment data that should be checked for validity at the specific site

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Production Summary - Full Simulation: Loader (PRJ) CATERPILLAR 385C (Dec 2006)

    Uploaded by

    Darwin Ajomado
    7 views1 page
    This document summarizes the projected productivity of a haulage system using a Caterpillar 385C loader and Caterpillar 773E trucks. The system is estimated to produce 857,578 tonnes of waste hard rock per year. To move an excavation target of 797,192 tonnes would take 339.53 days, requiring 4,506 operating hours for the loader and 4,056 hours for the trucks, at a total estimated cost of $2,939,216. The loader is projected to have an average bucket cycle time of 0.58 minutes and the trucks an average cycle time of 15.14 minutes per trip. This simulation uses manufacturer equipment data that should be checked for validity at the specific site

    Original Description:

    Simulación Talpac

    Original Title

    1A_1

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document summarizes the projected productivity of a haulage system using a Caterpillar 385C loader and Caterpillar 773E trucks. The system is estimated to produce 857,578 tonnes of waste hard rock per year. To move an excavation target of 797,192 tonnes would take 339.53 days, requiring 4,506 operating hours for the loader and 4,056 hours for the trucks, at a total estimated cost of $2,939,216. The loader is projected to have an average bucket cycle time of 0.58 minutes and the trucks an average cycle time of 15.14 minutes per trip. This simulation uses manufacturer equipment data that should be checked for validity at the specific site

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf or txt
    7 views1 page

    Production Summary - Full Simulation: Loader (PRJ) CATERPILLAR 385C (Dec 2006)

    Uploaded by

    Darwin Ajomado
    This document summarizes the projected productivity of a haulage system using a Caterpillar 385C loader and Caterpillar 773E trucks. The system is estimated to produce 857,578 tonnes of waste hard rock per year. To move an excavation target of 797,192 tonnes would take 339.53 days, requiring 4,506 operating hours for the loader and 4,056 hours for the trucks, at a total estimated cost of $2,939,216. The loader is projected to have an average bucket cycle time of 0.58 minutes and the trucks an average cycle time of 15.14 minutes per trip. This simulation uses manufacturer equipment data that should be checked for validity at the specific site

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 1

    Productivity

    Production Summary - Full Simulation


    Haulage System: Desmonte

    Haul Cycle: [PRJ] Haul Cycle

    Material: [PRJ] Waste Hard rock

    Roster: [PRJ] 7 day Week - 12 Hour Shifts

    Loader
    Availability
    Bucket Fill Factor
    Average Bucket Load Volume
    Average Payload
    Operating Hours per Year
    Average Operating Shifts per Year
    Average Bucket Cycle Time
    Production per Operating Hour
    Production per Loader Operating Shift
    Production per Year
    Wait Time per Operating Hour

    %
    cu.metres
    tonne
    OpHr/Year
    shifts/Year
    min
    tonne
    tonne
    tonne
    min

    Truck
    Availability
    Payload in Template
    Operating Hours per Year
    Average Payload
    Production per Operating Hour
    Production per Loader Operating Shift
    Production per Year
    Queue Time at Loader
    Spot Time at loader
    Average Loading Time
    Average Travel Time
    Spot Time at Dump
    Average Dump Time
    Average Cycle Time
    Fleet Size
    Average No. of Bucket Passes

    %
    tonne
    OpHr/Year
    tonne
    tonne
    tonne
    tonne
    min/ Cycle
    min/ Cycle
    min/ Cycle
    min/ Cycle
    min/ Cycle
    min/ Cycle
    min/ Cycle

    [PRJ] CATERPILLAR 385C (Dec 2006)


    90.00
    0.83
    2.88
    4.87
    4,847.83
    Op. hrs factored by availability
    493.00
    Shifts factored by availability
    0.58
    176.90
    1,740
    Max. prod. based on 100% avail.
    857,578 Avg. production factored by avail.
    26.25
    [PRJ] CATERPILLAR 773E Dual Slope Body
    90.00
    54.82
    4,363.05
    55.35
    196.55
    1,740
    857,578
    0.28
    0.40
    6.02
    7.61
    0.33
    0.50
    15.14
    1
    11.37

    Haulage System
    Production per Year
    Discounted Capital Cost
    Discounted Operating Cost
    Discounted Average Cost
    Excavation Target
    Time to move Excavation Target
    Loader Hrs to move Target
    Total Truck Hrs to move Target
    Total cost to move Target

    tonne/Year
    $/tonne
    $/tonne
    $/tonne
    tonne
    Days
    Op. Hours.
    Op. Hours.
    $

    857,578
    1.97
    1.72
    3.69
    797,192.00
    339.53
    4,506
    4,056
    2,939,216

    Loading Methodology
    Single Sided
    Full Truck
    Average for 150 Shifts

    Productivity estimates allow for insufficient time at the end of the shift to complete another cycle.
    Time for the first bucket pass coincides with the truck queuing and maneuvering times.
    This simulation is based on data provided by the equipment manufacturer.
    Equipment data should be checked to ensure it is valid for this site.

    Page 1

    You might also like