The document discusses regulations for flying aircraft and helicopters over different areas. It states that over congested areas, aircraft must maintain an altitude of at least 1,000 feet above the highest obstacle within 2,000 feet. Over other areas, aircraft must be at least 500 feet above the surface. The document then claims that on multiple occasions between 2006 and 2009, helicopters flew 40 feet above the author's residence, violating FAA regulations. The author demands a criminal investigation into the matter.
The document discusses regulations for flying aircraft and helicopters over different areas. It states that over congested areas, aircraft must maintain an altitude of at least 1,000 feet above the highest obstacle within 2,000 feet. Over other areas, aircraft must be at least 500 feet above the surface. The document then claims that on multiple occasions between 2006 and 2009, helicopters flew 40 feet above the author's residence, violating FAA regulations. The author demands a criminal investigation into the matter.
The document discusses regulations for flying aircraft and helicopters over different areas. It states that over congested areas, aircraft must maintain an altitude of at least 1,000 feet above the highest obstacle within 2,000 feet. Over other areas, aircraft must be at least 500 feet above the surface. The document then claims that on multiple occasions between 2006 and 2009, helicopters flew 40 feet above the author's residence, violating FAA regulations. The author demands a criminal investigation into the matter.
Over congested areas of citj-es, towns or settlement, or over
an open air assembly of person, an altitudes of 1 ,000 feets above the highest obstacle within a horizontal radius of 2, 000 feets from the helicopter or any aircraft; C. Over other than congested areas. An altitude of 500 feets above the surfaee, except over water or sparsely populated areas. In such event the helicopter shall not be operated closer than 500 feets to any person, vessel t ot structure. Under the U.S. Air Traffic Controllers at the Federal- Aviation Administration, FAA, National Transportation Safety Board Code and the 25 or more helicopters and airplanes attacks made against me and my resident violated my privacy and the rule and regulation of the U.S. Federal Aviation, FAA by sitting the unsafe and dangerous helicopters (40) feets overhead my resident. V{here the top of the trees in my backyard was blowing. A11 flights were in violation of the FAA, rules and reguIation and the National- Transportation Safety Board., were l-ower than 500 to 1 ,000 feets of my safety should face criminal- charges and hel-d accountable and liable for damages. There should be a crimj-nal invesLigatj-on made against all defendants involvement. The U.S. Air Traffic Controllers at the Federal Aviation Administration., wanted to be more active and productive in the harassment by sitting unsafe and dangerous helicopters overhead my resident on different occasionally approximately ( 40 ) feets and the airplanes circling overhead under 500 feets of my resident:
* * * * * * * * * * * *
On Friday, December 15, 2006;
On Sunday, December 17, 2006 at 7:50 a.m; On Thursday, March 29, 2007 at 3:00 p.m; On Sunday, April 15, 2A07 at 10247 a.m; On Monday, April 16, 2007 at 5:00 p.m; On Monday, AprJ-l 16, 2007 at 9220 a.m; On Tuesday, April 17, 2007 at B:20 a.m, 8:45 a.m and 2220 p.m; On Wednesday, April 18,2A07 at 5229 a.m, 5:50 a.m and 3240 p.m; On Thursday, April 19,2A07 at 5:00 p-m and 5:30 p.m; On Friday, April 2A, 2007 at 5:15 a.m, 12:20 p.m and 3:1 5 p.m; On Thursday, June 11, 2007; On Wednesday, October 7, 2009 at 11:.25 a.m, 11:30 a.m, 11240 a.m, 11:50 a.m and 12200;
Allegheny Airlines, Inc., Civil Aeronautics Board and Administrator of Civil Aeronautics, Intervenors-Appellees v. Village of Cedarhurst, 238 F.2d 812, 2d Cir. (1956)