Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Reservoir Simulation: Rizky Kurniawan Putra (1201175) Victor Pandapotan Nainggolan (1201172)

    Uploaded by

    Victor PandaPotan Nainggolan
    24 views24 pages
    This document summarizes reservoir simulation results for the CS-Field reservoir. It provides details on the rock and fluid properties, initial well plans for a base case and two alternative cases, and compares the oil production rates and recovery factors. The base case involved two production wells and achieved a 30.2% recovery factor. Case 1 added three more wells earlier and obtained a 47.6% recovery factor. Case 2 further increased the well count and starting dates and achieved the highest recovery factor of 52.5%. The conclusion is that the Case 2 development plan optimized recovery given the 10-year contract duration.

    Original Description:

    cxzasd

    Original Title

    Counter_Strike Field

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document summarizes reservoir simulation results for the CS-Field reservoir. It provides details on the rock and fluid properties, initial well plans for a base case and two alternative cases, and compares the oil production rates and recovery factors. The base case involved two production wells and achieved a 30.2% recovery factor. Case 1 added three more wells earlier and obtained a 47.6% recovery factor. Case 2 further increased the well count and starting dates and achieved the highest recovery factor of 52.5%. The conclusion is that the Case 2 development plan optimized recovery given the 10-year contract duration.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
    24 views24 pages

    Reservoir Simulation: Rizky Kurniawan Putra (1201175) Victor Pandapotan Nainggolan (1201172)

    Uploaded by

    Victor PandaPotan Nainggolan
    This document summarizes reservoir simulation results for the CS-Field reservoir. It provides details on the rock and fluid properties, initial well plans for a base case and two alternative cases, and compares the oil production rates and recovery factors. The base case involved two production wells and achieved a 30.2% recovery factor. Case 1 added three more wells earlier and obtained a 47.6% recovery factor. Case 2 further increased the well count and starting dates and achieved the highest recovery factor of 52.5%. The conclusion is that the Case 2 development plan optimized recovery given the 10-year contract duration.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
    of 24

    RESERVOIR SIMULATION

    Rizky Kurniawan Putra( 1201175 )


    Victor Pandapotan Nainggolan ( 1201172 )

    Counter Strike Field

    CS-Field
    First Exploitation : Year 2015
    Work Contract : 10 Years (2015 - 2025)
    OOIP: 10.597.923 RB

    Fluid Properties

    Rock PROPERTIES
    Rock Properties
    Porosity

    0.18
    Permeability XY = Porosity *1000

    Permeability
    Permeability Z = Permeability XY*0.1
    Saturation Function

    Sand

    Rock Compaction

    Consolidated Sandstone

    Correlation

    Newman

    Compressibility

    0.00000194 psi-1

    Pressures

    Reference P = 4000 psi


    Min. P = 1200 psi
    Max. P = 5000 psi

    Aquifer Model
    Aquifer
    Aquifer Model

    Fetkovich

    Area Interest

    Polygons 1

    Top Limit

    5150

    Base Limit

    5200

    Initial Pressure

    4000

    Fluid Model

    Heavy Oil + Gas

    Base Case
    Well

    Date

    Rate
    (STB /d)

    Well_CS 001

    01/01/2015
    01/01/2020

    350
    700

    Well_CS 002

    01/03/2015
    01/01/2020

    350
    700

    FOPT : 3203238,5 BOPD


    Recovery Factor : 30,225 %

    Kordinat

    Interval Perforasi

    Kordinat

    Case 1
    Well

    Date

    Rate
    (STB /d)

    Well_CS 003

    01/01/2017
    01/01/2020

    350
    700

    Well_CS 004

    01/03/2017
    01/01/2020

    350
    700

    Well_CS 005

    01/06/2017
    01/01/2020

    350
    700

    FOPT : 5043742 BOPD


    Recovery Factor : 47,6
    %

    CASE 2
    Well

    Date

    Rate
    (STB /d)

    Well_CS 006

    01/01/2019
    01/01/2020

    350
    700

    Well_CS 007

    01/03/2019
    01/01/2020

    350
    700

    Well_CS 008

    01/06/2019
    01/01/2020

    350
    700

    FOPT : 5553854,5BOPD
    Recovery Factor :
    52,546 %

    FOPT

    FOPR

    FWPR

    FWPT

    FGOR

    CONCLUSIONS
    Pada CS-FIELD, OOIP bernilai 10,597,923 RB, maka
    dioptimalkan dengan merencanakan 3 skenario optimasi
    untuk mendapatkan Recovery Factor (%) yang optimal.
    Didapatkan Recovery Factor (%),
    BASE CASE = 30,225 %
    CASE 1
    = 47,6 %
    CASE 2
    = 52,546 %
    Dipilih perencanaan skenario CASE 2 karena Recovery
    Factor (%)-nya bernilai lebih tinggi dari BASE CASE dan
    CASE 2 dengan Kontrak kerja 10 tahun

    Base case = 2 Sumur Prod


    Rp 1.694.272.225.330,000
    Case 1 = 5 Sumur Prod
    Rp 2.390.132.894.360,000
    Case 2 = 8 Sumur Prod
    Rp 2.257.718.734.610,000

    You might also like