Students Doe Exhibit 71@ , Update: Seenario 7 ‘The following is a summary and update based upon the administrative meeting on October 14, 2008. At this meeting three altematives to Scenario 7 were developed. Each of these options are presented. Scenario 7 provides the following: 1. Contiguous high schoo! and middle school attendance zones. 2. Students remain with their cohorts from grades 6-12. In previous scenarios the focus was keeping K —5 children together. 3. Balanced enrollments at the high schools insure program equity. 4. Inmost cases this scenario provides shorter bus ride times for high school students. 5. One variation of scenario 7 provides an opportunity to preserve the LMHS walk zone. ‘Maps of the three scenarios are attached to this update. Scenario 7C.1 Table 1 provides the totals based upon Scenario 7C-1. e Table 1: Scenario 7C-1 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 HHS 1110 1081 107110761049 Table 1 shows WV 796 783775762735 the non-projected totals for each of the middle and high schools LMHS: ' = 1164 11051054 10881058 ses in zones BC 90° 793-816 = 6820 scenario 7C.2 ‘Table 2 provides the totals for Scenario 7C-2 LMSD 03800 P32Table 2: Scenario 7C-2 2000-10 2010-11 2011-12'2012-13 2013-14 HHS 1094 1081 1078 10801053 wo mt 777768761735 LMHS 1180 1105 1047 10841054 BC 75 799 «823 TO Table 2 shows the non-projected totals for each of the middle and high schools based upon the changes in zones. Scenario 7C 5 LMSD 03801rorten008 ‘Scenario 7C 5 differs from the first to scenarios presented in that it provides an option area within the Harriton HS Attendance Area. Those students will have the option of attending either Harriton HS or Lower Merion HS. Table 3: Scenario 7C-5 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 HHS 1135 1104 1094 10981073, wy 812, 799794786754 LMHS 1139 1082 ©1031 10661034 CJ to ee re Cal ‘Table 3 shows the totals for Scenario 7C-5 without the potential number of students opting go attend Lower Merion HS. Table 4 below show the totals with 80% of the students living in the option area choosing to attend Lower Merion HS. Table 4: Scenario 7C-5 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Zone 87 86 78M HHS 1048 1018 1016 1016-982 LMHS 1226 1168 110911481125 ‘Table 4 shows the four year total for the rolled up grades at 80% for the option area (Lower Merion Walk Zone within the Harriton Attendance Area. The totals for each high school are shown with the option area students taking the Lower Merion HS option. This scenario assumes that the middle school children will not have the option to choose which middle school they will attend. Tables 3 and 4 do not include IB Program students who would be attending Harriton HS. Scenario 7C-5 shows good balance prior to any students zoned for Harriton opting to attend Lower Merion HS. Table 5- Scenario 7 C-5 Diversity 3 LMSD 03802tgt6z008 Harriton HS Tower Merion TS ‘Asian 77 B Black 8 140 Hispanic 27 29 ‘Am Ind/Pac Is 7 2 Mixed Race 0 1 White 336 37 Socio-Economic 2 3 [Special Needs 246 218 Table 5 only shows the data for the 2009-10 school year. 4 LMSD 03803Update: Scenario 7 The following is a summary and update based upon the administrative meeting on October 14, 2008. At this meeting three alternatives to Scenario 7 were developed. Each of these options are presented. Scenario 7 provides the following: 1. Contiguous high school and middle school attendance zones. 2. Students remain with their cohorts from grades 6— 12. In previous scenarios the focus was keeping K -5 children together. 3. Balanced enrollments atthe high schools insure program equity. 4, Inmost cases this scenario provides shorter bus ride times for ‘high school students, 5. One variation of scenario 7 provides an opportunity to preserve the LMHS walk zone. Maps of the three scenarios are attached to this update. ‘Scenario 7C 1 ~ Table 1 provides the totals based upon Scenario 7C-1. Table 1: Scenario 7C-1 2008-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 HHS “1110 | 1081 1071. 1076 1049 Table Ishows WV -796 - 763 775° 762738 each of the pon the TMH 1164 1105 1054 10681055 BC 800 783 B16 GBD Scenario 702 Table 2 provides the totals for Scenario 7C-2 1 LMSD 03795 the non-projected totals for ‘middle and high schools, ‘changes in zones. A> Belt Mel ils Assaron00s ‘Table 2: Scenario 7C-2 2000-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 HHS “194 "1081 1078 1080 1053 Ww ot 77768781735 LMHS 1180 1105 1047 10841084 Bc 75 7 «823 TO. ‘Table 2 shows the non-projected totals for each of the middle and high schools based upon the changes in zones. ‘Scenario 7¢ 5 LMSD 03796Scenario 7C 5 differs from the first to scenarios presented in that it provides an option area within the Harriton HS Attendance Area. Those students will have the option of attending either Harriton HS or Lower Merion HS. Table 3: Scenario 7C-5 2009-10 2010-11 2014-12 2012-13 2013-14 HHS “1135 "1104 “1094 1098” 1073, Ww 812 793794786754 LMHS 1139 1082 1031 1066 1034 Bc 784777797782 Table 3 shows the totals for Scenario 7C-5 without the potential number of students opting go attend Lower Merion HS. Table 4 below show the totals with 80% of the students living in the ‘option area choosing to attend Lower Merion HS. Table 4: Scenario 7C-5 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Zone 87 0 8878 HHS 1048 1018 1016 1018962 LMHS 1226 1168 1109 11481125 ‘Table 4 shows the four year total for the rolled up grades at 80% for the option area (Lower ‘Merion Walk Zone within the Harriton Attendance Area. The totals for each high school are shown with the option area students taking the Lower Merion HS option. This scenario assumes that the middle school children will not have the option to choose which middle school they will attend. ‘Tables 3 and 4 do not include IB Program students who would be attending Harriton HS. ‘Scenario 7C-5 shows good balance prior to any students zoned for Harriton opting to attend Lower Merion HS. Feeder Patterns 7 A Harriton HS & Welsh Valley MS 3 LMSD 03797Belmont Hills All Gladwyne All Re—-4 Penn Valley Penn Valley & Haverford Penn Wynne ‘Ardmore, area bounded by, er and Ballytore to Ballytore Circle Merion East Lancaster to E Wynnewood, E Wynnewood to Rockland (north side) to Merion to East Montgomery Ave. ¢ Lower Merion HS & Bala Cynwyd Cynwyd all Penn Wynne ‘Wynnewood except Ardmore, area bounded by E Lancaster and Ballytore ee ee ee eee Penn Valley Lower Meron HS Walk Zone Option Area ‘The option area is for students living in the LMHS Walk Zone east of N Wynnewood, and those living on Anderson, West Athens, and the sections of Ardmore Ave and Cricket Ave in the LMHS walk zone. Table 5- Scenario 7 C-5 Diversity arrton HS | ~ tower Merion iS ‘Asian 77 B Black 88 140 Hispanic 27 29 ‘Am Ind/Pac Is 7 2 Mixed Race 0 1 White 936 397 ‘Socio-Economic | ___72 33 Special Needs 246 218 ‘Table 5 only shows the data for the 2009-10 school year. 4 LMSD 03798