Later Years Placement Report

You might also like

Download as pdf
Download as pdf
You are on page 1of 5
Master of Teaching (P-12) SCHOOL OF EDUCATION MASTER OF TEACHING (P-12) TEACHING PRACTICE EVALUATION EDUSTEA — TEACHING PRACTICE A For use by Supervising Teachers and by LTU Supervisors NAME OF STUDENT Ava Lovie heurG ‘DATES OF PLACEMENT P51 2 Appr ja __ |S m NUMBER OFDAYS COMPLETED | >) {ac/ $ “ ScHOOI/SITE bdo od Dishict &. ‘YEAR LEVELS YEAR Eaglish U | SUPERVISING TEACHER'S NAME | Wiimis 931 Please MARK “X" at the appropriate greding(s) in each section of this form, and comment according to your evaluation of the student's performance relative to this stage of the course and against the Notional Standards for Graduate Teachers. ‘The seven National Standards for Graduate Teachers group the professional work of teachers into three categories: professional knowledge, professional practice and professional engagement. This evaluation form adopts that structure. Supervising teachers are asked to use the scales provided to indicate their evaluation of the student's demonstrated performance in each of the seven areas, using the scale provided. The scale categories should be interpreted as follows: Outstanding (equivalent to a markin the renge 80% —100%) Demonstrated performance at a level of excellence markedly above the standard expected at this stage of the course in all relevant areas Very Good (equivalent to a mark in the range 70% -79%) Demonstrated performance at a level clearly above the standard expected at this stage of the course inall relevant areas Good (equivalent to a mark in the range 60% - 69%) 4 level of performance deemed satisfactory and equivalent to the standerd expected at this stage in the course overall, and of a higher standard in some aspects Fair (equivalent to a mark in the range 50% -59%) ‘A level of performance deemed satisfactory and equivalent to the standard expected at this stage in the course Unsatisfactory (equivalent to a mark in the range 0% - 49%) ‘A level of performance deemed below the standard expected at this stage in the course 16 Master of Teaching (P-12) PROFESSIONAL KNOWLEDGE Unsatisfactory Fair Good Very Good | Outstanding ‘Standard 1 Knows students and how v they learn ‘Standard 2 Knows the content and how Ji to teach it Comments on professional knowledge, relative to this stage in the course act Wark nes & Rent Class anc Cenc tren — hele en Unenc, Oo eres of Te Meekingbiid: Censidardg Sut wes hy Giese hme SiS Wenoranect Wits Her (evel of Prefersiont, SKE obsevecr; cakeck question daring her desevetion ; dich prior renciing of ChE KEKE Onc SamOEmewery mote ial tek oleavect her (0 mrcica connechotd BERVEN Ve Beat, GuEWk och Gurare. Amy ao sch dawn ong Gaeuased NEF Unit plan lortatady “clan each Saad he OGaat in minds im vention No shears, one sefleckesl on Oey mn By § Be Pom CiBetany, Having yore & ; Seton Sete Ee Ss Cotes Ge aa cas By Cecches OVERS CHS one) Selverec Bisrtenk Svergh vevios So eS ee Aubangh ore neck proparect Content of WS clewr See come Th onch aghast US Ee Guanhont [issues raisect a ie ote vg howe hel Stuckest GRderK. Her level of professions «ch olovion woteenyc e eSaaced | ng isewe Sata slaned. (ec) eanich Sonera. see Ree oang S87 OS, . w bree mes mediate bea ane pleating fo SEE Amy gue qaattry feecbocts o inres gr tinie. Dar Soe. Ginn Oi Garey ok Claas Aersions, Tue Lote alse limer She hack to ciserpiine si = oe confront rg 7 Ghar Sheclends of waem wai nmausiy cotecicnte Arent. AML oF Pal ener Sector SF EMG ata Gel SNE Fe predne Westten ene, tree leant bret ERoching is ok yait Oe ARrmgs tus exeeione | hee conttles ne in tre Clogsroce. Ia 1 tne CHEE ChSQ Learn oko er eto AAS weenShy FS ey sete cous ee, confor Swans bo da When Meianesinyas Meveck DEE Fymed, eur | Prenat lephownt J. 7 Master of Teaching (P-12) PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE | Unsatisfactory Fair Good Very Good | Outstanding ‘Standard 3 Plans for and implement effective teaching and | v Leaning ‘Standard 4 Create and maintain supportive and safe v learning environments Standard 5 ‘Assesses and provides 3 feedback and reports on student learning ‘Comments on professional practice, relative to this stage in the course oan ee ngewe meen cms be nes oot oe tot a EO actaee Wren Cheer Cet Anny & we vergeck 2 CEU! SI Meeting Sat she iS ing te SE her Goin Stocner sine ee Lenehan dy tegen semee Sod HERG oA Rleaioaoe Sat | ensirrect tre qaretiy of ie lessons mprorecl. BYOraOnt her placement | mngnreck ea Be Ce Cae tac en Fase oom $n) SiMe he Geant Rn he peers Occaved [eos esag ry cel Cernig 8 egewe, pg menerent He Fredo rat Any woe she te gine her Shactets cack te Geen oes eatrering. dian (here te Wtorene in or cut of Cleas wih NCS Gamay Faget wnien rebieat ect Set Anny fe Cearning Cannan grape, Pont at no We nast alse be a la Guckent. No Suclent eo senr = on Ser antinnd se Rag SER 18 Master of Teaching (P-12) PROFESSIONAL ENGAGEMENT Unsatisfactory Fair Good Very Good _| Outstanding Standard 6 Engages in professional : | learning | ‘Standard 7 Engages professionally with L colleagues, parents/carers and the community Comments on professional engagement, relative to this stage in the course Anny came 4 Englisic KA meenngs wok te Stal meaning. SM alto Come ty my | rekon Hockiaity Sere igh along wn war re fecnne Sete enS CNS faagtonveaninvars Sires eepetene WE one raf memioys Grol Kok Ate Any wee proehes EE Sia ack EO RE RNS Ge Mg! Ay imay of oe senice PE clade oF Junior Misr) aSamade WeSelf aravciek Gr emvncericntes apna, Hee Se Knock COE Coun Ce TS Se INE SEA SPO Regs. GENERAL COMMENTS and RECOMMENDATIONS General comments and overall evaluation reacner if she cominnes WE exe bo Oe Oe pet. She menaeUTAr Ber HEME Ea TH pemeene qeeney ect, fm Witt oe an o-tSErching Cider sen cam be fe nee saci, : ERP SS aid SS AS oS es fy erorck he F The Gate Scae fect ner Slants wath flourish 7 Tee cccre: wna i century CamRuing WEL cock dee pofeenen Hench act come. . Where rer Sehank Wee fo be Cauget ay Amy HE Veet lee bested pore ER ES EE 19 Master of Teaching (P-12) Rebtive to this stage in the course, strong performance was demonstrated in + Professicnnt membantge + Pofiasions Praitec + Profesrions Exyegenet Relative to this stage in the course, particular attention is necessary in... 2Denting wit Smctents SO dort corprete ser WOM lay OME CAKES. Se perenkowe Se Cleat raGr, * Deaey en “Rane om very Wey Drags WO Mears ee eee a S, wre Peng WL Ocoee ethane Om To best promote this pre-service teacher's development, I/we recommend ... veroe Hime in fe ghaseroorn - “Fe rrore Sepamwe feng cen att h vere of semcos Me SEE Chae eceoe SANG o The final mark is calculated by LTU staff as a percentage based on the report of the ig teacher DAJE, | SUPERVISING TEACHER/S -G-/5| (sicnaTuRE/s). [DATE SITE COORDINAT( - 6/5 | (sigwaTuRE)... DATE PRE-SERVICE TEACH! GES | GIGNATURE).... 20

You might also like