Fosterl

William Foster
Prof. Bevill

ENGL 1301-15

l3

September 2015

//

ffi{r**
)Etui

Review: FANTASTIC FOUR: 2015

The Fantastic Four \\'as a disappointing movie because there was not as much action as I
had previously expected from the commercials. When
u'as late in the movie, making it feel like

it finally did get to the action it

it w'as cut short. Unlike the original one the nerv

l'ersions characters are not ver1, interesting because of not being able to connect with
them. On the other hand the Fantastic Four is a fun movie because of the adventure and
comedl- in it making it a u,orthlvhile movie to see.

My sources for this movie w'ould be:

l.

A rer,ieu,on RottenTomatoes.com bv Jason Best from Movie Talk

My criteria for judging the mor,ie:

,1.

1. The mor,,ie

1. Genre 2.

Music 3.Acting

The length of the movie 5. Characters 6. The special effects

Esslv INtRopucrIoN: PnBn RBvmw

rnstructions
Consider the following questions. Answer thoroughly and honestly so that you might help your peer writer as he
or she writes the essay. Remember, however, that the major benefit of peer review is to the reviewer.
Identifying and explaining issues in another writer's paper teaches us a lot about writing.

1. Whlt

2.

type of introduction has the wrrler use.{] (See Lunsford p. 563 for a partial list of introduction types.)

How well

the audience? Explain your response.

.*fi'i

J.

[g?

tlii;i'rt r"ur re sp on se.

4.

Is any needed information missing? Explain

r response.

5.

Suggest one other way to write the introduction

alternative make a good introducti

one of Lunsford's other types, perhaps. Why could this

for this

6.

Write the sentence that contains the writer's thesis, the evaluation the writer offers to readers. Explain why
the writer's thesis is or is not effective at conveying his or her main idea. Be specific about what works and
what does not. Remember that a review thesis should make a clear judgment about the subject being

1.

List the criteria the writer used to evaluate the subject.

8.W

te any criteria that you

think the wri

forgot to apply to the