Austerity agreement-opinion

I liked the introduction of the paper, the arguments why this topic is relevant were explained
in details, but I think some more academic, formal descriptions, arguments would be useful to
catch the interest of the reader. In my opinion the introduction of a study is very important,
because it influences the first impression of the reader, and the decision of reading it onwards
or not. The austerity problem is a topic, which had become more and more widespread among
economists, and the necessity of analyzing it turns out as we read the introduction of the
paper.
The second part of the paper presents some main economic facts of the before- situation, but
mostly describes the introduction of a specific austerity agreement, and the impacts of it. This
chapter seemed to me very relevant, although the association of the content with the title was
missing, because the whole content was not about the before- period, it mostly described the
first agreement orders. I would have expected more drastic facts that show the necessity of
austerity agreements.
The next two chapters focuses on the impacts, describes the destruction and the economy. I
find it very understandable, with a logical structure. The events are presented continuously, it
is easy to keep step with the imagination of the writer. The exact numbers, and facts helped
me to understand the effects of the austerity agreement, and I found out the main ideas of the
relevance of such agreement.
The conclusion of the paper reflects the opinion of the writer about this topic, and in the same
arguments pro and contra for the austerity issue. Maybe in the ending some opinions of
economists could be filled, it would have create the sensation of an impressive lockup. In my
opinion, as a whole, this paper was very good because it presented the ideas of the writer, it
was very understandable (for common people, too) and it focused on a single, main, relevant
issue, without complicating it.