Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Tam Act 1

    Uploaded by

    api-302020869
    27 views1 page
    The case is about a 19 year old boy who is on trial for stabbing and killing his father. Most of the jurors Automatically think that the boy is guilty for the witnesses and proof they have against him. Then the juror that is trying to defend the boy agrees to agree with everyone else if they take a vote on the case.

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    tam act 1 - google docs

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The case is about a 19 year old boy who is on trial for stabbing and killing his father. Most of the jurors Automatically think that the boy is guilty for the witnesses and proof they have against him. Then the juror that is trying to defend the boy agrees to agree with everyone else if they take a vote on the case.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf or txt
    27 views1 page

    Tam Act 1

    Uploaded by

    api-302020869
    The case is about a 19 year old boy who is on trial for stabbing and killing his father. Most of the jurors Automatically think that the boy is guilty for the witnesses and proof they have against him. Then the juror that is trying to defend the boy agrees to agree with everyone else if they take a vote on the case.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 1

    EthanCorral

    8/28/15
    InAct1oftheplayTwelveAngryMenyouareintroducedtothemaincharactersofthe
    play.Thereareatotalof16charactersand12ofthemarethemainjurors.Thecaseisabouta19
    yearoldboywhoisontrialforstabbingandkillinghisfather.TheJudgestartstheplayby
    tellingthejurorstovoteonthewhetherornottheboyisguiltyforthecrimeheisaccusedof.
    Automaticallymostofthejurorsthinkthattheboyisguiltyforthewitnessesandproofthey
    haveagainsthim.Onewitnessisawomanwholivesinthesameneighborhoodandsheswears
    thatshesawithappenasaneltrainwaspassingby.Anotherwitnesssaysthatheheardthe
    wholethingfromhishouse.Thenthejurorsaskforapieceofevidenceinthecase.Itisa
    switchbladethatissaidtobeoneofakindbytheclerkwhosoldittotheboy.Butthatisnottrue
    becauseoneofthejurorshadboughtoneexactlyliketheonetheboyhad.Allofthejurorsstill
    don'tbelievethejurorthatistryingtodefendtheboysoheagreestoagreewitheveryoneelseif
    theytakeavoteonthecase.Whentheytakethevotenotallofthemagreethatheisguiltysoit
    isstillundecided.

    You might also like