First Review Article

Firstly, the reviewer starts briefing the film quoting "financially

exploit the parkour craze and Twilight star Taylor Lautner's nowdwindling popularity". The reviewer claims that the film wasn't
created to attract a specific audience but to attract anybody that
would pay to watch this movie. In addition it talks about how Taylor
success from Twilight is deteriorating.
The next paragraph then focuses on how the film is naturally about
parkour, but is a re-styled crime drama & a stylized action film
according to the reviewer who references films that Taylor has been
in.

This paragraph writing style up to now is formal with using words

that is not subjected to the general audience (elusive, proclivity,
vacillates, succinct) and that Mark claims that Tracers is difficult
to synopsize. *

Furthermore, the author dives into the aspect that the minority of
the film is based on "Parkour". It doesn't identify anything that's
important in parkour with defining Tracers as "a hollow shell with
some impressive stunts". He goes on to reference Brick Mansions as a
film that is defined around parkour and that he re-emphasizes his
point on how the movie is only used to create profit.

Finally, Mark concludes that tracers has failed as a film to adapt

the true thrill of parkour and that Taylor career has been setback.