This paper traces the history of bilingual education policies in New York City and examines their implications for English Language Learners. It discusses how federal policies like No Child Left Behind have affected programs in NYC schools, replacing Transitional Bilingual Education with English-only models despite research showing the benefits of native language instruction. The paper also explains how past legislation failed to address the needs of immigrant communities, highlighting the importance of teachers being informed about laws and advocating for their students.
This paper traces the history of bilingual education policies in New York City and examines their implications for English Language Learners. It discusses how federal policies like No Child Left Behind have affected programs in NYC schools, replacing Transitional Bilingual Education with English-only models despite research showing the benefits of native language instruction. The paper also explains how past legislation failed to address the needs of immigrant communities, highlighting the importance of teachers being informed about laws and advocating for their students.
This paper traces the history of bilingual education policies in New York City and examines their implications for English Language Learners. It discusses how federal policies like No Child Left Behind have affected programs in NYC schools, replacing Transitional Bilingual Education with English-only models despite research showing the benefits of native language instruction. The paper also explains how past legislation failed to address the needs of immigrant communities, highlighting the importance of teachers being informed about laws and advocating for their students.
a Reflection: ESC 759 Bilingual Education Policies
This paper was written for ESC 759, Foundations of Bilingual/Bicultural Education. It traces the history of local and federal bilingual education policies, and examines the implications for English Language Learners in New York City. Using scholarly research sheds a light on how the policies affect second language acquisition. For instance Transitional Bilingual Education (TBE) has been fazed out of use in NYC public schools in response to NCLB. The paper cites how this conflicts with scholarly research that shows the benefit of native-language literacy to SLA. In this way, this artifact demonstrates an understanding of the impact of NCLB and other federal, state, and local laws and policies on the instruction and achievement of ELLs. The paper explains the impact of legislation on their classrooms and the schools community. It begins with the genesis of bilingual education in NYC in response to a demand by community groups to address the high dropout rate of immigrant Puerto Rican students due to English-only instruction offered in the 1960s. The existing legislation was hurting the community, and the community retaliated in such a way that they could change legislation. This artifact reminds me that not only do I need to stay informed regarding education legislation, but I also need to be aware of the community in which I am teaching and what their needs are regarding policies so I can advocate