Knowledge 25 marks 20 The ability to structure, document and develop a coherent argument This is a fascinating study of the relationships between Baudrillards theories of hyper-reality, simulacra etc. and Ecos novel. These relationships are teased out and discussed with great clarity and insight the overall argument of the essay is handled in way that is convincing and subtle. There are a few problems with the structure of the essay on the micro level many of the paragraphs are quite short, and the reader is not always told how they relate to the overall argument until later on, while there is some repetition and a couple of instances where the ideas would have been more effective earlier in the essay. Nonetheless, the ideas are consistently well-supported and backed up with specific examples, quotes, etc. Critique 25 marks 24 The ability to identify tensions, contradictions, ambiguities and parallels within and between discourses The essay is based on parallels drawn between Baudrillard and Eco, and these are discussed effectively with differences as well as similarities noted. These theories are additionally contexualised in terms of other aspects of post-modernist and proto-post-modernist theory, including Lyotard and Nietzsche. Research 20 marks 19 The ability to locate, discriminate and analyse specific material There is evidence of extensive research, drawn upon throughout the essay in the form of quotes and examples. Communication 20 marks 18 The ability to initiate/engage in dialogue using appropriate language and method to construct, survey or support an argument The essay is written in an impeccably clear and fluent style, hindered only by the slightly fragmentary effect of the paragraphing. Bibliography and referencing 10 marks 7 The ability to correctly and clearly reference information used in essay APA references are employed appropriately. Page numbers are required in many cases for intext citations. Minor issues with order of entries in list of references. Total: