Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Parts of An Argument Absorb Activity

    Uploaded by

    api-290981807
    48 views2 pages
    The document provides an overview of the components of constructing valid arguments through a presentation and accompanying PDF. It outlines the rhetorical triangle of logos, ethos, and pathos. For logos, it emphasizes the importance of logic and avoiding fallacies. For ethos, it discusses establishing credibility through emotional appeals tailored to the audience. For pathos, it stresses how credibility is essential. It also covers ensuring evidence is valid and reflective of the writer's credibility, characterizing opposition arguments objectively, and providing solutions that are logical, plausible, and authentic.

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    parts of an argument absorb activity

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document provides an overview of the components of constructing valid arguments through a presentation and accompanying PDF. It outlines the rhetorical triangle of logos, ethos, and pathos. For logos, it emphasizes the importance of logic and avoiding fallacies. For ethos, it discusses establishing credibility through emotional appeals tailored to the audience. For pathos, it stresses how credibility is essential. It also covers ensuring evidence is valid and reflective of the writer's credibility, characterizing opposition arguments objectively, and providing solutions that are logical, plausible, and authentic.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    48 views2 pages

    Parts of An Argument Absorb Activity

    Uploaded by

    api-290981807
    The document provides an overview of the components of constructing valid arguments through a presentation and accompanying PDF. It outlines the rhetorical triangle of logos, ethos, and pathos. For logos, it emphasizes the importance of logic and avoiding fallacies. For ethos, it discusses establishing credibility through emotional appeals tailored to the audience. For pathos, it stresses how credibility is essential. It also covers ensuring evidence is valid and reflective of the writer's credibility, characterizing opposition arguments objectively, and providing solutions that are logical, plausible, and authentic.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 2

    Allegra Coe

    Sample Absorb Activity


    Terminal Objective: Students will construct valid, well researched arguments
    Enabling Objective: Distinguishes characteristics
    Activity: Presentation: Students will view a presentation on the
    components, theory,
    methodology of construction of arguments. Material
    will be provided through links in
    course library. An accompanying PDF will
    be available in the course library.

    Freshman Composition 101


    Parts of an Argument
    (Accompanying PDF)

    Rhetorical Triangle
    Logos logic

    The foundation of the rhetorical triangle


    No logical sense = no credibility
    Remember Thy Logic Fallacies (Remember!!)

    EthosEmotion

    Emotional appeals = all about audience


    Emotion without logic = damaged argument
    Emotional appealsuse with caution! (Warning!) (Caution!)

    Pathos

    Your credibilityIT IS EVERYTHING!!


    Valid =credible
    Hows your logic? Emotional appeals? Quality of evidence?

    Why should your audience believe what you are saying?


    Can they trust you? Are you sure?

    Evidence

    How valid is your evidence?


    How do you know?
    How will your evidence reflect on your credibility as a writer? (In
    other words, dont be this guy)

    Opposition Argument
    Your characterization of the opposition = YOUR credibility

    Are you biased?


    Are you framing?
    Are you selectively editing?
    Are you objective?
    ARE YOU SURE?

    Logical,
    Plausible/realistic
    Authentic

    Solution

    You might also like