Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Assembly Systems and Assembly Line Balancing
Assembly Systems and Assembly Line Balancing
Assembly Systems and Assembly Line Balancing
1.
Assembly systems
The methods used to accomplish assembly processes:
1. Manual single-station assembly: Generally used on
a product that is complex and produced in small
quantities. One or more workers are required depending
on the size of the product. Ex: machine tools, industrial
equipment, aircraft, ships, etc.
2. Manual assembly line: Consist of multiple
workstations. One or more workers perform a portion of
the total assembly work on the product.
3. Automated assembly system: Uses automated
methods at the workstations rather than human beings.
Manual Assembly Lines
Used in high-production situations where the work can
be divided into small tasks (work elements) and the
tasks assigned to the workstations on the line.
By giving each worker a limited set of tasks repeatedly,
the worker becomes a specialist in those tasks
and perform more quickly. (Division of labor)
5
Assembly systems
Transfer of Work Between Workstations
1. Non mechanical Lines: Parts are passed from station to
station by hand. Problems are:
Starving at stations
Blocking of stations
Assembly systems
Model Variations
It is highly desirable to assign appropriate amount of
work to the stations to equalize the process or
assembly times at the workstations.
This brings
thesystems
line modeling
balancing
problem and the three
Manufacturing
&
perofrmance analysis (TGS)
Assembly systems
1. Single Model Line: Specialized line dedicated to
the production of a single product.
2. Batch-model Line (Multiple parallel lines):
Used for the production of two or more models with
similar sequence of processing or assembly
operations.
3. Mixed-model Line: Several models are
intermixed on the line and are processed
simultaneously.
DISSADVANTAGES
increasing scheduling
flexibility
higher skill requirements
job enrichment
slower learning
higher line availability
complex supervision
more accountability
As with most problems, multiple objectives exist. By far the
most commonly used objective for analytical models
is minimization of idle time.
However, in practice, real world issues of minimizing
tooling investment, minimizing the maximum lift or strain
by any worker, grouping tasks requiring similar skills,
minimizing movement of existing equipment, and meeting
production targets cannot be overlooked.
9
11
13
Line Balancing
14
Line Balancing
Problem formulation
production rate P (units/time)
number of parallel lines m
number of tasks N
time to perform task i : ti
total task time T = i=1N ti
to meet demand: cycle time Tc =m/p
no worker must be assigned a set of tasks of duration longer
zoning restrictions
task pairs to same station ZS
taskManufacturing
pairs not systems
performed
modelingin
& same workstation ZD
15
Line Balancing
BALANCE DELAY
(measures proportion of idle time)
D = (K* Tc - ti)/(K* Tc)
= idle time/paid time
where K* is the number of stations required by
the solution
16
Line Balancing
Decision variables
task i assigned to station k ?
total number of tasks N
Problem Formulation
Minimize
(Cik Xik)
Subject to:
ti Xik < Tc (all stations k)
17
Line Balancing
Comments
D is idle time over paid time
objective does not allocate idle time equally
among stns
best solutions: good work load balancing
total task time
T = ti
Maximum time per station is Tc
minimum stations (lower bound)
18
Ko = | T/TC |
19
Line Balancing
They are heuristic approaches - based on logic and common sense
rather than on mathematical proof. They do not guarantee an
optimal solution, but result in good solutions which approach the
true optimum.
1. Largest-candidate rule:
PROCEDURE
Step 1:List all elements in descending order of
.
Step 2:Start from the top and select an element that
satisfies the precedence requirements and does not cause the
sum of the
values at the station to exceed the cycle time
.
Step 3:Continue to apply Step 2 until no further elements
can be added without exceeding
.
Step 4: Repeat steps 2 and 3 for the other stations until all
the elements have been assigned.
The practical realities of the line balancing problem may not permit
the realization of the most desirable number of stations.
20
22
PW(i) = ti + tj
; j in S(i)
COMSOAL
4. COMSOAL - A Computerized Line Balancing
Method
PROCEDURE :
Computer Method for Sequencing Operations for
Assembly Lines
Simple record keeping to allow examination of many
possible sequences
Sequences are generated by random picking a task
and constructing subsequent tasks
New stations are opened when needed
Sequences that exceed the best solution are
discarded
Better sequences become upper bounds
Step 1: Construct list A, showing all work elements
in one column and the total number of elements that
immediately precede each element in an adjacent
column.
24
25
COMSOAL (contd)
6.- Select task: SET m = card{F}
Random generate RN U(0,1)
LET i* = [m*RN] th TASK from F
Remove i* from A,B,F
c = c - ti
FOR ALL i WIP(i*), NIPW=NIPW-1
IF A EMPTY Go to 7, OTHERWISE Go to 3
7.- Schedule completion
IDLE = IDLE + c
IF IDLE < UB , UB = IDLE Go to STORE SCHEDULE
IF x = X , STOP, OTHERWISE Go to 2
26
27
28
32
33
qj tij
UNPACED LINES
Paced line with K stations and cycle time TC, the
Each time spends KTC in system (throughput
time)
Production rate is 1/ TC
36
37