The petitioner applied to be a member and voter of the local youth council but was denied due to her age, which was just over the age limit according to COMELEC Resolution No. 2824. The court ruled that the COMELEC cannot deny a certificate of candidacy solely due to age restrictions without proper proceedings. When a candidate files documents in proper form, the COMELEC has a duty to receive them, as per the Omnibus Election Code. Questions of eligibility that do not involve facial defects in the documents are beyond the COMELEC's purview.
The petitioner applied to be a member and voter of the local youth council but was denied due to her age, which was just over the age limit according to COMELEC Resolution No. 2824. The court ruled that the COMELEC cannot deny a certificate of candidacy solely due to age restrictions without proper proceedings. When a candidate files documents in proper form, the COMELEC has a duty to receive them, as per the Omnibus Election Code. Questions of eligibility that do not involve facial defects in the documents are beyond the COMELEC's purview.
The petitioner applied to be a member and voter of the local youth council but was denied due to her age, which was just over the age limit according to COMELEC Resolution No. 2824. The court ruled that the COMELEC cannot deny a certificate of candidacy solely due to age restrictions without proper proceedings. When a candidate files documents in proper form, the COMELEC has a duty to receive them, as per the Omnibus Election Code. Questions of eligibility that do not involve facial defects in the documents are beyond the COMELEC's purview.
The petitioner applied to be a member and voter of the local youth council but was denied due to her age, which was just over the age limit according to COMELEC Resolution No. 2824. The court ruled that the COMELEC cannot deny a certificate of candidacy solely due to age restrictions without proper proceedings. When a candidate files documents in proper form, the COMELEC has a duty to receive them, as per the Omnibus Election Code. Questions of eligibility that do not involve facial defects in the documents are beyond the COMELEC's purview.
FACTS: The Sangguniang Kabataan (SK) elections nationwide was scheduled to be held on May 6, 1996. On March 16, 1996, petitioner applied for registration as member and voter of the Katipunan ng Kabataan of Barangay San Lorenzo, Bangui, Ilocos Norte. The Board of Election Tellers, however, denied her application on the ground that petitioner, who was then twenty-one years and ten (10) months old, exceeded the age limit for membership in the Katipunan ng Kabataan as laid down in Section 3 [b] of COMELEC Resolution No. 2824. ISSUE: Whether or not COMELEC can deny her certificate f candidacy due to age restriction. RULING: The Commission may not, by itself, without the proper proceedings, deny due course to or cancel a certificate of candidacy filed in due form. When a candidate files his certificate of candidacy, the COMELEC has a ministerial duty to receive and acknowledge its receipt. This is provided in Sec. 76 of the Omnibus Election Code. While the Commission may look into patent defects in the certificates, it may not go into matters not appearing on their face. The question of eligibility or ineligibility of a candidate is thus beyond the usual and proper cognizance of said body.