Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 11

Review Article

Towards the Era of Biologics and Biosimilars, a Case of Insulin


Suntara Eakanunkul
Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Pharmacy, Chiang Mai University


Recombinant human insulin is the first protein
therapeutic produced by recombinant DNA technology.
Currently, many patents of insulin analogs start to
expire. The intended-copy recombinant human insulins
manufactured from various manufacturers around the
world have entered the market in Thailand, whereas the
regulatory standard in medicine registration varies widely
between countries. Therefore, the basic concept on protein
therapeutics, biosimilars and insulin quality considerations
will be very useful for physicians, pharmacists, healthcare
professionals to help them evaluate and select high quality
recombinant human insulins and biological products for
hospital formulary.
Keywords: Biologics, biosimilars, biosimilar insulins,
insulin(s), product quality

2558; 30 (6): 630-640 Srinagarind Med J 2015; 30 (6): 630-640

630

2558; 30 (6) Srinagarind Med J 2015; 30 (6)

(biologics or biological products)



5 (protein
therapeutics)

3
erythropoietin, granulocyte
colony-stimulating factors, growth hormone, insulins,
monoclonal antibodies

Suntara Eakanunkul

(recombinant DNA
technology, rDNA)3,4




(immunogenicity)

-
5-7 ( 1)

1 8

(Da)
Heterogeneity
(stability)


1,000-150,000
< 1,000


(variability) 5,9

(heterogeneity)


(batch consistency)
4

Cloning


Protein production

(bioreactor)



Protein purification


2558; 30 (6) Srinagarind Med J 2015; 30 (6)

631

Towards the era of biologics and biosimilars, a case of insulin

.. 1921

Protein formulation

hypersensitivity
reactions

1921


(excipients)


..
hypersensitivity reactions


.. 1978

.. 1982
.. 1978

genetic engineering
.. 1982
(process-related impurities) host cell DNA host genetic engineering
14, 15
cell proteins
14, 15

5,808 Da Isoelectric point (pI)


5.4
2
5,808 Da Isoelectric point

5.4

2 A


high molecular
weight
proteins B (pI)

A
21

30

A
(HMWPs) protein aggregates product-related 21 B
10,11
30

(folding)

impurities


(folding)

alpha helix

A
A
B
alpha helix

helix

12,13

helix
betasheet

2
A
B

beta
sheet

2
(insulin
monomer)


(interaction)

(interaction)

(insulin monomer)



(insulin dimer)

(insulin dimer) B
betaB sheet

beta sheet


(hydrophobic interaction)
(hydrophobic
interaction)


Frederick Banting (insulin hexamer)16
16
Charles

Best

(insulin hexamer)

( 1)
( 1)

(a)

(b)

(c)

1 (a) (b)
(PDB:
The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System,
1 (a) (c)

(b) 4EWZ

(c)
Version 1.7.4 Schrdinger, LLC.)

(PDB: 4EWZ The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System, Version 1.7.4 Schrdinger, LLC.)

2558; 30 (6) Srinagarind Med J 2015; 30 (6)


632
D:\Bow\.\ 26 ..58 6\\ 30 6\08-64_Review_.docx



3



regular insulin intermediate-
acting insulin .. 1936 Hans
Christian Hagedorn
protamine
pI 7.0

neutral
protamine hagedorn insulin (NPH insulin)17


rapid-acting insulin .. 1996
genetic engineering
B
( 2)

Suntara Eakanunkul



regular insulin insulin lispro18, insulin aspart19
insulin glulisine20


2
basal insulin
long-acting insulin insulin glargine
arginine 2 B
asparagine 21 A glycine
deamidation A21
arginine pI 5.4 6.7
pH 4.0
pH
7.0 pI
microprecipitates

15, 21 ( 2)

2 insulin analogs22

Rapid-acting
Insulin aspart

Pro28 Asp

Insulin glulisine

Insulin lispro

Asn3 Lys
Lys29 Glu
Pro28 Lys
Lys29 Pro

Long-acting
Insulin glargine Asn21 Gly 2 Arg Thr30

pH

7.2-7.4
dimer interface
self-association 7.2-7.4
zinc
7.2-7.4
IGF-1
pI precipitation

4.0


European Medicines Agency (EMA)

2558; 30 (6) Srinagarind Med J 2015; 30 (6)

633

Towards the era of biologics and biosimilars, a case of insulin

.. 2005
EMA
(totality of evidence)
(quality aspects) (non-clinical
studies) (clinical studies)
(comparability exercise)
23


(risk management plan, RMP)

24

EMA (specific guidelines)
erythropoietin,
granulocyte-colony stimulating factors, growth hormone,
insulins monoclonal antibodies
EMA ( 3)

3 EMA25



process-related substances
desamido forms, glycosylated forms other forms
insulin receptor IGF-1 receptor (in vitro studies)
(biological tests)
(toxicity tests)
(in vivo studies)
(hypoglycemia)
single dose cross-over
double blind hyperinsulinaemic euglycaemic clamp studies
1
1
6 1



(.)

634


255626

2558; 30 (6) Srinagarind Med J 2015; 30 (6)

Suntara Eakanunkul

.
.
erythropoietin

( 2558)

erythropoietins
non-innovator biologics
(stand-alone registration)

27




33,34

35

(automatic substitution)36


Naming and traceability
(international
nonproprietary name, INN)

INN



(immunogenicity)
36
(interchangeability)

(naming and traceability)
(traceability)

Immunogenicity

non-innovator biologic

(substitution)
pure red cell aplasia

erythropoietin28




(glycosylation)
(brand name)36

(batch number)
protein

aggregates29,30

(batch to batch variability)31
(medication error)


hypersensitivity reactions 32
(pharmacovigilance)

Interchangeability

(switching)

(therapeutic equivalent)

Finnish Medicines Agency

Dutch Medicines Evaluation Board



2558; 30 (6) Srinagarind Med J 2015; 30 (6)

635

Towards the era of biologics and biosimilars, a case of insulin



( 4)
4 37

Insulin
Zinc* Tween20**
m-cresol* phenol*
Protamine sulphate***
Dibasic sodium phosphate sodium acetate

(stabilizer)


-
Glycerin mannitol sodium chloride
Isotonic agent
NaOH, HCl
-
* ** insulin glulisine *** NPH insulin

(certificate of
analysis, COA)
COA
.

COA
38
(finished
products)
39

(Identification)
peptide mapping, N-terminal sequencing,
immunoblotting, isoelectric focusing (IEF), HPLC

(Assay)

HPLC, immunoassay, biomimetic assays
(animal model assays, cell culture-based bioassays)


(Impurity)

HMWPs,

636

desamido insulin other related insulins


HPLC, size-exclusion chromatography (SEC)
sodium dodecyl sulphate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis
(SDS-PAGE)

(Safety)
(sterility)
bacterial endotoxins


(Miscellaneous tests)
pH (zinc)



COA

COA
British Pharmacopoeia (BP), United
States Pharmacopeia (USP)

(specification) (acceptance criteria)
regular insulin USP 201539
BP 201540 ( 5)

2558; 30 (6) Srinagarind Med J 2015; 30 (6)

Suntara Eakanunkul

5 regular insulin39, 40
Requirements
Definition
Identification
Assay
Impurities
HMWPs
Related proteins

pH
Zinc
Endotoxin
Preservative
Sterility
Particulate matter(1)
Particulate matter(2)

Specification of regular insulin


USP 2015
Isotonic sterile solution of insulin human in
water for injection
The retention time of the major peak in
the chromatogram
95.0-105.0%

BP 2015
Soluble insulin injection is a neutral solution
of human insulin
The position of the insulin peak in
the chromatogram
90.0-110.0%

Not more than 1.7%


Not more than 2.0%
Content of A-21 desamido and other insulin A-21 desamido is not greater than 5.0%
related compounds is not more than 2.0% and the sum of any other peaks is not
greater than 6.0%
7.0-7.8
6.9-7.8
10-40 ug/100 IU
Not more than 40.0 ug/100 IU
Not more than 80 IU/100 IU
Less than 80 IU/100 IU
Meets the requirements
Meets the requirements
Meets the requirements
Meets the requirements
10 um: not exceed 6000/container
10 um: not exceed 6000/container
25 um: not exceed 600/container
25 um: not exceed 600/container
10 um: not exceed 3000/container
10 um: not exceed 3000/container
25 um: not exceed 300/container
25 um: not exceed 300/container




COA


COA

2558; 30 (6) Srinagarind Med J 2015; 30 (6)

637

Towards the era of biologics and biosimilars, a case of insulin

COA


(long-term stability study)
(in-use stability study)


HMWPs


HMWPs

11


(GMP)


(certificate of pharmaceutical products)

(raw materials)






41

non-innovator
biologics
.

90
42

638

References
1.


2.


3.


4.

5.


6.


7.

Calo-Fernndez B, Martnez-Hurtado JL. Biosimilars: company


strategies to capture value from the biologics market.
Pharmaceuticals 2012; 5: 1393-408.
Lucio SD, Stevenson JG, Hoffman JM. Biosimilars: implications
for health-system pharmacists. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2013;
70: 2004-17.

. /
(Biological products) ASEAN Harmonization.
Schellekens H. Biopharmaceuticals and biosimilars, unraveling
the complexity. Eur J Hosp Pract 2006; 12: 13.
Schellekens H. Biosimilar therapeutics-what do we need to
consider? Nephrol Dial Transplant Plus 2009; 2 (Suppl
1): i27-i36.
Sharma B. Immunogenicity of therapeutic proteins. Part
1: impact of product handling. Biotechnol Adv 2007; 25
: 310-7.
Krmer I, Sauer T. The new world of biosimilars: what
diabetologists need to know about biosimilar insulins. Br J
Diabetes Vascular Disease 2010; 10: 163-71.

2558; 30 (6) Srinagarind Med J 2015; 30 (6)

8. Sekhon BS, Saluja V. Biosimilars: an overview. Biosimilars



2011; 1: 1-11.
9. Roger SD. Biosimilars: how similar or dissimilar are they?

Nephrology 2006; 11: 341-6.
10. Rosenberg A. Effects of protein aggregates: an immunologic

perspective. AAPS J 2006; 8: E501-7.
11. Wang W, Singh SK, Li N, Toler MR, King KR, Nema S.

Immunogenicity of protein aggregates-concerns and

realities. Int J Pharm 2012; 431: 1-11.
12. Wang W, Ignatius AA, Thakkar SV. Impact of residual
impurities and contaminants on protein stability. J Pharm

Sci 2014; 103: 1315-30.
13. Jiskoot W, Crommelin DJ. What makes protein drugs

different? Pharmaceutical aspects. Eur J Hosp Pharm

Pract 2006; 12: 20-1.
14. Brange J. The new era of biotech insulin analogues. Diabeto

logia 1997; 40 (Suppl 2): S48-53.
15. Hilgenfeld R, Seipke G, Berchtold H, Owens DR. The evolution

of insulin glargine and its continuing contribution to diabetes

care. Drugs 2014; 74: 911-27.
16. Derewenda U, Derewenda Z, Dodson GG, Hubbard RE,

Korber F. Molecular structure of insulin: the insulin monomer

and its assembly. Brit Med Bull 1989; 45: 4-18.
17. Hagedorn HC, Jensen B, Krarup NB, Wodstrup, II. Protamine

insulinate. J Am Med Assoc 1936; 106: 177-80.
18. DiMarchi RD, Chance RE, Long HB, Shields JE, Slieker LJ.

Preparation of an insulin with improved pharmacokinetics

relative to human insulin through consideration of structural

homology with insulin-like growth factor I. Horm Res 1994; 41

(Suppl 2): 93-6.
19. Heinemann L, Heise T, Jorgensen LN, Starke AA. Action profile

of the rapid acting insulin analogue: human insulin B28Asp.

Diabet Med 1993; 10: 535-9.
20. Barlocco D. Insulin glulisine. Aventis Pharma. Curr Opin

Investig Drugs 2003; 4: 1240-4.
21. Owens DR, Griffiths S. Insulin glargine (Lantus). Int J Clin Pract

2002; 56: 460-6.
22. Berenson DF, Weiss AR, Wan Z-l, Weiss MA. Insulin analogs

for the treatment of diabetes mellitus: therapeutic applications

of protein engineering. Ann NY Acad Sci 2011; 1243

: E40-54.
23. European Medicines Agency. Guideline on similar biological

medicinal products (CHMP/473/04 Rev 1) [cited August 8,

2015]; Available from: http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/

document_library/Scientific_guideline/2014/10/WC500176768.

pdf.

Suntara Eakanunkul

24.






25.






26.



27.


28.



29.



30.



31.

32.


33.



European Medicines Agency. Guideline on similar biological


medicinal products containing biotechnology derived proteins
as active substance: non-clinical and clinical issues (EMEA/
CHMP/BMWP/42832/2005 Rev1) [cited August 8, 2015];
Available from: http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/
document_library/Scientific_guideline/2015/01/WC500180219.
pdf.
European Medicines Agency. Guideline on non-clinical and
clinical development of similar biological medicinal products
containing recombinant human insulin and insulin analogues
(EMEA/CHMP/BMWP/32775/2005_Rev. 1) [cited August 8,
2015]; Available from: http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/
document_library/Scientific_guideline/2015/03/WC500184161.
pdf.
.
2556 [cited August
9, 2015; Available from: http://drug.fda.moph.go.th/zone_law/
files/d4.pdf.
Weise M, Bielsky MC, De Smet K, Ehmann F, Ekman N,
Narayanan G, et al. Biosimilars-why terminology matters. Nat
Biotechnol 2011; 29: 690-3.
Casadevall N, Nataf J, Viron B, Kolta A, Kiladjian JJ, MartinDupont P, et al. Pure red-cell aplasia and antierythropoietin
antibodies in patients treated with recombinant erythropoietin.
N Engl J Med 2002; 346: 469-75.
Dolinar RO, Edelman S, Heinemann L, Home P, Goyal S,
Polonsky WH, et al. Impact of Biosimilar insulins on clinical
practice: meeting report. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2014;
8: 179-85.
Sauerborn M, Brinks V, Jiskoot W, Schellekens H. Immunological
mechanism underlying the immune response to recombinant
human protein therapeutics. Trends Pharmacol Sci 2010;
31: 53-9.
Heinemann L, Hompesch M. Biosimilar insulins: basic consid
erations. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2014; 8: 6-13.
Garcia-Nares H, Leyva-Carmona MI, Perez-Xochipa N,
Chiquete E. Hypersensitivity reaction to a biosimilar insulin
glargine. J Diabetes 2015; 7: 155-7.
GaBI Online. Finnish drug regulator recommends interchange
ability of biosimilars [cited October 13, 2015]; Available from:
http://www.gabionline.net/Policies-Legislation/Finn
ish-drug-regulator-recommends-interchangeability-ofbiosimilars.

2558; 30 (6) Srinagarind Med J 2015; 30 (6)

639

Towards the era of biologics and biosimilars, a case of insulin

2558; 30 (5 ) Srinagarind Med J 2015; 30 (5)


34. GaBI Online. Dutch medicines agency aims to clarify

biosimilars confusion [cited October 13, 2015]; Available

from: http://www.gabionline.net/Biosimilars/General/

Dutch-medicines-agency-aims-to-clarify-biosimilars-confusion.
35. GaBI Online. Legislations on biosimilar interchangeability in

the US and EUdevelopments far from visibility [cited August 8,

2015.]; Available from: http://www.gabionline.net/Spon

sored-Articles/Legislations-on-biosimilar-interchangeabili

ty-in-the-US-and-EU-developments-far-from-visibility.
36. Declerck P. Biologicals in the era of biosimilars: implications

forand
naming
and prescribing.
Hosp 151:
Pharm
Pract 2007;
embryonic
stem cells. Eur
Cell J 2012;
68-79.
is
a
universal
amplifier
of
expressed
genes
in
lymphocytes

13: 51-3.
22.
Nie
Z,
Hu
G,
Wei
G,
Cui
K,
Yamane
A,
Resch
W,
al. c-Myc
37. Beals JM, DeFelippis MR, Kovach PM, Jackson JA. etInsulin.
In:
tuberculosis.
J
Exp
Med
2015;
212:
715-28.

Crommelin DJA, Sindelar RD, Meibohm B, editors.
a CD4 T cell population
with memory-like
properties during

Pharmaceutical
Biotechnology:
fundamentals
and
Higdon LE, etthal. ICOS and Bcl6-dependent pathways maintain
21.applications.
4 ed.
New York:
Springer,C,2013:
Moguche AO,
Shafiani
S, Clemons
Larson255-75.
RP, Dinh C,

20.

19.

18.

17.
16.

15.

14.

13.

640

3-kinase/Akt pathway. J Biol Chem 2001; 276: 329-33.


by phosphorylating Bad through a phosphatidylinositol
Mycobacterium tuberculosis promotes macrophage survival
Maiti D, Bhattacharyya A, Basu J. Lipoarabinomannan from
1011-22.
expression of antiapoptotic Bcl-xL. J Leukoc Biol 2014; 96:
macrophages by maintaining NF-kappaB-dependent
regulates survival during differentiation of human
Busca A, Saxena M, Iqbal S, Angel J, Kumar A. PI3K/Akt
apoptosis of HuH-7 cells. Apoptosis 2004; 9: 211-21.
correlate with caspase-3 activation in TGF-beta1-induced
dephosphorylation and p21(Cip1/Waf1) translocation
Fan G, Ma X, Wong PY, Rodrigues CM, Steer CJ. p53
cells and antigen load. J Immunol 2007; 178: 5217-26.
and IL-2 profile of Mycobacterium tuberculosis-specific T
Dosanjh DP, et al. Dynamic relationship between IFN-gamma
Millington KA, Innes JA, Hackforth S, Hinks TS, Deeks JJ,
961-5.
development of T regulatory cells. J Leukoc Biol 2003; 74:
Malek TR. The main function of IL-2 is to promote the
lipids. J Proteome Res 2009; 8: 282-9.
the macrophage response to Mycobacterium tuberculosis
Quantitative proteomic profiling of host-pathogen interactions:
Shui W, Gilmore SA, Sheu L, Liu J, Keasling JD, Bertozzi CR.
e1000545.
modulate macrophage response. PLoS Pathog 2009; 5:
homeostasis by regulating virulence lipid anabolism to
MB, et al. Mycobacterium tuberculosis WhiB3 maintains redox
Singh A, Crossman DK, Mai D, Guidry L, Voskuil MI, Renfrow
Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2007; 51: 3740-2.
microparticles and relevance to bactericidal activity.
cells infected with Mycobacterium tuberculosis by inhalable
Yadav AB, Misra A. Enhancement of apoptosis of THP-1

38.


39.


40.

41.

42.


32.

31.
30.
29.
28.

27.
26.

25.
24.
23.

WHO. Annex 10 Model certificate of analysis [cited August


8, 2015]; Available from: http://apps.who.int/prequal/info_gen
eral/documents/TRS902/WHO_TRS_902-Annex10.pdf.
United States Pharmacopeia and National Formulary
(USP38-NF33). Rockville, M.D.: United States Pharmacopeia
Convention, 2015.
British Pharmacopoeia. (BP 2015) London, U.K.: Stationery
Office, 2015.
Boone N, Kuy Hvd, Scott M, Mairs J, Krmer I, Vulto A, et al.
How to select a biosimilar. Eur J Hosp Pharm 2013; 20: 275-86.
, , ,
.
.
2558; 7: 60-72.
1982; 42: 1530-6.
monocytic leukemia cells by a phorbol diester. Cancer Res
Konno T, et al. Induction of maturation in cultured human
Tsuchiya S, Kobayashi Y, Goto Y, Okumura H, Nakae S,
Immunol Med Microbiol 2003; 39: 163-72.
following Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. FEMS
profiling detects patterns of human macrophage responses
Wang JP, Rought SE, Corbeil J, Guiney DG. Gene expression
multimeric complex formation. EMBO J 2004; 23: 4583-94.
p53 functions by activation of HIPK2 kinase through
Rui Y, Xu Z, Lin S, Li Q, Rui H, Luo W, et al. Axin stimulates
household contacts of tuberculosis. J Infect 2012; 64: 291-8.
Interferon-gamma release assay and Rifampicin therapy for
Wang JY, Shu CC, Lee CH, Yu CJ, Lee LN, Yang PC.
vaccinated military population. Mil Med 2008; 173: 388-92.
outbreak of tuberculosis in a bacillus Calmette-guerinLin JC, Lin TY, Perng WC, Mai CS, Chen YH, Ku CH, et al. An
differentiation. PLoS One 2013; 8: e73785.
inflammatory response by regulating intestinal epithelial cell
Perreault N, et al. HDAC1 and HDAC2 restrain the intestinal
Turgeon N, Blais M, Gagne JM, Tardif V, Boudreau F,
differentiation. Int J Dev Biol 2009; 53: 275-89.
HDAC2-controlled embryonic development and cell
Brunmeir R, Lagger S, Seiser C. Histone deacetylase HDAC1/
199-212.
inflammation, and cell cycle control. Immunity 2000; 13:
6 represses genes that function in lymphocyte differentiation,
Shaffer AL, Yu X, He Y, Boldrick J, Chan EP, Staudt LM. BCLof Immunology 2013; 190: 130-6.
mycobacteria in human macrophages (P4213). The Journal
Wang L, Li J, Lau A. The role of c-Myc in phagocytosis of
2011; 108: 17749-54.
anti-mycobacterial responses. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
Yim HC, Li JC, Pong JC, Lau AS. A role for c-Myc in regulating

2558; 30 (6) Srinagarind Med J 2015; 30 (6)


,

431

Benjawan Kaewseekhao, et al.

You might also like