This document provides summative and formative assessment feedback for a BA (Hons) Fashion student. It evaluates the student's 2D or 3D project and research journal based on 5 assessment criteria relating to their understanding of fashion markets, ability to communicate ideas visually, evidence of innovation, critical review skills, and representation of contemporary designers. An overall comment addresses the project's strengths and areas for improvement. A grade is given using a banding system from A+ to F that describes the student's level of achievement or performance for the unit. The assessors and date sent to the student are also included.
This document provides summative and formative assessment feedback for a BA (Hons) Fashion student. It evaluates the student's 2D or 3D project and research journal based on 5 assessment criteria relating to their understanding of fashion markets, ability to communicate ideas visually, evidence of innovation, critical review skills, and representation of contemporary designers. An overall comment addresses the project's strengths and areas for improvement. A grade is given using a banding system from A+ to F that describes the student's level of achievement or performance for the unit. The assessors and date sent to the student are also included.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
This document provides summative and formative assessment feedback for a BA (Hons) Fashion student. It evaluates the student's 2D or 3D project and research journal based on 5 assessment criteria relating to their understanding of fashion markets, ability to communicate ideas visually, evidence of innovation, critical review skills, and representation of contemporary designers. An overall comment addresses the project's strengths and areas for improvement. A grade is given using a banding system from A+ to F that describes the student's level of achievement or performance for the unit. The assessors and date sent to the student are also included.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Project Title Project Value Unit Title Womenswear 2: Innovation Unit Code F106 Project Leader Unit Leader
Assessment Criteria Indicative Grading
Excellent V Good Good Satisfactory Basic Fail N/A 2D or 3D realisation that shows: 1 Understanding of fashion markets and the impact of these on the ways in which designers operate and on the garments and samples that they produce; (LO1) 2 Their ability to visually communicate ideas and create a product incorporating knowledge from theoretical and experiential sources; (LO2) 3 Evidence of innovation within the constraints of the project brief. (LO4) Research and development journal that shows: 4 Evidence of a critical review of key issues, with findings articulated and coherently summarised in a journal format; (LO2) 5 Identification and visual representation of appropriate designers within contemporary practice. (LO3) Note 1 - Unless specified in the Project Brief it is assumed that all assessment criteria are equally weighted
Overall comment including strengths and areas for improvement
Grade Banding Brief Grade Descriptor
A+ 90-100 High Excellent all round work or outstanding A 80-89 Medium performance Grade (where appropriate) A- 70-79 Low B+ 67-69 High High level achievement or very good level of B 64-66 Medium performance B- 60-63 Low C+ 57-59 High Good level of achievement or proficient C 54-56 Medium performance C- 50-53 Low D+ 47-49 High Satisfactory level of achievement or competent D 44-46 Medium performance D- 40-43 Low E 35-39 Marginal Elementary achievement or basic level of Note 2 - All summative grades are subject to ratification by the Examination Board Pass performance F+ 30-34 Marginal Does not achieve the learning outcomes but Fail may be some element of understanding or Please contact your Unit Leader about retrieval competence arrangements (where appropriate) Assessor(s) F < 30 Name: Fail No evidence of achievement or competence F- > 10 Poor Fail 0 0 no submission or special circumstances